logo
Five years since start of pandemic, Aurora school districts talk technology, mental health and lessons learned

Five years since start of pandemic, Aurora school districts talk technology, mental health and lessons learned

Chicago Tribune26-03-2025

When students showed up to their junior year English class at East Aurora High School remotely in the fall of 2020, their teacher, Melinda Thomas, had not met them face-to-face. The seniors she'd met the year before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, but this group of students was new to her.
As the year went on, she continued to face obstacles getting face-to-face interaction with her students.
'A lot of students were either reluctant to turn on their cameras or, for various reasons, you know, maybe their technology didn't allow them to turn on the cameras,' Thomas recalled.
She said sometimes she would work one-on-one with a student and ask them a question, and they would type a response instead of answer out loud – sometimes because their microphone didn't work, and sometimes because they didn't want to speak in the remote class.
Even when her school returned to in-person instruction, Thomas said it was difficult to communicate with students without seeing their facial expressions and difficult to convey her own emotions as she wore a mask herself.
Those days are over now, but some of the difficulties still persist, Thomas said. She said she sees more social anxiety and mental health issues in her classrooms, which she attributes to both the pandemic and to an increased prevalence of technology use. She still has trouble getting students to participate like they used to.
'We've always had students who said, 'I don't want to work in groups,'' Thomas said. 'That's not new. But, having students who won't talk to anyone else in the room, that's more unusual.'
A lot has changed in the five years since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Life has largely returned to normal, as has classroom instruction in local schools. But, in many ways – from technology use to student mental health – Aurora-area districts say the pandemic forced great change in their schools, and accelerated changes that were already underway.
Technology was one of the first major shifts. To adapt to the district's remote learning policies, which lasted from the start of the pandemic to the following spring, East Aurora School District 131 had to rapidly play catch-up on technology access.
The district scrambled to get computers out to all middle school and high school students, said Jennifer Norrell, who was superintendent of the district through the pandemic up until earlier this month. Unlike some nearby districts, students didn't have 1:1 access to a district-provided computer.
East Aurora gave out physical packets of classwork to elementary school students, Norrell said. Federal pandemic relief funding not used for health and sanitation measures in the district immediately went toward buying iPads for elementary school students.
The district also began using Google Workspace, a system the district continues to use, according to Andrew Allen, East Aurora's executive director of information systems.
'Normally, that's kind of a slower rollout,' Norrell said of the transition, saying that the district would have ordinarily done a smaller pilot of the technology if it weren't for the pandemic. 'But, I mean, we couldn't. … That was the only way for them to teach with the kids.'
They also provided hotspots to students without reliable home internet access, another school policy that has continued, Allen said.
East Aurora's enrollment is roughly 12,000, down about 1,000 students since the start of the pandemic, according to data from the Illinois State Board of Education. Allen said just over 3% of students still use hotspots to complete their coursework at home.
At Indian Prairie School District 204, families were encouraged to enroll in T-Mobile's Project 10Million, which provides free internet to students, according to Rod Mack, the district's chief technology officer. Now, the district pays for a number of hotspots that students can use if they don't have reliable internet access at home.
Indian Prairie had recently shifted to 1:1 computer access before the pandemic, so they didn't have to make a total technology overhaul, Mack noted. But they have since moved to primarily submitting assignments online, Mack noted, a shift that might have had a greater impact on the staff than the students.
'Teachers learned that on the dime,' Mack told The Beacon-News. 'Students kind of grew up with it.'
He said his office devoted considerable time to helping teachers learn how to use technology for remote teaching – instruction that also had to be done virtually. Zoom, for example, was updated with new tools constantly, Mack said, which required teachers to learn new functionalities for remote classes.
Now that schools continue to use this technology, it can be used on an as-needed basis, noted the Indian Prairie Parents' Council, which oversees the district's Parent Teacher Associations and Parent Teacher Student Associations. It means the end-of-year school calendar is 'not as fluid as it used to be,' the Indian Prairie Parents' Council said in a statement to The Beacon-News, because snow days can be conducted remotely. But the downside is kids may not get to experience a true 'snow day,' they noted.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, school districts across the country received federal money from the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund, which is commonly referred to as ESSER funding, to help them operate during the pandemic. At Indian Prairie, the first installment of that funding went toward cleaning and social distancing efforts, said the district's Chief School Business Official Matthew Shipley.
Subsequent waves of federal funding went to capital projects and additional programming to support student learning for the more than 25,000 students in the district, according to data from ISBE. The district received around $13 million from 2021-2024, Shipley said, but it had to be spent by Sept. 30, 2024.
