See all the tariffs Trump has enacted, threatened and canceled
March 26, 2025 at 6:15 a.m. EDT Today at 6:15 a.m. EDT
Example of cases of tariffs proposed, delayed, applied and canceled
President Donald Trump began proposing new tariffs within hours of being sworn into office. Sixty days later, his whirlwind of on-again, off-again tariffs shows no sign of slowing down.
Having trouble following the deluge? Scroll on for a day-by-day look at how Trump's trade war has unfolded and where it stands now.
Tariffs have been enacted on roughly $800 billion of goods as of March 21. A much bigger wave of trade taxes are slated to begin April 2, impacting trillions of dollars of trade.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Here's where Trump's tariffs stand now, and what's coming next:
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Tariffs laid down by the Trump administration are meant to boost some domestic industries and extract concessions from other countries. But economists say that the new taxes may drive up consumer prices and threaten key American industries. Retaliatory tariffs from targeted countries like Canada and China could impact millions of jobs in the U.S.
The atmosphere of uncertainty created by rapid proposals and reversals could create a drag on the economy. Without knowing what tariffs may go into effect — or when — businesses may struggle to make big decisions, such as whether to build a plant or move supply chains, said Kimberly Clausing, an economist at UCLA School of Law.
'Trump has introduced a level of economic uncertainty in a deliberate and truly unnecessary fashion,' Clausing said. 'There's nothing parallel in my lifetime in the United States.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is coming under fire for seeking to rush through a major piece of legislation that grants cabinet sweeping powers to quickly approve major projects. Government House leader Steven MacKinnon put a motion on notice Thursday that would push Bill C-5 through the House of Commons by the end of next week — leaving just one day to hear from civil society groups, stakeholders and experts. Critics charge the move is anti-democratic. In a fiery exchange in question period, Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of trying to "steamroll" a bill through the House that would greatly expand his own powers. "The prime minister has no right to impose C-5 under closure when the bill gives him exceptional powers unlike anything that we've seen before," she said in French. "Is that the prime minister's intention, to bypass Parliament and govern by decree like Donald Trump?' MacKinnon pushed back by saying "Canadians and Quebecers spoke loud and clear" in the last election for action to shore up the economy, in part due to the illegal trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump. "We are acting in a democratic way," he said, noting the bill delivers on election promises laid out clearly in the Liberal platform. The bill includes controversial provisions that could allow cabinet to skirt existing processes and laws to fast-track approvals for projects the government deems to be in the national interest. The government aims to streamline disparate processes to limit approval timelines for big projects to a maximum of two years, boosting investor confidence. When asked about the timeline at a press conference Thursday, Energy Minister Tim Hodgson said the legislation needs to pass quickly to shore up an economy being undermined by Trump's tariffs. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadians' jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk. And quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," Hodgson said. But NDP MP Leah Gazan said in the House of Commons foyer Thursday that the bill isn't going to build the economy out because it will trigger a series of court challenges. She called on the government to extend the time frame of the public study and do more to consult with Indigenous Peoples — something she said got shortchanged in the bill. "I'm calling on the prime minister to slow it down, to not rush a bill that has this much consequence through in five days," she said. Hodgson pointed to support for the bill from the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, which represents more than 100 First Nations seeking to have their own projects advanced, and said he is consulting privately with stakeholders. "I can tell you I've got multiple conversations going on with different rights holders and business leaders as part of my department's efforts to ensure that consultation is robust," he said. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said there will be a meeting between the Prime Minister's Office and First Nations leaders, citing the wildfires as one reason it has been delayed. "I also want to acknowledge that because there are many communities in a critical state of wildfire and evacuation, that time will be taken to have that dialog," she said. "I know that it is the intention of the Prime Minister's Office to sit down with First Nation's leadership directly and to have the economic discussion and hear from them." But Anna Johnston, staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said the drive to push the bill through quickly is "incredibly concerning" because the government has done "very little engagement" so far on such a major piece of legislation. "The biggest concern is that it's going to give cabinet the power to approve projects before they have any information about them beyond what the proponent has decided to give the government," she said. "There's a reason why we have decisions at the end of environmental assessments and regulatory processes. It's so that governments can make informed decisions about