Nebraska feedlot political fight makes way to statehouse
A branding battle is emerging in Nebraska over whether feedlots should pay branding fees. ()
LINCOLN — A divide between rural Nebraska lawmakers is rustling in the statehouse.
State Sen. Teresa Ibach of Sumner, in west-central Nebraska, has proposed a bill that would exempt a significant sector of agriculture in the state — feedlots — from branding and inspection fees under the state's livestock branding law that she has said she aims to 'modernize' with Legislative Bill 646.
'LB 646 simply provides an exemption for [feedlots], so [they] are treated uniformly across Nebraska,' Ibach said during the bill Agriculture Committee hearing.
She has faced opposition from State Sen. Tanya Storer of Whitman, a freshman rural lawmaker from north-central Nebraska who proposed an amendment to essentially kill the bill and let lawmakers make a more informed decision later regarding one of the state's biggest industries. Her reason: Most lawmakers don't deal with cattle.
'The reality is there's only about four in this body of 49 that understand that,' Storer said.
Nebraska is the second-largest cattle-producing state in the U.S., generating $13.2 billion from cattle and other livestock, according to the latest tally from the Nebraska Department of Agriculture. Parts of that industry are regulated by the Nebraska Brand Committee, which is tasked with investigating cattle theft and verifying ownership through branding when cattle are bought, sold or moved in or beyond the brand zone in state law, essentially covering the western two-thirds of the state. Its services are funded entirely through fees, not by taxpayers.
The divide on the Ibach bill is that it would exempt feedlots in the state's brand inspection area from paying branding-related fees, replacing them with a one-time payment of $500 to apply for feedlots to get exempt status. The Brand Committee called the legislation an attempt to 'severely' weaken the cattle industry's checks and balances, and several cattle industry groups have opposed it.
During the bill's hearing before the Agriculture Committee, Nebraska Farmers Union president John Hansen said the Brand Committee provides security from cattle theft. He added the whole state should be under the Livestock Brand Act because the areas not in the branding area are an 'invitation for abuse.'
'If I were stealing cattle, I know that I would be trying to sell them in the area of the state that does not have brand inspection,' Hansen said. 'So the viability of the system will be undermined if this bill goes forward as is.'
The Nebraska State Dairy Association testified in support of the bill and requested its own exception from the state Livestock Brand Act, calling the system a time and economic burden on the dairy industry because the branding committee hasn't updated its ID Program.
'Our producers are tired of waiting for the change to pay for a program that has no value to our industry,' said Steve Wolfe, who testified on behalf of the Nebraska State Dairy Association.
Bill sponsors initially included all eight of the Legislature's Agriculture Committee members, though only six of the eight voted it out of committee for a floor debate: two original sponsors, State Sens. Mike Jacobson of North Platte and Dan McKeon of Amherst withdrew their names from the bill last week. Jacobson said it because his constituents won't like it.
'The only reason I signed on to begin with was to try to get to the point where we could negotiate something better than what we have today,' Jacobson said. 'Every email and phone call I've gotten on this issue, except from the feed yards who stand directly to benefit, have been not only no but hell no. That's a pretty strong message.'
Other cattle-feeding states, including Texas and Oklahoma, deal with cattle branding differently. In those states, it's not mandatory but encouraged to deter theft, while brand inspections are mandatory in Wyoming and Colorado.
Elliott Dennis, a University of Nebraska-Lincoln professor of livestock marketing and risk management, said Nebraska's cattle branding approach is unique because some parts of the state don't have to deal with the inspection fees.
Dennis said the quirk is because areas in the eastern parts of the state have fewer cattle than most of western Nebraska. He said consumers wouldn't feel the proposed changes to the branding law.
Feedlot owners and beef and dairy cattle growers tried but failed in 2020 and 2021 to comprehensively update state branding laws. Dennis said feedlot owners have historically been against brand inspection due to the frequency of fees they must pay based on their cattle numbers and because getting an inspector can slow down production.
He said who proposed the bill tells a lot about its intention.
'This isn't a person unfamiliar with the cattle industry,' Dennis said.
