
Tariffs are making these 5 things more expensive in Canada
Fridges and washing machines
Tariffs are making household appliances, such as fridges and washing machines more expensive for Canadian consumers. This is due to a combination of Canada's counter-tariffs on U.S. made appliances and the rising cost of American sheet steel, which has been impacted by U.S. tariffs on imported metals.
According to Statistics Canada, the price of refrigerators and freezers has increased by an average of 2%, while dishwashing and laundry appliances are up 4.5% compared to last year. While consumers may find ways to save by purchasing non-U.S. products, experts say that "pre-tariff" sales are a clear sign that prices for these items will continue to climb.
New and used cars
The automotive sector has been hit particularly hard by the ongoing trade dispute between the U.S. and Canada, largely due to the intricate nature of their manufacturing supply chains. A vehicle's components can cross the border up to eight times before final assembly, leaving the industry vulnerable to new tariffs.
A 25% tariff on cars and trucks not built in the U.S., along with Canada's reciprocal tariffs and broader metals tariffs, has resulted in a price surge for new vehicles, which were up over 5% in June compared to last year. This has also caused a price increase in the used car market, as experts believe consumers are keeping their vehicles longer to avoid purchasing new ones.
Peanut butter, canned soup and other groceries
Canada's counter-tariffs are noticeably impacting grocery prices, despite a temporary six-month exemption on some products. Loblaw, the country's largest grocer, is now labeling nearly 7,500 items with a "T" to indicate tariff-related price hikes, and its CEO reports that these items have seen a 20% decline in sales. This includes staples like tomato ketchup, peanut butter, jam, turkey, pasta, and oranges. Experts note that prices for fruit juice have increased by 7.5% and canned soups by 8% due to tariffs on American citrus and steel, as Canada imports most of its food packaging from the U.S.
Clothing and footwear
In an unexpected reversal of a 20-year trend, clothing and footwear prices in Canada rose by 2% year-over-year in June. According to a Statistics Canada analyst, this price increase is less a result of Canada's counter-tariffs on U.S. goods and more a symptom of the broader global trade war. U.S. tariffs on major Asian manufacturing hubs have created supply chain uncertainty, ultimately driving up costs for the Canadian apparel industry and, in turn, for consumers.
Housing and remodeling costs
The Canadian home building industry is struggling with the rising cost of materials due to tariffs, a factor that is now delaying project deadlines. A residential developer in Ontario noted that while the total cost increase is hard to calculate, the uncertainty has forced her company to seek out local suppliers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Two men who despise each other, one hour that will change the world: Trump and Zelensky to face-off again as Europe furiously briefs Ukrainian on how not to upset the US President
Sir Keir Starmer is heading to meet Donald Trump today as part of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky 's entourage of European leaders. The Prime Minister will join France 's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Finland 's Alexander Stubb in the White House. NATO chief Mark Rutte and European Commission boss Ursula von der Leyen are also travelling to Washington DC to join the talks with Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky. The US and Ukrainian presidents are set to hold an hour-long meeting before wider discussions between Mr Trump and European leaders. They are expected to use those talks to urge Mr Trump not to cede to Vladimir Putin 's demands for Ukraine to surrender the whole of the Donbas region to Russia. The European leaders are being dubbed Mr Zelensky's 'back-up' following the Ukrainian President's previous acrimonious visit to the White House. In an astonishing spat in February, US vice-president JD Vance accused Mr Zelensky of not being thankful enough for American support in the face of Russia 's invasion. The public row resulted in US aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted and sparked fresh panic across European capitals that Mr Trump was siding with the Kremlin. Mr Zelensky and Mr Trump have since attempted to repair relations, including with talks in the Vatican on the sidelines of Pope Francis's funeral in April. But the US President infuriated Ukrainians by rolling out the red carpet for Mr Putin during their talks about a potential ceasefire in Alaska last week. Mr Trump also ratcheted up tensions ahead of Monday's talks by claiming Mr Zelensky 'can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to'. He also ruled out future NATO membership for Ukraine and said Crimea would not be returning from Russian annexation. In a post on his Truth Social website, the US President wrote: 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight. Remember how it started. 