logo
Three shipbuilding clusters to come up at  ₹75,000 crore

Three shipbuilding clusters to come up at ₹75,000 crore

Mint15 hours ago
New Delhi: The Centre is looking at an investment of ₹75,000 crore in the three brand-new shipyards planned along its east and west coasts, as it targets to make India a global hub for shipbuilding. The investment will be made over four to five years, with the yards capable of making and repairing ships.
'The government is seeking to set up three greenfield shipbuilding clusters and support the existing shipyards carry out brownfield expansion. Overall, the government is targeting about ₹25,000 crore investment per greenfield cluster, which may be subject to significant changes based on the final locations and the shipyard sizes," the Union ports ministry said in response to a query.
Five states are in talks with local and foreign shipbuilders to pick the ideal locations to host the three facilities, the ministry said. One of the shipyards may also host a shipbreaking facility supplying material for shipbuilding.
'MoPSW is also finalizing schemes to support these clusters (greenfield). For the brownfield expansion of existing yards, there is a scheme under finalization to support the expansion efforts of all the yards," the ministry said. Greenfield manufacturing refers to facilities put up from scratch, while brownfield refers to the expansion of existing facilities.
The planned total amount of ₹75,000 is expected to come from both the Centre and companies.
Mint reported in July that Indian state-run firms were looking to tie up with global shipbuilders. Also, in September, Mint reported that India is looking to Japan and Korea for shipbuilding initiatives. Talks are on with Japanese and Korean shipbuilders for investments in Indian clusters, while existing public sector shipbuilders are separately negotiating with Korean firms for joint ventures.
Push for local
The shipyard push is part of the government's ambition to make ships of all sizes and build locally, and encourage Indian built, owned and flagged cargo ships. The country's share in global shipbuilding now remains below 1%. The government's projection is to raise the share of Indian built ships in India's fleet from 5% at present to 7% by 2030 and 69% by 2047.
Earlier, shipping secretary T.K. Ramachandran had told Mint that five locations in Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Maharashtra were being considered for developing shipbuilding clusters. It is expected that first three may come up in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Odisha, where identification and notification of land for the project has progressed swiftly. Special purpose vehicles have also been formed in these states and they have also commissioned techno economic feasibility report (TEFR) for the project.
Some of the sites have carried out initial viability assessments of the locations and the same is planned for other locations. The findings will be shared with shipbuilders, and they will be invited to invest in these clusters, the ministry said.
"A significant capital commitment under a public-private partnership model underpins the ambitious objective of becoming a leading shipbuilding power by 2047. While the challenge is massive, the opportunity is equally substantial," said Anshuman Magazine, chairman & CEO, India, South East Asia, Middle East & Africa, at CBRE, a global consulting firm.
India is a classic example of peninsular geography, with an extensive coastline spanning nine states, which provides a distinct competitive advantage in maritime logistics across the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and the Indian Ocean, Magazine said. "The regional market, particularly the supply chains of emerging Southeast Asian economies, presents a huge opportunity for India to position itself as a reliable and cost-competitive alternative in the shipbuilding industry," he added.
Indian officials have visited traditional shipbuilding centres in Korea, Japan, and a few Scandinavian countries to explore partnerships and joint venture agreements. Over the next few months, some tie-ups between global shipbuilders and Indian private sector and state-owned companies are expected.
The FY26 budget proposed Maritime Development Fund, a ₹25,000 crore government-industry partnership that would help develop manufacturing clusters with focus on shipbuilding and breaking. The budget also proposed that the existing Shipbuilding Financial Assistance (SBF) policy will be revamped to address cost disadvantages while also providing Credit Notes for shipbreaking to help purchase indigenously build ships.
The budget has also included large ships in the infrastructure harmonized master list (HML) allowing purchase of ships on easier terms while providing basic customs duty exemption on raw materials, components, consumables or parts for the manufacture of ships extended for another ten years. Formal government notification for these programmes is still awaited.
As per Maritime Vision 2030 and Vision 2047 plan, government is targeting to make India among the top 10 and among top five shipbuilding and ship owning country's worldwide respectively. Overall investment of ₹3 to 3.5 lakh crore across ports, shipping, and inland waterways categories is targeted.
The shipbuilding initiative would also address a concern of the trade about the uncertainty and variability (escalation) of shipping cost impacting their market competitiveness. With better availability of domestic shipping lines at affordable prices, the freight rate volatility due to black swan events like covid-19, the Russia-Ukraine war, Red Sea crisis, Iran-Israel conflict, etc, could also be checked.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Centre removes cotton import duty till Sept 30 to aid textile sector
Centre removes cotton import duty till Sept 30 to aid textile sector

