State pensioners born before certain date will lose £216 to DWP
But the old, Basic rate is currently valued at £176.45 per week compared to the new State Pension, which is paid at a rate of £230.25 per week if you receive the full amount – £53.80 more per week or £216 a month.
According to research published by House of Commons Library, there were an estimated 12.95 million state pensioners in Great Britain in 2024/25. Around two thirds (8.57 million pensioners) were claiming the pre - 2016 State Pension, while 4.38 million were new State Pension claimants.
READ MORE State pensioners face working 'beyond age 70' because of 2015 rule
The new State Pension was introduced in April 2016. New State Pension claimants are forecast to equal pre-2016 State Pension claimants by 2028/29.
The basic State Pension (BSP) – a contributory flat-rate benefit to which people built entitlement on the basis of their National insurance (NI) record.
The additional State Pension – this depended on the earnings or deemed earnings during their working life since 1978. People built up entitlement through the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme (SERPS) between 1978 and 2002, and the State Second Pension (S2P) from 2002 onwards.
It was possible to contract out into a private pension scheme that met set requirements, in return for which the employee (and their employer) paid a lower rate of NI.
The basic State Pension (BSP) was awarded to individuals who had claimed it, had reached State Pension age, and met the qualifying conditions.2 Entitlement was based on the number of qualifying years an individual had built up.
A 'qualifying year' for the purposes of the basic State Pension is one in which a person has paid, been treated as having paid, or been credited with enough National Insurance contributions on their earnings for it to count as a qualifying year.
For people reaching State Pension age before 6 April 2010, the number of qualifying years needed for a full basic State Pension was 44 for men and 39 for women.
There were several ways people could increase their entitlement – such as paying voluntary NICs, deferring (delaying making a claim, to receive a higher rate at a later date), or claiming on the basis of the contribution record of a spouse or civil partner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gatwick passengers warned of severe August delays amid baggage screener strike
Holidaymakers flying from Gatwick Airport could face severe delays as baggage screeners prepare to strike over pay, the UK's largest union has warned. The walkout, set for later this month and covering the August bank holiday, is expected to disrupt travel for thousands of passengers. Baggage screeners will strike from August 22 to August 26 and from August 29 to September 2, Unite the Union has said. All flights out of Gatwick will face disruption during these times, the union said, warning industrial action will intensify if the dispute is not resolved. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said'ICTS has more than enough money to offer these workers a fair pay rise. Not doing so is just corporate greed. 'ICTS' Gatwick workers will receive Unite's complete backing for as long as it takes during their strikes for fair pay.' Unite has said workers, employed by ICTS, are amongst the lowest paid workers at the airport and earn just above the minimum wage. Despite this, ICTS's turnover has grown by 110 per cent since 2020, reaching £170.59 million in 2024, the union said. It made a profit before tax of £6.1 million in 2024, a 46.9 per cent increase compared to the year before. Unite regional officer Ben Davis said: 'ICTS is entirely responsible for the disruption that will be caused to Gatwick passengers during the strike action. It can well afford to put forward an acceptable pay offer and that is what needs to happen. 'Despite performing a critical role, these workers are amongst the lowest paid at the airport. Gatwick should be stepping in and pressuring ICTS to put an improved offer forward.' A spokesperson for Gatwick said the airport does not anticipate significant disruption if strikes were to go ahead. They said: 'We are working with our suppliers to avoid any impacts and we expect to operate a normal summer holiday flight schedule for our airlines and passengers on these dates. Of course, we hope ICTS and their union can reach a resolution before then.' ICTS has been contacted by The Standard for comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
China Urges Firms to Avoid Nvidia H20 Chips After Trump Resumes Sales
