Viral moment Donald Trump praises Liberian leader on English, his native tongue
As the leaders sat around a table in the White House's State Dining Room on Wednesday, Mr Trump praised the president of Liberia on his English-speaking skills and asked where he learnt to speak the language. However, English is the official language of the country.
'Thank you, and such good English,' Mr Trump told Joseph Boakai. (Watch in the video player above).
Mr Boakai took the compliment with a polite laugh.
'Where did you learn to speak so beautifully?' Mr Trump asked. 'Were you educated? Where?'
'Yes, sir,' Mr Boakai said.
'In Liberia?' Mr Trump pressed.
'Yes, sir,' the Liberian president said again.
Mr Trump continued: 'That's very interesting. It's beautiful English. I have people at this table who can't speak nearly as well.'
Liberia was founded by African-Americans.
US engagement in Liberia began in the 1820s when the Congress- and slaveholder-funded American Colonization Society began sending freed slaves to its shores.
Thousands of 'Americo-Liberian' settlers followed, declaring themselves independent in 1847 and setting up a government to rule over a native African majority.
The country has a diverse array of indigenous languages and a number of creolised dialects, while Kpelle-speakers are the largest single linguistic group.
Mr Boakai himself can read and write in Mendi and Kissi but converses in Liberia's official tongue and lingua franca — English.
The awkward exchange quickly made headlines and was plastered across social media.
While some social media users labelled the moment 'embarrassing' and slammed the US President for being ignorant, others shared they didn't know English was the official language of the West African nation either.
— with AFP Read related topics: Donald Trump
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
6 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Trump threatens stadium deal if ‘Redskins' name is not reinstated
US President Donald Trump has taken aim at the Washington Commanders, demanding they change their name back to its original title, the Redskins. The team dropped the name in 2020 after it was considered offensive and racist towards Native Americans. In April of 2025, the Commanders agreed to a deal to build a multi-billion-dollar stadium at RFK Stadium. On Trump social, Trump floated the idea of restricting the stadium deal if the team does not change its name back to the Washington Redskins. 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original Washington Redskins and get rid of the ridiculous moniker Washington Commanders I won't make a deal for them to build a stadium in Washington." "The team would be much more valuable and the deal would be more exciting for everyone."
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
US President Donald Trump demands Washington Commanders NFL franchise and Cleveland Guardians MLB team change back to controversial names
US President Donald Trump wants two major sports team to revert to their controversial former names. Washington's National Football League (NFL) franchise and Cleveland's Major League Baseball (MLB) team have had their current names since the 2022 seasons. The now Washington Commanders were previously known as the Washington Redskins. The franchise dropped Redskins after the 2019 season and was known as the Washington Football Team for two years before moving to its current name. The now Cleveland Guardians were previously known as the Cleveland Indians. The team announced in December 2020 it would drop Indians, later announced its switch to Guardians in July 2021. In 2018, the team phased out 'Chief Wahoo' as its primary logo. The name changes had their share of supporters and critics as part of national discussions about institutions and teams dropping logos and names considered racist. Trump said Sunday on his Truth Social site that 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team'. 'There is a big clamouring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. 'Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' Josh Harris, whose group bought the Commanders from former owner Dan Snyder in 2023, said earlier this year the name was here to stay. Not long after taking over, Harris quieted speculation about going back to Redskins, saying that would not happen. Guardians president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti indicated before Sunday's game against the Athletics that there weren't any plans to revisit the name change. 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago, but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last four years and are excited about the future that's in front of us,' he said. Trump later said he would consider blocking the Commanders' from building a new stadium in Washington if they did not change names. The Guardians are the fifth name for Cleveland's baseball franchise. It joined the American League in 1901 as one of the eight charter franchises as the Blues. It switched to the Bronchos a year later and used the Naps from 1903 through 1914 before moving to the Indians in 1915. Washington started in Boston as the Redskins in 1933 before moving to the nation's capital four years later. Washington and Cleveland share another thing in common. David Blitzer is a member of Harris' ownership group with the Commanders and holds a minority stake in the Guardians.