'There was always a challenge of, 'How do we provide programming that addresses, that directly addresses, the concerns we're having coming out of the COVID period – so, the specific learning recovery that needed to be accomplished – but also recognizing these funds were temporary,' Shipley said.
Indian Prairie reduced class sizes in kindergarten through second grade, for example, by hiring about 20 teachers across the district, Shipley said. Although the pandemic-era federal funding has run out, the district decided to continue with these class sizes using local funds to pay for the additional staff.
They also added summer school and after-school programs to catch students up academically to account for interruptions in learning from the pandemic, and offered 'take-home tote bags' for elementary school students over the summer with books, arts supplies and math resources. Those programs won't continue now that the COVID funds have expired.
West Aurora School District 129 also instituted new programming to address learning challenges during the pandemic, according to a district spokesperson. They created a supplemental program called Success Through Academic Recovery for high school students, offer small-group virtual tutoring and provide supplemental instruction in reading and math through an online program called iReady.
East Aurora, too, implemented summer school programs and new curriculum initiatives, Norrell said. They also used pandemic funds to build a new facility at their old district office called the Resilience Education Center. It opened in March 2024, according to the district. It has mental health counseling with social workers and clinicians, career programming – including a recording studio and broadcast journalism studio – and art and physical wellness offerings.
Norrell said the district was deliberate in using pandemic funding toward long-term investments like capital projects and training for teaching staff.
'By doing that … we were able to make sure that when the money went away, we didn't have to change gears,' Norrell said.
Instead of having to add a significant number of new staff, for example, Norrell said the district provided training to classroom staff to support student well-being.
'We needed everybody to be a social worker, so to speak,' Norrell said about the training given to teachers during the COVID period and the district's attempts to avoid what she called an 'intervention cliff.'
At East Aurora High School, the district also instituted 15-minute office hours in the morning once learning resumed in a hybrid format, according to Jonathan Simpson, who was the principal of East Aurora High School during the pandemic and now works as the principal of Allen Elementary. During office hours, students could get one-on-one academic help, talk to their social worker or speak with a coach or other staff member.
Addressing mental health challenges was top-of-mind for the districts, officials said, and a lasting legacy of the pandemic.
Indian Prairie recently began offering free after-school counseling via a grant from Endeavor Health, Shipley said.
Last year, West Aurora opened the Jeff Craig Family Resource Center, which provides physical and mental health services and a small food pantry for its students, in partnership with VNA Health Care. They are also in their third year of having 'restorative practice counselors,' who help with handling disciplinary issues and conflict resolution in the district, a district spokesperson said.
The causes of student mental health concerns upon returning to in-person classes were wide-ranging, Norrell said. Not only did students miss out on a year of socializing with their peers, some had lost loved ones to COVID and others had family who lost work.
'There was so much social-emotional wellness … that was equal to what we experienced in terms of learning loss,' Norrell said. She also noted the impact of racial tensions in 2020 following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. 'That too was a huge part of the trauma.'
Nevertheless, officials at East Aurora said the return to in-person learning was a formative memory. Former East Aurora High School principal Simpson said the 2021 graduation – which the district held outside at Northern Illinois University's football field to comply with COVID restrictions – was a notable turning point in the return to normal.
'I can't even begin to describe it in words,' Simpson said. 'It will be an image I remember forever.'
Still, despite COVID-era programs and changes, some of which have continued through today, some issues have persisted.
Thomas, who continues to teach English at East Aurora High School, said distraction during class and attention span remains a problem in her classroom.
'We've always struggled with, 'OK, we're going to assign this book, and what do we do with the kids that don't read it?'' Thomas said. 'But, now, it's, it's almost like, 'OK, we're starting on the assumption that almost nobody is going to read it? So, how do we teach it instead?''
Thomas said teachers will sometimes show movies to accompany the books they read, or break up class time into multiple segments to keep students' attention, or do close readings of sections of books.
But it's not all due to the pandemic, she said.
'COVID exacerbated a lot of issues that we were already beginning to see,' she said. 'COVID sped up the process.'
But some district officials say the pandemic has offered some valuable lessons in adapting to technology – and adapting in general.
Mack said he doesn't think school districts would have been ready for the explosion of AI use otherwise.
'If AI happened before a pandemic, teachers would be like, 'Turn the internet off … I'm not ready to handle this,'' Mack said.
Going forward, the districts hope they'll be able to continue adapting, no matter what uncertainty they face.
'I think COVID taught us some valuable lessons,' Shipley said. 'Pivoting, and being flexible and ensuring we were able to meet the needs of our students and our families. … Hopefully, we kind of take some of (those) lessons learned and take some of that spirit, if you will, that allowed us to function during that time.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mid-century modern-style home designed by noted architect Paul Schweikher to be listed for $1.3M
Mid-century modern-style home designed by noted architect Paul Schweikher to be listed for $1.3M