Business Standard

time5 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Centre removes cotton import duty till Sept 30 to aid textile sector

Giving temporary relief to the textile and garment industry amid concerns over revenue loss from higher US tariffs, the finance ministry on Monday removed the 11 per cent duty on raw cotton imports for a period of 42 days till September 30. The exemption will benefit the textile chain — yarn, fabric, garments and made-ups — and provide relief to the textile industry and consumers. Through a notification by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, the government removed the basic customs duty and the Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on cotton imports from August 19 to September 30. The removal of import duty on cotton was a long-pending demand of industry bodies such as the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI). This move is crucial in making the industry competitive, as it requires high-quality, contamination-free cotton to meet global quality compliance standards for exports. Removal of duty on raw cotton is expected to have a salutary effect on cotton prices in India. Although the move may not result in large gains through new shipments, industry players expressed hope that the exemption would be extended. It comes as an immediate confidence booster for the industry troubled by the higher US tariff of 50 per cent. Exporters have either halted shipments to the US or are fulfilling orders at a loss, while American retail giants including Walmart, Target, Amazon, TJX Companies, Kohl's, Gap Inc., and H&M have asked their Indian suppliers to hold consignments until tariff clarity emerges. India has set a target of achieving textile exports worth $100 billion by 2030. However, it is at a steep competitive disadvantage in the American market. While Bangladesh and Vietnam face tariffs of 20 per cent and Indonesia and Cambodia 19 per cent, India is saddled with 50 per cent. Even China, at 30 per cent, fares better. Exporters fear not only revenue losses but also the prospect of ceding market share once again to rivals. The US is India's largest market for textile and apparel exports. According to CITI, India's exports to the US rose to $5.36 billion, up 12 per cent from $4.79 billion during the first six months of calendar 2024, ranking the country third. Vietnam, now the second-largest supplier, registered $8.54 billion worth of exports, a rise of 19 per cent. Bangladesh rebounded strongly after last year's political turmoil with a 24 per cent surge to $4.36 billion. China, still the largest supplier, saw a 16 per cent decline to $9.34 billion.

Debt-to-GDP ratio falls but interest payments increase: CAG report
Debt-to-GDP ratio falls but interest payments increase: CAG report

Economic Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Debt-to-GDP ratio falls but interest payments increase: CAG report

The central government's debt-to-gross domestic product (GDP) ratio eased between 2021-22 and 2023-24 but its interest payments increased during this period, according to the latest CAG report. The Centre's interest outgo, as percentage of its revenue receipts, increased to 35.72% in 2023-24 from 35.35% in 2022-23 and 33.99% in 2021-22, according to the CAG report on compliance of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act for 2023-24 presented in Parliament on Monday. The interest payment-to-revenue receipt ratio, an important indicator of the government's fiscal health, had hit a record 38.66% in 2020-21, when resource mop-up was hit by the Covid-19 pandemic. However, the Centre's debt, as a percentage of GDP, moderated steadily from the pandemic peak of 61.38% in 2020-21 to 57% as of March 2024. The pace of accumulation of central government debt between 2020-21 and 2023-24 was lower than the GDP expansion, the CAG said in the report. "Debt sustainability, as measured by the debt stabilization indicator, was positive in FY24 which is a positive indicator towards stability," it added.

