Faces of Trump's deportation push: The people falling victim to the immigration crackdown
Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to rapidly and brutally expel millions of immigrants.
In his first 100 days in office, he has bent every part of the government toward that goal, cracking down on non-citizen activists, invoking emergency wartime authorities, skirting court orders to stop deportation flights, pulling humanitarian protections from hundreds of thousands, and attempting to ignore the Constitution and end birthright citizenship.
In a White House defined by chaos, immigration may be the only place where the Trump administration is consistent.
For the millions of immigrants across the U.S., this has meant consistent anxiety. Will they be detained and deported without warning? Do they still have rights to protest? Will the courts check Trump, and will Trump obey the courts?
Four different immigrants and their families told The Independent about what it's like living through this age of uncertainty.
The first sign that something was wrong came when Wendy Brito, an asylum-seeker from El Salvador, attended one of her regular check-ins with immigration officials in Louisiana last month. She called her fiancé, Kremly Marrero, and said she heard the sound of handcuffs nearby.
'I said, 'Don't worry, you're not doing anything wrong. You got permission to stay here,'' Marrero told The Independent. ''You applied for asylum. You should be alright, don't worry about it.''
Brito hasn't been home since. She was arrested and sent to an Immigration and Customs detention center in the city of Basile, Louisiana, nearly 200 miles away from where the couple live with their three children, just outside of New Orleans.
'My kids are not sleeping. My kids are constantly depressed,' Marrero, a U.S. citizen from Puerto Rico, said. 'They break down at school crying…They're constantly asking why their mother is in jail if she's not a bad person.'
And he's not sure what to tell them. He said he still doesn't know why Brito, who first applied for asylum in 2009, was suddenly arrested after nearly two decades. Marrero said he suspects it may have had something to do with a long-ago incident in which a neighbor called the police on Marrero and Brito during a domestic dispute in which neither sought charges.
Brito fled El Salvador after a gang killed her brother in the midst of an extortion attempt on the family, and her life has been turned upside-down once again.
The immigration officer who arrested Brito said it had something to do with the new administration, Marrero's lawyer told him, but that's about all he knows.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement acknowledged a request for comment about the case from The Independent but did not respond to questions.
'She went in for a routine check-in with ICE and never made it home,' Congressman Troy Carter, Democrat of Louisiana, said on April 22, after a delegation of representatives visited Brito and others held at facilities in Louisiana's 'deportation alley.' 'That's a tragedy. Due process was clearly denied…This is America. This is not some third-world country.'
In between four-hour nights of sleep, caring for the kids, and working in facilities at a local hospital, Marrero speaks with Brito on a prison video tablet. He said his partner has become unwell behind bars.
'I'm looking at her. I know you're not eating,' he said. 'She says, 'I don't want to. I just want to go home.' That breaks you. I don't care how strong of a man you are. You see your wife there and you can't do anything. I feel hopeless.'
While Brito has been in detention, a new crisis has hit the family. Marrero just found out he has liver cancer. He's still working to understand the severity of the diagnosis, but so far he has ignored his doctors' pleas to stay in the hospital, he told The Independent.
'I didn't have anyone to take care of the kids, so I had to leave. We're waiting for her to come home so I can get treated,' he said. 'It's been very tough.'
There has been one bright spot though. Marrero said Brito's bond has been approved, and the father is hoping to raise some of the $5,000 payment on GoFundMe so Brito can return home ahead of a May asylum hearing.
Ahwar Sultan, 25, a graduate student at Ohio State University, was sitting in an architecture lecture on April 3 when he got a notice that his record within the SEVIS government exchange student database had been terminated, jeopardizing his ability to study and work inside the U.S.
The government said vaguely that Sultan may have lost his visa or that his name may have appeared in a criminal records check, while the university said it hadn't gotten any notice from the government about the change.
The timing was hard to miss, though. The Trump administration had vowed to deport all non-citizen students who joined in widespread campus pro-Palestine demonstrations. It also said it would investigate universities for alleged antisemitism, including Ohio State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed in late March the State Department had begun pulling hundreds of visas.
