Sweden's EQT secures $11.4 billion commitments for its new Asia fund
EQT activated its ninth regional private equity fund - BPEA Private Equity Fund IX, managed by EQT Private Capital Asia - on March 1, 2025, and held its first close in April, according to its half-year report 2025 published on Thursday.
Private equity funds typically begin investing after their first close, once they have secured an initial round of investor commitments.
"Fundraising for BPEA IX continued with strong momentum," it said in the report.
The fundraising comes against the backdrop of a uncertain global macroeconomic and geopolitical environment triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and policy orders.
"Our scale across Europe, North America and Asia Pacific enables us to invest capital with conviction and insight," EQT's CEO and Managing Partner Per Franzen said in the report.
He added that in Asia Pacific, structural growth and under-managed capital pools continue to create long-term opportunities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The clearest sign yet that progressive darling AOC has White House ambitions
Progressive 'Squad' leader Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has raised more money than anyone else in the House of Representatives. The millennial New York Democrat has even raised more cash than Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., Trump's closest ally in Congress and the third in line to the presidency. AOC, 35, has received a whopping $15.4 million dollars this year in donations, Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings show. Johnson has raised about half of that for his personal campaign, around $8.7 million, according to FEC filings. There's been wide speculation that she is amassing a major war chest to launch a bid for Senate or even the White House in 2028. Prediction sites have placed the New York Democrat among the most likely to run for the presidency next election. And the markets think she could even win her party's nomination. AOC has a 15 percent chance of securing the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028, according to Kalshi, only California Gov. Gavin Newsom has higher odds at 20 percent. Her prospects and popularity have skyrocketed as she has toured the country and pushed back loudly against the Trump administration both in Congress and online. 'She is trading on her national profile to go where the dollars are,' Jacob Neiheisel, a political professor at the University of Buffalo, recently told the New York Post. 'It's become incredibly easy to pull dollars from all across the country,' he added. Earlier this year she toured the country with Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont from February until June where they regularly filled out stadiums, spectacles akin to rallies hosted by President Donald Trump. Their 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour pulled in well over 100,000 attendees across a dozen states. 'In Q2, AOC raised $5.8m from over 161,000 individual donors and an average donation of just $17,' her campaign manager Oliver Hidalgo-Wohlleben, posted earlier this month. 'In 2025, over 342,000 individual donors have donated to the campaign with only four who have gave the max amount.' 'AOC is one of the few candidates to take zero corporate pac or lobbyist money,' he shared. 'We are 100% grassroots funded.' Many of her small dollar contributions come from outside her district in Queens. According to FEC filings, the majority of her funding comes from California. 'People willing to call out [President] Trump's corruption and Washington Republicans' extremism the loudest definitely attract the most attention and dollars,' John Lapp, former executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee told the Wall Street Journal. The most 'provocative stars in the Democratic party' will raise the most money, he said. AOC has stepped into the spotlight that Sanders used to occupy in his previous presidential campaigns, a champion for the working class. She is easily one of the most, if not the most, identifiable progressives in the entire party. Her frequent attacks aimed at Trump admin officials online, where she denounces their actions on immigration, tariffs, healthcare and virtually every other policy area, have also been a crucial point of resistance for the Democrats. Trump himself frequently bashes her on his Truth Social app - a badge of honor among Democrats these days - and AOC's accolades are stacking up fast. 'Stupid AOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, one of the 'dumbest' people in Congress, is now calling for my Impeachment, despite the fact that the Crooked and Corrupt Democrats have already done that twice before,' the president wrote last month. 'Mr. President, don't take your anger out on me — I'm just a silly girl,' AOC wrote back. 'Take it out on whoever convinced you to betray the American people and our Constitution by illegally bombing Iran and dragging us into war. It only took you 5 months to break almost every promise you made.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US gas producer CNX Resources boosts 2025 output estimate without extra spending
July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. energy firm CNX Resources (CNX.N), opens new tab said in its second quarter earnings that it plans to produce more natural gas this year than previously expected to meet growing demand while spending the same amount of money. Earlier this week, two other big U.S. gas producers, EQT (EQT.N), opens new tab and Range Resources (RRC.N), opens new tab, both said in their second quarter earnings that they too would produce more energy in 2025 than previously expected to meet rising demand. Demand for gas to produce power for data centers in the U.S. and for export to the rest of the world as liquefied natural gas is on track to keep hitting record highs in coming years, according to energy analysts. CNX, which focuses primarily on gas, said it planned capital expenditures of $450 million-$500 million in 2025, the same as its first quarter outlook, to produce about 1.68-1.70 billion cubic feet of gas equivalent per day (bcfed). That compares with the company's prior 2025 production guidance of 1.66-1.70 bcfed in the first quarter. In 2024, CNX spent about $540 million in capital and produced around 1.51 bcfed. In the second quarter, the company said it produced about 1.842 bcfed, up from 1.642 bcfed in the first quarter. Shares of CNX eased about 1% to around $32.75 in midday trade on Thursday. Analysts at investment banking firm Piper Sandler said in a note that CNX reported a second quarter beat driven by stronger production that was partially offset by weaker gas realizations.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australians lost $1bn through collapsed investment funds. What happened and how can workers keep their super safe?
