
What to know as Trump's immigration crackdown strips tuition breaks from thousands of students
The Justice Department has been suing states to end tuition breaks for students without legal residency, starting with Texas in June. It has also filed lawsuits in Kentucky, Minnesota and, most recently, Oklahoma. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally,
'Federal law prohibits aliens not lawfully present in the United States from getting in-state tuition benefits that are denied to out-of-state U.S. citizens,' the Justice Department argued in a lawsuit this month in Oklahoma. 'There are no exceptions.'
The tuition breaks once enjoyed wide bipartisan support but have increasingly come under criticism from Republicans in recent years.
Here's what to know about the tuition breaks:
Texas' program was blocked first
Texas' tuition policy was initially passed with sweeping bipartisan majorities in the Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for students without legal residency already living in the state. Supporters then and now say it boosted the state's economy by creating a better-educated and better-prepared workforce.
The law allowed students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they had lived in Texas for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They also had to sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible.
Texas now has about 57,000 qualifying students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The state has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities.
The difference in tuition rates is substantial.
For example, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, a 34,000-student campus along the border with Mexico, a state resident will pay about $10,000 in basic tuition for a minimum full-time class schedule in the upcoming school year. A nonresident student will pay $19,000.
Political pushback and a swift end
Texas' law stood mostly unchallenged for years, but it came under fire as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry apologized after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.'
The law withstood several repeal efforts in the Republican-dominated Legislature. During the legislative session that ended June 2, a repeal bill did not even get a vote.
But the ax fell quickly. After the Trump administration filed a lawsuit calling the law unconstitutional, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a key Trump ally, chose not to defend the law in court and instead filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced.
In Oklahoma, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, filed a similar motion.
'Rewarding foreign nationals who are in our country illegally with lower tuition costs that are not made available to out-of-state American citizens is not only wrong — it is discriminatory and unlawful," Drummond said in a statement.
Campuses nationwide feel the impact
At least 21 states and the University of Michigan system have laws or policies allowing tuition breaks for the immigrant students, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones such as Kansas and Nebraska.
Immigration lawyers and education advocates said they are assessing whether there are legal avenues to challenge the rulings.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Palantir: As Revenues Rise, Controversy Grows
The battle between big legacy firms like Lockheed Martin and emerging military tech firms like Palantir for dominance of the defense sector is well underway, and the outcome will have a huge impact on the size and scope of the Pentagon budget and the direction of U.S. defense strategy in the years and decades to come. Palantir, an emerging tech company that was founded by Peter Thiel in 2003 with support from In-Q-Tel, the CIA's venture capital arm, is a central player in the fight between the old guard and the up and coming weapons firms of Silicon Valley. It was with this in mind that I read a Wall Street Journal profile of Palantir that came out this week, entitled 'How Palantir Won Over Washington – and Pushed Its Stock Value Up 600%.' Early on, the piece contrasts Palantir's financial success with growing ethical concerns about the activities that are driving its revenue growth: 'The company's transformation from an awkward Silicon Valley upstart trying to make it as a government contractor has also emboldened it. Some of its recent and prospective deals toe the lines of what even some of the company's current and former employees consider a violation of ethical applications of AI and moral uses of software by the government—and Palantir is unapologetic.' 'Unapologetic' may be an understatement. At the height of the Israeli bombing campaign in Gaza, in January 2024, Palantir president and CEO Alex Karp held the company's board meeting in Tel Aviv to show solidarity with the Israeli war effort and to goad other pro-Israel business executives to openly support that country's campaign of mass slaughter in Gaza, which many independent experts – including independent human rights groups based in Israel – have described as a genocide. The Journal piece describes company leadership as Trumpian in its approach 'taunting its critics, lambasting the media, and showing contempt for the departed employees who have sounded alarms about Palantir's recent work.' As the Wall Street Journal piece on Palantir further points out, part of Palantir's extraordinary financial rise is due to its adoption of the president's agenda by 'providing software used in the deportation of immigrants, boosting manufacturing and shipbuilding, making a bid to build out the planned missile-defense shield called Golden Dome, and chasing AI deals in the Gulf states'. Palantir also has extraordinary influence inside the Trump team, beginning with vice president J.D. Vance, who was employed, mentored, and financed by Palantir's Peter Thiel before joining the administration. And former Palantir employees are hard at work inside a variety of executive branch agencies. At least a half dozen former company employees worked inside the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency, making recommendations for deep cuts in a variety of federal agencies. And a senior counselor at Palantir has close ties to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. Palantir has also dramatically beefed up its lobbying efforts, more than quadrupling its spending in this area since 2019, from $1.4 million then to $5.8 million last year. Palantir CEO Alex Karp expects there to be big winners