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Wall Street is flying amid Trump chaos
Either of Trump's tariffs or the attempted assault on the independence and reputation of the Fed would normally cause conniptions in financial markets. They, however, sail serenely on. The S&P 500 is up more than 7 per cent this year, Nasdaq 8.6 per cent and the AI-driven bigger technology stocks, as a group, 15 per cent. Bond yields, at both the short and long ends of the yield curve, have fallen since the start of the year. The apparent complacency of investors could be explained by the 'TACO' trade – a conviction that Trump Always Chickens Out – but that would suggest a lack of sophistication and awareness. Wall Street is brushing off the effects of the Trump chaos. Credit: Bloomberg Trump's tariffs are real. His 10 per cent baseline tariffs are in place, as are his sectoral tariffs on steel, aluminium, copper, autos, auto parts, small packages, imports from China and some from Canada and Mexico. Loading His punitive 'reciprocal' tariffs are scheduled to go live on August 1. Whether or not they are as Draconian as those unveiled on April 2, they will exacerbate the existing effects of Trump's trade wars and lengthen the time it will take before the full effects of the tariffs are felt and can be assessed. Trump's transparent attempts to force the Fed to cut US interest rates and his foreshadowing of the appointment of a Fed chair who will accede to his wishes are also very real. Rather than chickening out, as he did when he deferred the introduction of the reciprocal tariffs he announced on April 2 after the markets shuddered, Trump now seems emboldened by the return of investor optimism. Whether the market calm will survive when the reality of Trump's reciprocal tariffs hits home in 10 days' time or when he appoints his 'yes man' to be Powell's successor is the trillion-dollar (multi-trillion dollars?) question. Investors ought to be concerned about Trump's tariffs because they are already having an impact on inflation and some corporate profits. Loading Last week's June inflation data, while apparently benign, did blip up to 2.7 per cent (the Fed's target is 2 per cent) and there were material increase in the prices of those goods most exposed to the tariffs already in place, even though importers had rushed to stockpile their imports to get ahead of the imposition of the tariffs. Those indications of rising inflation can only strengthen as those inventories are run down and the cost pressures on US importers – who pay the tariffs – rise. Already retailers and others are talking about price rises to offset the tariffs' cost. On Monday, Stellantis, the manufacturer of Chrysler, Jeep, Ram, Peugeot and Fiat vehicles, announced a €2.3 billion ($4.1 billion) first half loss. It said the tariffs cost it €300 million after factory shutdowns had caused a 25 per cent reduction in deliveries of its cars to US buyers. It also wrote off another €300 million from the value of clean air credits that it held after Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill (the Republicans budget bill) removed the penalties for companies' failure to comply with clean air standards. Trump has continued his attacks on Fed chair Jerome Powell. Credit: Bloomberg General Motors, which also reports this week, has said the impact of Trump's tariffs will cost it about $US4.5 billion ($6.9 billion) this year. It imported nearly half the cars it sold last year from Mexico and South Korea. So far, the tariffs haven't had a material impact on the price of cars – they actually fell in June – or the volumes sold. That may be because buyers acted to get in ahead of the tariffs, as they may have done in other categories. That would explain the reasonably healthy retail sales numbers. As the impact of the tariffs gradually shows up in companies' costs as their inventories run down and their capacity to absorb those costs lessens, there will be price rises and increased inflation and, inevitably, a response from consumers. There's also the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill, which added a raft of new tax and spending measures to Trump's 2017 tax cuts for companies and the wealthy. The Congressional Budget Office's most recent update of the impact of that legislation is that it will add a net $US3.4 trillion to US government debt over the next decade. Foreign investors, it seems, are more wary of the Trump trade and central bank agendas than the locals. The bill is stimulatory at a time when inflation is just starting to accelerate. In those circumstances, Trump's repeated demand for the Fed to cut its policy rate by 3 percentage points would look ludicrous and the market's would be starting to fear rising, not falling interest rates. Any undermining of Powell before his term expires next May, or the appointment of someone obviously going to try to do Trump's bidding, would also see the US yield curve steepen. The yields on short-term securities would fall in expectation of a lower federal funds rate (analogous to the Reserve Bank's cash rate), but the yields on longer-term bonds would rise to compensate for the likely higher inflation rates. Loading The mixture of Trump's tariffs and the politicisation of the Fed would probably impact both economic growth and the inflation rate. With the S&P 500 trading at 27 times the earnings of its constituent companies last year and 22 times the bullish forecasts for this year's earnings, any significant rise in market interest rates would have a very material impact on share prices. For the moment, because the data has yet to reflect anything other than the earliest impact of Trump's less impactful tariffs, the only dissonant note within the markets is being sounded by the market for the US dollar, which has lost more than 10 per cent of its value this year. Foreign investors, it seems, are more wary of the Trump trade and central bank agendas than the locals. The Market Recap newsletter is a wrap of the day's trading. Get it each weekday afternoon.
