Shashi Tharoor Defends Nation-First Approach Despite Party Loyalty Concerns
Addressing an audience in Kochi at a discussion on "Peace, Harmony and National Development" on Saturday, the Thiruvananthapuram representative articulated his philosophy that political parties should serve as instruments for national betterment rather than ends in themselves. He emphasized that regardless of party affiliation, the ultimate goal should be creating a stronger India, even if different parties disagree on methodology.
Tharoor directly confronted recent criticism he has received for backing the Modi government's handling of Operation Sindoor and other defense-related initiatives. He defended his position by stating that supporting the nation's armed forces and government during critical security matters represents the correct course of action, regardless of political consequences.
When questioned by a student about his relationship with Congress leadership, Tharoor explained the delicate balance he maintains between party loyalty and national duty. He noted that while he respects his party and shares its fundamental values, he believes cooperation with other parties becomes necessary when national security is at stake, though such collaboration sometimes appears disloyal to party colleagues.
The veteran politician acknowledged that democratic politics inherently involves competition between parties, but argued that this competitive spirit should not prevent collaborative efforts during crucial moments. He described inclusive development as his consistent theme throughout his sixteen-year political career, alongside commitments to national security and broader national interests.
Speaking to reporters later, Tharoor reiterated that his "nation first" philosophy has guided his entire political journey since returning to India specifically to serve the country in various capacities. He emphasized that his service extends beyond conventional political boundaries.
The Congress leader also addressed growing speculation about internal party tensions, particularly following his appointment to head an all-party delegation regarding Operation Sindoor. While typically avoiding public discussion of such political matters, he felt obligated to respond to the student's inquiry and subsequently shared the interaction on social media platform X.
Tharoor invoked former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru's famous question "Who lives if India dies?" to underscore his belief that political actors must set aside partisan differences when national interests are threatened. This perspective has become increasingly relevant as he faces scrutiny for positions that some within his party view as overly accommodating toward the current government.
Recent controversy surrounding Tharoor intensified after he published an article praising Prime Minister Modi's international diplomatic approach, specifically commending his "energy" and "dynamism" in global affairs. The Prime Minister's Office's decision to share this article further fueled speculation about Tharoor's standing within the Congress hierarchy and his relationship with party leadership.
Throughout his remarks, Tharoor maintained that political parties across the spectrum should demonstrate willingness to collaborate during moments of national significance, suggesting that such cooperation represents true patriotism rather than political betrayal. His comments reflect ongoing tensions within opposition ranks about how to balance criticism of the ruling party with support for national initiatives, particularly those involving security and defense matters.
The controversy highlights broader questions about the role of individual conscience versus party discipline in contemporary Indian politics, with Tharoor positioning himself as someone willing to face internal criticism for what he perceives as principled stances on national issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Dhaka School Jet Crash Kills 19 V.S. Achuthanandan Dies at 101
A devastating Bangladesh Air Force F-7 BGI jet crash struck Milestone School and College in Dhaka's Uttara area, killing at least 19 people—most of them children—and injuring over 70. The crash triggered a massive fire, widespread panic, and a national day of mourning has been declared for July 22. The pilot, Flight Lieutenant Towkir Islam, is in intensive care, and the cause of the crash is under investigation. In India, Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the Monsoon Session of Parliament, calling it a 'Vijay Utsav' to celebrate achievements like Operation Sindoor and advancements in defence and space. However, the session quickly descended into chaos, with the Lok Sabha adjourned due to opposition protests over the Pahalgam terror attack and other issues. Still, the Rajya Sabha passed key bills, including the Bills of Lading Bill, 2025. Veteran CPI(M) leader and former Kerala Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan passed away at 101. A founding member of the party, he was widely respected for his anti-corruption stance and dedication to leftist ideology. Other headlines include the Nimisha Priya crowdfunding controversy and the Supreme Court's continued stay on the release of Udaipur Files. Script & Voiceover: Zeeshan Akhtar Editing: Zeeshan Akhtar
India Today
16 minutes ago
- India Today
Why U.S. military power is trapped in a loop of its own making
They say history repeats itself — but in America's case, it sometimes refuses to end. From the trenches of Europe to the deserts of the Middle East, the United States has fought, and continues to fight, wars that blur the lines between defence and domination, justice and justification. A century after entering the First World War, American troops are still deployed in more than 80 countries. Some conflicts fade from the headlines — yet they never truly This is the story of America's forever wars — open-ended military operations with no clear victory, no fixed timeline, and too often, no meaningful public debate. From World War to World PoliceThe United States entered World War to 'make the world safe for democracy'. The century that followed tested that promise repeatedly. In the post-1945 world, America fought in Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Panama, and beyond. Since 1945, the U.S. has used military force in over 100 foreign interventions — with wildly varying wars lasted weeks. Others spanned decades. The Korean War never ended — it merely paused with an armistice in 1953. U.S. troops are still stationed on the Korean peninsula, 70 years on. The Vietnam War left nearly 60,000 Americans and over 2 million Vietnamese dead, ending in scenes of chaos rather than Without EndThe Cold War may have ended in the 1990s, but the interventions did not. In 1989, the U.S. invaded Panama. In 1991, it launched Operation Desert Storm in Iraq. In 1993, American forces intervened in Somalia. In 1999, they bombed