Ibach, a first-term senator, is married to the longest-serving state agriculture director Greg Ibach. She and her family own a cattle operation in Dawson County. She said the legislation is about updating the state brand law, not getting rid of it.
'To be clear, [the] bill does not do away with brand inspection inside the brand area, nor does it impact anyone's ability to own or use a brand,' Ibach said.
In an op-ed last month on KRVN Rural Radio's website in Lexington, Ibach said she worked with the Nebraska Brand Committee and the Nebraska Farm Bureau after the bill's Agriculture Committee hearing to add amendments to address the concerns from the committee, farm bureau, and other groups.
'I believe the amendment addresses legitimate concerns raised by the testifiers and others,' Ibach wrote.
Her amendment, AM 829, to LB 646, would cap the amount the Brand Committee can charge feedlots.
Currently, the committee can charge for each additional increment of 250 cattle above the total of 1,000 cattle, which represents the lot's one-time capacity. Feedlots are charged a $1,000 annual permit. If the bill becomes law, it's estimated the committee would lose $1.6 million annually, roughly 25% of its operating budget.
Nebraska Farm Bureau Senior Director of State Legislative Affairs Bruce Rieker said the Bureau's stance on the bill could change as negotiations between stakeholders in the cattle industry continue.
'There are very sincere conversations going on between many of the parties now, Rieker said. 'Much more so now than maybe they were earlier in the session.'
On Tuesday, the Farm Bureau released a statement expressing disapproval of the amendment to the bill, signaling that it still opposes the changes.
'For more than 80 years, the Nebraska Brand Committee has played a vital role in overseeing livestock brand registration, enforcement, and proof of ownership.' The statement reads, 'We support the work of the Brand Committee and believe the Committee should have the fee authority necessary to adequately fund its programs.'
Nebraska Cattlemen also expressed continued opposition to the bill. Still, the group said it would 'remain committed to working with Senator Ibach toward a solution that could be acceptable to the membership as we work to modernize brand laws in Nebraska.' The statement said the Cattleman Board of Directors would meet Tuesday to discuss and take a stance on the agriculture committee amendment.
Storer announced an amendment late last week to Ibach's bill that would delay immediate action on the bill and call for a study by the Nebraska Brand Committee for potential solutions. Storer said she was 'frustrated' with how the bill was initially crafted without the input of the Brand Committee and the cattle industry. She said her amendment was reasonable and would give more parts of the cattle industry a say.
'I believe it is vitally important that we have an agency in place to provide oversight that prevents fraud and theft in that industry,' Storer told the Nebraska Examiner. 'So at the end of the day, anything that's going to weaken that agency…to prevent fraud and theft is problematic.'
The legislation is set to be debated on the floor Wednesday.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Upstate Democrats oppose cow limit for dairy farms
(WIVT/WBGH) – Some Upstate Democrats in the New York State Assembly are pushing back on a proposal that would limit the size of dairy farms. Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo, who is chair of the Agriculture Committee, and three of her Democratic colleagues issued a news release this week in opposition to a proposal by downstate Democrats to end the authorization of dairy farms with more than 700 milking cows. Lupardo says she was disappointed that the bill would be crafted without consulting anyone in the dairy industry. She also says dairy farmers are some of the best stewards of the land that she knows. Lupardo added that she doesn't foresee the bill going anywhere. Eucharistic Procession makes way through Binghamton Celebrate Pride Month with an evening of laughter at Schorr Family Firehouse Stage Roosevelt reflects on the legacy of Principal Dave Chilson Mercy House prepares for $2.1 million expansion Upstate Democrats oppose cow limit for dairy farms Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


New York Times
6 days ago
- New York Times
He Built an Airstrip on Protected Land. Now He's in Line to Lead the Forest Service.
