UK and US should cooperate on AI to counter China ‘threat', says Mandelson
The British ambassador to the US used a speech in Washington on Tuesday to warn that China posed a more serious threat than the Soviet Union and urge the UK and US to use this month's trade deal as a springboard for even closer cooperation.
Speaking to the Atlantic Council, he said: 'We face a clear shared threat.
'There is nothing in this world I fear more than China winning the race for technological dominance in the coming decades.
'China represents a far more dynamic and formidable strategic rival than the Soviet Union ever was – economically sophisticated, highly innovative and strategically patient.'
Labour has attempted to thaw relations with Beijing since coming to power, with ministers including Rachel Reeves and David Lammy visiting the country after a period of disengagement under the Conservatives – although the Government insists it will challenge China where necessary.
But US President Donald Trump has been consistently hostile, applying much higher tariffs to Chinese goods than those from any other country.
Arguing that the UK and US should 'combine forces' to 'drive the scientific breakthroughs that will define this century', Lord Mandelson said AI should be 'the spearpoint' of British-American collaboration.
He added: 'Rather than stifling these transformative technologies through excessive regulation, our two governments must unleash their immense potential for human benefit and Western advantage.'
Lord Mandelson's comments follow the announcement of a trade deal between London and Washington earlier in May that saw the US cut tariffs on British steel and cars, while keeping the 10% levy on imports in general.
At the time, the Government said the agreement opened a path to 'a future UK-US technology partnership', as well as a digital trade deal subject to further negotiation.
Lord Mandelson suggested that the 10% tariff rate was unlikely to come down, noting Mr Trump appeared 'quite wedded' to the figure as a baseline.
But he added that the two countries could look 'within that baseline' to reduce tariffs and non-tariff barriers 'where it is in our mutual advantage'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
19 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Israeli strike on Iran ‘would be inappropriate' during nuclear talks
Donald Trump said he has told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on striking Iran to give the US administration more time to push for a new nuclear deal with Tehran. 'I told him this would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. 'Now, that could change at any moment. It could change with a phone call. But right now, I think they want to make a deal. And, if we can make a deal, (it would) save a lot of lives.' The US president added that an agreement could come together 'over the next couple of weeks, if it happens'. His comments came as the head of the United Nations' atomic watchdog said 'the jury is still out' on negotiations between Iran and the US over Tehran's nuclear programme – but described the continuing negotiations as a good sign. Rafael Mariano Grossi, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), described himself as being in near-daily conversation with Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, as well as talking to Steve Witkoff, the US Middle East envoy. Mr Grossi acknowledged one of his deputies was in Tehran on Wednesday. Iranian officials identified the official as Massimo Aparo, the head of the IAEA's safeguards arm. That is the division that sends inspectors into Iran to monitor its programme, which now enriches uranium up to 60% purity – a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels of 90%. 'For the moment, the jury is still out. We don't know whether there's going to be an agreement or not,' Mr Grossi told journalists attending a week-long seminar at the agency in Vienna. However, he described the ongoing meetings as a good sign. 'I think that is an indication of a willingness to come to an agreement. And I think that, in and by itself, is something possible.' Iran and the US so far have held five rounds of talks in both Muscat, Oman, and Rome, mediated by Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi. A sixth round has yet to be set. The talks seek to limit Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for the lifting of some of the crushing economic sanctions the US has imposed on the Islamic Republic, closing in on a half-century of enmity. Mr Trump has repeatedly threatened to unleash air strikes targeting Iran's programme, if a deal is not reached. Iranian officials increasingly warn they could pursue a nuclear weapon with their stockpile of uranium. Mr Trump has described Iran as having an American proposal to reach a deal. However, Iran has repeatedly denied receiving such a proposal, with a fresh denial on Wednesday by Mohammad Eslami, the head of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran. However, if a deal is reached, Iran might allow the IAEA to have American inspectors on their teams during inspections, Mr Eslami said. Americans represent the largest single nationality of IAEA employees, a 2023 agency report showed. Before Mr Grossi's comments to journalists in Vienna, the head of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard issued a new warning to the US as the negotiations go on. 'Our fingers on the trigger, we are in ambush and we are waiting,' General Hossein Salami warned. 'If they make a mistake, they will immediately receive responses that will make them completely forget their past.' Despite the tensions, Mr Grossi said that he believed 'there's always a way' to reach a deal between the Americans and the Iranians – even with the disagreement over enrichment. He added the IAEA had been making some 'suggestions' to both the Iranians and the Americans, without elaborating. However, he added that any possible deal likely would require a 'solid, very robust' IAEA investigation of Iran's programme to understand where it stood after years of Tehran restricting inspectors' ability to assess it.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Canadian dollar dips as greenback notches broad-based gains
TORONTO, May 28 (Reuters) - The Canadian dollar edged lower against its U.S. counterpart on Wednesday as recent U.S. economic data bolstered the appeal of the American currency and ahead of domestic GDP data that could guide expectations for the Bank of Canada policy decision. The loonie was trading 0.2% lower at 1.3830 per U.S. dollar, or 72.31 U.S. cents, extending its pullback from a seven-month high on Monday at 1.3684. "It's a U.S. dollar story - the U.S. dollar is outperforming across the board," said Rahim Madhavji, president at "The U.S. economy is potentially doing better than some had expected." Data on Tuesday showed that U.S. consumer confidence improved in May after deteriorating for five straight months amid a truce in the trade war between Washington and China. "All eyes are looking towards the GDP data on Friday in Canada, which will obviously be a key indicator for the Bank of Canada," Madhavji said. Canadian gross domestic product data, due on Friday, is expected to show that the economy grew at an annualized rate of 1.7% in the first quarter, down from 2.6% in the previous quarter. Investors expect the BoC to leave its benchmark interest rate on hold at 2.75% at a policy decision meeting next Wednesday after recent domestic data showed underlying inflation heating up in April. The central bank paused its easing campaign last month for the first time since it began cutting rates in June. The price of oil, one of Canada's major exports, settled 1.6% higher at $61.84 a barrel as OPEC+ agreed to leave its output policy unchanged and the U.S. barred Chevron CVX.N from exporting Venezuelan crude. The Canadian 10-year yield eased half a basis point to 3.252%, while it was trading 5.1 basis points further below the equivalent U.S. rate at a gap of nearly 123 basis points.