Sultan had been a part of campus Palestine activism since 2023. The 25-year-old, who studies right-wing politics in India, felt compelled to join the movement out of a mixture of his academic background and a sense of solidarity with Palestinian scholars, who watched as Israel destroyed or damaged every university in Gaza.
Sultan may have come on the radar of authorities for an April 2024 incident where he was arrested as he attempted to protect a group of Muslim protesters at a divestment protest conducting evening prayers from advancing police. The resulting charges were later dismissed and expunged.
Still, the notice from the feds put him in a legal 'gray zone,' he said. He temporarily stopped attending class in person or conducting his duties as a teaching assistant. If he loses his ability to work for the university, he's not sure he'll be able to cover his bills, let alone stay in America.
'I don't feel safe being out and about, especially getting the news from everywhere around the country,' he told The Independent after his status was pulled.
On April 15, Sultan and a campus Palestine group sued the Trump administration, arguing its efforts to surveil and deport immigrants over their alleged views violated the First Amendment, and, in Sultan's case, due process and federal law as well.
Federal officials argued in court documents that Sultan's lawsuit was wrongly conflating canceling his status in the database with revoking his immigration status overall or beginning to deport him from the country, decisions he could contest in immigration court while being afforded full due process.
On April 24, Washington federal judge Tanya Chutkan ordered Sultan's status in the SEVIS database be temporarily reinstated, arguing the administration could 'point to no legal authority' for canceling it in the first place, while voicing doubt over the administration's larger treatment of the student.
'At this juncture, more than two weeks have elapsed since Sultan filed his Complaint and the court is highly skeptical of counsel's representations that Defendants are still waiting for ICE to confirm whether Sultan's presence in the United States is unlawful,' she wrote.
Despite the temporary win, Sultan isn't feeling very reassured. He got a letter from the U.S. Consul General General in Mumbai, informing him his F-1 visa had been revoked, meaning he may not be able to re-enter the country if he leaves it.
The grad student, who decided to pursue his studies in America to avoid the potential of government interference, now feels the U.S. is following Israel down what he sees as a path of lawlessness. Even if he gets some measure of reprieve in court, he feels the paradigm has shifted, noting that even his friends and colleagues without visa issues fear leaving the country.
'A pure sense of normalcy is not going to return. All bets are off,' he said. 'There might be ways to mitigate the uncertainty and try to push back against it. I don't really see how, with an administration that is turbocharging ICE and attacks on immigrants, any real sense of safety will return for most people.'
Ohio State declined to comment, citing the ongoing lawsuit.
Billy Elve, 32, is also waiting on the courts.
The Orlando, Florida, resident is originally from Haiti, and arrived in the U.S. in February 2024, granted temporary protected status and humanitarian parole under a Biden administration initiative.
He fled Haiti as gangs increasingly took control of the country and threatened his neighborhood.
'They forced their way into his house, tied up the husband, and went away with his wife,' Elve told The Independent of one neighbor. 'At that time my wife was pregnant, so we had to move.'
Elve managed to get approval to come to the U.S., but his wife Nehemie and daughter Villyncia's attempts were still pending as Trump took office.
The translator has felt a variety of emotions since — worry for his family, alarm at the Trump campaign's racist conspiracies about Haitians eating cats, and uncertainty after the administration sought to end the CHNV parole program in March, which covers some 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
A federal judge blocked the move in mid-April, prompting the Trump administration to appeal, and Elve doesn't know what will happen next. If he returns to Haiti he'll be marked as a target, an expat returning home from the wealthier United States, while if he stays in the U.S., there's still no guarantee his family can escape.
'It's very difficult to know what can be done next,' he said. 'There's a big question mark behind that.'
On Monday, he learned from immigration officials his wife and daughter definitely won't be able to get in on the same parole program as he did, which Homeland Security has taken to calling 'an unlawful scheme' from the previous administration.
Now he's considering joining his parents in Canada and seeking asylum, or pursuing a change of status in the U.S. to be a student or on a company-sponsored visa, whatever gets his family out of harm's way fastest.