Thousands of Australians recently lost more than $1bn in retirement savings after the collapse of funds linked to their superannuation platforms, sparking warnings from the corporate regulator about risky investment schemes. While only a small share of the population has been affected, some investors have seen their entire super balances wiped. Here is how the collapses happened, and what Australian workers can do to avoid a similar situation. Over the past year or so, more than 12,000 Australians have been exposed to three major collapsed or frozen investment schemes: First Guardian, Shield Master Fund and Australian Fiduciaries. The failures have so far led to collective losses of up to $1.2bn. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Asic) blocked investment in Shield in February 2024 and froze the assets of First Guardian in February 2025 after its managers blocked most investors from accessing their funds in May the previous year. The corporate regulator is also investigating concerns about Australian Fiduciaries including alleged inadequate management of conflicts of interest. First Guardian, which held $505m for about 6,000 investors, described its investments as focused on shares, property, private equity and fixed income, according to federal court-appointed liquidators. The liquidators found the company had put nearly $70m into businesses connected to its directors while more than $240m was invested offshore. One director also allegedly bought a Lamborghini with nearly $550,000 of company money. Investors have been warned they will probably only get a portion of an outstanding $446m back, and not until 2027 at the earliest, after liquidators said they expected to conclude directors breached their duties, the value of investments may have been overstated and funds may not have been properly recorded. The fund's May 2024 balance sheet indicated it had grown that to $525m but more than half of that was in question and investors were not likely to recover their entire investment, receivers for Shield reported in November 2024. They found managers had overstated the value of investments in a real estate fund and nearly $7m had been spent on a former director's personal expenses. Some investments would not be recovered for more than two years, the receivers said in December. In these cases, investors switched to superannuation products that would let them invest in First Guardian or in Shield with financial advisers' help, after being cold-called by salespeople, Asic says. The corporate regulator has put the spotlight on salespeople pressuring customers to invest in specific products. Red flags for consumers include cold calling and high-pressure sales tactics, or offers of prizes, free superannuation health checks, or free consolidation of lost super, according to Asic's deputy chair, Sarah Court. 'These calls don't have the hallmarks of a typical scam. The caller will seemingly have your best interests at heart, and they say they want to help you find a better super product or locate lost super for free,' she says. 'If you are unsure or are feeling pressured, just hang up.' Customers and financial advisers reached the products through superannuation platforms, including one operated by an arm of Macquarie Group, that temporarily chose to offer one or both products, Asic says. Super funds are highly regulated and they are discouraged from investing in schemes that are risky or opaque, according to Xavier O'Halloran, the chief executive of advocacy group Super Consumers Australia. Nearly 15 million among the 18 million accounts in Australia are in MySuper products, default super funds that employers offer workers, which did not invest in the collapsed schemes, he says. While all investment carries risk, MySuper products are diversified, and so not reliant on a single investment or asset class. Some Australians invest in less scrutinised schemes, especially through self-managed super funds. Asic recently warned it had growing concerns that peoplewere being encouraged by salespeople and cold-callers to switch from safe investments into complex and risky schemes. Phil Anderson, the general manager of policy, advocacy and standards at the Financial Advice Association Australia, encourages people to research their investments and check details with their financial advisers if they're worried they might be in an inappropriate investment. 'It is quite evident that there's failings in the system,' Anderson says. 'Don't be rushed into doing something. Challenge the adviser: Why is this the right thing for me? … What track record do these investment options have?' Investors can also spread their superannuation between different investment options within or across funds to limit the chance of a single collapse knocking out their entire savings, Anderson says. Customers can check what assets their super is invested in and how it is performing when superannuation funds release their annual statements for 2024-25 in coming months. People who have been told to swap from a MySuper product can also ask their adviser if their prospective fund has been checked by the regulator, the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority. Asic has encouraged those who have lost money in a collapse to make a complaint about their adviser to the sector's independent ombudsman, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. If a customer has lost money but their advice firm has gone into liquidation or insolvency, they may be able to appeal to the sector's compensation scheme of last resort. However, not all of the losses may be recompensed. Last resort compensation payouts are capped at $150,000 per individual and would only cover any clients who accessed the products under the guidance of an adviser, meaning any customer who made the decision without advice would not be eligible. The compensator is expecting claims against advisers linked to the funds but has received no claims for Shield and only one for First Guardian, according to the scheme's chief executive, David Berry. That has made it impossible to determine how many investors will be eligible, how much they might be paid or when they might be compensated, he said. This shortfall has led to calls for increased regulation of the products responsible for the losses, known as managed investment schemes, but also for reform of the compensation scheme of last resort so it covers those who invested without advice. Guardian Australia attempted to reach representatives of the funds Shield, First Guardian and Australian Fiduciaries, including through the firms' liquidators or administrators where applicable. Financial advice firm Interprac and superannuation platform trustees Macquarie, Equity Trustees, Diversa and Netwealth each declined to comment.
