Lavrov accuses Ukraine of abandoning peace talks
The sides have met for two rounds of direct negotiations in Türkiye this year, rebooting talks that Kiev unilaterally abandoned in 2022 to pursue military victory with Western assistance. At their most recent meeting in June, the delegates exchanged draft proposals outlining visions for a potential peace deal and agreed on further prisoner exchanges. Moscow has since repeatedly confirmed its readiness to continue the negotiations.
Speaking at a press briefing following an SCO session in Tianjin, Lavrov rejected Kiev's recent claims that the Istanbul format was limited to humanitarian issues and had exhausted itself. He said such statements reflect a refusal to negotiate and a 'disregard for their own citizens,' recalling Kiev's obstruction of efforts to return the bodies of dead Ukrainian soldiers.
Moscow proposed holding a third round of talks but has received no response from Kiev. Lavrov noted that Ukraine's delegation is now being reshuffled, with outgoing Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, who headed Kiev's team in Istanbul, reportedly set to become ambassador to the US.
According to Lavrov, the 2022 Istanbul agreements proved that, despite holding opposing positions, it was possible to agree on settlement principles. However, the UK instructed Kiev not to sign the draft, likely with US backing, effectively bringing diplomatic momentum to a halt.
Western countries have instead intensified their military support for Ukraine, supplying long-range weapons with the explicit goal of striking Russian territory and scuttling any prospects for negotiations.
Commenting on calls from Kiev and its Western sponsors for an unconditional ceasefire, Lavrov warned that Ukraine could use the pause to regroup and rearm.
Moscow has outlined conditions for a truce in its draft memorandum: Ukraine must either pull troops out of Russian territories that Kiev claims or suspend its conscription campaign and receipt of Western arms deliveries.
Lavrov reaffirmed that Russia's military operation would continue in line with the president's approved plan, which is aimed at securing the country's national interests and protecting Russians and the Russian-speaking population in Ukraine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Central American nation condemns Ukraine for deaths of children
Nicaragua's National Assembly has called for Ukraine to be held to international account for causing the deaths of civilians, including children, during its military actions in the conflict with Russia. On Thursday, Nicaraguan lawmakers endorsed a report compiled by Russian legislators, which Assembly President Gustavo Porras received during his visit to Moscow in mid-July. Arling Alonso, the assembly's first deputy speaker, said she was deeply disturbed by the report's contents, which documented hundreds of minors killed in attacks attributed to Ukrainian forces. 'Some of these crimes are characterized by extreme cruelty,' Alonso said. A declaration issued by the Nicaraguan National Assembly stated that Kiev's policies bear the characteristics of international terrorism and called for those responsible to face justice. The Russian-authored report spans the years 2014 to 2024 and records alleged Ukrainian attacks in Russian regions claimed by Kiev under its sovereignty, including the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, as well as Zaporozhye and Kherson Regions. Nicaraguan officials stressed their recognition of these areas as part of Russia. All four regions held referendums to join Russia – votes that Ukraine and its Western backers have rejected. According to Russian lawmakers, nearly 6,000 civilians, including 258 children, were killed, and more than 13,000 others injured, among them 676 children, during the time period covered by the report. Nicaragua's parliament also criticized international organizations for what it described as 'perpetuating the impunity of the Ukrainian regime' by turning a blind eye to its actions. Lawmakers attributed the lack of response to pressure from the United States and the European Union and pledged to support efforts to draw global attention to the issue.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
No more crutches: Russia's neighbors must now stand on their own
As global instability deepens, Russia's role in Eurasia – and the nature of its ties with neighboring states – is once again in sharp focus. Moscow is not driven by a mission to dominate its neighbors or enforce a privileged position over them. But it must ensure that future dependencies – economic, political, or security-related – do not come at the expense of its own national interests. This delicate balance is now being tested. The summer of 2025 has brought fresh tension to Eurasia. The worsening crisis surrounding Iran could easily spill over, affecting international cooperation and security throughout the region. Meanwhile, relations between Russia and long-standing partners such as Armenia – both a formal military and economic ally – are showing visible strain. Even frictions with Azerbaijan, though less dramatic, signal that the geopolitical fabric of southern Eurasia is shifting. Amid this turbulence, Russia's neighbors face a new set of choices. The ongoing standoff between Russia and the West, combined with uncertainty in the global economy, presents both risks and openings. These smaller states now must navigate a rapidly changing landscape – one where traditional alliances feel less reliable and new poles of influence emerge. Despite these pressures, Russia's influence remains evident. In July, Moscow formally recognized the Taliban government in Afghanistan, a move reflecting both realism and strategic calculation. While the United States still holds significant global clout, particularly through its Western military alliances and presence in the Middle East, Russia, China, and India continue to shape the regional dynamics of Eurasia. This is especially clear in the South Caucasus and Central Asia. These nations, already established as independent and sovereign players, are adapting to new realities – economic integration, demographic change, and environmental pressure. A