projects that have the potential to harm Canadians and to harm the environment." Stuart Trew, a senior researcher with the left-leaning think tank Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the bill is "destined to end up in court" and "really bump up against the government's commitments to reconciliation with First Nations." "It seems geared to let the government ram projects through, without adequate study, without all the usual considerations about the impacts on endangered species," he said. "We should raise our eyebrows any time a government claims a national emergency in order to rush through legislation with implications as significant as this does." The legislation also looks to break down internal trade barriers and make it easier for workers to take jobs in other provinces. MacKinnon rejected a call from the Bloc Québécois this week to split the landmark legislation in two. That would have allowed the House to speed through the less contentious internal trade provisions while putting the controversial major projects portion under the microscope. Carney has vowed repeatedly to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day, 19 days from now. The House has been sitting for just three weeks and is currently scheduled to rise next week on June 20. MacKinnon said in a scrum on Wednesday that he has not tried to get consensus from the other parties to have the House sit any later. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
Boeing 787 Dreamliner jet in Air India crash was subject of conspiracy theories about dead whistleblower — and battery problems
Thursday's Air India plane crash that killed more than 240 people has brought renewed scrutiny on Boeing's 787 Dreamliner aircraft — which was at the center of a conspiracy theory following a whistleblower's suicide last year. The disaster marks the first time a 787 Dreamliner — Boeing's newest plane model — has been involved in a catastrophic crash since its debut in 2011. It's also the latest disaster to hit the beleaguered American aerospace giant — which has been dogged by a door that blew off a 737 jet, a leaky spacecraft that stranded astronauts on the International Space Station for months, as well as politically damaging delays in outfitting the new Air Force One jets. The Dreamliner is Boeing's bestselling wide-body aircraft, and more than 1,200 have been delivered to airlines worldwide. Advertisement The deadly crash has left a stain on the jet's safety record heading into the Paris air show next week. Boeing's stock tanking by nearly 4.8% as CEO Kelly Ortberg scrambles to boost production of the Dreamliner. 6 A Boeing 787 Dreamliner operated by Air India crashed and exploded on Thursday morning, killing more than 240 people. Viral Press via Reuters Connect 6 First responders work at the site of the plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. Saurabh Sirohiya/NurPhoto/Shutterstock The Dreamliner was first introduced on Japan's All Nippon Airways in 2011 and there are more than 30 operated by Air India today, according to Cirium, an aviation data firm. Advertisement The Air India jet that crashed on Thursday was built in 2014 and had performed some 8,000 takeoffs and landings, according to the Wall Street Journal. Despite enjoying a 14-year safety streak, the troubled aerospace giant has seen its Dreamliner suffer from a series of production woes and attention from whistleblowers warning about the massive plane's assembly. The issues began in 2013, with Boeing's fleet of 787s grounded following a series of battery fires flagged by air safety inspectors. Advertisement Boeing was also forced to pause all 787 deliveries for nearly two years until the summer of 2022 over quality concern issues. 6 Debris of the doomed Air India plane hands over the destroyed ceiling of a local building. REUTERS 6 The tragedy is the biggest aircraft disaster in India in nearly three decades. Saurabh Sirohiya/NurPhoto/Shutterstock The pause ended when the Federal Aviation Administration approved Boeing's plan to make fixes that included filling paper-thin gaps around the plane and replacing parts that were not made with the approved titanium needed. Advertisement Things only got worse for Boeing last year when whistleblowers began coming out, accusing the company of taking shortcuts to fill the gap created by the 2020 pause, with the former employees and engineers warning that the practice could cause premature damage to the planes. Boeing has repeatedly disputed the claims made by the whistleblower, claiming an internal investigation recovered no evidence to support the whistleblowers' concerns over the South Carolina factory where the Dreamliners are made. 6 Mourners gather in Patna to pray for the victims of the plane crash, were only one passenger reportedly survived. AFP via Getty Images 6 Boeing has more than 1,000 787-9 Dreamliners in operation around the world. Getty Images Among the whistleblowers was John Barnett, 62, who was found dead just a day after sitting for a deposition with the company's lawyers in March 2024. His death was ruled a suicide. Barnett's death triggered countless conspiracy theories targeted against Boeing, despite investigators finding no evidence of foul play involved in the former employee's death. Thursday's crash also comes as Boeing is still reeling from the deadly accidents involving its 737 Max plane, which saw 346 people die in crashes in 2018 and 2019. Advertisement The company had reached a deal with the Department of Justice last month to avoid taking criminal responsibility for the crashes. 'Our deepest condolences go out to the loved ones of the passengers and crew on board Air India Flight 171, as well as everyone affected in Ahmedabad,' Ortberg said in a statement following Thursday's tragedy.
