Latest news with #AgricultureCommittee
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Upstate Democrats oppose cow limit for dairy farms
(WIVT/WBGH) – Some Upstate Democrats in the New York State Assembly are pushing back on a proposal that would limit the size of dairy farms. Assemblywoman Donna Lupardo, who is chair of the Agriculture Committee, and three of her Democratic colleagues issued a news release this week in opposition to a proposal by downstate Democrats to end the authorization of dairy farms with more than 700 milking cows. Lupardo says she was disappointed that the bill would be crafted without consulting anyone in the dairy industry. She also says dairy farmers are some of the best stewards of the land that she knows. Lupardo added that she doesn't foresee the bill going anywhere. Eucharistic Procession makes way through Binghamton Celebrate Pride Month with an evening of laughter at Schorr Family Firehouse Stage Roosevelt reflects on the legacy of Principal Dave Chilson Mercy House prepares for $2.1 million expansion Upstate Democrats oppose cow limit for dairy farms Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Times
3 days ago
- Business
- New York Times
He Built an Airstrip on Protected Land. Now He's in Line to Lead the Forest Service.
Michael Boren, founder of a billion-dollar tech company, Idaho ranch owner and Trump donor, has clashed with the U.S. Forest Service for years. He was accused of flying a helicopter dangerously close to a crew building a Forest Service trail, prompting officials to seek a restraining order. He got a caution from the Forest Service, and criticism from his neighbors, when he built a private airstrip on his Hell Roaring Ranch in a national recreation area. And in the fall, the Forest Service sent a cease-and-desist letter accusing a company that Mr. Boren controlled of building an unauthorized cabin on National Forest land. Now, Mr. Boren is Mr. Trump's nominee to oversee the very agency he has tussled with repeatedly. On Tuesday, the Senate Agriculture Committee is scheduled to hold a confirmation hearing on Mr. Boren's nomination to be the under secretary of agriculture for natural resources and environment, a role that would put him in charge of the Forest Service. If confirmed, he would manage an agency that oversees almost 200 million acres of public lands across the United States, including maintaining trails, coordinating wildfire response and overseeing the sale of timber and other resources. He would also oversee the Natural Resources Conservation Service, which helps farmers and ranchers conserve natural resources on their own land. Mr. Boren would be leading the Forest Service at a tumultuous time. In April, the secretary of agriculture, Brooke Rollins, issued an order removing environmental protections from almost 60 percent of national forests, or more than 112 million acres, mostly in the West. That came after Mr. Trump issued an executive order to increase logging on those lands by 25 percent. The Forest Service has also fired thousands of workers as part of Mr. Trump's drive to shrink the federal government. Hangar Land before Boren purchase. Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip Hell Roaring Ranch 2014 2016 2024 IDAHO 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 feet Hangar Land before Boren purchase Grass airstrip starts to take shape Fenced-in airstrip 2014 2016 2024 1,000 ft. Source: Airbus DS via Google By Mira Rojanasakul/The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Sales tax, tobacco tax push doom Nebraska's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' for property tax relief
State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth, at podium, with Gov. Jim Pillen and State Sen. Barry DeKay of Niobrara, from left. Brandt serves as chair of the Legislature's Natural Resources Committee. DeKay chairs the Agriculture Committee. May 7, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Nebraska's version of 'One Big Beautiful Bill' for property tax relief went up in smoke Monday despite an effort to narrow new revenues to increased taxes on cigarettes and vapes. It becomes the third property tax package in the past year to propose and fail to garner traction to use new sales tax revenues to lower property taxes. It also deals a significant blow to Gov. Jim Pillen's pledge to keep property taxes flat this year as he eyes reelection. Legislative Bill 170, led by State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth, failed 30-15. It needed 33 votes to overcome a filibuster from opponents across the political spectrum who opposed the tax 'shift. The proposal originally sought to add sales taxes to 20 currently exempt goods or services, including pop, dating services, chartered jets, swimming pool cleaning and maintenance services and pet grooming. It also sought to hike the taxes on cigarettes (up to $1.36) and vapes (up to 40%). The original package anticipated $110 million in new revenue, with $100 million directed to property tax credits to offset property taxes paid to local K-12 school districts. 'Property taxes remain one of the most painful burdens our residents face, impacting everyone from family farmers to first-time homeowners,' Brandt said. 'This legislation is a responsible, targeted effort to address the burden by broadening Nebraska's tax base.' However, as happened at the end of both the 2024 regular session and an 18-day special session Pillen called last summer, lawmakers ultimately rejected expanded sales taxes on several goods and services, which could have raised about $53 million, Brandt's estimates indicated. 'It's just rebranded or repackaged from the prior two failed attempts that this Legislature has not moved forward for a variety of different reasons, with strong support across a politically diverse coalition,' said State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln. Brandt sought to narrow LB 170 to a lower revenue target of $80 million for new property tax relief each year by striking any broadening of the sales tax base. Instead, he proposed to increase cigarette taxes to $1.64 per 20-pack, which he said would raise nearly $60 million each year, and to increase vape taxes to 40% wholesale, which he said would raise about $15 million. Both versions of LB 170 also included a proposal from Fremont State Sen. Dave Wordekemper to capture a 20% tax on cigars, cheroots and stogies purchased online, which senators estimated would raise $100,000 in revenue. That left roughly $5 million that would have needed to be made up later, such as by adding back a handful of expanded sales taxes to the package. State Sen. Jana Hughes of Seward, who has fought for increased taxes on vapes, said property tax relief is necessary for the grandmas or grandpas across Nebraska, as well as retirees and veterans, who are being priced out of their homes because of property taxes. Hughes, State Sen. Mike Jacobson of North Platte and a handful of other conservatives in the officially nonpartisan Legislature defended the shift to new sales tax revenue as targeting 'optional' goods or services. 'We are so dang lazy we can't even go to the McDonald's drive-through by ourselves to go pick up our food. We hire someone to pick it up, and that's a service, and we're not even talking about taxing that service,' Hughes said. A vote against LB 170, supporters said, was a vote against property tax relief. 'Don't tell me you're representing your constituents when you say you don't want to lower property taxes, because you aren't representing your constituents,' said State Sen. Mike Jacobson of North Platte. 'You're representing some ideology.' Much of the pushback to LB 170 was bipartisan, including from Republican State Sens. Brad von Gillern of the Elkhorn area, chair of the Legislature's Revenue Committee, and Stan Clouse of Kearney, who said the bill was not 'sustainable' relief. Clouse, a former longtime Kearney mayor, said the relief was 'not real' and was 'simply increasing revenue streams.' He suggested eliminating unfunded mandates was a better focus. Added von Gillern: 'This is putting dollars into the top of a bucket that has a hole in the bottom of it.' State Sen. Beau Ballard of Lincoln, a Pillen appointee, criticized LB 170 and its narrower components as a 'tax increase with no end in sight' that wasn't the right path forward, even as he identified property tax relief as a top priority for his district. Von Gillern and State Sen. Tanya Storer of Whitman said the increased revenue also wouldn't keep up with property tax growth, which was nearly $300 million in two of the past three years. The exception in annual increases that high was last fall, after the state took on the tab for property taxes previously levied by community colleges. The state budget passed last week included about $57 million in expanded property tax credits for next year, and about $11 million more for homestead exemptions. Even combined with the $80 million in Brandt's bill, property taxes would likely increase statewide next year. That stands in direct contrast to Pillen's pledge to hold property taxes flat. He has said that, without 'a shadow of a doubt,' he and allies would find additional property tax relief this year. Storer, a rancher in north-central Nebraska, said she was concerned that the continued reliance on property tax credits was 'feeding the demon' and taking away accountability from local taxing authorities. 'We still haven't pulled the right triggers,' Storer, a freshman lawmaker, said. Another path forward for property tax relief includes buying down property tax levies directly, an approach led by Hughes in a Pillen-backed LB 303, which also sought long-term changes to how the state funds K-12 schools. However, the provision to lower property taxes directly has since been stripped out of LB 303 to give time for senators to further study the approach before returning next January. On the Democratic side, State Sen. George Dungan of Lincoln, who has consistently opposed expanding the sales tax to exempted items without lowering the 5.5-cent statewide sales tax rate, said the latest package would pick 'winners and losers.' Dungan criticized repeated efforts for a 'grand slam swing' at tax policy when expansive adjustments need more time to be effective. State Sens. Ashlei Spivey and Terrell McKinney, both of Omaha, noted LB 170 wouldn't have helped renters. Conrad and State Sen. Dunixi Guereca of Omaha cautioned that an increased tax on nicotine products also wouldn't be paid by 'Big Tobacco' executives, but everyday Nebraskans. Dungan and State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha added that increasing taxes on cigarettes and vapes would hopefully decrease tobacco usage, which could lead to less tax revenue. 'If we continue to just try to put a piece of tape over the hole in the boat,' Dungan said, 'it's not going to fix the actual problem.' After the vote, Brandt said he was disappointed and that he had made his 'run' for more relief. 'If the Legislature doesn't want to give property tax relief, I don't know what else I can do,' Brandt told the Nebraska Examiner. Voting to move forward on LB 170: Democratic State Sens. Wendy DeBoer of Omaha, Jason Prokop of Lincoln, Dan Quick of Grand Island, Jane Raybould of Lincoln and Victor Rountree of Bellevue. Voting against LB 170: Republican State Sens. Bob Andersen of Sarpy County, Beau Ballard of Lincoln, Stan Clouse of Kearney, Glen Meyer of Pender, Tanya Storer of Whitman, Jared Storm of David City and Paul Strommen of Sidney. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
15-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Budzinski reacts to SNAP cuts approved by Agriculture Committee
ILLINOIS (WCIA) — Cuts could be coming to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, better known as SNAP. The cuts were voted on by the Agriculture Committee in the U.S. House Wednesday evening. The bill will move on to a full vote by the House of Representatives. Over 13% of Central Illinoisans are food insecure: EIF, Feeding America Supporters of the cuts said that SNAP has ballooned in cost. Some changes the legislation would make includes: Requiring states to shoulder a share of the benefit costs beginning in FY2028 Blocks future increases to the cost of Future Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) Increases the work requirement for able-bodied adults without dependents from 54 to 64 Ends SNAP-Ed (an educational program that helps people stretch out their SNAP money, cook healthy meals, and lead active lifestyles) Requires that to be eligible for SNAP, an individual must be a U.S. Citizen or green card holder Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski (IL-13) spoke out against the cuts during the budget reconciliation bill in the House Agriculture Committee Tuesday evening. She said the the $313 billion in SNAP cuts would impact families in need, as well as farmers and the food supply chain. 'This will take away food for SNAP households that are home to a child, an old adult or a disabled adult,' Budzinski said. 'And for what? To pay for tax cuts for the wealthiest people in this country.' You can find the full text of the budget resolution here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Post
15-05-2025
- Business
- New York Post
House GOP plan to slash over $230 billion in spending, reform food stamps clears committee
Republicans moved a plan to slash over $230 billion in spending over the next decade and overhaul the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) out of the Agriculture Committee late Wednesday. Lawmakers on the Agriculture panel advanced it out of committee in a 29-25 party-line vote. Now, the measure, which is a key component of President Trump's 'big, beautiful' agenda mega-bill, heads to the House Budget Committee for a markup starting Friday that will package the various legislative pieces together. Advertisement Back in April, Congress passed a framework for the 'big, beautiful' bill that gave assignments to various committees and directed the Agriculture panel to come up with at least $230 billion in savings over a 10-year timeframe. An estimate from the Congressional Budget Office concluded that the committee's plan exceeds that goal, but didn't specify by how much. Some Republicans on the Agriculture panel suggested it could slash spending by as much as $300 billion. 3 Now there are just a handful of committees left to produce the remaining pieces of the GOP's mega-bill. @RepBost/X Advertisement The proposal calls for the federal government to penalize states with error rates on payments for SNAP — which is commonly known as food stamps — but using data Uncle Sam collects on that. In fiscal year 2023, the national average for state error rates was 11.68% and 46 states had error rates over 6%, according to data from the Food and Nutrition Service. What's in the Agriculture Committee legislation? States with error rates on SNAP payments between 6% and 8% will be required to cough up 15% of the program (historically, the federal government fully funded the program). States with error rates of 8% to 10% would be forced to pay 20%. States with error rates over 10% would have to cover 25%. Able-bodied adults without children would also see work requirements for the program, which currently last until the age of 54, jump to the age of 64. Makes room for Republicans to tack $60 billion farm bill with items like crop insurance, export trade promotion and more to the mega-bill. 3 Agriculture Committee Chairman G.T. Thompson sought to make room for a farm bill. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement SNAP, a program that provides food to the poor, had a federal budget of $112.8 billion in fiscal year 2023. Over 42 million Americans are estimated to be receiving over $212 in benefits from the program each month. Moderate Republicans had been squeamish about the proposed SNAP changes, but two more pressing sticking points with the 'big, beautiful' bill appear to be concerns about cuts to Medicaid and complaints that the state and local tax (SALT) deduction isn't being raised enough. On Wednesday, the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee advanced its tax plan that could add an estimated $3.7 trillion to the debt over a 10-year stretch. Later that same day, the Energy and Commerce Committee passed its roughly $900 billion spending cut and Medicaid reform package. Advertisement The framework for the 'big, beautiful' bill also called on the House Financial Services Committee to find $100 billion in savings and the House Education and Workforce Committee to identify $330 billion over a decade, bringing the total to over $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. 3 House GOP leadership is struggling to get everyone in line on the 'big, beautiful' bill. REUTERS The 'big, beautiful' bill is set to include an extension of the 2017 tax cuts, no taxes on tips, no taxes on overtime pay, beefed-up border security, bolstered energy supply and more. It is intended to be Trump's signature legislative achievement of this year, and possibly his second term. GOP leadership is hoping to get the final bill to Trump's desk by the Fourth of July but has to overcome significant hurdles with Republican infighting and slim margins in both chambers of Congress.
