Funding for L.A.'s emergency management unit, vital to Palisades recovery, remains static
Myriad calamities could hit the city of Los Angeles in coming years: Wildfires. Floods. Mudslides. Drought. And of course, the Big One.
Yet this month, L.A. leaders once again balked at dramatically increasing the budget of the city's Emergency Management Department, even as the office coordinates recovery from the Palisades fire and is tasked with helping prepare for a variety of disasters and high-profile events, such as the 2028 Summer Olympics.
Facing a nearly $1-billion budget shortfall, the L.A. City Council voted 12 to 3 last week to pass a budget that rejected the funding increases requested by EMD leaders to hire more staffers and fix broken security equipment around its facility.
The only budgetary increase for EMD will come through bureaucratic restructuring. The department will absorb the five-person Climate Emergency Mobilization Office, which Mayor Karen Bass had slated for elimination in her initial proposal to trim the budget deficit.
The funding allotment for EMD — with an operating budget of about $4.5 million — puts the department short of similar big cities in California and beyond.
Read more: As L.A. rebuilds from the Palisades fire, residents ask: What's the plan?
As a 2022 audit by then-City Controller Ron Galperin noted, San Diego ($2.46), Long Beach ($2.26) and San Francisco ($7.59) all spent more per capita on emergency management than L.A., which then spent $1.56 per resident. Whereas L.A. has a staff of roughly 30, New York, with more than double the population of L.A., has 200 people in its emergency management team, and Philadelphia, with a population less than half of L.A.'s, has 53.
The current leaders of EMD, General Manager Carol Parks and Assistant General Manager Jim Featherstone, had specifically requested funding this spring to build an in-house recovery team to better equip the city for the Palisades recovery as well as future disasters.
"We are one of the most populous and at-risk jurisdictions in the nation, if not in the world," Featherstone told the L.A. City Council's budget committee April 30. "I won't say negligent, but it's really not in the city's best interest to [not] have a recovery capability for a disaster similar to the one we just experienced.'
Zach Seidl, a spokesperson for Bass, pushed back against the idea that EMD's funding level would hamper the Palisades fire recovery or preparation for the Olympic Games and 2026 World Cup.
"During a difficult budget year, Mayor Bass focused on emergency management to keep Angelenos safe — that absolutely includes ensuring EMD has continued staffing and resources," Seidl said in a statement. "We will continue to push forward with one of the fastest recovery efforts in state history."
Councilmember Traci Park — who represents the Palisades — was among the trio on the City Council who opposed the budget that passed last week, citing insufficient funding for public safety as one of her main objections.
Read more: With PCH reopening this weekend, state and city tussle over Palisades security plans
"It's inevitable that we are going to have another disaster, and we still won't be prepared. We'll be in the same position we were before," said Pete Brown, a spokesperson for Park, who decried cuts to EMD and a lack of resources for the Police and Fire departments.
"We got a horrible taste of what it's like when we are not prepared," Brown said, "and despite all of that, we haven't learned a lesson from it, and we are doing the same thing."
Rick Caruso, the developer whom Bass defeated in the 2022 mayoral race, called both the budget proposal put forward by Bass and the spending plan approved by the City Council "a blatant display of mismanagement and bad judgment," expressing incredulity over the rationale for EMD's funding level.
"We are in an earthquake zone. We are in a fire zone. Come on," Caruso said in an interview.
Seidl, Bass' spokesperson, disputed that L.A. had not learned from the Palisades fire and emphasized that the spending on emergency management included "continued and new investments" in EMD as well as the city's police and fire agencies.
Emergency management experts, audits commissioned by the city and EMD's current leadership have warned that the department lacked the staff and funding to accomplish its mandate in one of the nation's most disaster-prone regions.
'That department could be the world leader in emergency management, and it could be the standard for the rest of the country, but with a third of the staff and a tenth of the budget that they need, that's not possible,' said Nick Lowe, an independent emergency management consultant and the president and chief executive of CPARS Consulting.
The general manager of EMD and an agency spokesperson did not respond to written questions last week about the approved budget.
In recent public statements, Parks disclosed that her budget requests this year received opposition and appeared to have been whittled down.
She told the Ad Hoc Committee for L.A. Recovery in March that she had sought 24 more staffers at EMD, but that officials under the city administrative officer balked at her request.
Read more: The L.A. wildfires left lead and other toxic material in the soil of burn zones. Here are their health risks
Featherstone, who is now coordinating the Palisades fire recovery, said Parks' requests received "a qualitative negative response," and suggested that there was a lack of understanding or appreciation of the import of EMD's role.