Michael Boren, founder of a billion-dollar tech company, Idaho ranch owner and Trump donor, has clashed with the U.S. Forest Service for years. He was accused of flying a helicopter dangerously close to a crew building a Forest Service trail, prompting officials to seek a restraining order. He got a caution from the Forest Service, and criticism from his neighbors, when he built a private airstrip on his Hell Roaring Ranch in a national recreation area. And in the fall, the Forest Service sent a cease-and-desist letter accusing a company that Mr. Boren controlled of building an unauthorized cabin on National Forest land. Now, Mr. Boren is Mr. Trump's nominee to oversee the very agency he has tussled with repeatedly. On Tuesday, the Senate Agriculture Committee is scheduled to hold a confirmation hearing on Mr. Boren's nomination to be the under secretary of agriculture for natural resources and environment, a role that would put him in charge of the Forest Service. If confirmed, he would manage an agency that oversees almost 200 million acres of public lands across the United States, including maintaining trails, coordinating wildfire response and overseeing the sale of timber and other resources. He would also oversee the Natural Resources Conservation Service, which helps farmers and ranchers conserve natural resources on their own land. Mr. Boren would be leading the Forest Service at a tumultuous time. In April, the secretary of agriculture, Brooke Rollins, issued an order removing environmental protections from almost 60 percent of national forests, or more than 112 million acres, mostly in the West. That came after Mr. Trump issued an executive order to increase logging on those lands by 25 percent. The Forest Service has also fired thousands of workers as part of Mr. Trump's drive to shrink the federal government. Hangar Land before Boren purchase. Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip Hell Roaring Ranch 2014 2016 2024 IDAHO 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 ft. Source: Airbus DS via Google By Mira Rojanasakul/The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Yahoo
Sales tax, tobacco tax push doom Nebraska's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' for property tax relief
State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth, at podium, with Gov. Jim Pillen and State Sen. Barry DeKay of Niobrara, from left. Brandt serves as chair of the Legislature's Natural Resources Committee. DeKay chairs the Agriculture Committee. May 7, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Nebraska's version of 'One Big Beautiful Bill' for property tax relief went up in smoke Monday despite an effort to narrow new revenues to increased taxes on cigarettes and vapes. It becomes the third property tax package in the past year to propose and fail to garner traction to use new sales tax revenues to lower property taxes. It also deals a significant blow to Gov. Jim Pillen's pledge to keep property taxes flat this year as he eyes reelection. Legislative Bill 170, led by State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth, failed 30-15. It needed 33 votes to overcome a filibuster from opponents across the political spectrum who opposed the tax 'shift. The proposal originally sought to add sales taxes to 20 currently exempt goods or services, including pop, dating services, chartered jets, swimming pool cleaning and maintenance services and pet grooming. It also sought to hike the taxes on cigarettes (up to $1.36) and vapes (up to 40%). The original package anticipated $110 million in new revenue, with $100 million directed to property tax credits to offset property taxes paid to local K-12 school districts. 'Property taxes remain one of the most painful burdens our residents face, impacting everyone from family farmers to first-time homeowners,' Brandt said. 'This legislation is a responsible, targeted effort to address the burden by broadening Nebraska's tax base.' However, as happened at the end of both the 2024 regular session and an 18-day special session Pillen called last summer, lawmakers ultimately rejected expanded sales taxes on several goods and services, which could have raised about $53 million, Brandt's estimates indicated. 'It's just rebranded or repackaged from the prior two failed attempts that this Legislature has not moved forward for a variety of different reasons, with strong support across a politically diverse coalition,' said State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln. Brandt sought to narrow LB 170 to a lower revenue target of $80 million for new property tax relief each year by striking any broadening of the sales tax base. Instead, he proposed to increase cigarette taxes to $1.64 per 20-pack, which he said would raise nearly $60 million each year, and to increase vape taxes to 40% wholesale, which he said would raise about $15 million. Both versions of LB 170 also included a proposal from Fremont State Sen. Dave Wordekemper to capture a 20% tax on cigars, cheroots and stogies purchased online, which senators estimated would raise $100,000 in revenue. That left roughly $5 million that would have needed to be made up later, such as by adding back a handful of expanded sales taxes to the package. State Sen. Jana Hughes of Seward, who has fought for increased taxes on vapes, said property tax relief is necessary for the grandmas or grandpas across Nebraska, as well as retirees and veterans, who are being priced out of their homes because of property taxes. Hughes, State Sen. Mike Jacobson of North Platte and a handful of other conservatives in the officially nonpartisan Legislature defended the shift to new sales tax revenue as targeting 'optional' goods or services. 