Chicago Tribune

time16 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Mid-century modern-style home designed by noted architect Paul Schweikher to be listed for $1.3M

A four-bedroom, 4,068-square-foot mid-century modern-style house in west suburban Wayne that was designed by noted architect Paul Schweikher will be listed today for $1.299 million. Built in the 1950s and known as the Frazel House after its first owners, the redwood brick and glass house is located in the Kane County portion of Wayne and sits on a 3.76-acre lot that bisects Norton Creek. Its architect, Schweikher, designed a host of Chicago-area homes and other buildings. Among his designs are the Third Unitarian Church in Chicago, the Unitarian Church of Evanston, the Graeme Stewart house in Wheaton and the Berg house in Glen Ellyn. Schweikher also designed his own home and studio in Schaumburg, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The house in Wayne has 3-1/2 bathrooms, high ceilings, expansive glass, a recently renovated kitchen, a three-season room and two interior garden areas. Outside are a pool and a pergola. 'This home is not just a residence — it's a rare architectural heirloom,' listing agent Tina Aronson of @properties told Elite Street. '(It's) an inspired marriage of nature, design and timeless artistry by Paul Schweikher.' Architectural Record magazine in November 1955 wrote that the enclosed garden areas eliminate 'the sensation of being shut in.' The magazine added that the house has a contrast between solid brick walls and large expanses of glass because of Schweikher's belief that 'alternate floor-to-ceiling openings and completely closed walls are more dramatic and livable, given appropriate surroundings, than the continuous glazed wall, either from ceiling to the floor or over a spandrel.' In an oral history that Schweikher gave to the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, he noted in response to a question that while he saw a lot of the famed architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe in the 1950s — mostly at the Arts Club of Chicago, any Miesian aspects of the Frazel house would have been 'an accident in the constant search for simplicity.' 'I can't remember at all trying to follow Mies in any way other than that I was working with rectangles,' Schweikher told interviewer Betty Blum. 'My principle (sic) concentration was in trying to increase the importance of an indoor-outdoor relationship in which we introduced outdoor spaces in the interior of the plan.' Schweikher also noted the softening effect of the home's latticework, as it 'made the sun sparkle.' He also recalled van der Rohe's visit to the Frazel house. 'It was his suggestion that we go there,' Schweikher said. 'Having done that I think he felt that he had expressed his pleasure, if not in the house, at least in a kind of endorsement I suppose of some of the things that I was doing. At least I always took it that way. He was very sparing about compliments. His presence usually indicated a kind of endorsement and I took it to mean that.' Schweikher expert Dan Fitzpatrick, who is the managing director and historian at The Schweikher House in Schaumburg, told Elite Street that the Frazel house is 'an outstanding example of his elegant home designs.' 'The Frazel house is one of the last residential designs by Paul Schweikher in Chicagoland before moving east to chair the architecture school at Yale University,' Fitzpatrick said. 'Designed in 1952, the Frazel house highlights Schweikher's impeccable sense of scale, texture and blending of the indoors and outdoors. The tall ceilings and windows are just right, allowing for beautiful views of nature in each space. The private lot enhances this harmony so well.' The current owners paid $715,000 for the home in 2013. The house had a $17,017 property tax bill in the 2024 tax year.