'No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!' In a follow-up post, Mr Trump said it was a 'great honour' to host a slew of European leaders in Washington. 'Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!! President DJT,' he wrote. Britain, France and Germany are said to have taken the lead on preparing Ukraine's delegation for Monday's meeting - including advice on how not to upset Mr Trump. Sir Keir met with Mr Zelensky in Downing Street on Thursday ahead of Mr Trump's talks with Mr Putin in Alaska. The Prime Minister and Mr Macron, the French President, also co-chaired a virtual meeting of the so-called 'coalition of the willing' on Sunday. Following the talks, Mr Macron said Ukraine's allies would 'present a united front' to Mr Trump during Monday's meeting in the White House. 'If we are weak with Russia today, we'll be preparing the conflicts of tomorrow and they will impact the Ukrainians and - make no mistake - they can impact us, too,' he added. Mr Zelensky is expected to face calls from Mr Trump to concede to full Russian control of Donetsk and Luhansk, two mineral-rich regions of Ukraine that are mostly occupied by Russia. In exchange for these demands, Mr Puting would reportedly withdraw his forces from other areas of Ukraine and accept a NATO-like guarantee that Ukraine would be protected from further incursion. European leaders have said it is up to Ukraine to decide how it wishes to end the war. Mr Trump has appeared to drop his calls for a ceasefire after his summit with Mr Putin in Alaska. The US President has instead said he wants to focus a long-term peace deal, although US secretary of state Marco Rubio has signalled a deal is 'still a long ways off'. There will be 'additional consequences' for Russia if it does not agree to a peace deal, Mr Rubio added, but he suggested fresh financial sanctions would be unlikely to force Mr Putin to the negotiating table. Ms von der Leyen suggested at a press conference on Sunday that both a ceasefire and a peace deal would have the same impact: to 'stop the killing'. Appearing alongside her, Ukraine's Mr Zelensky appeared to agree, though he also signalled his preference for a ceasefire. 'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons. So it's necessary to cease fire and work quickly on a final deal,' he said. Government minister Stephen Kinnock this morning said Mr Zelensky must not be forced to accept a peace deal if he is not happy with its terms. He said Sir Keir had three objectives for when he meets Mr Trump at the White House alongside Mr Zelensky on Monday. He told Times Radio: 'The first of all is to make it absolutely clear that any decisions taken about Ukrainian territory must be taken with the agreement of the Ukrainian government and President Zelensky. 'The other is that the pathway for Ukraine to NATO and to security guarantees cannot be dictated to them by any other country. 'And the other is to send a very clear message that we the British people stand firmly shoulder-to-shoulder with the Ukrainian people as we showed when we opened our homes and our hearts to the Ukrainian refugees.'


Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Meghan Markle is a 'fraud' who is 'milking' her fame from Prince Harry to 'sucker people' into buying her products, leading US brand experts claim
Meghan Markle is a 'fraud' and As Ever is all about 'milking' her fame from marrying Prince Harry to 'sucker people into buying her stuff', two of North America's leading brand experts have claimed. Canadian lawyer Phillip Millar and California marketing executive Camille Moore, stars of popular The Art of the Brand podcast, believe the launch and concept of her lifestyle business has been one of the worst they have ever seen. 'I love sh***ing on people who suck. Meghan Markle sucks as far as I'm concerned', Mr Millar has said. 'It [As Ever] is run by a confederacy of dunces working on this platform that is just getting maximising the value from her fame that came from Suits and being a part of the Royal Family and they're just milking that for everything they can'. Millar and Moore, who have advised big businesses including Mercedes-Benz, L'Oreal, Olaplex, Dior, Van Cleef and Air Canada, say Meghan's business has been a 'royal disaster'. Mr Millar believes that As Ever lacks authenticity because he claims that Meghan is 'pretending' to be a domestic goddess and most people don't believe it. But he added that the people who have rushed to buy her wine, jam, crepe mix and tea shows 'how gullible a lot of consumers are'. Canadian lawyer Phillip Millar and California marketing executive Camille Moore, stars of popular The Art of the Brand podcast, believe the launch and concept of her lifestyle business has been one of the worst they have ever seen He said: 'She's not substantial. I'm agitated by her so much because it is a deliberate misrepresentation of what she is because she thinks she can pretend to be that while actually being this and sucker people into buying her stuff and every step of the way she's failing because it's not legitimate. It's not intelligent. It's not well executed. 'There was nothing about her brand that was good from the start to a distinguishing eye. She was a fraud what I can see from the beginning who was just using opportunities to advance herself. Her brand wasn't one built on substance. It was based on using people. 'They're not executing anything well on any show on anything. But it shows how gullible a lot of consumers are'. Mr Millar said that investors including Netflix appear to have failed to ask serious questions of Meghan before the launch. 