Could a rebellion in eastern Congo widen into a regional war?
The M23 rebels ' capture of the city of Goma last month and their reported advance on another provincial capital have drawn in concerned countries from east and southern Africa. A joint meeting of leaders from those regions over the weekend offered no strong proposals for ending the fighting beyond urging talks and an immediate ceasefire.
Notably, they didn't call for the rebels to withdraw from Goma.
At the summit's conclusion, Congo issued a statement welcoming its 'foundations for a collective approach' to securing peace. But there are concerns that long-shifting alliances in the region also could lead to a collective collapse.
Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi had sought the help of allies in the region and beyond when the M23 rebels resurfaced at the end of 2021.
Troops from Burundi, with its own tense relations with Rwanda, were sent to fight alongside Congolese forces. Troops from Tanzania, which hosted the weekend summit, were deployed in Congo under the banner of a regional bloc. And Uganda, on poor terms with Rwanda, had already deployed hundreds of troops to fight a different rebel group in eastern Congo.
For Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi, it was 'like juggling a polygamous marriage' as he maneuvered to protect his vast country's territorial integrity, said Murithi Mutiga, Africa director at the International Crisis Group.
'Rwanda felt excluded while Burundi and Uganda were welcome' in eastern Congo, Mutiga said. 'Rwanda decided to assert itself.'
Congolese authorities see the M23 rebels as a Rwandan proxy army driven to illegally exploit eastern Congo's vast mineral resources, whose value is estimated in the trillions of dollars.
The rebels are backed by some 4,000 troops from Rwanda, according to evidence collected by United Nations experts.
The M23 rebellion stems partly from Rwanda's decades-long concern that other rebels — ethnic Hutus opposed to Rwanda's government and accused of participating in Rwanda's 1994 genocide — have been allowed to operate in largely lawless parts of eastern Congo.
Rwanda's longtime President Paul Kagame accuses Tshisekedi of overlooking the concerns of Congo's ethnic Tutsis after hundreds of thousands of Tutsis were killed in the genocide.
The M23's ranks contain many Congolese Tutsis.
The rebels' next big target is Bukavu, capital of South Kivu province, and they have vowed to go all the way to Kinshasa, Congo's capital, some 1,600 kilometers (1,000 miles) away.
Eastern Congo in recent decades has been the setting for a conflict that has caused the highest death toll since World War II.
Its last major regional upheaval broke out in 1998 as Congo's then-President Laurent Kabila invited forces from countries including Zimbabwe and Angola to protect him from Rwanda-backed rebels who sought to overthrow him. Uganda and Rwanda, which had helped Kabila seize power by force the previous year before feeling alienated by him, fought mostly on the same side.
Now, analysts say both Rwanda and Uganda are key again.
The risk of regional escalation this time is 'big,' especially with both Kagame and Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni still eager for influence in eastern Congo, said Godber Tumushabe, an analyst with the Kampala-based Great Lakes Institute for Strategic Studies think tank.
Both leaders are crucial to any effort to stop the fighting, Tumushabe said: 'They will not allow a settlement' that doesn't look after their interests in eastern Congo. But they have their own friction as Rwanda suspects Uganda of backing yet another group of rebels opposed to Kagame.
Burundi is also heavily involved. A year ago, Burundi closed border crossings with Rwanda and severed diplomatic ties over allegations that Rwanda's government was supporting rebels in eastern Congo who oppose Burundian President Evariste Ndayishimiye. By then, Burundian troops were deployed there to fight alongside Congolese troops.
Ndayishimiye has accused Kagame of reckless warmongering. He told a gathering of diplomats in Bujumbura last month that 'if Rwanda continues to conquer the territory of another country, I know well that it will even arrive in Burundi.' He warned that the 'war will take a regional dimension.'
With Rwanda and Congo each 'drawing a line in the sand,' diplomacy faces a great challenge, said Mutiga with the International Crisis Group.
