#NSTviral: Video of exchange at zebra crossing sparks debate on road manners
In a video posted by Facebook user driving4dummies, a short reel depicted the motorcyclist giving way to pedestrians before being confronted by a driver.
The driver, driving a Proton X50 pulls up beside him, winds down the window, and questions why he stopped, claiming it was unnecessary.
"He then repeatedly asks whether he had hit the motorcyclist, suggesting there was no need to give way unless contact was made," he said.
Despite the confrontation, the user remains composed and explains that vehicles are legally required to stop when pedestrians are waiting to cross.
The driver, however, continues to press the point before eventually driving off.
In a caption accompanying the video, driving4dummies urges fellow road users to observe the rules and stop at pedestrian crossings.
"I was honked at. I was scolded. But I still stopped. Because I know… every crossing carries a life.
"Sometimes it's an elderly person. Sometimes a small child. And sometimes, it's someone I know personally. We stop not because of the rules, but out of respect" he said in the caption accompanying the video.
The incident ended on a conciliatory note where in a follow-up post, the Facebook user said he later met the driver, who offered an apology.
"I have a chance to meet Brother X50. We greet and forgive, with an open heart.
"Maybe through the incident with this Brother X50, we can all pay attention to the zebra crossing issue in Malaysia, a place where there are many people who find it difficult to cross and all this time there are many that 'suffers in silence'.
"I also call on the crowd to stop attacking and bullying this X50 brother. Let's not do the same thing but online anyway," he wrote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
FILE PHOTO: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg makes a keynote speech during the Meta Connect annual event, at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, California, U.S., September 25, 2024. REUTERS/Manuel Orbegozo/File Photo WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -Mark Zuckerberg is expected to appear as a star witness in an unusual $8 billion trial that kicks off this weekat which the Meta CEO is accused of operating Facebook as an illegal enterprise that allowed users' data to be harvested without their consent. Shareholders of Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, sued Zuckerberg and other current and former company leaders, saying they continually violated a 2012 agreement between Facebook and the Federal Trade Commission to protect users' data. The case dates back to 2018, after it emerged that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica,a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful campaign for U.S. president in 2016. Shareholders want Zuckerberg and the other defendants to reimburse the company for more than $8 billion in fines and other costs paid by Meta after the Cambridge Analytica scandal came to light, including a record $5 billion fine imposed on Facebook by the FTC in 2019 for violating the 2012 agreement. Defendants in the case include former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, as well as former board members Peter Thiel, the Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, the co-founder of Netflix. Zuckerberg and the other defendants, who declined to comment, have dismissed the allegations in court filings as "extreme claims."Meta, which is not a defendant, also declined to comment. The non-jury trial in Wilmington, Delaware, is scheduled to last eight days. It will mostly focus on decade-old events and board meetings to determine how Facebook leaders implemented the 2012 agreement. While the trial will cover long-ago policies, it comes as privacy concerns continue to dog Meta, which is under scrutiny for its training of AI models. The company says it has invested billions of dollars since 2019 in its program to safeguard users' privacy. Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers, said the case will fill in details about what the board knew - and when - regarding the data of users, who now total more than 3 billion daily across Meta's platforms. "There's an argument we can't avoid Facebook and Instagram in our lives," he said. "Can we trust Mark Zuckerberg?" MOST DIFFICULT CLAIMS Two years ago, the defendants sought to dismiss the case before trial, which the judge declined. "This is a case involving alleged wrongdoing on a truly colossal scale," said Travis Laster, the judge handling the case at the time. The trial in the Court of Chancery will be overseen by Kathaleen McCormick. Now the plaintiffs, individual investors and union pension funds including California's State Teachers' Retirement System, must prove what is often described as the most difficult claim in corporate law - showing that directors utterly failed in their duty of oversight. Legal experts said it appears to be the first trial on such a claim. Zuckerberg and Sandberg are alleged to have knowingly caused the company to violate the law. While Delaware law protects directors and officers for bad business decisions, it does not protect them from illegal ones, even if they are profitable. Defendants said in court filings that plaintiffs cannot deliver the evidence. The shareholders in pretrial court papers said they can prove that after the 2012 agreement, Facebook continued deceptive privacy practices, at the direction of Zuckerberg. The defendants said the evidence will show that the company built a team to oversee privacy and hired an outside compliance firm and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's "studied deceit." In addition to the central privacy claims, plaintiffs also allege that when Zuckerberg could see that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was about break and send company stock lower, he was motivated to offload his stock and reaped at least $1 billion in profit. Defendants said evidence will show he used a stock-trading plan that can protect against insider-trading allegations. They also said the motivation was to benefit his charitable pursuits. (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Matthew Lewis)
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
BMW driver dodges toll payment by piggy-backing on other car
THE actions of a BMW driver who dodged paying toll and 'piggy-backed' on another car has drawn sharp criticism from social media users. Through a video clip shared on the Facebook page 'Himpunan Cerita Lawak', the blue BMW successfully escaped by 'piggy-backing' on the car in front of it. Based on the video clip, the BMW driver first gave way to the victim's car before turning on the hazard lights. Then, after the victim's car paid the toll, the BMW was seen accelerating quickly before the barrier came down. The BMW driver's actions were recorded on the victim's dashboard camera, but the exact toll location and timing of the incident could not be confirmed. Looking at the comments section, most Facebook users condemned the BMW driver's action for dodging the toll payment and causing trouble for other road users. 'Just embarrassing, wants to show off but too stingy to pay toll,' wrote Rozana Ismail. Another user known as Hairudin Dinangah also left a comment. 'Should have released the barrier a bit, wait for the barrier to drop then press forward,' he said.
