Colorado homeowners dropped by insurer despite exceeding fire protection standards.Find out if your home is high risk
The wildfire insurance crisis isn't just a California problem — Colorado homeowners are also seeing their policies canceled. Steve and Jen Hoogendoorn of Evergreen, Colorado, have spent years mitigating their fire risk.
Still, their insurance company recently informed them their homeowners' insurance policy will not be renewed, leaving them scrambling for coverage, reports CBS News. Their home features fire-resistant materials, including a metal roof, stucco exterior, and triple-paned windows.
"Steel roof, steel beams on the outside. So steel columns. Then after that, we went with concrete decking and not wood decking around the house," Steve told CBS.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Home prices in America could fly through the roof in 2025 — here's the big reason why and how to take full advantage (with as little as $10)
Americans with upside-down car loans owe more money than ever before — and drivers can't keep up. Here are 3 ways to cut your monthly costs ASAP
Every year, they remove trees to expand the fire buffer around their home, yet their insurer still deems them too risky.
"Not only are we a high catastrophe state but those catastrophes are escalating,' Carole Walker, executive director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance Information Association, told CBS.
"There is a ripple effect from California."
Despite exceeding fire protection standards, the Hoogendoorns are still losing coverage.
"They have an A-plus," Jess Moore, wildland project coordinator at Evergreen Fire Rescue, told CBS.
Moore knows the Hoogendoorns and is familiar with the work the couple has done on their home and in their neighborhood.
The couple worked with local fire officials, cleared vegetation and hardened their home against fire — yet their insurer still deemed them too risky to cover.
So, why is this happening?
Insurance companies use complex risk models — often based on broad regional data rather than property-specific inspections. Many rely on satellite imagery, fire hazard maps and historical loss data to determine risk, meaning individual mitigation efforts may not always factor into their decisions.
Colorado Insurance Commissioner Michael Conway has pushed for insurers to better incorporate homeowner mitigation efforts into their pricing and coverage decisions.
"Insurers need to make it clear to consumers the value of those mitigation efforts. And insurance companies need to ensure that the predictive models that they are using meaningfully incorporate the mitigation that homeowners, communities, and the state are investing in," he told CBS.
While California law now requires insurers to factor in mitigation when setting rates, Colorado has yet to enact similar regulations. Lawmakers are considering a bill that would require insurance companies to disclose discounts for mitigation efforts.
However, that's little comfort to the Hoogendoorns, who are being dropped now, with limited options for new coverage.
Read more: Jamie Dimon issues a warning about the US stock market — says prices are 'kind of inflated.' Crashproof your portfolio with these 3 rock-solid strategies
As extreme weather events increase, preparation is more important than ever. How you prepare will depend primarily on the risks in your area. The Federal Emergency Managemnt Agency (FEMA) National Risk Index features an interactive map that shows the main risks by geographic location.
The highest-risk wildfire areas include California, Florida, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. To reduce wildfire risk, clear vegetation within 30 feet of your home, clean gutters and install fire-resistant materials like metal roofs and tempered glass. Local fire departments can offer risk assessments and mitigation guidance.
Hurricane-prone areas include the Gulf Coast, all of Florida and the Atlantic Coast from Florida to Maryland. The National Weather Service recommends covering all windows with either storm shutters or marine-grade plywood and following all evacuation orders during a hurricane. Elevating appliances can help protect them from storm surges. In hurricane-prone areas, raising your home on stilts — though costly — can reduce flood damage.
Flooding is one of the most common natural hazards, whether from coastal storms or overflowing rivers. To minimize your losses in a flood, FEMA recommends raising your home if possible and using flood-resistant building materials, such as non-paper-faced gypsum board and terrazzo tile flooring. Sealing your home against flooding can help protect it and may decrease your risk in the eyes of flood insurance companies.
Even with preparation, homeowners in high-risk areas are at the mercy of shifting insurance policies. The Hoogendoorns' experience is a warning: mitigation doesn't always guarantee coverage.
As insurers reassess risk models, homeowners must take action to protect their properties — and ensure they have the coverage they need before disaster strikes.
One dozen eggs in America now costs a record high of $4.95 — here are 3 simple ways to inflation-proof your retirement portfolio
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Protect your retirement savings with these 5 essential money moves — most of which you can complete in just minutes
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First-time homebuyers are an endangered species in the U.S.