"Make In India Need Not Become Make All That India Needs": RBI Ex-Governor
"Make In India Need Not Become Make All That India Needs": RBI Ex-Governor

NDTV

time13 minutes ago

  • NDTV

"Make In India Need Not Become Make All That India Needs": RBI Ex-Governor

New Delhi: Sounding a note of caution, former RBI Governor D Subbarao on Monday said that 'Make in India' should not transform into 'Make all that India needs' as it would hurt investments in the country and impact productivity. Subbarao further said the punitive 50 per cent tariffs on Indian exports imposed by the US will raise the costs of Indian goods in the most important overseas market, which is America. "If 'Make in India' degenerates into 'Make all that India needs', we risk losing the chance to attract investment away from China. "The tariffs remind us that openness, not isolation, is the path to sustainable growth," he told PTI in an interview. Subbarao said the success of 'Make in India' hinges on competitiveness, not protectionism. "Atmanirbhar Bharat, an aspiration that the Prime Minister reiterated in his Independence Day speech, must mean strategic self-reliance in sensitive areas like defence and energy, not blanket self-sufficiency," he said. According to him, 'Make in India' was conceived as positioning the country as an export-driven manufacturing hub-making in India, not just for India, but for the world. "Punitive US tariffs cut directly into this ambition by raising the cost of Indian goods in our most important overseas market," Subbarao said, adding that investors considering India as an alternative to China in their China+1 diversification strategy will hesitate to lock into an India that is saddled with the highest tariffs in Asia. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day address, had said that for a nation, the biggest basis for self-respect ('atmasamman') is still 'atmanirbharta' (self-reliance). "And, the basis for 'Viksit Bharat' is also 'Atmanirbhar Bharat'". Responding to a question on impact on the impact of 50 per cent tariffs on India's exports and competitiveness, Subbarao said America is India's single largest export market, accounting for nearly 20 per cent of our total exports and over 2 per cent of GDP. "A 50 per cent tariff - even after exempting pharma and electronics - would hit at least half of our exports, especially in labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, gems & jewellery, and leather," he said. Subbarao also pointed out that the current exemptions on pharma and electronics are not permanent; ongoing reviews could bring them under tariff in the future "More worrying is that India now faces the highest tariff in Asia, far above Bangladesh (20 per cent), Vietnam (20 per cent), and Indonesia (19 per cent). This undermines our China+1 aspiration at a critical moment," he said. The former RBI Governor noted that the joint pledge by Modi and Trump at their February meeting to more than triple bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 now looks unrealistic. "While assessing the potential impact on our exports, we must also reckon with the possibility of China dumping in world markets to offset the loss of its US market. "To the extent these are markets where we compete, our exports to destinations outside of the US will also be hit," he said. Asked if it is at all possible for India to yield a little in giving access to the US in the agriculture and dairy sector, Subbarao said agriculture and dairy are politically sensitive sectors in India, providing livelihoods to millions, and tied closely to the country's food security. "A blanket opening to US imports is neither feasible nor desirable. "However, some calibrated flexibility could help unlock the impasse in negotiations," he said. According to him, this might mean limited tariff-rate quotas, selective product lines, and sanitary and phytosanitary alignment in exchange for significant gains in US market access for India's exports. Noting that any such opening should be phased, targetted, and paired with a strong backstop for farmers - investment in cold chains, productivity upgrades, and rural support programs, Subbarao said," India must protect its red lines but should not reject pragmatic compromises that deliver broader trade benefits." Asked if it is possible to pare down Russian oil imports, he said if India were to suddenly pivot from Russia to the Gulf, global oil prices would spike because neither US shale nor OPEC can ramp up supply quickly. "The effect would be to raise the global crude price, hurting India's current account, weakening the rupee, and fuelling inflation pressures," Subbarao said, adding that, in short, moving away is not a simple solution. He observed that the pragmatic course is gradual diversification - adding Middle Eastern and African barrels over time - while retaining flexibility to protect national energy security. "Currently, we import about 1.7 million barrels a day of Russian oil. There is an argument that since the Russian discount has fallen to USD 5 per barrel, the cost of switching away is less than 0.1 per cent of GDP," he added. On the impasse on India-US trade talks and what should be India's negotiating strategy going forward, Subbarao said a balanced agreement is possible if both sides focus on comparative advantages rather than deficits. "Our strategy should be pragmatic: resist emotional reactions, identify win-win sectors, and push for preferential access in labour-intensive industries, while offering selective concessions where feasible," he said. For India, America is the largest partner and one of the few countries with which it enjoys a trade surplus.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store