notable example is the growing cohesion among Central Asia's five republics. Their cooperation may well enhance their regional agency in the years to come. Russia views this development positively. A more resilient Central Asia – capable of solving its own challenges – contributes to overall regional stability and makes cooperation more effective. Nonetheless, new challenges are on the horizon. First, the Middle East will remain volatile. The outcome of the Israel-Iran confrontation remains uncertain, but its destabilizing effects are already rippling outward. Türkiye's foreign policy, often unpredictable, adds further complexity. For countries like Armenia and Azerbaijan, these dynamics will pose a constant strategic test. Second, the energy economies of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan remain vulnerable to global market shocks. A sustained drop in oil and gas prices – or the depletion of reserves – could threaten both countries with domestic turmoil. Managing this risk will demand careful economic planning and diversification. Third, climate change is poised to hit Central Asia hard. Rising temperatures and water shortages, paired with demographic pressures, may evolve into a genuine crisis within the next decade. Fourth, and perhaps most profoundly, Russia's neighbors are not insulated from the deepening instability of global politics and economics. Larger powers may weather volatility thanks to reserves and institutional strength. Smaller states may not be so lucky. They are aware of these vulnerabilities – and they are preparing for them. This, in turn, raises the question: what kind of relationship should these countries build with Russia? Geography, history, and shared infrastructure mean that Russia remains a central power in the former Soviet space. But the nature of this 'space' is evolving. The past three decades have seen the emergence of distinct, sovereign states with their own political trajectories. The idea of a unified 'post-Soviet' region is fading. Cooperation now depends less on shared ideology or past structures, and more on pragmatic interest. Russia does not seek to impose its will on these nations. But it must avoid any arrangement that allows others to benefit from Russian support – economic, security-related, or political – without reciprocity. This would be not only unfair, but strategically dangerous. In this light, the political regimes of neighboring countries are not of primary concern. What matters is that their partnerships with Russia do not undermine its sovereignty or long-term stability. Moscow welcomes genuine cooperation – built on mutual interest and equality – but cannot allow itself to become a crutch for governments unable or unwilling to manage their internal affairs. That principle applies across the board: in the South Caucasus, in Central Asia, and in Eastern Europe. What's required is a consistent, firm, and future-oriented approach to regional policy – one that encourages integration where possible but is unafraid to protect Russian interests when necessary. Of course, breaking away from old habits and assumptions will not be easy. The legacy of the Soviet Union still shapes expectations on both sides. Many governments in the region continue to treat Russia as a default provider of security and economic support – even while forging closer ties with other powers. This dual approach is unsustainable. It's time for a new model – one where Russia is not the guarantor of regional balance but a stakeholder among equals. A partner, not a patron. In such a system, cooperation would no longer rest on sentiment or historical inertia, but on clearly defined, reciprocal benefits. To succeed in this, Russia must act with strategic patience and clarity of purpose. It must support its neighbors where doing so serves mutual goals. But it must also draw clear boundaries – ensuring that its resources, prestige, and geopolitical position are not squandered on arrangements that yield little in return. In a world tilting towards greater uncertainty and multipolar competition, Russia's role in its own neighborhood remains vital. But it must be a role shaped not by nostalgia or charity, but by realism, prudence, and a firm defense of national interest. Only then can lasting, balanced partnerships emerge in the vast, shifting space of article was first published by Valdai Discussion Club, translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump says trade talks with India are off
President Donald Trump has said the US has halted trade negotiations with India until the two countries resolve their ongoing dispute over tariffs. On Wednesday, the White House announced an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports, doubling those it recently imposed on the South Asian nation to 50%. The US president said the latest tariffs were imposed due to India's continued purchases of Russian oil. The new tariffs are set to take effect August 27, as per Trump's executive order. Asked if he expects 'increased trade negotiations' with India after announcing the latest tariffs, Trump said, 'No, not until we get it resolved.' Washington and New Delhi held talks for several months over a trade deal, but differences arose when the US reportedly asked for agricultural and dairy products to be exempted from tariffs. 'For us, the interest of farmers is our top priority,' Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in response to the latest tariffs on Thursday. On Tuesday, Trump claimed in a CNBC 'Squawk Box' interview that India had offered to completely waive tariffs for US imports. 'But that's not good enough, because of what they're doing with oil,' he said. A day earlier, the US president stated that India is making 'big profits' by selling Russian oil in the open market. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine,' he said in a Truth Social post. An Indian Foreign Ministry spokesman said this week that 'imports from Russia are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India.' In the 2024-25 fiscal year, bilateral trade between India and the US stood at $131.8 billion, with a trade surplus of $41.18 billion for New Delhi, according to the Indian government.