'It was already a pain and now it's just adding oil to the fire,' he told The Independent.
Momodou Taal, a UK-Gambian grad student at Cornell and campus pro-Palestine leader, felt he couldn't wait on the U.S. courts for protection.
Taal sued the Trump administration last month with a group of fellow academics, alleging a pair of January executive orders had effectively made it illegal for non-citizens to protest the administration and its allies like Israel.
As the constitutional lawsuit proceeded, immigration officials told Taal to surrender immediately and officers circled near his residence.
Court documents later revealed that ICE was notified on March 14, a day before the suit was filed, that the State Department pulled Taal's visa, with officials claiming his protest actions had created a hostile environment for Jewish students. The threat raised the prospect he might be deported before a court could rule on his challenge.
Taal grew up in a political milieu, where family members served in The Gambia's post-colonial government, and told The Independent he saw his own Palestine activism as a way to continue their legacy of fighting colonialism. He said he has never supported antisemitism of any kind, pointing to a letter of support from Jewish Cornellians, and only advocates the right to resist what he sees as an illegal occupation of Palestine under international law.
Still, despite his faith in his convictions, he felt his leverage in the U.S. slipping away as he hid out in a friend's apartment in Ithaca, barely eating and avoiding communicating with family for fear of being tracked.
'Given that I dared to challenge Trump and challenge his executive orders, I felt they would make an example of me,' Taal told The Independent from an undisclosed location, as he prepares to return to the UK.
The Trump administration has defended its handling of the Taal case.
'It is a privilege to be granted a visa to live and study in the United States of America,' the Department of Homeland Security said after he fled the country. 'When you advocate for violence and terrorism, that privilege should be revoked.'
It wasn't an idle fear that something exceptional might happen in or outside of court. The same day as Taal filed his suit, the government invoked the wartime Alien Enemies Act to summarily deport alleged gang members, many of whom say they have no ties to criminal groups, and wrongly deported a man to El Salvador, despite a court order specifically barring his removal to the country.
And Taal had watched for months as Trump spoke more and more specifically about the mass deportation of non-citizen Palestine activists.
'I felt like it was only a matter of time until something happens to me, unless I triumphed in court,' he said. 'I didn't think it would be so quick.'
Now, as Taal works to finish his degree remotely, he said he gets messages from other activists asking when he knew it was time to leave America.
Every person has a different threshold, but it's clear that for the millions of immigrants in the United States something fundamental about the country has already changed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Coinbase adds former top Obama and Harris adviser Plouffe as it broadens its political reach
WASHINGTON (AP) — A senior adviser to Kamala Harris' 2024 presidential campaign is joining Coinbase's global advisory council, which already includes several former U.S. senators and Donald Trump's ex-campaign manager, as the cryptocurrency exchange broadens its political reach. David Plouffe, a top Democratic strategist best known as an architect of Barack Obama's successful 2008 presidential campaign, is the latest addition to the council, joining as the cryptocurrency industry plays an increasingly prominent role in shaping fast-moving legislation in Congress. The legislation aims to create a comprehensive framework for the regulation of digital assets and comes amid a shift in Washington. President Trump, a Republican, has pledged to make the U.S. the global capital of cryptocurrency, contrasting with what industry leaders viewed as a stifling regulatory approach under the previous Democratic administration. Trump and his family have also been aggressively expanding their personal business into almost every part of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, including raising billions of dollars to buy bitcoin, creating a new stablecoin and launching and promoting a Trump-themed meme coin. Chris LaCivita, the former co-campaign manager of Trump's successful 2024 presidential bid, joined Coinbase's advisory council in January. Former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent from Arizona, also joined the council, which consists of a number of other high-profile figures from both major political parties. Plouffe previously served on the global advisory board for Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, before joining Harris' presidential campaign as a senior adviser in August. Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase's chief policy officer, described the role of the advisers as being a 'sound board' to discuss policy efforts and business strategy. In Congress, legislation is advancing far more quickly than usual for a new industry — a pace that some involved in shaping the bills say comes amid an all-out pressure campaign from the cryptocurrency sector. On Wednesday, a group of Democrats joined the Republican majority to advance legislation regulating stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. Final passage through the Senate could come next week. Meanwhile, a more sweeping bill to implement cryptocurrency market structure has begun moving through House committees.