Efforts at peace have largely sputtered, including the yearslong presence of a U.N. peacekeeping force in eastern Congo that has been under Congolese government pressure to leave.
Other fighters on the ground have included mercenaries for Congo, including many Romanians, and troops from the southern Africa regional bloc that Rwanda's president has alleged — without providing evidence — are not peacekeepers but collaborators with Congo's army.
Congo's president has refused to engage with the M23. And he did not attend the weekend summit in Tanzania, instead monitoring it virtually. At its conclusion, his government welcomed the collective effort to stop the fighting but disputed Rwanda's attempted explanation for M23's resurgence.
'The current crisis is, above all, an attack on (Congo's) sovereignty and security, and not an ethnic question,' Congo's statement said.
The next steps in trying to resolve the conflict are unclear.
____
Associated Press writer Gaspard Maheburwa in Bujumbura, Burundi, contributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
ICJ to deliver landmark climate ruling
The top United Nations court will on Wednesday hand down a landmark global legal blueprint for tackling climate change that also sets out top polluters' responsibilities towards the countries suffering most. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has been tasked with crafting a so-called advisory opinion on countries' obligations to prevent climate change and the consequences for polluters whose emissions have harmed the planet. Experts say this is the most significant in a string of recent rulings on climate change in international law, with major potential repercussions for states and firms around the world. Climate-vulnerable countries and campaign groups hope it will have far-reaching legal consequences in the fight against climate change, unifying existing law, shaping national and international legislation, and impacting current court cases. "It will be the compass the world needs to course correct," said Vishal Prasad, director of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change. "It will give new strength to climate litigation, inspire more ambitious national policies and guide states toward decisions that uphold their legal duties to protect both people and planet," said Prasad. But some critics argue the ruling will be toothless, as ICJ advisory opinions are not binding and major polluters can choose simply to ignore it. - 'Acts and omissions' - The UN, pushed by tiny island state Vanuatu, asked the court to answer two questions. First, what obligations do states have under international law to protect the Earth's climate from polluting greenhouse gas emissions? Second, what are the legal consequences for states which "by their acts and omissions have caused significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment?" The second question was explicitly linked to the damage that climate change is causing to small, more vulnerable, countries and their populations. This applies to countries facing increasingly damaging weather disasters and especially to island nations under threat from rising sea levels like those in the Pacific Ocean. - 'David Vs Goliath' - In what was termed a "David versus Goliath" battle, advanced economies and developing nations clashed at the ICJ during December hearings on the case. The iconic Peace Palace in the Hague, the seat of the ICJ, played host to more than 100 oral submissions -- the largest number ever, many from tiny states making their first appearance. "This may well be the most consequential case in the history of humanity," said Vanuatu's representative Ralph Regenvanu, opening the two weeks of hearings. "The outcome of these proceedings will reverberate across generations, determining the fate of nations like mine and the future of our planet," he told the 15-judge panel. Major polluters argued the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was sufficient and new guidelines on countries' obligations were not necessary. US representative Margaret Taylor said this framework was "the most current expression of states' consent to be bound by international law in respect of climate change". Taylor urged the court "to ensure its opinion preserves and promotes the centrality of this regime". Meanwhile, the speaker from India was even more explicit. "The court should avoid the creation of any new or additional obligations beyond those already existing under the climate change regime," said Luther Rangreji. The United States under President Donald Trump has since pulled funding for the UNFCCC and withdrawn from its landmark pact, the Paris climate agreement. - 'Watery graves' - But smaller states said this framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects. "As seas rise faster than predicted, these states must stop. "This court must not permit them to condemn our lands and our people to watery graves," said John Silk from the Marshall Islands. After bitterly fought UN climate talks in Azerbaijan in November, wealthy countries agreed to provide at least $300 billion a year by 2035 to help developing nations transition to clean energy and prepare for an increase in extreme weather. The vulnerable nations argued this is simply not enough and urged the ICJ to push for more. "This is a crisis of survival. It is also a crisis of equity," said Fiji's representative Luke Daunivalu. "Our people... are unfairly and unjustly footing the bill for a crisis they did not create. "They look to this court for clarity, for decisiveness and justice." ric/gil/tc
