
Why U.S. military power is trapped in a loop of its own making
From World War to World PoliceThe United States entered World War to 'make the world safe for democracy'. The century that followed tested that promise repeatedly. In the post-1945 world, America fought in Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Panama, and beyond. Since 1945, the U.S. has used military force in over 100 foreign interventions — with wildly varying justifications.Some wars lasted weeks. Others spanned decades. The Korean War never ended — it merely paused with an armistice in 1953. U.S. troops are still stationed on the Korean peninsula, 70 years on. The Vietnam War left nearly 60,000 Americans and over 2 million Vietnamese dead, ending in scenes of chaos rather than triumph.War Without EndThe Cold War may have ended in the 1990s, but the interventions did not. In 1989, the U.S. invaded Panama. In 1991, it launched Operation Desert Storm in Iraq. In 1993, American forces intervened in Somalia. In 1999, they bombed Yugoslavia. And then came the so-called War on Terror.After the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003. The justifications varied — from dismantling al-Qaeda to eliminating Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction. But those WMDs were never found. Instead, war became a permanent fixture of U.S. foreign policy.Afghanistan became America's longest war — 20 years, 2,400 U.S. soldiers killed, and over 170,000 Afghan lives lost. Even after the death of Osama bin Laden in 2011, the war continued for another decade. In Iraq, over 4,500 U.S. troops died, alongside up to 500,000 Iraqis. The power vacuum after Saddam's fall enabled the rise of ISIS.In Syria, U.S. forces have operated since 2015 with no formal declaration of war. In Yemen, the U.S. has supported the Saudi-led coalition, supplying weapons and intelligence despite mounting civilian casualties and a deepening humanitarian crisis.The Machinery of Perpetual WarWhy can't America stop fighting?advertisementCritics point to a blend of policy, politics, and profit. A crucial legal mechanism is the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) — passed in 2001, just days after 9/11. It has since been used by successive presidents to launch operations in 19 countries, bypassing Congress and public scrutiny. There is no geographic limit, no expiry date, no oversight. In effect, it's a blank cheque for war.The numbers are staggering. Since 2001, the U.S. has spent over $8 trillion on its post-9/11 wars — including $2.3 trillion in Afghanistan and $1.9 trillion in Iraq and Syria. According to Brown University's Costs of War project, over 929,000 people have been killed in these wars, and more than 38 million have been displaced.These aren't just financial or statistical costs. They are human tragedies.The Invisible War at HomeBut the impact isn't limited to foreign battlefields. The domestic consequences of perpetual war are profound. War, once a national emergency, has become background noise. There's no draft. No war tax. No shared burden. A small volunteer military fights overseas, while the rest of the country scrolls past the headlines.Meanwhile, the Pentagon's budget keeps growing — topping $860 billion in 2024, more than the next 10 countries combined. Much of this money flows to private defence contractors like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing — the backbone of the military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower famously warned about in 1961.advertisementThe logic of these forever wars is circular: instability demands presence; presence breeds backlash; backlash justifies further presence. The treadmill keeps turning — and stepping off seems politically impossible.Redefining the ThreatSince the early 2000s, the targets have changed — from al-Qaeda to ISIS, from terrorists to great power rivals. Today, U.S. troops conduct drone operations and low-intensity combat missions in Africa, while shifting strategic focus toward Russia and China. The War on Terror may be fading, but the Forever War architecture remains firmly intact.Even more alarming, the tools of war have seeped into American civil life. To combat terrorism, Washington expanded surveillance, militarised policing, justified torture, and operated secret prisons. Civil liberties eroded, often with bipartisan support — and the public barely noticed.The Question No One Wants to AnswerThe media moves on. Congress rarely intervenes. And presidents, regardless of party, continue the mission. War is rebranded, relocated, resold — but not retired.In 2021, President Biden withdrew U.S. forces from Afghanistan. The chaotic exit dominated headlines. But even as troops left Kabul, they redeployed elsewhere. The war machine, critics argue, never stopped — it merely reshuffled.advertisementSo how do these wars end?Veterans, whistleblowers, and peace activists argue that endless war erodes democracy and weakens global stability. They point to the psychological toll on soldiers, the rise of authoritarian policies, and the blowback that breeds new enemies faster than old ones are defeated.Their warning is clear: if war becomes the default state, democracy becomes an illusion. If conflict becomes identity, then peace becomes impossible.In the end, America's forever wars pose a fundamental question: What does the United States gain by fighting endlessly? And what does the world lose when it cannot stop?Until those questions are seriously addressed — not just by policymakers but by citizens — the cycle will continue. The headlines may fade. But the bombs will fall. The costs will mount. And the war will go on.- Ends