RFK Jr.‘s mass firing of the government's vaccine experts, explained
RFK Jr.‘s mass firing of the government's vaccine experts, explained

Vox

time30 minutes ago

  • Vox

RFK Jr.‘s mass firing of the government's vaccine experts, explained

covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017. For the past 60 years, a committee of independent experts has advised the federal government on vaccine policy, providing guidance on which shots people should get and when. Government public health officials have almost always followed the panel's recommendations, all but making it the final word on public health policy in the US for most of its existence. And over those decades, the United States has made tremendous health gains over that time through mass vaccination campaigns. But on Monday, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired every sitting member of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a move that stunned doctors and scientists across the country. And it means that the CDC's days as the clear and unchallenged authority on US vaccine policy appear numbered. 'Up until today, ACIP recommendations were the gold standard for what insurers should pay for, what providers should recommend, and what the public should look to,' Noel Brewer, a health behavior professor at the University of North Carolina, who was a member of the panel until this week, told the Associated Press. 'It's unclear what the future holds.' Today, Explained Understand the world with a daily explainer plus the most compelling stories of the day, compiled by news editor Sean Collins. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. New committee members will be announced at some point, but as of Tuesday morning, even top US senators did not know who the replacements would be. The panel is supposed to hold one of its periodic public meetings in late June to discuss the Covid-19 vaccine, as well as shots for RSV and HPV, among others. This is a watershed moment in US public health, one that seems sure to sow confusion among patients and health care providers. The deepening divide between Kennedy's Make American Healthy Again (MAHA) movement and mainstream medicine could make it harder for people who want vaccines to get them, while encouraging more doubt about the value and safety of shots among the general public. Here's what you need to know. Why is Kennedy doing this? The vaccine advisory committee was first convened by the surgeon general in 1964, but it is not enshrined in federal law. That means that Kennedy — as the top official at the US Department of Health and Human Services, which contains the CDC — can change its membership or dissolve the panel entirely if he so desires. Kennedy framed his decision to clear out the members as necessary to restore public trust in the government's vaccine recommendations. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Kennedy asserted the committee 'has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine.' As health secretary, he has made overhauling vaccine policy a centerpiece of his agenda, both through his rhetoric and policy. Over the past few months, while the worst measles outbreak in 30 years has spread through the US, Kennedy has equivocated in public comments on the value of the measles vaccine, which doctors say is far and away the best tool to combat the disease. He directed an anti-vaccine researcher to scour federal data for evidence of a vaccine-autism link. His department's recent MAHA report on childhood chronic disease named vaccines as one example of how the US overmedicalizes its children and exposes them to artificial agents that could do harm to their body. Then in late May, Kennedy oversaw a revision of the federal government's Covid-19 vaccine guidance, limiting the shots to elderly people and those who are immunocompromised. He ended the recommendation that pregnant women and kids get a Covid vaccine shot, even though studies have shown they help confer immunity to infants, who are at a higher risk from the virus and cannot be vaccinated until they are 6 months old. The move plainly circumvented ACIP's accepted role in setting vaccine policy, presaging this week's mass firing. Whatever his intentions, Kennedy's gutting of the federal vaccine committee seems likely to sow even more distrust — and certainly more confusion. People are reasonably left to wonder whether they can trust forthcoming CDC guidance on vaccines, and just what vaccines they'll be able to get. How will I know which vaccines to get? In the past, ACIP would typically meet a few times a year to discuss any additions or changes to the country's vaccine schedule. Their recommendations have usually been adopted without alterations by the CDC director, and then became the standard for state and local health departments across the country. Importantly, most health plans are required to cover any shots that the committee recommends. Now there is far more uncertainty. Will doctors follow the CDC guidance, even if it changes under a new advisory panel staffed by Kennedy loyalists, or will they stick with the earlier vaccine schedule? Will health insurance plans cover the cost of a vaccine that