Japan's Resilience lander fails to stick moon landing again
The attempted touchdown was meant to mark a milestone for Japan's private space ambitions but ended with lost contact and no confirmation of a soft landing.
The uncrewed lander, carrying scientific payloads worth US$16 million, appears to have suffered issues measuring its distance to the lunar surface and failed to slow down in time, ispace said. Contact was lost just under two minutes before the scheduled touchdown.
This was ispace's second failed attempt after its inaugural mission crashed in 2023 due to inaccurate altitude recognition. While the hardware design remained mostly unchanged, software updates had been made. Still, Resilience couldn't avoid a hard landing.
"Truly diverse scenarios were possible, including issues with the propulsion system, software or hardware, especially with sensors," said Chief Technology Officer Ryo Ujiie.
More than 500 people — including ispace staff, sponsors, and government officials — had gathered at a Tokyo venue to witness the historic moment. Instead, a tense silence descended when the signal was lost.
Shares of ispace plunged, hitting sell-order limits and looking set to close down 29%. Still, CFO Jumpei Nozaki said the company faced "no immediate financial deterioration," citing continued investor backing.
Resilience had targeted Mare Frigoris, a plain near the moon's north pole, where it planned to conduct 14 days of exploration — including NASA-contracted work capturing regolith.
The mission carried a rover built by ispace's Luxembourg subsidiary, alongside external instruments from Japanese companies and a Taiwanese university.
While a commercial success would have aligned Japan with U.S. companies like Intuitive Machines and Firefly Aerospace, both of whom achieved moon landings this year, ispace now faces a multi-year pause. Japan's national space agency, JAXA, did land its SLIM lander in 2023, making Japan the fifth country to manage a soft lunar landing.
Despite the setback, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said, "Expectations for ispace have not faded."
The company plans to continue its efforts, with a third mission slated for 2027 through its U.S. unit under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services. Ispace aims to complete six more missions across Japan and the U.S. by 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
42 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Digital agriculture languishing in Canadian fields
Opinion Frustration oozes out of the opening lines of a report highlighting the current state of adoption for digital agriculture in Canada. 'Digital agriculture offers powerful tools to address Canada's pressing agricultural challenges, but the current approach isn't delivering results,' says the analysis compiled by Manitoba-based EMILI and the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute. 'Despite the potential to increase yields by 20 per cent, while reducing environmental impact, Canada captures just three per cent of global agtech venture capital investment compared to 55 per cent in the United States.' SUPPLIED A drone-mapping tech demonstration takes place at Innovation Farms, the Manitoba field space EMILI uses for testing new ag technology. If the trend continues, the report forecasts fewer Canadian agtech companies and fewer innovations to support Canadian farmers, which places the sector at a competitive disadvantage relative to more 'digitally advanced nations.' EMILI (Enterprise Machine Intelligence Learning Initiative), an industry-led body that works with farmers, industry, investors and innovators to promote the development of digital tools for agriculture. So from its perspective, any pace of adoption is too slow. But if you overlay the issues holding it back and the future challenges Canadian agriculture faces in productivity, competitiveness, profitability, generational transfer, labour and sustainability — to name a few — it's hard to argue with the report's conclusion. In short, while farmers have widely embraced technology such as GPS guidance systems, which have shown to reduce fuel costs by as much as 15 per cent and increased yields by upwards of 10 per cent, they have been slow to fully embrace this expanding suite of technologies. It's not because they are stodgy old stick-in-the-muds like they are sometimes portrayed, but because the results so far can't consistently align with the promises. That hesitancy in turn puts a chill on investment as startups working in the innovation space struggle to scale up to commercial release and enter a marketplace where uptake is anything but certain. Just as with the adoption of no-till farming two generations ago, farmers moving into this space aren't just buying different field equipment, they must change how they think about farming to achieve the benefits. It's how they apply what is described as the 'broad ecosystem' of software, robotics and AI-driven insights to their on-farm management that unlocks the potential. 'These tools don't just boost yields. They save time, reduce stress and strengthen farmers' control over their operations. Recognizing this full scope is key to unlocking its full potential across all farm types,' the report says. However, on the farm, potential doesn't pay the bills. If it doesn't rain or it's too cold, hot or wet, the return on investment on a new technology evaporates, even if it works as promised, which isn't always the case. Plus, there are significant barriers to adoption, not the least of which is poor connectivity. More than one-fifth of rural Canadians still lack access to high-speed internet and 90 per cent of Canada's farmers live in underserved areas. Data ownership and control are another problem. Farmers are repeatedly assured they retain ownership of their data, but control over how it is used is a grey area underscored by lengthy consent forms that seemingly require a legal degree to decipher. Farmers are careful about how much intel about their operations they share, as it can affect relationships with suppliers, buyers and competitors. Information is power. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. Another issue is interoperability; the different technologies and platforms in the marketplace today don't always talk to each other — making it hard for farmers to harvest the benefits of an integrated system. On top of all that, the policy approach within Canada has been fragmented and short-sighted. 'Canada's mix of federal and provincial programs is not sufficient to drive a digital revolution in Canadian agriculture,' the report says. It calls for digital agriculture to become the focus of Canada's next five-year plan for agriculture when it is negotiated by federal, provincial and territorial ministers. That plan must include an enabling regulatory environment, investment in programs and partnerships, as well as extension support for farmers. Or Canada will fall even further behind. Laura Rance is executive editor, production content lead for Glacier FarmMedia. She can be reached at lrance@ Laura RanceColumnist Laura Rance is editorial director at Farm Business Communications. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Winnipeg Free Press
42 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Actively managed but truly more profitable?