Yugoslavia. And then came the so-called War on the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. The justifications varied — from dismantling al-Qaeda to eliminating Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction. But those WMDs were never found. Instead, war became a permanent fixture of U.S. foreign became America's longest war — 20 years, 2,400 U.S. soldiers killed, and over 170,000 Afghan lives lost. Even after the death of Osama bin Laden in 2011, the war continued for another decade. In Iraq, over 4,500 U.S. troops died, alongside up to 500,000 Iraqis. The power vacuum after Saddam's fall enabled the rise of Syria, U.S. forces have operated since 2015 with no formal declaration of war. In Yemen, the U.S. has supported the Saudi-led coalition, supplying weapons and intelligence despite mounting civilian casualties and a deepening humanitarian Machinery of Perpetual WarWhy can't America stop fighting?advertisementCritics point to a blend of policy, politics, and profit. A crucial legal mechanism is the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) — passed in 2001, just days after 9/11. It has since been used by successive presidents to launch operations in 19 countries, bypassing Congress and public scrutiny. There is no geographic limit, no expiry date, no oversight. In effect, it's a blank cheque for numbers are staggering. Since 2001, the U.S. has spent over $8 trillion on its post-9/11 wars — including $2.3 trillion in Afghanistan and $1.9 trillion in Iraq and Syria. According to Brown University's Costs of War project, over 929,000 people have been killed in these wars, and more than 38 million have been aren't just financial or statistical costs. They are human Invisible War at HomeBut the impact isn't limited to foreign battlefields. The domestic consequences of perpetual war are profound. War, once a national emergency, has become background noise. There's no draft. No war tax. No shared burden. A small volunteer military fights overseas, while the rest of the country scrolls past the the Pentagon's budget keeps growing — topping $860 billion in 2024, more than the next 10 countries combined. Much of this money flows to private defence contractors like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing — the backbone of the military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower famously warned about in logic of these forever wars is circular: instability demands presence; presence breeds backlash; backlash justifies further presence. The treadmill keeps turning — and stepping off seems politically the ThreatSince the early 2000s, the targets have changed — from al-Qaeda to ISIS, from terrorists to great power rivals. Today, U.S. troops conduct drone operations and low-intensity combat missions in Africa, while shifting strategic focus toward Russia and China. The War on Terror may be fading, but the Forever War architecture remains firmly more alarming, the tools of war have seeped into American civil life. To combat terrorism, Washington expanded surveillance, militarised policing, justified torture, and operated secret prisons. Civil liberties eroded, often with bipartisan support — and the public barely Question No One Wants to AnswerThe media moves on. Congress rarely intervenes. And presidents, regardless of party, continue the mission. War is rebranded, relocated, resold — but not 2021, President Biden withdrew U.S. forces from Afghanistan. The chaotic exit dominated headlines. But even as troops left Kabul, they redeployed elsewhere. The war machine, critics argue, never stopped — it merely how do these wars end?Veterans, whistleblowers, and peace activists argue that endless war erodes democracy and weakens global stability. They point to the psychological toll on soldiers, the rise of authoritarian policies, and the blowback that breeds new enemies faster than old ones are warning is clear: if war becomes the default state, democracy becomes an illusion. If conflict becomes identity, then peace becomes the end, America's forever wars pose a fundamental question: What does the United States gain by fighting endlessly? And what does the world lose when it cannot stop?Until those questions are seriously addressed — not just by policymakers but by citizens — the cycle will continue. The headlines may fade. But the bombs will fall. The costs will mount. And the war will go on.- Ends
News18
40 minutes ago
- News18
Champion of poor, marginalised: Congress condoles Achuthanandans demise
New Delhi, Jul 21 (PTI) The Congress on Monday condoled the passing away of former Kerala chief minister and veteran CPI(M) leader V S Achuthanandan, with Rahul Gandhi hailing him as a champion of the poor and the marginalised who upheld the values of principled politics through bold decisions. Achuthanandan, one of India's most respected Communist figures and a key presence in Kerala's political history, died on Monday at the age of 101. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said ideological differences aside, Achuthanandan's steadfast commitment to his principles earned him respect as a crusader for democracy. 'My deepest condolences on the passing of former Kerala Chief Minister Comrade V S Achuthanandan, who spent decades in public life," Kharge said in a post on X. 'Ideological differences aside, his steadfast commitment to his principles earned him respect as a crusader for democracy, public welfare and environmental issues," he added. 'My thoughts are with his family, friends and fellow comrades," Kharge said. Gandhi said he was deeply saddened by the passing of Achuthanandan, a tireless voice for justice and democracy. 'A champion of the poor and the marginalised, he upheld the values of principled politics through bold decisions — especially on issues of environmental and public welfare," the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha said. 'My condolences to his family, comrades, and admirers," he added. Congress general secretary Priyanka Gandhi said, 'My heartfelt condolences to the family of former Chief Minister of Kerala, Shri V S Achuthanandan, and to all who were touched by his life and work." 'His contribution to Kerala and to the nation will be respected and remembered for years to come," she said. The veteran leader died at 3:20 pm while undergoing treatment in the critical care unit of the Pattom SUT Hospital in Thiruvananthapuram, according to an official bulletin issued by the hospital. Achuthanandan was receiving treatment since June 23, following a cardiac arrest. A founding member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), Achuthanandan was a lifelong champion of workers' rights, land reforms and social justice. He served as Kerala's chief minister from 2006 to 2011 and was elected to the state Assembly seven times, serving three terms as the leader of opposition. PTI ASK RC view comments First Published: July 21, 2025, 22:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