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Johnson, heckled by Democrats, backs censure for Padilla
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Thursday said Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) should be censured after he tried to approach and question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference in Los Angeles, prompting federal agents to forcibly remove him from the room and handcuff him. Video of the altercation — captured by reporters on the scene — sent shockwaves through the Capitol, with Democrats slamming the way law enforcement personnel handled Padilla, and Republicans condemning the senator's conduct at the media availability. Pressed on whether Padilla should face consequences, Johnson initially demurred — 'it's not my decision to make, I'm not in that chamber' — before endorsing censure for the California Democrat. 'I think that that behavior at a minimum rises to the level of a censure,' Johnson told reporters. 'I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we're going to do, that's not what we're going to act.' 'We're not gonna have branches fighting physically and having senators charging Cabinet secretaries,' he added. 'We got to do better and I hope that we will.' The comments came during a press availability in the Capitol after House Republicans narrowly passed a bill to claw back $9.4 billion in federal spending for public broadcasting and foreign aid. Johnson staged the gaggle to discuss the legislation, but was swarmed with questions about the altercation in Los Angeles. 'I saw the same video, a very brief video, that I think many people did — I think the senator's actions, my view, is it was wildly inappropriate,' he said. 'You don't charge a sitting Cabinet secretary, and everybody can draw their own conclusions, you can see it's a heated debate here.' As he delivered those remarks, a long line of House Democrats — including many in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and from the California delegation — walked behind the Speaker and heckled him and he spoke. Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-Calif), who represents the San Francisco bay area, shouted 'Mike, that's absurd.' Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) yelled 'why don't you stand up for Congress?' Another House Democrat exclaimed 'that's a lie.' Asked if he would respond to some of the comments, Johnson declined. 'I'm not gonna respond to that,' the Speaker said. 'I think the American people can draw their own conclusions. They saw a senator acting like a, wildly inappropriate, I'll leave it at that.' 'What I saw was agents asking him to quiet down so that the secretary could continue her press conference. He refused to do so. What were they supposed to do? They have to restrain someone who is engaging in that kind of behavior. They moved him out of the room,' Johnson later added. 'A sitting member of Congress should not act like that, it is beneath a member of Congress, it is beneath a U.S. senator. They are supposed to lead by example and that is not a good example.' Earlier on Thursday, Padilla interrupted a press conference Noem was holding in Los Angeles amid widespread protests against the Trump administration's deportation efforts and against Trump mobilizing the National Guard and Marines to protect agents. Multiple men forcibly removed him from the room and handcuffed him. 'I'm Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla is heard saying as he struggled with officers holding him back. As he was aggressively moved out two double doors the senator can be heard saying 'Hands off!' 'Senator Padilla is currently in Los Angeles exercising his duty to perform Congressional oversight of the federal government's operations in Los Angeles and across California,' Padilla's office said in a statement immediately after the altercation. 'He was in the federal building to receive a briefing with General Guillot and was listening to Secretary Noem's press conference. He tried to ask the Secretary a question, and was forcibly removed by federal agents, forced to the ground and handcuffed. He is not currently detained, and we are working to get additional information.
