EU sets sights on climate target deal by September
EU countries are negotiating their new 2040 climate change target, which the Commission last week proposed should be a 90% emissions reduction from 1990 levels, although countries would be allowed to buy international carbon credits to meet a limited share of the goal.
Denmark, which took over the EU's rotating presidency this month and is chairing negotiations among countries on the target, aims to strike a deal at a summit of ministers in September, Denmark's energy and climate ministry said in a statement.
"It is extremely important that we unite the EU around new climate goals ... We have a very small window to put a bow on these negotiations," Danish climate minister Lars Aagaard said, following a meeting of EU countries' climate ministers in Aalborg, Denmark, which concluded today.
In the meeting, most of the EU's 27 member countries backed the plan to land a deal on the 2040 climate target in September, three sources familiar with the talks said.
But a handful of countries, including Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, opposed a fast-tracked deal, while others demanded changes to the Commission's proposal, the sources said.
"This is not a decision that we can just take lightly, it's affecting the whole economy. Working under such time pressure is just not reasonable," Polish deputy climate minister Krzysztof Bolesta said, of the proposed September deadline.
Spokespeople for Hungary and the Czech Republic's EU representations each confirmed their governments opposed the September deadline.
Climate change has made Europe the world's fastest-warming continent, fuelling deadly heatwaves and fires.
But the 2040 target has stoked political tensions over how ambitious to be in tackling climate change, at a time when Europe is sharply raising defence spending and attempting to support struggling local industries.
To attempt to win over sceptical governments, the Commission proposed flexibilities that would soften the 90% emissions target for European companies.
Bolesta said countries had raised concerns in Friday's meeting over issues including a lack of clarity on how these flexibilities would work.
The EU faces a mid-September deadline to submit a new 2035 climate target to the UN, which the Commission has said should be derived from the 2040 goal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
European trade ministers gather in Brussels to plan response to Trump's latest tariff warning
European trade ministers will gather in Brussels on Monday to try to formulate a response to Donald Trump's imposition of a 30% tariff on the EU, which threatens to spark a trade war. Negotiations on tariffs were upended on Saturday when US president Donald Trump warned that if a deal is not struck by the August 1 deadline, the rate on goods coming from the EU would be 30%. Across Europe, there is some difference about how to respond to Mr Trump's weekend letter, with French president Emmanuel Macron urging the EU to 'defend European interests resolutely', be ready for a trade war, and to stand up to the US president. Leaders in Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, and Germany called for calm. Irish leaders have appealed for calm with three weeks to go until the latest deadline. On Sunday, EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said she would seek a negotiated settlement. "We have always been very clear that we prefer a negotiated solution. This remains the case and we will use the time that we have now until August 1,' said Ms von der Leyen. Ms von der Leyen added that a suite of retaliatory EU measures due to kick in on Monday would be delayed pending the outcome of talks with the US. Those measures would hit US goods to the tune of €21bn. At the National Day of Commemoration in Dublin, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said Mr Trump's letter had been "worrying" and that a trade war would have damaging effects. "Clearly, 30% is not sustainable or tenable," he said. However, he said it is important that Europe not "overreact to every statement" and that Europe has countermeasures available should it choose to use them. He said that scenario would not be bad for consumers and businesses. It would damage everybody, and the world would suffer because of the enormous trading relationship between the EU and US. So, it would be a very significant deterioration. Speaking at the same event, Tánaiste and minister for trade Simon Harris said that the letter sent by Mr Trump was "unhelpful, because it's escalatory, but I think it also doesn't change anything in the here and now". He said the deadline was always August 1 and "remains the first of August and looks to me like a negotiating tactic by Donald Trump". "We prefer to do our negotiations around the table. He tends to do his negotiations on Truth Social and he can do it however he wishes, [but] from a European perspective and an Irish perspective, we're continuing to intensively engage. "I was in contact overnight with the EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič speaking to him on a very regular basis," Mr Harris said. Mr Harris said that the Government had not yet released models on the impact of a 30% tariff but that the 10% scenario, which he said was now "baked in", saw a 25,000 fewer jobs created than the 100,000 added in a no-tariff scenario and the rate of economic growth slowing.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The greatest Frenchman of the 20th century and the Irish blood that flowed in his veins
