logo
Beijing's tussle with Brussels: China retaliates on EU medical devices

Beijing's tussle with Brussels: China retaliates on EU medical devices

CNBC5 days ago
CNBC's Chery Kang and Elaine Yu discuss what China's move to impose reciprocal tariffs on the import of medical devices from the European Union could mean for an upcoming EU-China summit later this month.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cost of living: Which are the cheapest and most expensive countries in Europe?
Cost of living: Which are the cheapest and most expensive countries in Europe?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Cost of living: Which are the cheapest and most expensive countries in Europe?

Prices vary significantly between countries in Europe. Significant differences exist even between neighbouring countries such as Austria and Hungary — or Germany and Poland. But how can we best compare prices across Europe? And what are the most expensive and cheapest countries across the continent? Price level indices are a good way to help us understand how expensive or cheap goods and services are in each country. They compare national price levels to the EU average and are calculated using Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs). According to Eurostat, PPPs act like an artificial common currency, as they show how much people can buy with the same amount of money across countries. The results are based on price surveys covering more than 2,000 consumer goods and services, conducted across 36 European countries. There are several price level indices that compare the cost of different goods and services — such as food, drink, clothing, hotels, and more. In addition to these individual or group indices, there are two main indicators that show the 'overall' price level of consumer goods and services: One is actual individual consumption (AIC), which measures all goods and services actually consumed by households. It includes consumer goods and services purchased directly by households, as well as services provided by non-profit institutions. The indicator also includes services provided by the government for individual consumption such as health and education services. Another indicator is household final consumption expenditure (HFCE), which studies total spending on individual goods and services by resident households. In other words, AIC looks at what households use — including services they don't directly pay for — and HFCE shows what they spend money on. Eurostat notes that AIC is often used in international comparisons, as it captures more than the narrower concept of household consumption. Euronews has therefore used AIC figures for comparisons, although consumption data is also included in the chart. As of 2024, out of 36 countries, Switzerland is the most expensive, with prices at 184% of the EU average — 84% higher than the average. Turkey is the cheapest, with prices at 47% of the EU average, meaning they are 53% lower than the EU average. This makes Switzerland 3.9 times as expensive as Turkey, revealing the sharp contrast in price levels across Europe. A price level above 100 means a country is more expensive than the EU average; below 100 means it's cheaper. In the EU, Luxembourg is the most expensive country, with prices 51% higher than the EU average. Bulgaria and Romania are the cheapest members, at 57% of the EU average. This means Luxembourg is about 2.7 times as expensive as Bulgaria and Romania, showing a significant but smaller gap compared to the difference between Switzerland and Turkey. Ten EU countries have prices above the EU average. Denmark (143%) and Ireland (141%) follow Luxembourg as the most expensive. Among the EU's four largest economies, Germany (109%) and France (108%) are slightly above average, while Italy (98%) and Spain (91%) are below. Western and Northern European countries tend to have high price levels. Switzerland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Denmark, Ireland, Norway, and Finland all show significantly above-average prices. These are generally high-income countries with strong currencies and higher living costs. All five Nordic countries— Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Iceland — also consistently rank near the top. In contrast, Central and Eastern European countries generally have lower price levels. Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, and the Baltic States — Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia — are all below the EU average. These regions typically record lower labour costs. Price levels are also lower in the EU candidate countries. They included Turkey, North Macedonia, Albania, Serbia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Two European Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries — Switzerland and Iceland —rank first and second in 2024, with Norway in sixth place. In a 2018 analysis based on 2017 figures, Lars Svennebye of the EFTA Statistical Office explained that high workforce productivity and corresponding high salaries were key factors behind the high price levels in EFTA countries. Filippo Pallotti, PhD Candidate in Economics at University College London, told Euronews Business that across Europe, the most expensive countries to live in tend to be the most productive. 'Productivity gains in tradable sectors (like manufacturing and tech) drive up wages economy-wide - even in non-tradable sectors such as hairdressing, hospitality, and real estate, where productivity growth is slower,' he said. Comparing the highest and lowest ends of the EU, Pallotti pointed out that hourly labour costs mirror price levels — around €55 in Luxembourg, €50 in Denmark, and just €11 in Bulgaria. 'But when comparing coffee at €4 in Copenhagen versus €1 in Sofia, it's the interplay of strong tradable-sector productivity and the resulting elevated wages across all sectors that chiefly explains the gap." he added. Pallotti also noted that beyond wages, productivity itself stems from several key factors: capital intensity, technology adoption, human capital, institutional quality, infrastructure, and foreign investment - including skilled management and talent inflows. Other contributing factors - VAT and indirect taxes, cost of regulation, urban density, transport infrastructure, and even currency valuations - play roles in shaping prices. Individual or household incomes are not included in price level comparisons. 'These figures are pure price comparisons of goods and services. They do not take the level of wages, salaries or other measures of personal income into account,' Lars Svennebye told Euronews Business. This means that someone living in a country with a high price level may still be able to buy more goods and services than someone in a country with a lower price level, depending on income. Price levels vary significantly across different categories. For example, the price level for alcohol and tobacco in the EU was nearly three times higher in Ireland (205%), the most expensive country, than in Bulgaria (69%), the cheapest.