Opinion Negative consumer sentiment in Canada toward anything American-made has not stopped one of the world's largest investment managers from launching products north of the border. JP Morgan Asset Management, based in New York, recently introduced a new actively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF), specially designed to provide Canadian investors with access to its world-leading U.S. stock-picking managers. 'Actively managed ETFs are what we do well and that expertise is what we're bringing to Canada,' says Jay Rana, head of Canadian adviser business at J.P. Morgan Asset Management in Toronto. Part of the storied U.S. investment bank J.P. Morgan Chase, the asset manager oversees US$3.7 trillion, among largest money managers in the world. It recently brought a stock-picking strategy for the U.S. stock market to Canada in an ETF wrapper that doesn't even exist in that form in the U.S. 'It is truly a core U.S. equities position for investors' portfolio,' Rana says about the JPMorgan US Core Active ETF (JCOR). It is the fifth actively managed ETF launched in Canada in the last year by J.P. Morgan. Yet the others — JPMorgan U.S. Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI), JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ), JPMorgan U.S. Growth Active ETF (JGRO) and JPMorgan U.S. Value Active ETF (JAVA) — all have U.S.-listed ETF twins, providing a track record of their performance. The new JCOR ETF, launched in June, has a mutual fund twin in the U.S — and its long-term history is impressive. Its JPMCB U.S. Active Core Equity Fund (the mutual fund version) has beaten its benchmark index, the S&P 500, over the last 15 years. Albeit, it has done so by a little more than a half-percentage point. Yet it is impressive all the same given the S&P Spiva Scorecard report on mutual fund performance shows more than 90 per cent of actively managed U.S. equity funds do not beat their benchmark over 10-year periods. Rana chocks up the performance to J.P Morgan's experience and size. 'At J.P. Morgan, we do have an advantage across a number of asset classes just as a result of our scope and reach.' Yet its recent launches of active ETFs is part of a larger trend. What was once almost strictly a passive product with low management fees, often a 10th of the cost annually of a similar mutual fund, the market is now seeing a wave of new active products, says Prerna Mathews, Mackenzie's vice-president of ETF product Strategy in Toronto. 'Active ETFs now make up almost 35 per cent of total assets under management of all ETFs in Canada,' says Mathews, noting Mackenzie is a Canadian leader in actively managed ETFs. Among those new funds on the market is the Mackenzie U.S. Low Volatility ETF (MULV) launched last year. 'The demand is there because a lot of advisers see these as better portfolio tools.' What's more, she notes active management could come in handy in the years ahead. Investors likely face many challenges: a volatile U.S. administration and ongoing trade strife, persistent inflation, swelling debt, environmental degradation and geopolitical unrest. As well, the U.S. market is highly overvalued. It remains heavily weighted to big tech stocks. As such, a passive strategy mirroring the S&P 500 performance will certainly benefit when big tech does well, as it has recently, but it will also fall with big tech, which dominates the market. Active management, according to one report by a top European active management asset firm, could help mitigate the many risks. Simply, active managers can navigate risks while seeking out opportunities a passive strategy can't, Rana says. 'Active management can assess and respond to complex risks and adjust portfolios in real-time,' he says. What's more, one of the knocks against active management strategies has been fee costs. Mutual funds run by active managers can charge, for example, two per cent per year for a U.S. stock market fund. Yet that fee often hinders performance. It is difficult to beat a broad-based benchmark like the S&P 500 when you're consistently two per cent behind. That said, its U.S. mutual fund version of J.P. Morgan's JCOR ETF did so well because its MER, or management expense ratio (average annual fee cost), is 0.4 per cent. The Canadian ETF, by the way, charges 0.44 per cent as an annual fee. Still, a Winnipeg portfolio manager specializing in ETF strategies for private clients is skeptical the growing trend of actively managed ETFs will benefit investors. 'I've heard the same argument for decades that passive ETFs may not work because of the environment we're in,' says Alan Fustey, portfolio manager with Bellwether Investment Management. The premise 'this time will be different' and active managers will rise to the challenge is constantly bandied about by the industry, but it rarely materializes consistently, says Fustey. That's simply because it is incredibly hard for even professionals to beat big, broad markets like the S&P 500 and the TSX Composite Index. With passive investing, you are just trying to capture the market performance for a low cost, today often less than 0.10 per cent. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. 'The reason it's so hard to outperform those indices is that everyday winners get marked up and losers get marked down,' he says. 'And no one can predict which shares are going to be the winners long-term and which ones will be the losers long-term.' Of course, don't expect the debate to die. But you can expect more active ETF launches, especially as investors fret about what lies ahead, Rana says. 'We believe active management can play a pivotal role in this environment.' Joel Schlesinger is a Winnipeg-based freelance journalist joelschles@