Associated Press
20 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Coinbase adds former top Obama and Harris adviser Plouffe as it broadens its political reach
WASHINGTON (AP) — A senior adviser to Kamala Harris' 2024 presidential campaign is joining Coinbase's global advisory council, which already includes several former U.S. senators and Donald Trump's ex-campaign manager, as the cryptocurrency exchange broadens its political reach. David Plouffe, a top Democratic strategist best known as an architect of Barack Obama's successful 2008 presidential campaign, is the latest addition to the council, joining as the cryptocurrency industry plays an increasingly prominent role in shaping fast-moving legislation in Congress. The legislation aims to create a comprehensive framework for the regulation of digital assets and comes amid a shift in Washington. President Trump, a Republican, has pledged to make the U.S. the global capital of cryptocurrency, contrasting with what industry leaders viewed as a stifling regulatory approach under the previous Democratic administration. Trump and his family have also been aggressively expanding their personal business into almost every part of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, including raising billions of dollars to buy bitcoin, creating a new stablecoin and launching and promoting a Trump-themed meme coin. Chris LaCivita, the former co-campaign manager of Trump's successful 2024 presidential bid, joined Coinbase's advisory council in January. Former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent from Arizona, also joined the council, which consists of a number of other high-profile figures from both major political parties. Plouffe previously served on the global advisory board for Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, before joining Harris' presidential campaign as a senior adviser in August. Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase's chief policy officer, described the role of the advisers as being a 'sound board' to discuss policy efforts and business strategy. In Congress, legislation is advancing far more quickly than usual for a new industry — a pace that some involved in shaping the bills say comes amid an all-out pressure campaign from the cryptocurrency sector. On Wednesday, a group of Democrats joined the Republican majority to advance legislation regulating stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. Final passage through the Senate could come next week. Meanwhile, a more sweeping bill to implement cryptocurrency market structure has begun moving through House committees.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Contributor: The scars from unrest can run deep, for protesters, residents and even authorities
The heavy-handed responses by the Trump administration to ongoing protests in Los Angeles reveal how little imagination our politicians continue to have when it comes to grasping the causes and consequences of social unrest. Last Friday, in response to increasingly bold and reckless raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Angelenos began large-scale protests. They mobilized in support of family members, friends and neighbors being unscrupulously removed from their communities, often without sound legal justification. As a behavioral epidemiologist who studies psychological trauma, I spend a lot of time speaking to people about their mental health and what motivates them to act. The aim is to understand what keeps them up at night and what helps keep them grounded, to get a sense of what they'll do next. It's an intuitive process. Concern about increasingly untethered ICE raids are clearly one of those things that has kept thousands in Los Angeles up at night, and it directly contributed to the swelling protests and the isolated, unfortunate instances of property destruction and looting. Scholars also research the aftermath of unrest. Studies of protests from around the world show that rarely do participants leave emotionally unscathed. For both protesters and those protested against, feelings of indignity, frustration and despair often persist well after the protest sites are abandoned. These types of outcomes are even worse when violence — from the protesters, law enforcement or military elements — is part of the equation. Protests like those in L.A. this week aren't spontaneous. Their genesis is usually rooted in the perceived denial of their civil rights or physical and psychological safety. A protest is a way of expressing feelings of rejection. Some argue that demonstrations are sometimes a response to collective trauma. Whatever the spark for the larger social uprisings, most researchers and activists rightfully see destructive riots and looting as primal, unhelpful outgrowths of protests. Vandalism and hooliganism distract from the purposes of constitutionally protected demonstrations — and this blurring is an especially grave danger in an era of mass media and hyper-polarized audiences here in the U.S. Depending on the quality of your news sources, you might have the sense that Los Angeles is a war zone right now — even though on almost every block, quotidian life is proceeding as normal, and where there has been destruction, it has been minimal. Reality is not all that matters, however; the perception among many Americans is that L.A. has been consumed by riots and lawlessness, which is precisely