On this Bastille Day let us cheer 'Vive la France'. All hail our nearest EU neighbour and good friend throughout history, in good times and bad. Our refuge for many Irish political 'sinners' and exiles such as James Joyce (for some of the time), Samuel Beckett (most of the time) and Oscar Wilde (a short time). Our ties are myriad but, more recently, were best represented by probably the greatest Frenchman of the 20th century – as seen in France – Charles de Gaulle. His Irish ancestry meant much to him, so that when he resigned as France's president in 1969 he took a six-week break here. READ MORE He explained: 'It was a kind of instinct which brought me to Ireland. Perhaps it was because of the Irish blood which flows in my veins – for we always come back to our origins – but also because it was Ireland.' De Gaulle was a descendent of the McCartans of Kinelarty, Co Down who, their lands confiscated by the Cromwellians, fled for France with other leading Irish families and after Patrick McCartan was hanged and beheaded at Carrickfergus, Co Antrim in 1653. Famously, de Gaulle was no fan of the English and twice vetoed Britain's (and Ireland's) attempts to join the then European Economic Community, later the EU. Churchill once said de Gaulle 'hates England and has left a trail of Anglophobia behind him everywhere'. De Gaulle was not the only French president to have had Irish ancestry. So too had Patrice de MacMahon, president of France from 1873 to 1879. He was descended from Mahon, son of Muirchertach Ua Briain, High King of Ireland and great-grandson of Brian Boru. They also lost lands – in Clare – during the Cromwellian confiscations, after which a branch of the family moved to Limerick. They supported the deposed King James who lost at the Battle of the Boyne in 1690 and the MacMahons subsequently headed for the safety of France too. There, they were very much a military family and, in recognition of his own military services, Patrice MacMahon was appointed Marshall of France and awarded the title of Duke of Magenta. In May 1873, he was elected President of France's Third Republic by the National Assembly, with just one vote cast against him. He died in 1893. France, from Latin ' Francia ' . inaword@
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on EU climate targets: vital to avoid backsliding
The European Commission finally announced on July 2nd that it would retain the target of a 90 per cent CO2 reduction by 2040 compared to 1990 levels. This is a positive development as there had been fears that there would be backsliding on the headline target amid pushback from some member states. However, the Commission's latest set of proposals included a compromise that has attracted much criticism from environmental campaigners. Following intense lobbying, the commission announced new 'flexibilities' that would help member states reach their obligations. The most controversial of these is the proposal that from 2036, member states can use carbon credits to reach their overall target. Carbon credits is a system whereby countries can invest in carbon offsetting programmes in developing countries and include the reduction for domestic use. Critics of the measure claim that it will divert much needed investment from the EU to the developing world, which will result in member states rolling back on their decarbonisation efforts. It should be noted, however, that as it stands, member states can only use carbon credits for 3 percent of their reduction efforts. While it is a fudge, its overall impact will be limited. The package must to be signed off by all EU member states by September 19th. The Czech Republic, Italy and Hungary, want more compromises on the 90 per cent reduction target. READ MORE Meanwhile, it emerged last week that the Patriots for Europe, a far-right grouping in the European Parliament, will take the lead in the parliament's response to the legislation, which will be deliberated this autumn. This has prompted concerns that there will be further 'flexibilities' before the EU's final package is agreed. Broadly, the argument among sceptical member states and European Parliamentary groupings is that because Donald Trump has dropped America's climate change commitments, on the basis that they were a threat to economic growth, this will undermine the EU's competitiveness. This is an entirely spurious argument. The devastating effects of climate change are becoming more frequent. It is the biggest threat to long term economic growth and prosperity. Any backsliding on commitments now to reduce the CO2 levels will have incalculable future costs. The good news is that the EU is on track to reduce its CO2 emissions by 55 per cent by 2030 and 90 percent by 2040. But there is a significant disparity between member states. Ireland is among the worst performing , as the latest figures from the EPA show that the country is on course for a 23 per cent CO2 reduction by 2030. Just as it is incumbent upon the EU to retain its 90 per cent 2040 reduction target, it is also crucial that each member state, including Ireland, abides by its legally binding commitments.