The dream of homeownership is fading for millions of Americans. Figures from the National Association of Realtors (NAR) show that only 24% of housing sales last year were by first-time homebuyers — that's down from 50% in 2010. The typical purchaser is also older than in the past, with an average age of 38, or about 10 years above historical norms. Such trends reflect the challenges of climbing on the property ladder as home prices hover near record highs, inventory remains low and with mortgage rates at their highest level in years. "There are fewer first-time homebuyers and they are older than we've ever seen, both because of headwinds inside and outside of the housing market," NAR deputy chief economist Jessica Lautz told CBS MoneyWatch. Opportunity missed Americans who are shut out from buying their first homes miss out on an opportunity to build wealth through homeownership, Lautz said. "It's their biggest asset, and with the delay into homeownership first-time homebuyers are losing about 10 years of housing wealth. And that's for those who can enter into the market," she said. "For those who can't, they lose out on housing wealth by not having that as the biggest asset in their nest egg." Only about 1 in 5 listed homes in March were affordable for households with $75,000 in annual income, according to a NAR analysis of property listings. Today, a household with annual income of $50,000 can only afford 8.7% of listings, down from 9.4% a year ago, according to the data. "The lack of homes, especially at affordable price points where they would be entering the market, has been plaguing first-time homebuyers for the last several years," Lautz said. "It's been a continual issue, especially with interest rates. It makes the cost of homeownership quite high." Along with inadequate construction of affordable housing, many existing homeowners are reluctant to sell their properties given their lower mortgage rates. "People who are homeowners have no motivational factors to move, so that's not freeing up inventory," Lautz said. "It's almost created a hoarding situation for those in low-interest rate mortgages who don't want to separate from them." Financial squeeze Other factors are making it hard for people to buy a first home. The high cost of rent gets in the way of saving for a down payment, while credit card debt, car loans and child care costs also hold first-time homebuyers back. More recently, meanwhile, the resumption of student loan payments is putting many people under financial pressure. Some Americans are managing to save enough for a first home by temporarily moving in with family or friends to minimize the cost of rent, Lautz said. But that approach isn't viable for everyone. "It has been a pathway to ownership for some. But for someone who is 38-years-old, moving in with mom and dad can get uncomfortable," she said. "For an older homebuyer, that might be less attractive for everyone involved." Australian reporter covering Los Angeles protests shot with rubber bullet by police officer Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Magic in the dark: The fantastical worlds of Lightwire Theater


Newsweek
41 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Where Seniors Drive the Longest to Reach Social Security Offices
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As the Social Security Administration (SSA) undergoes major changes, seniors are driving hours just to get to their closest Social Security office. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities released a new study that found 13.5 million seniors are affected by long drives to get to the most nearby office. Roughly 25 percent of the entire U.S. population has to drive more than an hour to get to a Social Security branch. Why It Matters Roughly 70 million Americans rely on Social Security payments each month. While the SSA usually sends out checks via direct deposit or mail, some beneficiaries are required to make a trip to their local field office in case issues arise with their benefits. Earlier this year, the Department of Government Efficiency announced it would be closing several field offices as it works to consolidate government real estate and reduce operational costs. But the shuttering of offices has worsened drive times for seniors who need to visit one. What To Know Roughly half of seniors who receive Social Security live at least 33 minutes from a Social Security office and in 31 states, more than 25 percent of seniors face travel times of more than an hour. The following states saw an even higher number, with 40 percent of seniors facing a drive of an hour or longer: Arkansas Iowa Maine Mississippi Montana Nebraska North Dakota South Dakota Vermont Wyoming In Arizona, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee, Wisconsin and Virginia, from 25 percent to 40 percent of seniors have to travel an hour or more. The SSA has changed its policy in recent months, now mandating that recipients who do not pass its anti-fraud check will have to visit an office in person. This will likely cause an additional 1.93 million trips to SSA offices yearly. The agency also announced its plans to cut 7,000 employees and prioritize digital technology and artificial intelligence to speed up processes that previously required more staff. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C., is pictured on March 26. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C., is pictured on March 26. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "It's of little surprise that states where Social Security recipients face the longest drive times tend to be ones that have more swaths of rural areas, like Kentucky, Iowa, or Wyoming. Complicating matters further could be further staffing cuts to the administration, which would push back appointment times and extend the process of meeting with a representative in-person and gaining assistance even longer." White House spokeswoman Liz Huston said in a previous statement: "Under President Trump's leadership, SSA has charted a new course for the agency that prioritizes enhancing customer service, reducing waste, fraud, and abuse, and optimizing its workforce towards direct public service." New SSA Commissioner Frank Bisignano said previously: "I think we should get away from focusing on head count to focus on what our objective is, which is to do a great job for the public." What Happens Next As many seniors may prefer to speak with a person in an office rather than online or in a phone call, any further closures of Social Security offices could have dire consequences. "The reality for many seniors is they still prefer going to a physical location and meeting with a person to discuss problems they're having or communicate for clarity on their benefits. Further administrative cuts will just make this process more difficult," Beene said.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Trump, CEOs promote savings plans for newborns
CEOs attended President Donald Trump's roundtable event touting a program that would deposit $1,000 in investment accounts for newborn Americans. Dell Technologies pledged Monday to provide the same amount for so-called Trump accounts for new children of its employees. Other executives at the event included Dell's Michael Dell, Dara Khosrowshahi of Uber, Goldman Sachs' David Solomon and Vladimir Tenev of Robinhood.