'People who consider themselves smart because nobody ever questions them are running this business and telling her to use a playbook that works for products where scarcity matters. Confectionery scarcity doesn't matter. He added: 'There's an egocentric approach to it that if you achieve some level of celebrity, you think you can build a brand, but that's the start of your brand. You can make short-term money from it, but it's not a long-term strategy'. Phillip believes Meghan has failed to see what she really is - a 'disruptor' rather than a homemaker. He said: 'Her brand should be I'm a disruptor. I go into TV. I make noise. I go into the Royal Family. I make noise. She should brand herself as a rebel, but she's not consistent with what she is. 'She should be a disruptor and sell products that are not that expensive and that represent disruption, but that audience is not spending a lot of money'. Ms Moore said Meghan is responsible 'for really probably having the worst brand execution to date', adding: 'She's had zero ownership in this business. It's effectively like she's just like labeling her brand'. She added: 'I feel like she's doing such a brutal or good job, depending on how you're looking at it, of getting this like free PR and then absolutely s***ing the bed'. When she started posting links on the ShopMy e-commerce site, some thought that this was going to prove an irresistible source of serious income for the Duchess of Sussex. It couldn't be easier, really – influencers link posts from their Instagram to the online shop, and then rake in a percentage of every item of clothing, make-up or homeware sold as a result. Some of the top creators make up to $1million (£740,000) a year with a cut of between 10 and 30 per cent per item, depending on the retailer. The 'creators' are ranked in a tiering visible only to other ShopMy entrepreneurs; the biggest earners are 'icons' and the lowliest ranking is 'enthusiast'. After an initial flurry on the site, in which she directed shoppers to the sweaters she wore in her Netflix show With Love, Meghan, the denim dress she wore on a 'date night' with Prince Harry to watch Beyonce and her make-up and hair favourites, Meghan has fallen silent. Indeed, she's not posted in over two months on ShopMy and it seems that her ranking has dropped from icon to enthusiast as a result. While she continues to appear regularly on her own Instagram page and that of her brand, As Ever, she or her team are not linking through for 'easy money'. A spokesman for the couple did not respond to requests for clarification but a source says that – however lucrative – this potential revenue stream is simply not important to her. 'Her current priorities are centred on As Ever and expanding her business ventures. ShopMy represents an exploration into social media that she enjoys.' The source adds: 'The duchess has consistently approached ShopMy with a focus on authentically sharing products and designers she supports, particularly female founders she wants to uplift.' The deal is then: Meghan doesn't need the money, because she's making plenty already. As speculation grows over the couple attempting to renew links to the UK – with two key members of the Sussex team meeting the King's aide, Tobyn Andreae, earlier this month, as revealed exclusively by The Mail on Sunday – it's intriguing to examine what commercial successes the couple have had since moving their lives to California. The bottom line, of course, has always been significant for both Harry and Meghan. As they seemingly make steps towards rebuilding bridges with the Royal Family, you have to ask: How would a rapprochement serve the Sussexes? And, more than this, might they need to make up with the King for financial reasons. After all, he used to fund his son Harry's life ... right down to a wardrobe allowance for his wife. People who know the Sussexes say the reopening of communications doesn't mean they're any less committed to life in Montecito. I'm told: 'They're very happy living in and raising their family in California and, as it stands, have no plans to leave. The duke will of course continue, as he has done since he emigrated, to visit the UK in support of his charitable causes and patronages.' Indeed, Montecito is the epicentre of how they are marketing themselves. Meghan's As Ever brand was originally known as American Riviera Orchard, after the area in which they live. Five months after Megxit in February 2020, the Sussexes bought their house in Montecito for $14.65million (£10,890,000). And it's that purchase which seems to have fired the starting gun on the Sussexes' endeavours. In their tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey the following year, which took place while Meghan was pregnant with daughter Lilibet, Prince Harry reflected on their money-making activities to date. He said their deals with Netflix and Spotify had both been driven by financial necessity. The prince said he was cut off by his family in the first quarter of 2020, shortly after he and Meghan announced they would step back as senior members of the royals. He added that he still had the money left to him by his late mother, Princess Diana. 