U.S. demands $15,000 deposit for visa applicants from Zambia and Malawi
The policy introduces a visa bond requirement for applicants from Zambia and Malawi for specific visa categories.
Bonds range from $5,000 to $15,000, determined during the visa interview, and must be paid through an official platform.
Compliance with visa terms will result in a refund of the bond amount; non-compliance may impact future travel eligibility.
The administration of President Donald Trump will soon require visa applicants from Zambia and Malawi to pay bonds of up to $15,000 for certain tourist and business visas, the U.S. State Department announced on Tuesday. The policy will take effect in two weeks as part of a new pilot program.
" Starting August 20, 2025, any citizen or national travelling on a passport issued by one of these countries who is found otherwise eligible for a B1/B2 visa must post a bond in amounts of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000, determined at the time of visa interview," according to the State Department website.
The applicant will also be required to complete Department of Homeland Security Form I-352, agreeing to the bond conditions, and submit the payment through the Department of the Treasury's online platform, Pay.gov. This requirement applies universally, regardless of where the visa application is filed.
The State Department emphasised that paying a bond does not guarantee visa issuance. If any individual pays fees without being directed to do so by a consular officer, that money will not be returned.
However, the bond amount will be refunded to the applicant provided they depart the United States within the authorised period of stay and fully comply with all conditions of their visa status.
Required Ports of Entry
As a condition of the bond, all visa holders who have posted a visa bond are required to enter and exit the United States through one of the designated ports of entry listed below:
Failure to comply may result in denial of entry upon arrival or improper documentation of departure, which could impact future immigration benefits.
Since assuming office in January, President Donald Trump has signed multiple executive orders aimed at dismantling humanitarian protections for migrants from certain countries already living in the United States.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 things you need to know about Trump's nominee for the Fed
President Donald Trump's nominee to the Federal Reserve Board has implications for the central bank's monetary policy decisions. The president nominated Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to the Fed to replace Fed governor Adriana Kugler, who is stepping down Friday. Miran will hold that seat for a few months until the Jan. 31 term expires while the president looks for a different candidate to nominate for a full 14-year term as Fed governor. But how will the nomination impact the central bank and the decisions it makes on setting interest rates? Here are three things you need to know about Miran's views and what they could mean for the Fed. Miran wants lower interest rates Miran, who criticized the Fed last fall for cutting rates, warning that lower rates could perpetuate inflation further, is now in favor of cutting rates. Miran, who holds a PhD in economics from Harvard University, believes that the Trump administration's policies, from immigration to trade and deregulation, which he has helped create, are disinflationary. This contrasts with many on the Fed who believe the president's tariffs could lead to higher inflation. If the Senate were to confirm Miran in time for the Sept. 16-17 policy meeting and the full committee is not convinced to lower rates at that time, Miran would likely dissent in favor of cutting rates. That would mark three on the committee who could dissent: Fed governors Chris Waller and Michelle Bowman both dissented at the July policy meeting, preferring to lower rates by 25 basis points. Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments Miran's 'Mar-a-Lago Accord' favors a weaker dollar Miran favors a weaker dollar as a way to offset higher inflation from tariffs while also increasing exports, narrowing the trade deficit, and boosting growth. He is the author of what he dubbed the "Mar-a-Lago Accord," a reference to the 1985 Plaza Accord that succeeded in depreciating the dollar's value. The Mar-a-Lago Accord seeks to devalue the dollar while retaining the greenback as the world's reserve currency. As one who favors a weaker dollar, Miran favors lower interest rates, which could lead to a weaker dollar if US rates are lower than the interest rates of other central banks around the world. The president has pushed for a 3 percentage point drop in the Fed's benchmark policy rate. Investors will watch for how much Miran will push for the policy rate to drop if confirmed. Miran wants a less independent Fed Miran has advocated for major changes to the Fed. In a paper co-authored in 2024 with the now chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Miran called for an overhaul of the central bank by Congress that would give the White House more control over firing Fed governors, as well as not allowing Fed governors to serve in the executive branch for four years following their term as governor. He also argued for subjecting the Fed's independent budget to congressional appropriations. The proposals for allowing the president to dismiss Fed officials at will have stirred fears that the move could politicize the central bank and push the Fed to make policy according to the whims of the political cycle and not the economic cycle. Read more: How jobs, inflation, and the Fed are all related Still, as only one governor on the Fed, and possibly a temporary one, Miran himself isn't expected to tip the scales all that much. Any major changes to the structure of the central bank would have to come from Congress, and there's still a 19-member committee that will make decisions on rates led by Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who, like the majority of the Fed, remains in a "wait-and-see" mode for the impact of tariffs on inflation. Jennifer Schonberger is a veteran financial journalist covering markets, the economy, and investing. At Yahoo Finance she covers the Federal Reserve, Congress, the White House, the Treasury, the SEC, the economy, cryptocurrencies, and the intersection of Washington policy with finance. Follow her on X @Jenniferisms and on Instagram. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America Is Making Billions From Catching 'Tariff Cheaters'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Among the most frequently touted upsides of President Donald Trump's tariffs is that they can serve as an additional and substantial source of government revenue. Ahead of his reciprocal duties being reinstated this week, Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform: "IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!" The Treasury Department has already provided evidence to this effect. Since April, the government has collected around $100 billion in tariff revenues, according to CNN analysis of Daily Treasury Statements, including $30 billion in July alone. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said he believes customs authorities could soon be raking in around $50 billion per month thanks to recent tariff hikes. The revenue is taken from importers themselves—rather than foreign governments or producers. However, many fear this will eventually result in noticeable price hikes for consumers. Should these taxes succeed in encouraging companies to relocate manufacturing practices to the United States or push consumers away from now costly foreign-sourced goods, the resulting decline in imports would also lead to more meagre tariff revenues. But another source of revenue is emerging alongside the imposition and dutiful payment of these tariffs—catching tariff cheaters. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Homeland Security agency responsible for collecting tariffs, told Newsweek it is "aggressively combatting" efforts by businesses to evade the duties. This practice, known elsewhere as customs fraud or tariff "cheating," has been incentivized this year by higher tariffs and the increased reward for skirting these duties. But catching those engaged in this form of tax evasion has itself become more lucrative. The CBP told Newsweek that in the current fiscal year it has secured "over $27 billion in additional revenue as a result of targeted reviews of 55,004 shipments flagged as high-risk for duty evasion." This compares to around $668 million accrued in fiscal year 2024, an increase of over 3,900 percent. Trucks stop at a US Customs and Border Protection inspection facility in Detroit near the Ambassador Bridge, which connects Detroit to Windsor, Canada, on August 1. Trucks stop at a US Customs and Border Protection inspection facility in Detroit near the Ambassador Bridge, which connects Detroit to Windsor, Canada, on August 1. Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images What Is Tariff Cheating? According to litigation attorney Gregory Husisian, partner at Foley & Lardner LLP and chair of the firm's International Trade and National Security Practice, "any element that goes into the tariff calculation can potentially be manipulated by cheating." In the new, and still rapidly evolving tariff environment, it is up to businesses themselves to establish and correctly declare the goods they are trying to import into the U.S.—a fact that allows for honest mistakes and intentional evasion. Husisian told Newsweek that the five biggest ways companies could avoid tariffs—knowingly or not—are: Claiming the wrong country of origin Incorrectly classifying goods Valuing goods incorrectly Falsely claiming a free trade preference Simply failing to pay countervailing or anti-dumping duties, taxes placed on goods sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices. Most of these are "much bigger deals under the new Trump tariffs," he added, given the varying rates between countries, as well as the now significant—potentially costly—distinction between being covered by a sectoral duty like those on steel, or a reciprocal country-specific tariff. How Is the CBP Catching Tariff Cheaters? According to David Simon, partner and a defense lawyer at Foley & Lardner, the most commonly used tool in penalizing tariff cheaters is the Federal False Claims Act, a broad anti-fraud statute violations that can result in severe civil and, in select cases, criminal penalties. He told Newsweek that the tariffs have put this statute "on steroids," given violators are forced to pay three times recovery—the amount lost due to the false claim. Higher tariffs—and higher rewards for catching evaders—has drastically increased the potential return-on-investment for the CBP to step up its anti-cheating efforts. The agency told Newsweek it is has intensified investigations into those suspected of evading duties, through programs like the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA). It has also relied on public whistleblowers, who are able to file allegations of tariff cheating through its e-Allegations platform. The CBP said it had received over 2,100 such reports in the current fiscal year for a variety of alleged violations. Doing so could itself prove lucrative. As Simon told Newsweek, the False Claims Act contains a whistleblower provision, giving those who successfully bring a case to the federal government a percentage of the recovery. Given the higher tariffs in place, this can amount to "really big dollars." The CBP told Newsweek that attempts to evade owed duties "have always existed, regardless of the tariff environment." However, the issue of tariff cheating has undoubtedly grown in scale given the greater scope of the tariffs themselves. But understanding how widespread the issue is remains challenging, according to Husisian. "I don't think even CBP has the full answer to that," he said, acknowledging the perennial problem in such matters: that "they only know the people they've caught."
Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Who Will Win the Race for Greenland's Rare Earths?
Never miss an episode. Follow The Big Take daily podcast today. For years, President Donald Trump has voiced his ambitions to expand the US presence in Greenland. But making that happen is easier said than done.