Sinar Daily
8 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
'The Malaysian Diddy freak-offs'? Marriage programme under fire for nude rituals
SHAH ALAM – What was marketed as a women's self-empowerment and marital motivation programme turned into something deeply disturbing. Held here in September 2024, this 'marriage motivation' event, spearheaded by a husband-and-wife team, has triggered national outrage following allegations of nude rituals, sexually charged activities and spiritual practices resembling religious deviance. Now, the authorities are stepping in. The event was alleged to have involved indecent displays and elements deemed un-Islamic. Photo: Masyitah Asyari's Facebook page The Malaysian Diddy freak-offs The core of the four-day event was a session known as the Queen Session, which attracted around 50 women. According to a former participant, the atmosphere became unsettling when the room was dimmed and the facilitators entered with romantic music playing. Several women dressed as 'Cleopatra' took the stage, followed by the programme's founder (the wife), who eventually danced naked in front of attendees. 'She invited others to join in. Many were stunned and uncomfortable,' the former participant wrote in a now-viral Facebook post. What followed was a sequence of events that reportedly resembled a cult-like initiation: Female facilitators danced provocatively and simulated intimate acts. Participants were allegedly given a strange beverage called 'Piya', said to invoke feelings of courage and desire. A symbolic ritual called 'Sacred Bath' or 'Rebirth' involved a nude woman being wiped with wet towels, allegedly representing spiritual cleansing. Attendees were instructed to discard symbolic burdens by throwing underwear and clothing onto the stage. Some participants stripped completely nude. The former participant described the ritual as a dangerous blend of New Age spiritualism and religious deviation, especially shocking in Selangor, a state with strict religious regulations. She stated that an official report with evidence had been submitted and this issue had been raised previously by education activist Cikgu Fadli Salleh, but without prior action. Police and religious authorities begin investigation Following a complaint filed in February by the husband of a participant, Shah Alam district police confirmed that an investigation was underway. Shah Alam district police chief Assistant Commissioner Mohd Iqbal Ibrahim revealed that witnesses and the complainant's wife had been interviewed. Representatives from Jais (Selangor Islamic Religious Department) were present during questioning. 'We recorded statements from several witnesses who were at the scene. Anyone with information is urged to contact Shah Alam Police,' Iqbal urged. Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs), Datuk Dr Mohd Na'im Mokhtar, stated that he is aware of the public concerns. 'The approach used in the programme has caused considerable unease. I have instructed Jakim's Director-General to work closely with Jais to address this matter,' he said. Were these rituals rooted in other faiths? Some former participants claim the programme drew references from non-Islamic religious texts, including Hindu scriptures and that teachings were distributed through private Telegram channels. These allegations further fueled speculation that the programme was spreading deviant doctrines under the guise of women's self-help and marriage counselling. Reports indicated that the mysterious drink called, 'Piya' was given to participants before the bizarre rituals commenced. The drink allegedly caused altered emotional states and made attendees more vulnerable to suggestion. Politicians and religious leaders respond The programme's activities have received harsh criticism from both religious and political figures. Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari confirmed that the event had no affiliation with any state agency. 'I am concerned about the allegations. I have instructed Jais to conduct a full investigation and to take firm action if the allegations are found to be true,' he said. Jakim Director-General Datuk Dr Sirajuddin Suhaimee said that this joint investigation is part of an ongoing effort to curb deviant practices and the spread of harmful ideologies that contradict Islamic teachings. He added that Jakim views this matter seriously and will work with state authorities to protect morality, family harmony and the sanctity of Islamic teachings. Offers of help for affected women In a more supportive response, the Women, Family and Community Development Ministry has offered counselling services to women affected by the incident. Deputy Minister Datuk Seri Dr Noraini Ahmad said that their Social Welfare Department and Women's Development Division are prepared to assist. 'In cases like this, we usually mobilise counsellors. We advise women to thoroughly verify the credibility of any programme before joining,' she said. Repercussions and public outrage Public sentiment has been unforgiving. Many on social media are questioning how such a programme with nudity, ritualistic elements and sexual content could have taken place without prior scrutiny from local authorities. The fact that the event occurred at a public convention centre in Shah Alam, so close to Jais headquarters, only intensified criticism. Calls are now mounting for criminal charges, a ban on similar self-help movements and a crackdown on unregulated motivational programmes masquerading as spiritual healing or family therapy. What is Next? The founders of the event allegedly a husband-and-wife team will soon be summoned by Jais for formal questioning. Investigators are also looking into potential violations of religious law, public decency laws and whether any psychoactive substances were used. Religious authorities have urged the public to report any suspicious programmes and avoid groups not recognised by Jakim or state Islamic departments. The case also serves as a cautionary tale, especially for those seeking help for marital or emotional issues. Always verify the legitimacy of any programme, especially those involving closed-door activities, unregulated rituals, or unverified claims of transformation. As of now, no arrests have been made, but authorities assure the public that appropriate action will follow once investigations conclude.