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Land deal cancellation was illegally revoked by ex-Haryana CM Hooda: ED to Court
Haryana's former Chief Minister and Congress leader Bhupinder Singh Hooda 'illegally' revoked the cancellation of a land deal in Shikohpur, Gurugram, which was carried out in 2008 in favour of Robert Vadra, alleged the Enforcement Directorate before a Delhi court on Thursday. 'The mutation was cancelled by the then Director General of Land Consolidation and Land records-cum-Inspector-General of Registration of Haryana (IAS Ashok Khemka)… the cancellation was revoked illegally by Haryana's CM,' said ED's Special Counsel Zoheb Hossain before the court of Special Judge Sushant Changotra. The deal being mentioned here was the purchase of 3.5 acres of land in Shikohpur from Onkareshwar Properties for Rs 7.5 crore in 2008 and selling the land to DLF four years later for Rs 58 crore by a company named Skylight Hospitality, whose director was Vadra. 'There were irregularities such as false declarations. This company had no capacity to pay. It had only Rs 1 lakh in its capital… the actual payment was made later leading to evasion of stamp duty,' Hossain, who was accompanied by ED's Special Public Prosecutor NK Matta, argued. The ED was arguing on its chargesheet, which was filed last Thursday against Vadra and 10 others (eight companies and two persons). The chargesheet was filed a day after the agency attached 43 immovable properties linked to Vadra, Sky Light Hospitality Pvt Ltd and others. 'The seller never encashed the cheque. The buyer didn't have the capacity to buy. The government was cheated of revenues and stamp duties worth `45 lakh were evaded,' Hossain said. 'The real transaction was 15 crores, not 7.5 crores… all the proceeds of crime flowed to companies owned by Vadra,' he added. According to sources, the ED's chargesheet alleged that the sale deed 'falsely' stated that the payment was received via cheque, which was actually never encashed. The chargesheet also states, as per sources, that the stamp duty worth `45 lakh was evaded via misdeclaration. The ED has quantified the total proceeds of crime to be worth Rs 58 crore tentatively. The chargesheet claims that there was pressure on Directorate of Town and Country Planning (DTCP) officials from higher authorities to accelerate the process, say sources. 'All pvt. ltd. companies were converted into LLPs (limited liability partnerships) …as the former have more disclosure requirements,' Hossain argued before the Court. The matter will now be heard on July 31 and the ED will outline the individual roles of all the accused persons in the case. After the ED has concluded its arguments, the Judge is likely to decide whether to take cognizance of the chargesheet or not.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rahul Gandhi's 'vote theft' claim an afterthought, says EC
NEW DELHI: Election Commission of India on Thursday said leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi 's allegations of "vote theft" during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka appear to be an afterthought, given that Congress neither filed a single appeal with election officials after publication of the state's final electoral roll in Jan 2024 nor did it challenge the results in state high court through an election petition. Talking to reporters in Parliament complex, Rahul claimed that Congress has "concrete 100% proof" of "cheating in an LS seat" in Karnataka and warned that "if you (EC) think you are going to get away with this... you are mistaken... we are going to come for you". The Congress MP said opposition would ensure that EC is held accountable. Dismissing his charges as "baseless" in a statement, EC said: "It is highly unfortunate that rather than filing an election petition as per section 80 of Representation of the People (RP)Act, 1951, or if filed, awaiting verdict of HC, he has not only made baseless allegations but also chosen to threaten EC, which is a constitutional body." With his allegations coming more than a year after the LS polls result, EC said it was wondering why "such baseless and threatening claims were being made against it and the CEC, and that too now." It added that the losing Congress candidates did not file a single election petition to challenge the result, despite Representation of the People Act, 1951 allowing this within 45 days of declaration of result. Others, however, did file 10 election petitions in HC. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo Countering Rahul's "unwarranted threatening statements", the Karnataka chief electoral officer (CEO) on X said copies of the draft and final electoral roll for the state's 224 assembly seats were provided to recognised parties, including Congress, on Oct 27, 2023, and Jan 22, 2024, respectively. Between publication of the draft and final roll, around 9.2 lakh claims and objections were received and settled across 34 districts. Neither Congress nor any other entity avail the two-stage appeal option available under Representation of the People Act, 1951, the post said. Meanwhile, backing RJD functionary Tejashwi Yadav suggested possibility of boycotting Bihar elections over the special revision of electoral rolls issue, Congress' K C Venugopal said a political party's biggest weapon in a democracy is the voters' list and if that is compromised, with names being deleted and lists not being clean, then you are challenging democracy. "Let there not be an election and there be one party. Let Election Commission rule that. That is what Yadav meant by his comment about boycotting," Venugopal said.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Indian students flagged difficulty in obtaining U.S. student visa appointments: Govt to Parliament
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has received several representations from Indian students and their families, flagging difficulty in obtaining U.S. student visa appointments after American authorities announced an expanded screening and vetting for visa applicants, the government said on Thursday (July 24, 2025). In a written response to a query in the Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh also said the MEA took up the matter with the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi as well as the U.S. Department of State. The Ministry was asked whether the government is aware of U.S. student visa issues being faced by prospective Indian students. "On 18 June 2025, U.S. Department of State (DOS) issued a press release titled 'Announcement of Expanded Screening and Vetting for Visa Applicants'. In the said press release, DOS stated that it uses all available information in its visa screening and vetting to identify visa applicants who are inadmissible to the United States, including those who pose a threat to U.S. national security," the Minister said. Under the new guidelines, the U.S. would conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting, including online presence, of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications. To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas would be instructed to adjust the privacy settings on their social media profiles to "public", according to the guidelines. "Following these developments, the Ministry of External Affairs has received several representations from Indian students and their families flagging difficulty in obtaining student visa appointments. The Ministry took up the matter with U.S. Embassy in New Delhi as well as the U.S. Department of State," Mr. Singh said. While the issuance of visa is a sovereign prerogative of the state concerned, the MEA has "consistently raised" with the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi as well as the U.S. State Department in Washington DC the issues being faced by prospective Indian students in obtaining U.S. visas, he added. "The Government of India remains engaged with the U.S. Government to promote mutually advantageous and secure mobility frameworks that allow for streamlining avenues for legal mobility of students and professionals, and facilitating short-term tourist and business travel," Mr. Singh said. In a written response to a separate query, the MoS said the Indian government remains engaged with authorities in the United States on "addressing illegal immigration and human trafficking by taking strong action against the bad actors, criminal facilitators, and illegal immigration networks". In a separate query, the MEA was asked whether the government has taken cognisance of the illegal-immigration rackets operating in the country that fraudulently send Indians abroad, causing loss of money and national reputation. The Ministry issues advisories through the eMigrate portal, social media handles and other modes of publicity about the perils of fake job rackets and ways to prevent the same. "Till June 2025, a total of 3,505 illegal agents in the country have been notified on the eMigrate portal," Mr. Singh said. An awareness campaign on safe and legal migration through the eMigrate portal has been carried out by the ministry across the country by conducting workshops, training, information sessions, digital campaigns for media groups, police officials and law enforcement agencies, local administration, aspiring recruiting agents, entrepreneurs and the general public, the Minister added. "During these sessions, awareness emigration regulations, schemes beneficial for emigrants like Pravasi Bharatiya Bima Yojana (PBBY), Pre-Departure Orientation Training (PDOT), eMigrate portal and various advisories issued by Indian embassies are brought to the notice of all stakeholders," he said.