President Trump's hope. He further hopes that people with this misconception eventually come to see very little distinction between an impassioned protest and a riot. Once that happens, he knows they're more likely to broadly tolerate and acclimate to the kinds of strongman responses that we're currently seeing. Americans also disagree widely on when protests are appropriate. A poll conducted in 2023 by YouGov found that people are more likely to find protest tactics acceptable when those tactics are in support of a cause they favor. Apparently, many people wish for those who disagree with them to package their dissent as unassumingly as possible, ideally making it invisible and inaudible. But some politicians seem almost giddy when their political enemies demonstrate. In the recent protests in L.A., Trump saw a prime opening to send in the National Guard and later Marines, finally scratching an itch he has had — dating back to the summer of 2020 when protesters fanned out across the nation to protest George Floyd's murder — to use military force on American soil. L.A., of course, is something of a vanguard when it comes to protests, and in particular to protests that devolve into riots. The city's civic meltdowns have typically been measured in terms of people killed and property damaged. The Watts riots in 1965, sparked by police brutality against the city's Black population, killed 34 people and caused $40 million in damage (equivalent to around $300 million today). In the 1992 L.A. riots, another act of resistance in response to police brutality against Black people, 63 people were killed, and losses reached up to a staggering $1 billion (around $2 billion today). Fortunately, so far, there have been very few injuries reported in the current demonstrations, and no deaths. There is no sense yet of the property toll, which is sure to draw a lot of attention from those intent on demonizing the protesters and their cause. Our real focus should be on the psychological toll. One large study of mental health outcomes following various protests determined that the prevalence of major depression in the affected community increased by 7%, irrespective of how personally involved an individual was in the protest. The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder ranges from 4% to a stunning 41% in areas affected by protests, riots and revolutions. And those impacts also radiate to the law enforcement officers who intervene. For example, in a study of LAPD officers following the 1992 riots, 17% subsequently showed symptoms aligned with post-traumatic stress disorder, including avoidance and emotional resignation. Similar results were observed among law enforcement in Ferguson, Mo. in 2014, following riots there in the aftermath of the murder of a Black teen, Michael Brown. More recently, U.S. Capitol officers reported PTSD-like symptoms after the Trump-inspired insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021. A major trope in American politics and among free speech advocates is that dissent makes for a healthy democracy. But too much of anything — especially dissent — has become an albatross on the American psyche. And there are deepening consequences to our seemingly never-ending dissent: It's likely to continue coming in the form of protests and riots. In the eyes of the average American, the U.S. has been in a perpetual state of unrest for at least the last decade. In the last five years alone, the U.S. has been convulsed by coast-to-coast protests — in the aftermath of Floyd's murder in Minneapolis at the hands of police, in response to Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza, and now in Los Angeles and elsewhere in the U.S. over ICE's feckless immigration raids. When the smoke clears, psychological trauma lingers in those who were on the protest grounds, and even those vicariously exposed to it through social media and TV reports. If the response to protests or riots is militarization, and we normalize it, Pandora's box will be opened. It perhaps already has been with Trump's quixotic decision to send unneeded troops to L.A. The militarization of a community, whether in the form of short-term interventions or long-term occupations, is rarely received well by those who must live with it. At best, we consider intrusions by policing officials a necessary evil. At least when it comes to our own communities, most of us appear to prefer to live in spaces that are reasonably policed but still governed by elected representatives. We're at a precarious moment now when we can envision how that could be lost — as we see Trump's effort to militarize Los Angeles and America more broadly through ICE and other authoritarian intimidation tactics. However one feels about the backlash against ICE, or the federal government's reaction to those protesters supporting their immigrant neighbors, most of us likely agree that the political theater and the clashes in the street are bad for the nation — and preventable. With the ultimate hope of removing the need for protests like these, I'm reminded of what a research participant once told me: We have just as much capacity to create trauma for one another as we have to eliminate it. Jerel Ezell is an assistant professor and the director of the Center for Cultural Humility at UC Berkeley. He studies the racial and cultural aspects of politics. If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.