'Without that, we wouldn't have been able to do this,' he said, referring to the family's move to California. If Harry and Meghan had really been getting $100million over five years from Netflix at a steady rate of $20million a year, then you could consider it taken care of. But a source with knowledge of the Netflix deal say it's never worked out like that But even the reputed £10million left by Diana wouldn't be enough to buy his house and sustain their lifestyle for long. The couple are widely reported to have taken out a mortgage, with repayments apparently standing at $480,000 a year. On top of this, property tax will be a further $68,000 a year. Utilities are estimated at $24,000 a year, staffing costs $250,000 and security – always a priority for Prince Harry, who made two tours of duty in Afghanistan with the Army Air Corps – is said to cost up to $3million a year. It all adds up to needing to clear around $4million a year after tax, which is quite a task. Sources also indicate that the price Harry and Meghan pay to run their Archewell production company is significant, 'probably $3million a year, which as an overhead commitment is quite big by Hollywood standards', though some of those costs come out of charity funds. If Harry and Meghan had really been getting $100million over five years from Netflix at a steady rate of $20million a year, then you could consider it taken care of. But a source with knowledge of the Netflix deal say it's never worked out like that. They said: 'From speaking to someone with knowledge of the deal, it looks like they've probably managed to maybe keep $10million-$15million or a touch more purely for themselves over the nearly five years so far – not bad business, but that kind of money doesn't last long with their lifestyle. 'Netflix paid for the production of [the tell-all hit documentary series] Harry & Meghan, which would have included a big fee for them. 'I'd guess [the money Netflix spent on it] works out at $20million all-in. 'Netflix haven't done too badly out of the relationship in as much as they've probably only gone out of pocket to the tune of around $40million or thereabouts, and they did at least get a huge hit documentary out of the investment, and a less successful show in With Love, Meghan. 'The whole arrangement was basically a trade-off for Netflix getting the Harry & Meghan documentary and they will regard it as a modest win.'


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Zelensky defies Trump minutes after US President lays out his terms for peace - setting up another showdown at White House TODAY watched by European leaders
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky appears to have already rejected President Donald Trump 's terms for a peace plan with Russia as the two leaders prepare for an Oval Office showdown. Trump laid out his demands on Sunday night by telling Zelensky to sacrifice Crimea and give up his desire to join NATO in advance of Monday's blockbuster meeting in the White House. Zelensky returns to Washington DC for the first time since their famous bust-up in February. Unlike on his previous visit, Zelensky will be backed by the UK's Keir Starmer, France's Emmanuel Macron, and Germany's Friedrich Merz, who will all join him in Washington. Trump posted a dramatic statement that claimed Zelensky could 'end the war with Russia almost immediately' - which the Ukrainian leader rebuked within 90 minutes. 'President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' Trump wrote on Truth Social about 9.20pm. 'Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!' In response, Zelensky took to X to insist 'Russia must end this war, which it itself started,' railing against Trump's suggestion that he was solely responsible for ending the conflict. 'Ukrainians are fighting for their land, for their independence. Now, our soldiers have successes in Donetsk and Sumy regions,' he wrote. Zelensky also indicated he would not acquiesce to Trump on Crimea, territory which Russia annexed in 2014 and has been furiously defending during the three-year war. 'We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably. And peace must be lasting,' Zelensky wrote. 'Not like it was years ago, when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part of our East - part of Donbas - and Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack. 'Of course, Crimea should not have been given up then, just as Ukrainians did not give up Kyiv, Odesa, or Kharkiv after 2022.' Zelensky took a lighter note while addressing Trump, taking pains to not criticise the president directly. 'I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance,' he added. Meanwhile, fighting is still raging on in Ukraine. Kharkiv, which has been a constant target since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, was hit by missiles and drones overnight in another wave of attacks that left civilians dead and homes destroyed. Local officials said three people were killed, including a two-year-old boy, and at least 17 were wounded. Graphic images have shown emergency crews carrying the lifeless body of a child. Regional governor Oleh Synehubov said the toddler was killed in a drone strike that struck early on Monday, only hours after a ballistic missile had slammed into the city on Sunday night. He wrote on Telegram that the number of injured was 'continuously increasing'. Despite the ongoing push for peace, Putin has been persistent in his attacks on Ukraine. Kharkiv mayor Ihor Terekhov confirmed two more people had been killed, while 17 others were hurt in the double strike. He added: 'A woman has just been rescued from under