Canada News.Net
6 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Quebec to 'Carefully Examine' New Proposal for Saguenay LNG Megaproject
The government of Premier Francois Legault is promising to "carefully examine" a proposal for a new gas liquefaction plant and terminal in the Saguenay-Lac St. Jean region that would be just as big as the GNL-Quebec megaproject the province rejected in 2021 after years of opposition, Le Devoir revealed in an exclusive dispatch Friday. The proposal by Marinvest Energy Canada, a subsidiary of Bergen, Norway-based Marinvest Energy, would also require a new pipeline through several hundred kilometres of wilderness to connect the plant with TC Energy's Canada-wide gas network, just as GNL-Quebec intended, Le Devoir writes. The gas would be produced by primarily by hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a methane-intensive process that is prohibited in Quebec. After squashing the previous LNG proposal, Quebec became the world's first jurisdiction to ban oil and gas exploration in 2022. "We believe there is a strong business case for an LNG [liquefied natural gas] project in Quebec aimed at exporting Canadian natural gas to international markets, particularly in Europe," Greg Cano, one of three Marinvest Energy Canada directors and the only one not based in Norway, told Le Devoir in an email. "We believe Quebec can play a key role in diversifying export options for Canadian natural gas, particularly at a time when relying solely on the U.S. market presents increasing challenges." That optimism runs counter to an analysis released just six weeks ago by Investors for Paris Compliance (IPC), which pointed to an expected 40% increase in global LNG production between 2024 and 2028 to argue that there's no business case for a new terminal in Quebec. European LNG demand was down 18% between 2022 and 2024, and the group said Canadian exporters would also have trouble competing in Asian markets, The Canadian Press reported at the time. "Investing in infrastructure that will be very expensive and likely won't be profitable will weaken our economy rather than strengthen it," economist and IPC senior advisor Renaud Gignac told the news agency. IPC warned that inflation could drive the cost of the $18-billion GNL-Quebec project above $33 billion, making it impossible to complete without taxpayer subsidies. "These are considerable investments that mobilize public capital and labour as well," Gignac said. "When you direct resources to this type of project, you make choices, and we believe there are options that could be more profitable in the long term, for both public and private investors." One of Marinvest's identified lobbying targets, Hydro-Quebec, has been going all-in on those other options, with a planned $185-billion investment in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and new transmission over the next decade. Cano also tried to position LNG as "carbon-free" energy, even though methane is a climate super-pollutant with about 84 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide over the crucial 20-year span when humanity will be scrambling to get climate change under control. The Legault rejected the notion that gas is carbon-free in its response to the GNL-Quebec bid, "emphasizing in particular that the project that was to be built in Saguenay risked 'disadvantaging the energy transition' in the countries that would purchase this liquefied natural gas," Le Devoir says. A provincial spokesperson told the paper it was too soon to say whether the project would be eligible for subsidies, and the office of Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson wouldn't say whether it would qualify as one of the "nation-building" projects the Carney government is looking for. But "the current context is disrupting several aspects of our economy," a spokesperson for provincial Economy and Energy Minister Christine Frechette told Le Devoir in a statement. "We have always said that if new projects are presented, we are ready to examine them carefully. That is what we will do with this one." The spokesperson added that "social acceptability remains an essential condition for any project, and there will have to be benefits for Quebec." In a release, Greenpeace Canada urged the Carney government to exclude the Marinvest proposal from its list of nation-building projects, while calling on Quebec to "close the door on new fossil fuel transportation and export projects so that it can focus on renewable energy." "We should be building offshore wind farms, not floating fossil fuel plants", said Greenpeace Senior Energy Strategist Keith Stewart. "There is no way that a fossil fuel project with so little consultation and such a weak business case should be on Mark Carney's list of projects that can bypass environmental laws." Marinvest has hired two lobbyists to carry its message to the provincial government, Le Devoir reports, and two in Ottawa, Greenpeace says.