"There was a qualitative opinion not in favor of Ms. Parks having these positions and people who aren't emergency managers opined about the value or the worth of these positions," Featherstone said.
Parks said she scaled her request down "given the city's current fiscal situation," adding, "I need a minimum of 10" more positions. In a memo, Parks said these 10 positions would cost about $1.1 million per year.
When Bass unveiled her budget proposal, those 10 additional positions were not included; EMD remained at roughly 30 positions, similar to previous years, which costs about $7.5 million when pensions, healthcare and other expenses are included. Bass' budget proposal touted that she was able to preserve all of EMD's positions while other departments faced steep staff and funding cuts.
Both Parks and Featherstone had argued for the creation of a designated, in-house recovery team, which EMD has lacked. When the Palisades fire broke out in January, EMD had no person assigned full-time to recovery and instead had to move its limited staff onto a recovery unit. Bass also retained Hagerty Consulting, a private firm, to boost EMD and provide instant expertise on a yearlong contract for up to $10 million, much of which Bass' spokesperson said is reimbursable by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Still, Featherstone has told the City Council that, since L.A. had no in-house recovery expertise, the need to train and create an in-house team has occupied much of the initial Palisades fire recovery effort.
Phasing in an in-house recovery and reconstruction division with 10 staffers would cost an additional $1.5 million next year, according to a memo prepared by the city administrative officer. Hiring an additional 21 staffers to prepare for the Olympics and other major events would cost nearly $3 million.
Parks also requested $209,000 to repair the video system at the emergency operations center, saying the lack of surveillance cameras posed a threat to city employees.
"Multiple incidents have occurred where the safety and security of the facility have been compromised without resolution due to the failing camera system," Parks wrote in a budget memo submitted this spring.
The request for funding for replacement cameras was also denied.
L.A. officials have long been warned that EMD lacks resources. The 2022 audit by Galperin, the former city controller, found that L.A. provided less emergency management funding than peer cities, and that the COVID-19 pandemic "strained EMD resources and staffing, causing several existing preparedness programs to lag behind, likely impacting the City's readiness for future emergencies."
An after-action report on EMD's handling of COVID-19, authored by Lowe, the emergency management consultant, found that the agency was 'undervalued and misunderstood, underfunded, and demoralized.' Parks took over as general manager after the time period covered by Lowe's report.
Read more: Trump's FCC delays multilingual emergency alerts for natural disasters, sparking concern in L.A.
The lack of training and funding became apparent at a budget hearing in April 2024. Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky asked Parks directly at the meeting: 'With your current budget, are you able to staff your [emergency] response centers 24/7 during emergencies?'
'The answer is no,' Parks said. "If there are multiple days that the emergency operations center needs to be activated, we do not have enough staff.'
During the Palisades fire, EMD said it had to bring in additional emergency management officials from other cities to sustain the emergency operations center around the clock.
Lowe said L.A. leaders had failed to recognize EMD's role within the broader public safety infrastructure of the city.
"I'm not sure at a political level that the city understands and appreciates emergency management and the purpose of the department, and that trickles down to the budget and the size of the department," Lowe said.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
San Diego parking changes: What to know after City Council vote
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — San Diego City Council on Monday approved new parking regulations that will allow the city to adjust parking fees for times with high demand and during special events, along with increasing parking enforcement to seven days a week. City Council back in February voted to raise parking meter rates in the City of San Diego from $1.25 to $2.50 per hour. This latest update to the City parking regulations aims to generate more revenue for the City to support improvements and maintenance of local infrastructure while freeing up General Fund resources for other uses, and encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation, according to the City. The updated parking regulations will allow the City to use 'dynamic pricing' for parking meters for high demand times and during special events like concerts, conventions, parades and festivals. The changes also include taking away free parking on Sundays so enforcement will be seven days a week. San Diego considers sweeping parking reform package: What it entails It will also require City staff to consult and provide solutions to residents who rely on regulated street parking due to a lack of off-street solutions before parking meter enforcement expands to Sundays. Fees will be updated for valet parking permit applications and permits for blocking parking spaces during construction part of the new changes. Lastly, the changes will include reforms to Community Parking District management in an effort to address how parking meter funds are spent by districts. The City says parking meter revenues are limited by state and local law to specific areas and uses and that they must be reinvested to benefit parking and mobility-related needs within the meter zone where they were collected. Monday's vote came after more than a year of work by the City, which included a series of parking management recommendations from a consulting firm after a detailed analysis was performed. While the parking reforms passed City Council on Monday, the City says the actual changes to existing meters and meter rates will be implemented over time and the public will be notified beforehand. Dan Plante contributed to this report. Watch in the video above. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Atlanta City Council approves $3B budget for 2026