(Bloomberg) -- Beijing has urged local companies to avoid using Nvidia Corp.'s H20 processors, particularly for government-related purposes, complicating the chipmaker's return to China after the Trump administration reversed an effective US ban on such sales. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park Over the past few weeks, Chinese authorities have sent notices to a range of firms discouraging use of the less-advanced semiconductors, people familiar with the matter said. The guidance was particularly strong against the use of H20s for any government or national security-related work by state enterprises or private companies, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is sensitive. The letters didn't, however, constitute an outright ban on H20 use, according to the people. Industry analysts broadly agree that Chinese companies still covet those chips, which perform quite well in certain crucial AI applications. President Donald Trump said Monday that the processor 'still has a market' in the Asian country despite also calling it 'obsolete.' Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. both recently secured Washington's approval to resume lower-end AI chip sales to China, on the controversial and legally questionable condition that they give the US government a 15% cut of the related revenue. But even with Trump's team on board, the two companies face the challenge that their Chinese customers are under Beijing's pressure to purchase domestic chips instead. Beijing's overall push affects AI accelerators from AMD in addition to Nvidia, one of the people said, though it's unclear whether any letters specifically mentioned AMD's MI308 chip. Shares of Chinese AI chip designer Cambricon Technologies Corp. surged to their daily limit of 20% on the news of China's guidance, leading a rally in peers such as Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. Beijing's stance could limit Trump's ability to turn his export control about-face into a windfall for government coffers, a deal that highlighted his administration's transactional approach to national security policies long treated as nonnegotiable. Still, Chinese companies may not be ready to jump ship to local semiconductors. 'Chips from domestic manufacturers are improving dramatically in quality, but they might not be as versatile for specific workloads that China's domestic AI industry hopes to focus on,' said Homin Lee, a senior macro strategist at Lombard Odier in Singapore. Lee added that he anticipates 'strong' demand for the chips the Trump administration is allowing Nvidia and AMD to sell. Rosenblatt Securities analyst Kevin Cassidy said he doesn't anticipate that Nvidia's processor sales to China will be affected because 'Chinese companies are going to want to use the best chips available.' Nvidia and AMD's chips are superior to local alternatives, he said. Beijing asked companies about that issue in some of its letters, according to one of the people, posing questions such as why they buy Nvidia H20 chips over local versions, whether that's a necessary choice given domestic options, and whether they've found any security concerns in the Nvidia hardware. The notices coincide with state media reports that cast doubt on the security and reliability of H20 processors. Chinese regulators have raised those concerns directly with Nvidia, which has repeatedly denied that its chips contain such vulnerabilities. The Financial Times reported that some Chinese companies are planning to decrease orders of Nvidia chips in response to the letters. Right now, the people said, China's most stringent chip guidance is limited to sensitive applications, a situation that bears similarities to the way Beijing restricted Tesla Inc. vehicles and Apple Inc. iPhones in certain institutions and locations over security concerns. China's government also at one point barred the use of Micron Technology Inc. chips in critical infrastructure. It's possible that Beijing may extend its heavier-handed Nvidia and AMD guidance to a wider range of settings, according to one person with direct knowledge of the deliberations, who said that those conversations are in early stages. AMD declined to comment on Beijing's notices, while Nvidia said in a statement that 'the H20 is not a military product or for government infrastructure.' China has ample supplies of domestic chips, Nvidia said, and 'won't and never has relied on American chips for government operations.' China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the Cyberspace Administration of China didn't respond to faxed requests for comment on this story, which is based on interviews with more than a half-dozen people familiar with Beijing's policy discussions. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. The Chinese government's posture raises questions about the Trump administration's explanation for why the US is allowing those exports mere months after effectively banning such sales. Multiple senior US officials have said their policy reversal was the result of trade talks with China, but Beijing has publicly indicated that the resumed H20 shipments weren't part of any bilateral deal. China's recent notices to companies suggest that the Asian country may not have sought such a concession from Washington in the first place. Beijing's concerns are twofold. For starters, Chinese officials are worried that Nvidia chips could have location-tracking and remote-shutdown capabilities — a suggestion that Nvidia has vehemently denied. Trump officials are actively exploring whether location tracking could be used to help curtail suspected smuggling of restricted components into