professional medical organizations support but the CDC does not? Once-unthinkable questions could soon be something doctors and patients must deal with every day. Some doctors already believed, before the firings at ACIP, that the CDC was no longer trustworthy under Kennedy's leadership; his unilateral change to the Covid vaccine guidance in May was enough to convince them. In a media call last week, experts from the Infectious Disease Society of America urged patients and providers in the short term to consult with professional medical societies — not the CDC — on vaccine recommendations. They considered those groups, as well as guidance from European health authorities, the best substitutes we currently have for information on vaccines if the CDC's recommendations can no longer be taken at face value. 'It's been a confusing several days, confusing last two weeks, and I'm not sure that confusion is going to be abated in the near future,' John Lynch, an infectious disease doctor at the University of Washington, said on the call. 'These are evidence-based guidelines developed by experts in the field using transparent methods and published publicly,' Lynch said. Kennedy, in explaining his change to the Covid vaccine guidelines, said he wanted to encourage shared decision-making between providers and their patients. The CDC guidance would be only one consideration in the decision whether to vaccinate, rather than a firm recommendation. The doctors from the IDSA said that such conversations are already to be considered best practice among physicians — and noted Kennedy's undermining of trust in the federal vaccine policy would now make them more important. 'I would just emphasize the need to have a good source of information when this situation occurs. If indeed shared decision making is going to occur, we always do our research,' Dr. Flor Muñoz-Rivas at Baylor College of Medicine said. 'But go to the proper sources.' What are the long-term risks? There is a lot we don't know right now: Who will be named to the new panel? Will they change existing vaccine recommendations? Will they approve new ones? But the experts warned that Kennedy's rhetoric alone risks undermining people's confidence in vaccinations. 'All health care decisions are shared decision-making; this is not a special concept that's only rolled out for conversations like vaccination,' Lynch said on the IDSA call. 'As an infectious disease doctor, when I talk to a patient about treatment or diagnostics, it is a conversation. It is shared decision-making.' Kennedy has quickly disrupted decades of public health consensus. Anyone who watched the sometimes contentious ACIP meetings during the pandemic saw the members grappling with genuinely vexing questions about who should be prioritized for vaccination in a public health emergency. The pandemic featured rare examples of Biden CDC director Rochelle Walensky overruling the panel in certain cases in which the experts actually recommended against more vaccinations. (Walensky said she overrode the guidance to align the CDC with a separate recommendation from the FDA's advisory committee, and cited the narrow 9-6 vote against the recommendation.) Those scenes should have helped dispel the notion that they were acting as a rubber-stamp for any new shot Big Pharma produced. But the nation's top health official is now telling Americans that they should never have trusted the ACIP, which risks pushing more people to skip routine immunization. Shortly after the country declared measles eradicated in 2000, 94 percent of adults said childhood immunizations were extremely or very important. But that consensus has since weakened: 69 percent of Americans said the same in 2024. If changing opinion leads to declining vaccination rates, diseases that we successfully stamped out through vaccines to rebound — which is exactly what we are seeing now with measles. The US is experiencing its highest number of measles cases since the 1990s, nearing 1,200 as of this writing. One outbreak that accounts for most of those cases took off in a small Texas community where vaccination rates had fallen far below the 95-percent threshold that is considered necessary to stop the virus's spread. Other knock on effects could hurt Americans who still want to get vaccinated. Pharma companies, the target of so much of Kennedy's criticism, could decide to stop pursuing new vaccines if they believe the federal government will limit access as much as possible, shrinking the world's biggest pharmaceutical market. Vaccines are not big moneymakers for drug companies, and they have often relied on the US government's support to develop new ones. Kennedy, however, has canceled major vaccine development contracts during his first few months as health secretary, including a $700 million contract with Moderna, one of two companies that produced the mRNA Covid vaccines, to work on a universal flu shot. Kennedy has quickly disrupted decades of public health consensus. For now, the best reaction is, oddly enough, for patients and providers to take him at his word when he says people should not take medical advice from him — and make their own decisions in collaboration with their doctors.