the rubble: she is alive,' warning that more victims could still be trapped. The earlier ballistic missile strike shattered around 1,000 windows in Kharkiv, according to Synehubov. Ukraine's state emergency service said some residents had to be evacuated as buildings were left unsafe. Reuters reporters in the city saw paramedics treating people on the streets and rescue teams inspecting damage to residential blocks. The wider region was also pounded. Two people were wounded in neighbouring Sumy, where officials said at least a dozen houses and an education centre were wrecked. Oleh Hryhorov, head of the Sumy regional administration, said on Telegram: 'The enemy continues to deliberately target civilian infrastructure in the Sumy region - treacherously, at night.' Meanwhile, although Zelensky expressed gratitude for both Trump and America in his statement, there were concerns across Europe that his meeting with Trump on Monday could end poorly. Leaders from Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland are rallying around the Ukrainian president and will join him in Washington for the highly anticipated meeting amid fears he is walking into a trap. The meeting comes days after Trump met with Putin for a two-and-a-half hour discussion in Alaska about the ongoing conflict In a sign of EU leaders' bullishness, French president Emmanuel Macron said afterwards: 'If we're not strong today, we'll pay dearly tomorrow.' Their pledge to be at Zelensky's side is an apparent effort to ensure the meeting goes better than the last one in February, when Trump berated Zelensky in a heated Oval Office encounter. At the time, the Ukrainian leader was asked to leave the White House by top Trump advisors following the heated confrontation. 'You're gambling with World War III, and what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country that's backed you far more than a lot of people say they should have,' Trump told Zelensky. Vice President JD Vance chimed in, demanding that Zelensky show gratitude - asking, 'Have you said ''thank you'' once?' 'The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt,' said retired French General Dominique Trinquand. 'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump.' Trump appeared unfazed by the EU leaders' decision to join Zelensky to send him a message, writing on Truth Social on Sunday night: 'Big day at the White House tomorrow. 'Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!' He added: 'The Fake News will say that it is a big loss for President Trump to host so many great European Leaders at our beautiful White House. Actually, it is a great honor for America!!!' The leaders will begin to arrive at the White House at 12noon EST (17:00 BST). Trump and Zelensky are due to meet at 1pm ET, with a bilateral discussion to take place at 1.15pm. At 13:15, Trump will meet and greet the rest of the European leaders. By 3.00pm, Trump is due to host multilateral meetings with leaders from the EU. Details of when the meeting is expected to end has not been revealed yet. Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute, said European leaders are trying to 'shape this fast-evolving agenda.' The meeting comes days after Trump met with Putin for a two-and-a-half hour discussion in Alaska about the ongoing conflict. Afterwards, Trump admitted he and Putin could not strike a deal on the crisis, but insisted: 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to. 'We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' After the Alaska summit, the idea of a ceasefire appears all-but-abandoned, with the narrative shifting toward Putin's agenda of ensuring Ukraine does not join NATO or even the EU. Diplomatic sources said that Friday's summit paved the way for a deal in which Ukraine would be expected to surrender large swathes of the Donbas region in the east of the country, including areas currently controlled by Kyiv. While Russia has taken most of Luhansk, it only holds about 75 per cent of Donetsk, which is both vital for the nation's defence and also home to many of the rare-earth minerals Putin craves. He has also taken about 74 per cent of the neighbouring Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. Zelensky earlier pushed back against Trump's assertion — which aligned with Putin's preference — that the two sides should negotiate a complete end to the war, rather than first securing a ceasefire. This would allow Putin to continue his deadly strikes until a full peace deal was achieved. Zelensky said a ceasefire would provide breathing room to review Putin's demands. 'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons,' he said. 'Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it.' Despite the push for peace, Putin has been persistent in his attacks on Ukraine On Sunday, Trump's former vice-president Mike Pence insisted Putin was 'the bad guy' and should be treated as such during negotiations.] He said he knew Trump liked to use a 'velvet glove' style in dealing with dictators, but added: 'The hammer needs to come and it needs to come immediately.' Pence told CNN that as well as meeting Zelensky, Trump should call for another sanctions bill against Russia to be passed 'immediately' in the Senate. He also gave Trump credit for pursuing his earlier ceasefire deal despite 'many voices in and around the administration that would have cut Ukraine loose months ago.'