Here are investors' burning AI questions with tech earnings around the corner
Here are investors' burning AI questions with tech earnings around the corner

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Here are investors' burning AI questions with tech earnings around the corner

AI has powered the market to all-time highs. But this earnings season will be an important moment for Big Tech to show that massive AI spending is paying off. Here are three big questions investors have about AI before tech earnings kick off this month. Big Tech companies are soon going to let investors know if all the hype is still worth it. Amid tariff turmoil and market uncertainty, the tech trade continues to power the S&P 500 higher. With mega-cap tech earnings due to kick off later this month, investors are looking for clues to know if the AI-fueled momentum can keep powering stocks higher. The launch of DeepSeek—a cost-efficient AI model from a startup in China—was an "existential moment" for the AI trade, according to Eric Sheridan, co-business unit leader of the TMT group at Goldman Sachs. "There's an increasing focus on the payoff or the return dynamic," Sheridan told Business Insider. "How are we seeing enterprises use AI? How are we seeing consumers adopt AI applications in their day-to-day life? Is AI technology delivering on its promise of increasing productivity and profit margins? Investors will soon be turning to second-quarter earnings season for answers. Big Tech companies have poured billions into building out AI infrastructure, and there's a lot of debate on Wall Street about how much more companies can spend. As of February, Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta's total AI investment for 2025 was over $300 billion, a notable increase from the $246 billion spent in 2024. Competition in the AI space is fierce as Big Tech companies race to develop better large language models. And it's still early stages, meaning that this level of capital expenditure could persist well into the future. "There's still pretty low visibility into what they're going to spend next year," Sheridan said of the Big Tech companies. "I wouldn't put a high probability on a slowdown," he added. A lot of money and effort is being poured into AI tools for companies, but investors want a clearer sign of what it all means. Investors will look for clues on earnings calls that AI adoption is accelerating. They're not just interested in whether Nvidia beats consensus expectations; they're also looking for more widespread adoption of AI among other companies. Investors have reasons to be optimistic, as there have been green shoots in previous months. The earliest signs of AI adoption have been showing up primarily in the software industry as companies adopt agentic AI to complete tasks autonomously. According to Bank of America, earnings calls of Russell 2000 companies have mentioned AI more frequently over the last few quarters. This quarter's earnings season will be key to determining whether the trend holds. In June, Bank of America identified software winners, including Microsoft, Salesforce, and ServiceNow. The bank expects monetization to begin taking off in 2026. For Big Tech, the pressure is on to show strong software margins. "We think the AI backdrop is a big stimulant for the cloud computing businesses on the revenue side," Sheridan said. "And we'll be looking for some proof points around that through earnings season as well." First-quarter earnings were stronger than expected despite uncertainty related to tariffs. That's mostly thanks to Big Tech, and investors are watching to see if the sector can continue to lead to outperformance again. Nadia Lovell, senior US equity strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management, believes AI will continue to be the primary driver of earnings growth across the S&P 500. "Yes, there might be vulnerability, but we need to focus on those secular and structural growth stories, like AI power and resources," Lovell said at the bank's roundtable on July 8. Tariffs are putting extra pressure on the AI trade, as investors are worried about higher import costs eating into company margins. Could AI use cases provide a shield against tariff headwinds? Jeremy Siegel, Wharton professor and senior economist at WisdomTree, thinks firms need to start showing investors that they're putting AI to use, especially as tariffs drag on consumer sentiment. "I think they're going to have to do it very soon, facing some of these tariff price increases," Siegel said on CNBC on Friday. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store