Nearly 700,000 Americans Lose Health Care Coverage in 2025
Nearly 700,000 Americans Lose Health Care Coverage in 2025

Newsweek

time30 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Nearly 700,000 Americans Lose Health Care Coverage in 2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Almost 700,000 Americans lost Medicaid coverage in one month at the start of this year, according to new enrollment data compiled by KFF. The significant drop in Medicaid enrollment in January from December 2024 is part of a long-term trend amid the continuation of the federal program's "unwinding" process, which began after pandemic-era protections ended. Enrollment was still higher in January than it was in February 2020. Why It Matters The data highlights the continued ripple effects of the Medicaid policy shift, with millions more likely to be affected in the months ahead—particularly low-income families, children, and older adults who rely on Medicaid for basic care access. Health care experts and advocates warn that the unwinding process is opening large gaps in the U.S. health care system, with many falling through the cracks due to administrative barriers or lack of communication, not because they no longer qualify. File photo: people block a street during a protest over proposed cuts to Medicaid funding. File photo: people block a street during a protest over proposed cuts to Medicaid funding. Rick Bowmer/AP What to Know Data collected by KFF shows that from December 2024 to January 2025, Medicaid enrollment dropped by 669,938, bringing the total number of Americans enrolled in Medicaid to around 71.2 million. While this number remains high, it reflects a steady monthly decline that began in 2023 when states resumed redeterminations, where they checked whether enrollees were still eligible for benefits. The process had been paused during the COVID-19 public health emergency alongside an expansion to the federal protection available for vulnerable Americans with limited income and resources. When those protections were lifted following the pandemic, millions faced the risk of being disenrolled—not just due to income changes, but because of paperwork errors, missed deadlines, or outdated contact information. According to KFF's data, more than 16 million people have been disenrolled from Medicaid since the unwinding began in the spring of 2023. An April 2024 survey by KFF of 1,227 U.S. adults who had Medicaid coverage in prior to April 1, 2023, found that 28 percent of former enrolees found other forms of health coverage, while 47 percent were eventually re-enrolled to Medicaid. Around a quarter of enrolees reported as remaining uninsured. States like Montana, Tennessee and Colorado have seen some of the largest decreases in enrollment, with levels in January 2025 dropping below pre-pandemic levels. What People Are Saying William Schpero, assistant professor of population health sciences at Weill Cornell Medicine, told Newsweek: "This is evidence that we are likely still seeing the effects of the end of the continuous coverage provisions in place during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency that paused redeterminations of Medicaid eligibility. During the 'unwinding' of continuous coverage through September 2024, close to 70 percent of those who lost coverage were disenrolled for purely procedural reasons—for example, they missed a required renewal form because of a change in address. Many of these people likely remained eligible for Medicaid." He added: "It would be particularly concerning if procedural terminations continue to underlie the latest reported decreases in Medicaid enrollment. It suggests that states can be doing more to prevent avoidable losses of coverage. Research has estimated that a large portion of individuals who have lost Medicaid in recent months have become uninsured or experienced gaps in coverage. We have consistent evidence that loss of Medicaid coverage interrupts access to care — without coverage, people forgo visiting the doctor or taking their prescribed medications due to cost. Ultimately this will hurt health outcomes." Kathleen Adams, professor of health policy and management at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health, Georgia, told Newsweek: "We are always concerned with the loss of insurance coverage, especially among the lower income and vulnerable groups traditionally served by Medicaid. If these individuals are not able to find a source of other coverage such as Employer Sponsored Insurance (ESI) or through the subsidized exchanges, they will have lower access to needed health care, face higher costs if they obtain care and could impose costs on the health care system as they are forced to seek care in ERs or other publicly subsidized sources of care." She added: "The unwinding has taken place over a year and as the report notes, Medicaid enrollment is still higher now than in the pre-pandemic period. It is also important to note the differences seen across states. Some states that had not expanded Medicaid under the ACA did so recently and many of them show the largest increases in enrollment from their pre-pandemic levels. Currently, the concerns with Medicaid enrollment are with the administration's proposed changes to Medicaid eligibility which some states are already seeking to implement." What's Next Unless policies change, experts project that millions more Americans may lose health coverage through 2025, not just due to changes in eligibility requirements, but also because of bureaucratic hurdles.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store