New York Post
11 hours ago
- New York Post
Thune warns Schumer may let govt shut down as ‘struggling' Dems scramble to appease far-left
Senate Majority Leader John Thune warned that Congress may be careening towards a partial government shutdown this fall because of pressure from the far-left flank of the Democratic Party. Thune (R-SD) observed that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has faced intense pressure from his base and mused that a few upcoming votes will provide more clarity about the risks of a partial shutdown. 'I think he [Schumer] probably thinks that it's beneficial to their political base, the far left of the Democrat Party, and you can kind of see what's happening up there in New York politics,' Thune told Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' In March, Schumer faced fierce progressive backlash after he declined to block a GOP-backed spending patch to avert a partial government shutdown. The blowback was so pronounced that Schumer was forced to reschedule parts of his book tour as progressives demanded Democrats in Congress put up more of a fight against President Trump. 3 Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated that a few upcoming votes on appropriations bills will help determine the likelihood of a government shutdown. Getty Images 3 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer faced progressive backlash when he moved to avert a partial government shutdown in March. AP Government shutdown showdowns are one of the few instances in which Democrats have leverage with the Trump administration, given that they are the minority party in both the House and the Senate. Every new fiscal year, which starts on Oct. 1, Congress is required to fund the government via 12 appropriations bills or through a continuing resolution in order to avoid a shutdown. Both avenues are subject to the Senate fillibuster, which requires 60 votes to overcome. Republicans only have 53, which means they need cooperation from Democrats. At the moment, Congress has funded the government via a continuing resolution, which essentially means that it is running on autopilot until the fall. 'This is a party struggling for an identity. This is a party that's completely out of step with the mainstream of this country,' Thune added. 'We're going to be waiting to see anxiously what Chuck Schumer and other leaders on the Democrat side decide to do.' Earlier this month, Schumer railed against Republicans for advancing a rescissions package, which allows them to cancel previously approved spending without support from Democrats. Schumer argued that such a move jeopardizes negotiations over the government shutdown showdown. 'We are doing everything we can to keep the bipartisan appropriations process going,' Schumer told reporters earlier this month. 'And they're undermining it with rescissions, with pocket rescissions, with impoundment and every other way.' The implication from Schumer is that Democrats can't trust Republicans to stick to the terms of a bipartisan appropriations deal because they've shown a willingness to bypass them via rescissions and presidential impoundment, when Trump decides not to spend certain authorized funds. On the Republican side, GOP leaders, particularly in the House, have long struggled to get fiscal hawks on board with either a continuing resolution or the 12 appropriations bills. There's been a strong push from the right flank for deeper cuts to spending, something that is a dealbreaker for Democrats. 3 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hasn't said what her 2028 intentions are yet. LP Media Schumer also has to navigate dicey progressive politics. The Democratic establishment was upended last month when Zohran Mamdani bested former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. The top Senate Democrat is up for reelection in 2028 and hasn't said whether or not he will run amid the threat of a challenge from 'Squad' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). 'Ultimately, keeping the government funded is good for the country, and hopefully we will have bipartisan cooperation to do that,' Thune added. 'If their recent track record is any indication, they're under a tremendous amount of pressure from that far left wing of the Democrat Party to shut the government down.' The last partial government shutdown, which lasted 35 days, took place between late 2018 and early 2019 due to a feud between Trump and Democrats over border wall funding.