and big losers in the fight to reshape the federal government and revise U.S. military spending and strategy: 'We love disruption. There will be ups and downs – there's a revolution. Some people get their heads cut off.' Palantir is aggressively pursuing business with Saudi Arabia, a move that the Journal article describes as 'a departure from the company's stated focus on Western democratic values and freedom of speech.' In addition to protests over the use of Palantir technology in Israel's campaign of mass slaughter in Gaza, the company's most controversial activity involves its role in aiding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in locating subjects for deportation. Alex Karp claims that the criticism doesn't bother him, but perhaps he protests too much: 'We are sorry that our haters are disappointed, but there are many more quarters to be disappointed and we are working on that too.' Meanwhile, Palantir's revenue stream just keeps growing. Last month it got its largest military contract ever – up to $10 billion to consolidate ongoing software initiatives for the Army. The emerging military tech firms and the venture capital firms that invest in them see themselves as more than just business people. They believe that they are a special breed of human being, the 'new patriots' who are willing to take risks to restore America's position in a place of global dominance, so far ahead of China that Beijing will never catch up, or so Karp and others have said. Karp's coauthored book, The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West fuses 19th century ideology with an uncritical faith in the power of 21st century technology. Karp believes that America has lost its way. We're soft and unfocused, more interested in shopping, gaming, and reality TV than in building useful products or bolstering America's global influence. Karp's solution is for the U.S. government to fund a unifying national mission – a Manhattan Project-sized effort to master military applications of artificial intelligence. Given all of the problems we face – from active conflicts to climate disasters to outbreaks of disease to ever widening global inequality, Karp's proposed vision seems like an unduly narrow, impoverished view of what America should be about. Karp is right that we need a new mission and a new narrative to define what America should be about in an era of rapid change and shifting power relationships, but rushing to militarize AI is not the right mission, and worshiping at the altar of tech is not the right narrative. Silicon Valley has achieved some amazing technological feats from the middle of the past century up to this moment, but that doesn't mean the leaders of emerging tech firms should have privileged influence over how we organize our government, our economy, or our foreign policy. They should be vendors, providing tools that can be used to defend the country or improve the economy. But the decisions on how and when to use those tools, and what strategy we should pursue to keep America safe, should lie with elected officials, influenced by their constituents, not by a political/technological elite.


Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
White House And Kremlin Aides Say Trump May Meet With Putin Next Week
Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov announced on Thursday that President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet 'in the coming days.' The statement was made a day after a White House official told the Associated Press that Trump may be meeting with Putin in person as soon as next week. It would be the first time the Russian president has met with a U.S. president since June 2021. Few Western leaders have met with Putin following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Only Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico have met with Putin in 2023 and 2024. It is unclear where the in-person meeting between Trump and Putin will take place. During Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for the Russian president, citing war crimes. The warrant means that Putin is unable to travel to countries that have ratified the Rome Statute. This treaty allows the ICC to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression. There are 125 countries that uphold the Rome Statute. An additional 29 countries have signed the treaty, but have not ratified it. This limits Putin's ability to travel internationally. Trump has previously remarked that one of his top priorities while in office is to end the Russian invasion of Ukraine. During the campaign trail for the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Trump remarked that he would end Russia's war 'in a day.' Then, when he took office in January, Trump worked with his cabinet officials to secure a meeting with Russian representatives to discuss the war in Ukraine. This negotiation process first began in Saudi Arabia in February. These meetings, however, have produced few results. For six months, U.S. officials have met with their Russians counterparts to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. The United States has also issued several deadlines to achieve peace. Despite attempts, the Russian Federation has continued to launch drone and missile strikes across Ukraine. Noting Russia's ongoing attacks on Ukraine, Trump has issued a new ultimatum. He has given Putin until August 8 to reach a peace agreement with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Should Russia fail to find a solution, Trump has said that the U.S. will consider 'sanctions and maybe tariffs.' This would include penalties on countries that buy Russian oil and gas. As an additional way to pressure the Russian Federation to end its war, Trump also announced that the United States will continue sending defense aid to Ukraine. This assistance has allowed the Ukrainians to defend themselves from Russia's ongoing invasion. The U.S. has additionally sold weapons to Europe's NATO members. The defense equipment from these sales has helped the European continent bolster its national security. Some of the weapons from these exchanges have also been transported to Ukraine, where they will be used by Ukraine's defense forces. It remains to be seen if Russia will meet the August 8 deadline. Ukrainian and European officials will anxiously wait to see if Trump implements new sanctions on the Russian Federation. They will also closely monitor the meeting between Trump and Putin to see if any progress can be made to bring an end to the war in Ukraine.


CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Soldier explains how he disarmed shooting suspect
Soldier explains how he disarmed shooting suspect Staff Sgt. Aaron Turner says he disarmed the shooting suspect during a mass shooting at Fort Stewart. Quornelius Samentrio Radford, 28, was taken into custody and is accused of shooting five of his fellow service members. Radford's motive is not known. 00:51 - Source: CNN Vertical Top News 11 videos Soldier explains how he disarmed shooting suspect Staff Sgt. Aaron Turner says he disarmed the shooting suspect during a mass shooting at Fort Stewart. Quornelius Samentrio Radford, 28, was taken into custody and is accused of shooting five of his fellow service members. Radford's motive is not known. 00:51 - Source: CNN Apple CEO gifts Trump plaque with 24K gold base Apple CEO Tim Cook gifted President Donald Trump a plaque made of glass manufactured in Corning's Harrodsburg, Kentucky, which he announced would be the cover glass on all iPhones and Apple Watches soon. 01:01 - Source: CNN Suspected Fort Stewart shooter identified The man suspected of opening fire at Fort Stewart has been identified as Quornelius Radford, according to Brig. Gen. John Lubas, the commanding general of the 3rd Infantry Division. The suspect is alive and in custody, a law enforcement official told CNN. 01:09 - Source: CNN US special envoy Witkoff meets Putin in Russia US special envoy Steve Witkoff met with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, as President Donald Trump threatened to impose punishing new sanctions on Russia. The meeting, which lasted around 3 hours, was described as 'constructive and useful' by Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov, according to Russian state media TASS. CNN's Frederik Pleitgen reports. 01:49 - Source: CNN Texas Democratic lawmaker responds after Abbott tries to remove him from office Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) asked the state Supreme Court to remove Rep. Gene Wu (D) from office. Wu is one of 50 quorum-breaking Democratic House members who fled the state to forestall a vote on new congressional maps, and he responded to Abbott's move on AC360. 00:38 - Source: CNN Trump asked if he knew about Maxwell's prison transfer President Donald Trump told CNN's Kaitlan Collins he wasn't aware of Ghislaine Maxwell's prison transfer, and praised Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche when asked if he thought Ghislaine Maxwell is a credible witness. 01:46 - Source: CNN Texas lawmaker says he's willing to risk arrest or fines Texas state Rep. Ramón Romero said that he is willing to be arrested after he and other Democratic lawmakers left the state to block GOP redistricting efforts. The Texas House speaker said he signed civil arrest warrants for absent Democrats, and the governor ordered state officials to arrest them. But legal experts say the warrants are likely unenforceable outside state lines. 00:39 - Source: CNN Suspect arrested in Tennessee killings case The suspect in the killings of four relatives of a baby found abandoned last week has been arrested after a weeklong manhunt across rural Tennessee, according to police in Jackson. 00:49 - Source: CNN US Coast Guard releases new report on Titan submersible implosion The implosion of OceanGate's Titan submersible, which killed five people in 2023, was a preventable tragedy caused by OceanGate's failure to follow safety protocols and a toxic workplace culture, according to a report released by the US Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation. 01:07 - Source: CNN GOP congressman met with boos and jeers at town hall Rep. Mike Flood (R-NE) was met with boos and jeers after his answer about funding for migrant detention facilities and ICE during a town hall in Lincoln, Nebraska. 01:43 - Source: CNN