The Brief The Atlanta City Council approved a $3 billion budget for fiscal year 2026, focusing on public safety, housing, infrastructure, and youth programs. Key spending priorities include strengthening police and fire services, affordable housing, infrastructure upgrades, economic development, and expanded youth programs. Additional measures include infrastructure improvements, small business support, and environmental considerations for new data centers. ATLANTA - The Atlanta City Council unanimously approved a $3 billion operating budget for the 2026 fiscal year on Monday, including a $975.4 million general fund, marking the fourth consecutive year the Dickens administration has passed its budget without opposition. What we know The budget, which takes effect July 1, allocates funding across multiple city departments and major funds, with investments in public safety, housing, infrastructure, and youth programs. What they're saying "This budget represents our shared commitment to building a city that invests in its people, strengthens our infrastructure and looks to the future," Mayor Andre Dickens said in a statement. "I am grateful to the City Council for their collaboration in advancing a budget that puts public safety, economic growth and sustainability at the forefront." Chief Financial Officer Mohamed Balla called the package a "balanced budget" that reflects "smart, responsible planning—prioritizing impact, equity and long-term value for Atlanta residents." By the numbers Among the spending priorities: Public safety and community programs: Funding to strengthen police and fire services and expand youth engagement and violence prevention programs. Affordable housing and homelessness support: Continued investments in housing developments and services for residents experiencing homelessness. Infrastructure and transit: Upgrades to roads, sidewalks, and public transit systems. Economic development: Programs to attract new businesses and support small business growth. Youth and education: Expanded after-school programs and youth employment initiatives. Big picture view In other action, the council approved a series of measures ranging from infrastructure improvements to small business support: An ordinance requiring reflective roofing materials in new construction to reduce urban heat (25-O-1310). A resolution accepting $80,000 in upgrades from the Atlanta Hawks Foundation for the Pittman Park Recreation Center (25-R-3507). Renewals of contracts with 10 vendors to continue afterschool programs through the Centers of Hope initiative (25-R-3515, 3516, 3518). A resolution to study challenges small businesses face in securing affordable retail space and explore possible solutions such as tax incentives and lease subsidies (25-R-3503). An ordinance mandating special-use permits for new data centers, with environmental considerations for water and energy use (25-O-1063). A $3 million agreement with the Atlanta Downtown Improvement District for pedestrian wayfinding improvements (25-R-3449). Additional funding of up to $250,000 for the Silver Comet Connector trail project (25-R-3508). Authorization for the city's public defender office to accept a $156,000 grant to provide immigration deportation defense services (25-O-1305). Several new proposals were also introduced Monday, including a $61.3 million sewer replacement project in southwest Atlanta, a reallocation of federal funds for affordable housing, and an agreement with Cobb County to provide wastewater treatment services in some parts of the city. The council also issued proclamations recognizing National Safety Month, Paralegal Week and the National Puerto Rican Day Parade. The Source The details in this article were provided by the city of Atlanta.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Competing hard': Olympic house price battle
The Brisbane Olympics continue to loom as a potentially massive upward driver of house prices. Speculation is rife about just how much the Games will push up prices in Brisbane in particular. As soon as the long-awaited venues were confirmed in March, realtors began promoting their properties as within the 'Olympic precinct'. Finder research suggests 1.5 million people would be looking to buy in Brisbane between now and the 2032 Games. 'The ripple effect on the local property market, especially in Brisbane's inner and middle-ring suburbs, cannot be underestimated,' Australian Property Investor magazine said in April. Propertytology managing director Simon Pressley tempered the huge expectations this week though, downplaying estimates Brisbane house prices would double in the next seven years. 'No guarantee,' he told Channel 7 on Tuesday morning. 'Property markets are obviously very, very complicated. 'There's no precedent with past Olympic Games around the world that property booms always happen.' The Sydney 2000 Games did spark a property boom though, but the NSW economy and the monetary policy of the time were larger factors for the boom, Mr Pressley said. 'Broadly, for the whole state of Queensland, the outlook for its property market for the foreseeable future looks to be strong,' he said. 'Buyers are already competing very hard for a small volume of properties for sale.' The latest national figures show Brisbane's median dwelling value has increased 7.1 per cent in the past year to $918,000. Of the capital cities, only Perth prices have gone up more in the past 12 months. Regional South Australian prices have shot up the most. In March, the Queensland government unveiled plans for a new Olympics precinct in Brisbane. 'There's going to be a lot of construction obviously with various stadiums and arenas built all over the state,' Mr Pressley said. 'Skilled labour is going to be a big challenge for the Queensland government as well.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data