11 hours ago
Japan's governing coalition likely to lose upper house election, exit polls show
TOKYO -- The governing coalition of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is likely to lose a majority in the smaller of Japan's two parliamentary houses in a key election Sunday, according to exit polls, worsening the country's political instability. Voters were deciding half of the 248 seats in the upper house, the less powerful of the two chambers in Japan's Diet. Ishiba has set the bar low, wanting a simple majority of 125 seats, which means his Liberal Democratic Party, or LDP, and its Buddhist-backed junior coalition partner Komeito need to win 50 to add to the 75 seats they already have. That would mean a big retreat from the 141 seats they had before the election. Exit poll results released seconds after the ballots closed Sunday night mostly showed a major setback for Ishiba's coalition. Japan's NHK television projected a range of 32-51 seats for the prime minister's coalition, while other networks projected it would win just over 40 seats. The LDP alone is projected to win from 32 to 35 seats, the fewest won by the party, which still is the No. 1 party in the parliament. 'It's a tough situation. I take it humbly and sincerely,' Ishiba told a live interview with NHK. He said that the poor showing was because his government's measures to combat price increase have yet to reach many people. Ishiba showed his determination to stay on to tackle economic and security challenges. 'I will fulfill my responsibility as head of the No. 1 party and work for the country.' A poor performance in the election would not immediately trigger a change of government because the upper house lacks the power to file a no-confidence motion against a leader, but it would certainly deepen uncertainty over his fate and Japan's political stability. Ishiba would face calls from within the LDP party to step down or find another coalition partner. Soaring prices, lagging incomes and burdensome social security payments are the top issues for frustrated, cash-strapped voters. Stricter measures targeting foreign residents and visitors have also emerged as a key issue, with a surging right-wing populist party leading the campaign. Sunday's vote comes after Ishiba's coalition lost a majority in the October lower house election, stung by past corruption scandals, and his unpopular government has since been forced into making concessions to the opposition to get legislation through parliament. It has been unable to quickly deliver effective measures to mitigate rising prices, including Japan's traditional staple of rice, and dwindling wages. U.S. President Donald Trump has added to the pressure, complaining about a lack of progress in trade negotiations and the lack of sales of U.S. autos and American-grown rice to Japan despite a shortfall in domestic stocks of the grain. A 25% tariff due to take effect Aug. 1 has been another blow for Ishiba. Ishiba has resisted any compromise before the election, but the prospect for a breakthrough after the election is just as unclear because the minority government would have difficulty forming a consensus with the opposition. Frustrated voters are rapidly turning to emerging populist parties. The eight main opposition groups, however, are too fractured to forge a common platform as a united front and gain voter support as a viable alternative. The emerging populist party Sanseito stands out with the toughest anti-foreigner stance, with its 'Japanese First' platform that proposes a new agency to handle policies related to foreigners. The party's populist platform also includes anti-vaccine, anti-globalism and favors traditional gender roles. Conservative to centrist opposition groups, including the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, or CDPJ, the DPP, and Sanseito have gained significant ground at the Liberal Democrats' expense. The CDPJ was projected to win up to 26 seats, while the DPP could quadruple to 17 seats from four, exit poll results show. Sanseito is expected to surge to 16 from just one. None of the opposition parties said that they were open to cooperating with the governing coalition. CDPJ leader Yoshihiko Noda told NHK that his priority is to form an alliance among the opposition. The spread of xenophobic rhetoric in the election campaign and on social media has triggered protests by human rights activists and alarmed foreign residents. LDP has almost continuously dominated Japan's postwar politics, contributing to its political stability and social conformity. Voters are divided between stability and change, with some voicing concern about escalating xenophobia. Yuko Tsuji, a 43-year-old consultant, who came to a polling station inside a downtown Tokyo gymnasium with her husband, said they both support LDP for stability and unity. and voted 'for candidates who won't fuel division." 'If the ruling party doesn't govern properly, the conservative base will drift toward extremes. So I voted with the hope that the ruling party would tighten things up,' she said. Self-employed Daiichi Nasu, 57, who came to vote with his dog, said that he hopes for a change toward a more inclusive and diverse society, with more open immigration and gender policies such as allowing married couples to keep separate surnames. 'That's why I voted for the CDPJ,' he said. 'I want to see progress on those fronts.'