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Prosecuting man for burning Qur'an ‘reintroducing blasphemy law', court told
Prosecuting a man for burning the Qur'an is 'tantamount to reintroducing a blasphemy law' in Great Britain, a trial has heard. Hamit Coskun, 50, shouted 'fuck Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and 'Qur'an is burning' as he held aloft the burning Islamic text outside the Turkish consulate in Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge, London, on 13 February, Westminster magistrates court heard. Coskun denies a religiously aggravated public order offence of using disorderly behaviour 'within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress', motivated by 'hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam', contrary to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the Public Order Act 1986. He also pleaded not guilty to an alternative charge of using disorderly behaviour 'within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress', contrary to section five of the Public Order Act 1986. At his trial on Wednesday, Katy Thorne KC, defending, said: 'The prosecution, in bringing this prosecution at all, is seeking to introduce a law unknown to this land, namely blasphemy in relation to Islam.' Blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008 and in Scotland in 2021. In Northern Ireland, blasphemy laws date back to the early 19th century and, while rarely used, blasphemy and blasphemous libel remain offences. Coskun, giving evidence via a Turkish interpreter, told the court that he has the 'right' to criticise Islam but said that he does not like using swear words. Thorne said that burning the Qur'an 'cannot be a criminal offence' and accused the Crown Prosecution Service of an abuse of process in its decision to bring the case against Coskun. She said in her written argument: 'To render such an act a criminal offence is tantamount to reintroducing a blasphemy law in relation to Islam, rendering the Qur'an a specially protected object in the UK, where a flag or another book would not be, and rendering trenchant or offensive criticism of Islam a criminal offence, is also akin to reinstating an offence of blasphemy. 'People must be free to exercise their religious or non-religious beliefs and to manifest those beliefs in whatever non-violent way they choose, and any curtailing by the state of that freedom must be absolutely necessary in a democratic society.' Thorne said that Coskun 'did not exhort hate' but voiced his dislike and frustration with a religion. She added: 'He expressed nothing to suggest that he was hostile to those who followed Islam. 'He did so outside the Turkish Consulate, a political institution, which provides further evidence he was not seeking to persuade others to dislike Islam, but express his personal criticism of Turkey and its stance on Islam. 'His protest was specifically political and thus, it is submitted, requires the highest protection of freedom of speech.' Prosecutor Philip McGhee said that Coskun was not being prosecuted simply for the burning of the Qur'an, but for 'disorderly conduct'. McGhee said of Thorne's argument: 'There is simply no misconduct in this case.' District Judge John McGarva ruled that there was no abuse of process and dismissed the application. McGhee added that the decision to prosecute does not affect the ability of others to criticise religion. The prosecutor had earlier said that Coskun had deliberately chosen the time and location of his demonstration. He went on: 'His actions gave rise to a very clear threat to public order and went beyond a legitimate expression of protest, crossing the line to pose a threat to public order.' Turkey-born Coskun, who is half-Kurdish and half-Armenian, travelled from his home in the Midlands on 13 February and set fire to the Qur'an at about 2pm, the court heard. Coskun had posted on social media that he was protesting against the 'Islamist government' of Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who the defendant allegedly said 'has made Turkey a base for radical Islamists and is trying to establish a sharia regime', prosecutors said. Coskun, who is an atheist, believes that he protested peacefully and burning the Qur'an amounted to freedom of expression, the court heard. Ahead of his trial, in a quote released through the Free Speech Union, he said: 'Encountering such treatment in a country like England, which I truly believed to be a place where freedom prevailed, was a real shock to me.' His legal fees are being paid for by the Free Speech Union and the National Secular Society. The Free Speech Union said it is defending him 'not because we're anti-Islam, but because we believe no one should be compelled to observe the blasphemy codes of any religion, whether Christian or Muslim'. The prosecution and defence have finished their cases, but a further hearing will take place on Thursday afternoon, with a verdict likely to come on a later date, the court heard.