China, and lawmakers have introduced a bill that would require location verification for advanced AI chips. Second, Beijing is intensely focused on developing its domestic chip capabilities, and wants Chinese companies to shift away from Western chips in favor of local offerings. Officials have previously urged Chinese firms to choose domestic semiconductors over Nvidia H20 processors, Bloomberg reported last September, and have introduced energy efficiency standards that the H20 chip doesn't meet. Nvidia designed the H20 chip specifically for Chinese customers to abide by years of US restrictions on sales of its more advanced hardware, curbs designed to limit Beijing's access to AI that could benefit the Chinese military. The H20 chip has less computational power than Nvidia's top offerings, but its strong memory bandwidth is quite well suited to the inference stage of AI development, when models recognize patterns and draw conclusions. That's made it a desirable product to companies like Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. in China, where domestic chip champion Huawei Technologies Co. is struggling to produce enough advanced components to meet market demand. By one estimate from Biden officials — who considered but did not implement controls on H20 sales — losing access to that Nvidia chip would make it three to six times more expensive for Chinese companies to run inference on advanced AI models. 'Beijing appears to be using regulatory uncertainty to create a captive market sufficiently sized to absorb Huawei's supply, while still allowing purchases of H20s to meet actual demands,' said Lennart Heim, an AI-focused researcher at RAND, of China's push for companies to avoid American AI chips. 'This signals that domestic alternatives remain inadequate even as China pressures foreign suppliers.' In his remarks Monday, Trump said China's Huawei already offers chips comparable to the Nvidia H20, echoing previous remarks by officials in his administration who've defended the decision to resume H20 exports partly on those grounds. The US should keep the Chinese AI ecosystem reliant on less-advanced American technology for as long as possible, these officials say, in order to deprive Huawei of the revenue and know-how that would come from a broader customer base. Other administration officials have strongly objected to that logic, Bloomberg has reported, arguing that resuming H20 exports will only embolden China's tech champions and bolster the country's overall computing power. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and other Trump officials have also claimed that the H20 move was part of a deal to improve American access to Chinese rare-earth minerals — despite the Trump team's previous assertions that such an arrangement wasn't on the table. 'As the Chinese deliver their magnets, then the H20s will come off,' Lutnick said last month. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in late July that the magnet issue had been 'solved.' The first Nvidia H20 and AMD MI308 licenses arrived a bit over a week after Bessent's declaration — after Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang met with the president and both companies agreed to share their China revenue with the US government. --With assistance from Yanping Li, Sangmi Cha and Emily Forgash. (Updates with additional analyst commentary in ninth paragraph.) Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
SpaceX rival AST SpaceMobile prepares to deploy nearly five dozen satellites
Satellite designer AST SpaceMobile said it's preparing to deploy nearly five dozen satellites to power cellular-based broadband networks, a move that establishes the company as a rival to Elon Musk's dominant SpaceX. The company, based in Texas, released its second-quarter earnings after the bell on Monday, reporting that its satellites are fully funded and preparing for deployment with more than $1.5 billion on its balance sheet. Shares of the space company surged more than 10% on the news on Tuesday. The stock is up more than 140% year-to-date in what's been a boom for space broadband technology. "We are confirming our fully-funded plan to deploy 45 to 60 satellites into orbit by 2026 to support continuous service in the US, Europe, Japan, and other strategic markets, including the U.S. Government," CEO Abel Avellan said in the report. "We also have planned orbital launches every one to two months on average during 2025 and 2026." AST SpaceMobile currently has six satellites in orbit, used for both commercial and government applications. The company plans to deploy service in the U.S. by the end of the year, followed by the UK, Japan and Canada in the first quarter of 2026. Avellan added that AST SpaceMobile plans to launch satellites every one to two months to reach its goal of 45 to 60 by next year. With Monday's announcement, the company joins the growing race to build broadband service in space, with notable player SpaceX currently boasting more than 8,000 Starlink satellites in orbit. Other rivals in the space include Globalstar, backed by Apple, and Project Kuiper, backed by Amazon.
