Gov. Bill Lee's school voucher bill soars through House committees
The process didn't come without some resistance from Democrats, who strongly oppose the bill, claiming it would take funding from public schools, among other concerns.
Just two hours before the first House committee hearing, lawmakers filed a lengthy amendment that would require a sample of students who receive a voucher to take a standardized test like TCAP—the same test administered in public schools—so the state could compare scores.
PHOTOS: Protesters convene at TN State Capitol
In addition, the amendment prioritizes which public school districts would receive funding generated from sports betting, which the bill promises it will allocate to public schools to use for maintenance and construction. The amendment says districts in at-risk and distressed counties and high performing, fast growing districts would get first dibs at the money. Then, any districts facing natural disaster recovery could receive money. If there is any funding left, the remaining districts could apply for the money.
During the House Education Committee hearing, Democrats tried their best to pick apart the bill, questioning the sponsor and witnesses testifying on the bill, however, just before the vote, Republicans blocked them from asking any more questions.
Rep. Gloria Johnson (D-Knoxville) called the act 'authoritarianism.'
'They can't answer questions on their bill because it's bad, because the people don't want it; they don't care. This is about billionaire interests from outside of our state. That's what all of this is about,' Johnson told News 2's Tori Gessner.
However, Republicans in favor of the bill say it's about giving parents more options to choose the best education for their child.
'This money doesn't come from TISA, period, it comes from the general fund,' House Majority Leader William Lamberth said. 'There is no money coming from public schools at all. I know you don't want to believe it, but yes, that is absolutely too good for both parties. You may not want to believe it, but it's true. Public schools will continue to receive all the money and then some they're going to receive, and we're setting up a scholarship fund. It is very different from really anything anybody has done in the nation.'
The bill easily passed both the House Education and Government Operations committees, along a party-line vote. The bill also passed the Finance, Ways and Means Committee Tuesday evening.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Americans split on whether Trump support of Israel has gone too far: Poll
Americans are split on whether President Trump's support for Israel has gone too far or is just about right, according to a survey released on Tuesday. The Economist/YouGov poll found that 36 percent of U.S. adults think that the president's backing of Israel has gone too far, while another 32 percent stated the commander-in-chief's support for the Jewish state is about right. Only seven percent of respondents said Trump is not supportive enough of Jerusalem. The large majority of Americans, 71 percent, including 87 percent of Democratic Party voters and 54 percent of Republicans, think there is a hunger crisis in the Gaza Strip, according to the survey. Just over four-in-10 respondents, 43 percent, think that Israel is committing 'genocide' on the war-torn enclave against Palestinians. Around 65 percent of Democrats and 19 percent of GOP voters agreed. In the same survey from January 2024, 35 percent of U.S. adults said Israel was committing 'genocide.' More Americans, 41, in the survey said that Israeli military attacks on 'Gaza are unjustified and harm too many innocent Palestinians' compared to 32 percent of those who argued that 'Israel is justified in its attacks on Gaza as a response to threats' from the Palestinian militant group Hamas. Over four-in-10 respondents, 42 percent, are supportive of decreasing military aid to Israel, compared to those who are supportive, 13 percent, of increasing it. More Americans are in favor, 38 percent, of increasing humanitarian aid to the Palestinians than tamping it down, 18 percent, according to the survey. The majority of U.S. adults, 78 percent, are 'strongly or somewhat' supportive of reaching a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government. Nearly half of Americans, 49 percent, including 70 percent of Democrats and 23 percent of Republicans, argued that Palestinians should have their own state. Some 17 percent do not agree. The survey was conducted from Aug. 1-4 among 1,702 Americans. The poll had a margin of error of around 3.5 percent.


San Francisco Chronicle
6 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
What to know as Trump's immigration crackdown strips tuition breaks from thousands of students
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Tens of thousands of U.S. college students without legal resident status are losing access to in-state tuition prices as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on immigration. The Justice Department has been suing states to end tuition breaks for students without legal residency, starting with Texas in June. It has also filed lawsuits in Kentucky, Minnesota and, most recently, Oklahoma. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, 'Federal law prohibits aliens not lawfully present in the United States from getting in-state tuition benefits that are denied to out-of-state U.S. citizens,' the Justice Department argued in a lawsuit this month in Oklahoma. 'There are no exceptions.' The tuition breaks once enjoyed wide bipartisan support but have increasingly come under criticism from Republicans in recent years. Here's what to know about the tuition breaks: Texas' program was blocked first Texas' tuition policy was initially passed with sweeping bipartisan majorities in the Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for students without legal residency already living in the state. Supporters then and now say it boosted the state's economy by creating a better-educated and better-prepared workforce. The law allowed students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they had lived in Texas for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They also had to sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. Texas now has about 57,000 qualifying students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The state has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities. The difference in tuition rates is substantial. For example, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, a 34,000-student campus along the border with Mexico, a state resident will pay about $10,000 in basic tuition for a minimum full-time class schedule in the upcoming school year. A nonresident student will pay $19,000. Political pushback and a swift end Texas' law stood mostly unchallenged for years, but it came under fire as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry apologized after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.' The law withstood several repeal efforts in the Republican-dominated Legislature. During the legislative session that ended June 2, a repeal bill did not even get a vote. But the ax fell quickly. After the Trump administration filed a lawsuit calling the law unconstitutional, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a key Trump ally, chose not to defend the law in court and instead filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced. In Oklahoma, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, filed a similar motion. 'Rewarding foreign nationals who are in our country illegally with lower tuition costs that are not made available to out-of-state American citizens is not only wrong — it is discriminatory and unlawful," Drummond said in a statement. Campuses nationwide feel the impact At least 21 states and the University of Michigan system have laws or policies allowing tuition breaks for the immigrant students, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones such as Kansas and Nebraska. Immigration lawyers and education advocates said they are assessing whether there are legal avenues to challenge the rulings.

Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump yammers that he's the victim of rigged statistics. But he's the rigger in chief.
For President Trump, right behind retribution as a guiding principle comes projection: He falsely projects onto his enemies the sins of which he's guilty. Trump, whose vision only seems to extend backward, lately has renewed his tired lies that the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections were rigged against him. As he yammers away, he's also openly attempting to fix the 2026 midterm elections for Congress by brazenly goading Republicans to redraw congressional districts. If he succeeds, it could prevent the widely favored Democrats from capturing majority control of the House — just as they did in the 2018 midterms of his first term — and with it the power to block his agenda and investigate his evident abuses of power. But the president's rigging goes beyond elections, to all aspects of governance, if his cruel, chaotic maladministration can be called that. Don't like the weak jobs numbers from the nonpartisan bureaucrats at the Bureau of Labor Statistics? Fire the woman in charge, slander her for, yes, 'rigging' the numbers on employment and inflation 'to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' and look to hire someone who by hook or crook actually will rig the number to try to make you look better. As if the experts everywhere who rely on quality U.S. economic data will be fooled. Or even average Americans, who don't need BLS reports to conclude that food, housing and healthcare costs are a source of stress, as 86% of them said in an Associated Press/ NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll released Monday. Mad that federal judges rejected your former defense lawyer Alina Habba and other incompetent loyalists as U.S. district attorneys, as provided by law? Devise complicated end runs to keep them in place anyway, and have your aides condemn the judges (including Republican appointees) and their 'left-wing agenda.' That charge is especially rich when Habba, Trump's pick for U.S. attorney for New Jersey, makes no secret of her own right-wing agenda: Her goal, she told a right-wing podcaster, is to 'turn New Jersey red.' Want to impose punishing tariffs on U.S. trading partners, though the Constitution empowers Congress to set import duties? Seize on a law giving presidents emergency economic powers and twist its definition of 'emergency' beyond recognition or precedent. Go ahead and impose 50% tariffs on Brazil, for example, because it's conducting a 'witch hunt' (sound familiar?) against former president and Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro. It's not as if the subservient Republican-run Congress is going to object and reclaim its constitutional power. But courts might step in. One federal court has ruled against Trump on the tariffs issue and an appeals court last week was hostile during arguments in the two cases before it. Ultimately, however, the question of the president's tariff power will be up to the ever-deferential Supreme Court, which Trump and Senate Republicans really did rig in his favor during his first term. Trump even cheats on relatively small stuff (besides his golf game). An exhibit at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History on presidential impeachments naturally included Trump, the only president to be impeached twice. But somehow, any mention of him was removed, leaving just Presidents Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, the last of whom resigned before he could be impeached. Presto! 'Wiping away the impeachments like an ill-fated Kremlin apparatchik,' in the Atlantic's words. Trump's rigging is of course most obvious, and most hypocritical, in his unabashed demand to concoct congressional maps that could all but guarantee that Republicans don't suffer the usual midterm election losses for the party in power. He's already messed with Texas, with its trove of Republican votes and compliant Republican leaders. There, at Trump's command, a special session of the Republican-controlled state legislature, which was supposed to be about providing relief to victims of the July 4 Guadalupe River deluge and mitigating future flooding tragedies, has turned into a partisan power play to re-gerrymander Texas' congressional maps so that Republicans win five additional House seats next year. But just in case five seats aren't enough to stave off a Democratic takeover of the U.S. House, Trump and his team are pressing for sudden redistricting in other red states, including Missouri and Ohio, as well as Indiana, where Vice President JD Vance is scheduled to visit Thursday in his side role as Trump's deputy election-rigger. Such machinations have provoked Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, to threaten counter-gerrymanders in their blue states. Gerrymandering is a ploy nearly as old as the nation. Yet the skulduggery traditionally has been limited to once a decade, after the decennial census that the Constitution requires so states can redraw their political maps to reflect population changes. Trump and team haven't even bothered to sugarcoat their extraordinary mid-decade power grab: 'We are entitled to five more seats,' the president ridiculously decreed on Tuesday. Trump and his political aides cooked up their scheme to rig the 2026 House elections several months ago. In June, White House aides met with Texas Republicans in Congress to urge a 'ruthless' effort to get the state's districts redrawn. According to the New York Times, the aides warned — as if Republicans need warnings by now — that the vengeful Trump would pay close attention to who helped that effort and who didn't. On Tuesday, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, desperate for Trump's endorsement as he seeks reelection, tried to show some MAGA muscle by asking the FBI to help locate and arrest Democratic state legislators who fled the state so the Texas House couldn't vote on the Republican gerrymander plan. Trump didn't blink at the idea of his appointees sending federal agents after elected state officials who aren't breaking the law: 'They may have to,' he said. After all, he's the rigger in chief. Bluesky: @jackiecalmesThreads: @jkcalmesX: @Jackiekcalmes