'We are so dang lazy we can't even go to the McDonald's drive-through by ourselves to go pick up our food. We hire someone to pick it up, and that's a service, and we're not even talking about taxing that service,' Hughes said. A vote against LB 170, supporters said, was a vote against property tax relief. 'Don't tell me you're representing your constituents when you say you don't want to lower property taxes, because you aren't representing your constituents,' said State Sen. Mike Jacobson of North Platte. 'You're representing some ideology.' Much of the pushback to LB 170 was bipartisan, including from Republican State Sens. Brad von Gillern of the Elkhorn area, chair of the Legislature's Revenue Committee, and Stan Clouse of Kearney, who said the bill was not 'sustainable' relief. Clouse, a former longtime Kearney mayor, said the relief was 'not real' and was 'simply increasing revenue streams.' He suggested eliminating unfunded mandates was a better focus. Added von Gillern: 'This is putting dollars into the top of a bucket that has a hole in the bottom of it.' State Sen. Beau Ballard of Lincoln, a Pillen appointee, criticized LB 170 and its narrower components as a 'tax increase with no end in sight' that wasn't the right path forward, even as he identified property tax relief as a top priority for his district. Von Gillern and State Sen. Tanya Storer of Whitman said the increased revenue also wouldn't keep up with property tax growth, which was nearly $300 million in two of the past three years. The exception in annual increases that high was last fall, after the state took on the tab for property taxes previously levied by community colleges. The state budget passed last week included about $57 million in expanded property tax credits for next year, and about $11 million more for homestead exemptions. Even combined with the $80 million in Brandt's bill, property taxes would likely increase statewide next year. That stands in direct contrast to Pillen's pledge to hold property taxes flat. He has said that, without 'a shadow of a doubt,' he and allies would find additional property tax relief this year. Storer, a rancher in north-central Nebraska, said she was concerned that the continued reliance on property tax credits was 'feeding the demon' and taking away accountability from local taxing authorities. 'We still haven't pulled the right triggers,' Storer, a freshman lawmaker, said. Another path forward for property tax relief includes buying down property tax levies directly, an approach led by Hughes in a Pillen-backed LB 303, which also sought long-term changes to how the state funds K-12 schools. However, the provision to lower property taxes directly has since been stripped out of LB 303 to give time for senators to further study the approach before returning next January. On the Democratic side, State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln, who has consistently opposed expanding the sales tax to exempted items without lowering the 5.5-cent statewide sales tax rate, said the latest package would pick 'winners and losers.' Dungan criticized repeated efforts for a 'grand slam swing' at tax policy when expansive adjustments need more time to be effective. State Sens. Ashlei Spivey and Terrell McKinney, both of Omaha, noted LB 170 wouldn't have helped renters. Conrad and State Sen. Dunixi Guereca of Omaha cautioned that an increased tax on nicotine products also wouldn't be paid by 'Big Tobacco' executives, but everyday Nebraskans. Dungan and State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha added that increasing taxes on cigarettes and vapes would hopefully decrease tobacco usage, which could lead to less tax revenue. 'If we continue to just try to put a piece of tape over the hole in the boat,' Dungan said, 'it's not going to fix the actual problem.' After the vote, Brandt said he was disappointed and that he had made his 'run' for more relief. 'If the Legislature doesn't want to give property tax relief, I don't know what else I can do,' Brandt told the Nebraska Examiner. Voting to move forward on LB 170: Democratic State Sens. Wendy DeBoer of Omaha, Jason Prokop of Lincoln, Dan Quick of Grand Island, Jane Raybould of Lincoln and Victor Rountree of Bellevue. Voting against LB 170: Republican State Sens. Bob Andersen of Sarpy County, Beau Ballard of Lincoln, Stan Clouse of Kearney, Glen Meyer of Pender, Tanya Storer of Whitman, Jared Storm of David City and Paul Strommen of Sidney. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX