logo
After Punjab, Haryana may ban harmful pesticides, help Indian Basmati rice clear strict overseas standards

After Punjab, Haryana may ban harmful pesticides, help Indian Basmati rice clear strict overseas standards

Mint24-06-2025
New Delhi: Haryana is gearing up to ban hazardous pesticides in Basmati rice in an attempt to make it easier to export the grain to developed and other markets with high food safety standards.
Neighbouring Punjab—like Haryana a major agricultural state—has already enforced such a ban in order to meet what is known as the International Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs).
These two states account for nearly 70%-75% of India's basmati exports of 6 mllion tonnes (in FY25). MRL is the highest concentration of a pesticide or veterinary drug residue legally allowed in food or animal feed, established to ensure food safety based on Good Agricultural Practices (GAP).
The Union government has also imposed a ban on four highly hazardous pesticides.
Basmati rice exports from India have been facing repeated rejection by the European Union, US, Japan, Oman, Kuwait, Lebanon, and UAE, owing to pesticide residues exceeding the prescribed MRLs of the importing country,according to Haryana Rice Exporters Association.
This has led to a substantial loss of export business, reputational damage, and a decline in India's market share, much of which has shifted to competitors like Pakistan.
The Haryana move seeks to replicate initiatives taken in Punjab.
"We have banned the sale, distribution, and use of 11 insecticides on basmati rice crops for a 60-day period, starting 1 August to 30 September, to address concerns about pesticide residues exceeding permissible limits,' said a senior official in Punjab agriculture Department.
The banned insecticides are Acephate, Buprofezin, Chlorpyriphos, Propiconazole, Thiamethoxam, Profenofos, Carbendazim, Tricyclazole, Tebuconazole, Carbofuran and Imidacloprid.
The Punjab Rice Millers and Exporters Association reported that tests conducted by them previously had shown these pesticides at levels that were much above the MRL values for basmati.
"So, our association requested for a ban on these agrochemicals to save the heritage basmati produce of Punjab, and to ensure hassle free export of basmati rice to other countries" said an exporter on the condition of anonymity.
Taking a cue from Punjab, Haryana basmati exporters also approached the state government seeking a ban.
"We have sought immediate intervention of the state government on prohibition on sale, stock, distribution and use of certain pesticides on basmati crop in Haryana to safeguard the integrity and global reputation of Basmati rice cultivated in the state," said Sushil Jain, President, Haryana Rice Exporters Association.
According to exporters, despite continued efforts by exporters associations—through farmer awareness programmes and advisory dissemination—certain pesticides remained widely available and in use, undermining all efforts.
"In light of the upcoming paddy cultivation season and the urgent need to protect the heritage, and export viability of basmati rice, we have appealed the state government to impose a prohibition for a period of at least 90 days (during the paddy crop season) 15 July on the sale, stock, distribution and use of the certain pesticides,' Jain added.
The pesticides for which a ban has been sought are the same as in Punjab.
A senior official in Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ministry in Haryana said the final decision related to a ban will be taken in consultation with stakeholders and other relevant concerned officials.
Exporters suggested that the prohibition should be strictly implemented at the field level, and that a monitoring and complaint mechanism should be established to prevent the illegal sale and use of these pesticides.
"We believe that implementing a pesticide prohibition in Haryana, in line with this vision, will go a long way in promoting pesticide-compliant basmati rice and reviving India's lost standing in some foreign markets," said Vijay Setia, advisor, Haryana Rice Exporters Association.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU push to protect digital rules holds up trade statement with US: Report
EU push to protect digital rules holds up trade statement with US: Report

Indian Express

time6 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

EU push to protect digital rules holds up trade statement with US: Report

The European Union is trying to prevent the United States from targeting the bloc's digital rules as both sides work through the final details of a delayed statement to formalise a trade deal reached last month, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. EU officials said disagreements over language relating to 'non-tariff barriers', which the U.S. said include the digital rules, are among the reasons for the hold-up of the statement, the newspaper said. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The European Union, the White House and the State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The statement had originally been expected days after the July announcement by EU President Ursula von der Leyen and U.S. President Donald Trump, according to FT. The July deal imposed a 15% import tariff on most EU goods – half the initially threatened rate – and helped avert a broader trade war between the two allies, who together account for nearly a third of global trade. The U.S. wanted to keep the door open for possible concessions on the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), which Washington says stifles free speech and imposes costs on U.S. tech companies, according to FT, which added that the commission has said that relaxing these rules is a red line. The EU's DSA is a landmark law meant to make the online environment safer and fairer by compelling tech giants to do more to tackle illegal content, including hate speech and child sexual abuse material. The commission had anticipated that Trump would sign an executive order by August 15 to cut tariffs on EU car exports to the U.S. from 27.5% to 15%. However, a U.S. official signaled that this would be delayed until the joint statement was finalized, according to FT.

Three shipbuilding clusters to come up at  ₹75,000 crore
Three shipbuilding clusters to come up at  ₹75,000 crore

Mint

time6 minutes ago

  • Mint

Three shipbuilding clusters to come up at ₹75,000 crore

New Delhi: The Centre is looking at an investment of ₹75,000 crore in the three brand-new shipyards planned along its east and west coasts, as it targets to make India a global hub for shipbuilding. The investment will be made over four to five years, with the yards capable of making and repairing ships. 'The government is seeking to set up three greenfield shipbuilding clusters and support the existing shipyards carry out brownfield expansion. Overall, the government is targeting about ₹25,000 crore investment per greenfield cluster, which may be subject to significant changes based on the final locations and the shipyard sizes," the Union ports ministry said in response to a query. Five states are in talks with local and foreign shipbuilders to pick the ideal locations to host the three facilities, the ministry said. One of the shipyards may also host a shipbreaking facility supplying material for shipbuilding. 'MoPSW is also finalizing schemes to support these clusters (greenfield). For the brownfield expansion of existing yards, there is a scheme under finalization to support the expansion efforts of all the yards," the ministry said. Greenfield manufacturing refers to facilities put up from scratch, while brownfield refers to the expansion of existing facilities. The planned total amount of ₹75,000 is expected to come from both the Centre and companies. Mint reported in July that Indian state-run firms were looking to tie up with global shipbuilders. Also, in September, Mint reported that India is looking to Japan and Korea for shipbuilding initiatives. Talks are on with Japanese and Korean shipbuilders for investments in Indian clusters, while existing public sector shipbuilders are separately negotiating with Korean firms for joint ventures. Push for local The shipyard push is part of the government's ambition to make ships of all sizes and build locally, and encourage Indian built, owned and flagged cargo ships. The country's share in global shipbuilding now remains below 1%. The government's projection is to raise the share of Indian built ships in India's fleet from 5% at present to 7% by 2030 and 69% by 2047. Earlier, shipping secretary T.K. Ramachandran had told Mint that five locations in Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Maharashtra were being considered for developing shipbuilding clusters. It is expected that first three may come up in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Odisha, where identification and notification of land for the project has progressed swiftly. Special purpose vehicles have also been formed in these states and they have also commissioned techno economic feasibility report (TEFR) for the project. Some of the sites have carried out initial viability assessments of the locations and the same is planned for other locations. The findings will be shared with shipbuilders, and they will be invited to invest in these clusters, the ministry said. "A significant capital commitment under a public-private partnership model underpins the ambitious objective of becoming a leading shipbuilding power by 2047. While the challenge is massive, the opportunity is equally substantial," said Anshuman Magazine, chairman & CEO, India, South East Asia, Middle East & Africa, at CBRE, a global consulting firm. India is a classic example of peninsular geography, with an extensive coastline spanning nine states, which provides a distinct competitive advantage in maritime logistics across the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and the Indian Ocean, Magazine said. "The regional market, particularly the supply chains of emerging Southeast Asian economies, presents a huge opportunity for India to position itself as a reliable and cost-competitive alternative in the shipbuilding industry," he added. Indian officials have visited traditional shipbuilding centres in Korea, Japan, and a few Scandinavian countries to explore partnerships and joint venture agreements. Over the next few months, some tie-ups between global shipbuilders and Indian private sector and state-owned companies are expected. The FY26 budget proposed Maritime Development Fund, a ₹25,000 crore government-industry partnership that would help develop manufacturing clusters with focus on shipbuilding and breaking. The budget also proposed that the existing Shipbuilding Financial Assistance (SBF) policy will be revamped to address cost disadvantages while also providing Credit Notes for shipbreaking to help purchase indigenously build ships. The budget has also included large ships in the infrastructure harmonized master list (HML) allowing purchase of ships on easier terms while providing basic customs duty exemption on raw materials, components, consumables or parts for the manufacture of ships extended for another ten years. Formal government notification for these programmes is still awaited. As per Maritime Vision 2030 and Vision 2047 plan, government is targeting to make India among the top 10 and among top five shipbuilding and ship owning country's worldwide respectively. Overall investment of ₹3 to 3.5 lakh crore across ports, shipping, and inland waterways categories is targeted. The shipbuilding initiative would also address a concern of the trade about the uncertainty and variability (escalation) of shipping cost impacting their market competitiveness. With better availability of domestic shipping lines at affordable prices, the freight rate volatility due to black swan events like covid-19, the Russia-Ukraine war, Red Sea crisis, Iran-Israel conflict, etc, could also be checked.

What has been the impact of ethanol blending?
What has been the impact of ethanol blending?

The Hindu

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

What has been the impact of ethanol blending?

The story so far: E20 petrol, which contains 20% ethanol and is being sold by Indian oil refiners, has been much in the news lately. India has achieved its target to blend 20% ethanol per litre of fuel five years ahead of the target under the National Policy on Biofuels. Ethanol blending in India rose from just 1.5% in 2014 to 20% in 2025, backed by the government's strong fiscal incentives to the sugarcane industry. While the government says ethanol blending achieves a range of goals such as cutting greenhouse gas emissions, bolstering farmers' incomes and reducing India's oil import bill, its benefits to the environment require closer scrutiny. How are vehicle owners reacting to this change? Vehicles sold in India from 2023 come with E20 stickers, indicating compatibility with 20% ethanol blended petrol. Additionally, manufacturers have addressed the concerns of those who own older vehicles. Hero Motocrop says in its website, 'The material composition such as rubbers, elastomers and plastic components that are directly exposed to fuel also need to be changed to E20 compatible materials.' However, according to LocalCircles, two in three petrol vehicle owners are against the E20 mandate. Only 12% of the 36,000 people surveyed across 315 districts are in favour of the switch. Critics cited a drop in mileage and increased maintenance costs. The survey urged the Union government to allow consumers to choose the type of fuel they want. While the Centre admitted to a 'marginal drop' in engine efficiency, it said this 'can be further minimised through improved engine tuning and use of E20-compatible materials.' Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has called the consumer angst a 'vilification campaign' facilitated by 'vested, economic interests'. While the Union government attempts to defend its E20 policy, its own think tank, the NITI Aayog, has urged the government 'to compensate the consumers for a drop in efficiency from ethanol blended fuels', by way of 'tax incentives on E10 and E20 fuel'. According to the Minister, 'since 2014-15 India has already saved more than ₹1.40 lakh crore in foreign exchange through petrol substitution.' But has the benefit been passed to the end consumer? An analysis by The Hindu showed that Coal India Ltd, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corporation (BPCL), and Gas Authority of India Ltd collectively contributed ₹1.27 lakh crore, or 42.3% of the total ₹3 lakh crore dividends the Union government received from non-banking Public Sector Undertaking (PSUs) between 2020-21 and 2024-25. IOC and BPCL together saw a 255% rise in their dividend payouts since 2022-23 and a 65% decrease in oil prices. However, the two PSUs only passed on a 2% decrease in petrol prices to the public. What about the impact on agriculture? Sugarcane-based ethanol supply has grown from 40 crore litres in FY14 to nearly 670 crore litres, derived from about 9% of total sugar output, in FY24. The Union government says it has paid 'over ₹1.20 lakh crore to farmers' since FY15. But how environmentally friendly is India's dependence on sugarcane for ethanol? About 60-70 tonnes of water is required to cultivate one tonne of sugarcane. Many sugarcane growing regions in India do not receive the 1,500 to 3,000 millimetre rainfall that is necessary for the crop's optimal growth. This leads to groundwater extraction and unsustainable irrigation methods. A 2023 Central Groundwater Board report says that sugarcane growing districts in Maharashtra extract more groundwater than nearby regions. Distress among sugarcane growers in that State has been widely reported. Unsustainable agriculture practices accelerate land degradation. The Desertification and Land Degradation Atlas of India 2021 found that almost 30% of India's land is degraded. The water intensive nature of sugarcane and the impact on ground water reserves at a time of extreme weather has been absent from the discussion on ethanol-blended petrol. The Centre, however, says it is looking to diversify ethanol supplies. The Food Corporation of India's rice allocation for ethanol jumped to a record 5.2 million metric tonnes, which is about 3.6% of output, from less than 3,000 tonnes allocated last year. Similarly, in 2024-25, over 34% of corn output was diverted for ethanol production. This diversion forced India to import about 9.7 lakh tonnes of corn during 2024-25 — a six-fold increase over the previous year's 1.37 lakh tonnes. Despite diversification efforts, area under sugarcane cultivation this year is estimated to be 57.24 lakh hectare against 57.11 lakh hectare last season. The assured payment mechanism for sugarcane, the Fair and Remunerative Pricing, is the key reason farmers bet on the crop as a source of stable income. While this rise is marginal, an analysis by the OECD-FAO says that 22% of India's sugarcane will be used for ethanol production by 2034. India's booming ethanol economy has also come under the gaze of the U.S. The Trump administration is pushing India to relax restrictions to its ethanol imports. The 2025 National Trade Estimate report noted India's policy as a significant 'trade barrier.' Import relaxation could potentially undermine years of investment and capacity building in ethanol production. The Indian Sugar Mills Association has urged the government to maintain the restrictions. Will it affect the transition to EVs? The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas said the shift to ethanol-blended petrol 'has helped India reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 700 lakh tonnes.' Shifting to EVs, however, will achieve far higher rates of emissions reductions and speed up transport's decarbonisation, which is the third largest carbon emitting sector globally after energy and industry. The success of cities like Beijing in cutting air pollution is mainly due to the rapid adoption of EVs. Of course, this switch has to be backed by renewable energy rather than coal, to aid in decarbonising transport. Adoption of EVs has been much slower in India when compared to other large economies like the U.S., the European Union and China. About 7.6% of vehicle sales in 2024 was electric. Sales of EVs have to increase by over 22% in the next five years to reach the government's own target of 30% by 2030. Another challenge to wider EV adoption in India is its dependence on Rare Earth Elements (REE). According to the Ministry of Mines, before China's export curbs were imposed, only 2,270 tonnes of REEs and compounds of REEs were imported in 2023-24. But this relatively lower level is critical for the industry to sustain the current level of EV production. The production and processing of many REEs is geographically concentrated in China, making global supply vulnerable to several risks. The automotive industry has also sounded alarm bells about the disruption in rare earth supply. India's largest carmaker Maruti Suzuki reduced its near-term production targets for its new EV, e-Vitara, attributing it to delays in receiving rare earth magnets. Other manufacturers too are bracing themselves for disruptions. Crisil Ratings Senior Director Anuj Sethi has said, 'The supply squeeze comes just as the auto sector is preparing for aggressive EV rollouts.' The recent detente in bilateral relations with China might help the industry to address the crisis in the short term. The Union government is engaged in diplomacy with Beijing to address the rare earth supply crunch, mainly germanium. Going forward, there is uncertainty on whether the Centre wants to push ahead with ethanol blending beyond 20%. While Minister Puri said the government will push for blending beyond 20%, the Union government in March said that there has been no decision yet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store