What I Learned Driving a Porsche Taycan from Detroit to L.A.
At Road & Track, we like to live the dream. Sometimes that means driving supercars in exotic locations, and sometimes that means impromptu road trips to pick up impulsive car purchases from the other side of the country. My love of a bargain led me to buy a 2022 Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo in Michigan, having only appraised it through online pictures. The next challenge was to get this luxury EV home to California.
I did make it, eventually, without having to resort to either cannibalism or gasoline. This proved to me that it is possible to drive an EV 2300 miles, in winter, with zero preplanning. But not zero thought—there was plenty of time for that in the five days it took me to make the trip. Which is what I wanted to share here.
The first revelation was that driving on New Year's Eve—when I started the journey—and also New Year's Day is incredibly luxurious. It was like heading back to the Sixties or Seventies, or like the early COVID-19 era but without the fear of dying. For three whole charge cycles in the boondocks I was able to leave the adaptive cruise control to regulate speed and not touch a single pedal between entering and leaving the highway.
Yet, despite what might seem like optimal conditions for huge velocities, speeding was futile. EVs are not particularly efficient at highway speeds, especially in winter, and range drops precipitously above 70 mph. So, even in a Porsche, I spent hours and hours doing 74 mph and being passed by everyone because driving any faster would increase the number of charge stops and offset speed-related gains. While frustrating at first, I quickly entered a zen-like state of acceptance. This is how EVs road trip.
I used the time to call people I hadn't spoken to in a while (Porsche's CarPlay interface is excellent), think up ideas for The Smoking Tire podcast and listen to other people's podcasts. Providing you know how long a journey will take, the mental freedom from stress feels pretty good.
Range is also less important than you might expect if you are a human being with bodily functions. In ideal circumstances, with thoughtful planning, the Taycan will do up to 300 miles. But with no planning, in cold weather, constantly cruising at 74 mph saw me stop to charge for 20 to 30 minutes every 150 to 160 miles. Having a car that forces you to stop so often can be frustrating, but it is definitely better for spinal health than trying to one-hit a long trip.
Driving in the cold reduces range, with most EVs losing about 20 percent when temperatures drop to freezing. I watched the range estimates increase steadily as I headed west and it grew warmer, from 160 miles at 19 degrees Fahrenheit to 240 miles in 70 degrees.
Despite the fact that 19 of my 21 visits to DC fast-chargers were seamless and trouble-free, I didn't end the trip with a complete trust in the infrastructure, that any charger will work as reliably as a gas pump. Of the two unsuccessful charge stops, one featured an appropriate alternate just up the road; the other resulted in a stressful reroute in which range dropped to an indicated three miles. I then hooked up at slow Level 2 charging unit for a half-hour to juice up enough to get to the next fast-charger.
The bigger frustration is where charging places tend to be located. Few of the fast-chargers seem to be in the sort of small, quaint towns you might want to explore or have lunch while you're adding electrons. No fewer than 13 of my DC stops were at a Walmart, and six others were fundamentally identical to an extended gas-station experience. Only two were in or near cute town squares.
A bigger hiccup in EV road tripping is, surprisingly, "destination charging" at hotels. Sadly, major booking websites do not accurately reflect the reality on the ground. Of three attempts to spend nights at hotels with EV charging units, all failed. At one, the units didn't work. At another, they were all occupied. At the third, they were Tesla Superchargers, and I didn't have an adapter. Had I begun those three drive days with a full charge and the car preheated from shore power, life would have been much easier. Instead, I had to start with a low battery and do an early-morning charge, which, because the car was cold, went slow. Put me in charge of U.S. transportation, and I would insist every hotel with at least 40 parking spaces be required to install at least four Level 2 charge points.
Yet the trip took much less brain power than I was expecting it to take. There are a core number of chargers out there, and even if one doesn't function properly, you have a very high chance of getting to a working one nearby. Porsche's route-planning software is good, and learning to use it on the fly was an excellent primer. In the Porsche, range was also commendably accurate. If I had four miles of range and the charger was two miles away, I knew I would make it—there is none of the inaccuracy of a gas car's generally pessimistic distance-to-empty reading.
My view? If we quadrupled the number of fast-chargers, focusing on densely populated areas first, we would have a viable infrastructure for long-haul EV trips. If there were even 10 percent as many fast-chargers as gas stations we would get there. And for any economically distressed but otherwise charming small towns, install a bank of DC fast-chargers, and you'll soon be drawing a regular stream of relatively well-off people looking to kill time and spend money in your town while charging.
But will we get there? Given the apparent priorities of the current administration, it seems entirely possible my experience in early January won't improve significantly even as the number of EVs on the road continues to rise. Without public subsidy, charging infrastructure is unlikely to get better at the rate it needs to. We might already be at the high-water mark. And yes, that would be sad. So sad.
But if you want time to think, there's plenty if you choose to road trip an EV in winter. At 74 mph.
You Might Also Like
You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox
Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners
The Man Who Signs Every Car
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Colleges, plagued by fraudulent ‘ghost students,' will soon have to ID aid applicants
With the growing success of criminal ghost students — bots posing as humans to steal millions of dollars in financial aid for fraudsters — California and federal regulators say they will start fighting back with an old-school technique: Making college students identify themselves. On Friday, the U.S. Department of Education announced that starting this fall, applicants for federal Pell Grants will have to show up in person or appear on a live video with an 'institutionally authorized individual' to provide 'unexpired, valid, government-issued photo identification.' The department cited California in particular, where fraudbots have siphoned off $10 million of Pell Grants and $3 million in state Cal Grant student aid since last year. California college officials voted last month to implement 'robust identity verification protocols' at their CCCapply application portal, where 2 million students a year — including many fraudbots — first enter the state's community college system. 'I think that's great,' said Kim Rich, a criminal justice instructor at L.A. Pierce College near Los Angeles. She has become an expert at identifying fraudbots and says she typically clears out three-quarters of the students — most of them bots — that enroll in her classes each term. Once they register, the bots can generate financial aid applications and disappear when the money arrives. Before any student applies to the system or enrolls in a class, Rich said, 'you verify their identity. Period. End of story. It's simple.' And yet, making sure each student is a student is anything but simple these days. That basic expectation became harder for college systems and the federal government to confirm after 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic led to an explosion of distance-learning classes, mainly at community colleges that are open to all. Remote classes and lax verification protocols have made it far easier for criminals to impersonate students than in prior years, and then to disappear when the financial aid checks land in the mailbox. Despite the new pronouncements about a return to individual identification for state and federal financial aid, neither the U.S. of Education nor the California Community College Chancellor's Office specified how that would be achieved. Implementation difficulties became apparent at the May 21 meeting of the California Community College Board of Governors, where members debated the fraud crisis for more than three hours, ultimately agreeing to generally upgrade the CCCApply technology to try to screen out more fraudulent applications, and to generally enhance applicant identification. Love Adu, a member of the Board of Governors and an incoming junior at UC Berkeley, noted that colleges often used the identity verification software 'ID Me,' but that it excludes many kinds of students, including those who are incarcerated, undocumented, homeless or under 18. The last category includes high school students who simultaneously enroll in community college through the increasingly popular practice of dual enrollment. 'I experienced this personally and had to drive more than five hours to a college to identify myself in person because I didn't qualify for ID Me,' Adu said at the meeting. 'I had the means to do that — but I know that most students do not.' Adu urged her colleagues on the board to consider that when they eventually do hash out the specifics of how to check whether students are human. The board spent most of the meeting debating whether the state chancellor's office should be given the authority to ask the state legislature for permission to impose an application of, say, $10, on applicants in order to help authenticate them. Although the board eventually gave them that authority, students and faculty who spoke at the meeting said a fee would probably discourage many low-income students from enrolling and might not serve its intended purpose in any case. Instead, most speakers said they would prefer to figure out how to verify real students. 'I think we can all agree that we can no longer minimize the effects of this problem. Something must be done,' Eleni Gastis, president-elect of the faculty senate at Laney College in Oakland, told the board members before imploring them to 'find other strategies to mitigate fraud before we ask our students to pony up.' She is among the instructors and staff members up and down the state who are forced to spend increasing amounts of time trying to identify and disenroll fake students before they can collect financial aid. Instructors report there are so many bots that there is often no room for real students. 'It takes faculty hours of time that they could be spending supporting our students,' state Chancellor Sonya Christian said at the meeting. 'It takes our classified staff hours of time to support students that they don't have.' Statewide, security software detected and thwarted fraud in 31.4% of applications this year, up from 20% in 2023, Chris Ferguson, head of finance at the state chancellor's office, 'We needed a plan yesterday,' Gastis told the Chronicle on Friday. And when a plan is created, she said, it will have to be made clear to students and be fair to 'marginalized and fearful communities.' Following Friday's announcement from the feds, even officials at the state chancellor's office said they weren't sure what to do next. The office is 'waiting for additional guidance,' a spokesperson for the chancellor's office told the Chronicle. Even then, it might be awhile before a plan is in place. Once guidance arrives, the spokesperson said, 'we will consult with our community college stakeholders to determine what processes and procedures will be needed to comply.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Serious' M11 crash in Essex leaves motorway closed to traffic
A major UK motorway is closed following a 'serious' crash tonight (Friday, June 6 into Saturday June 7). The M11 is shut to traffic southbound between Junction 6 and Junction 5 in Essex. The incident was first reported shortly after 11pm. It is currently unclear how long the closure will be in place for. READ MORE: UKHSA 'stay at home' advice as Covid variant NB.1.8.1 confirmed in UK READ MORE: When UK weather will change as soaring temperatures of 28C set to hit Inrix, the traffic data company, said: "M11 Southbound closed due to serious accident from J6 M25 J27 to J5 A1168 Chigwell Lane (Loughton)." A National Highways spokesperson said: "The M11 southbound is currently closed between J6 (M25) and J5 (Chigwell) due to a serious collision. Emergency services continue to work at scene. There is currently not timescale for how long the road will be closed. We await updates from from Essex Police." ---- Day in day out, our reporters in the Manchester Evening News newsroom bring you remarkable stories from all aspects of Mancunian life. However, with the pace of life these days, the frenetic news agenda and social media algorithms, you might not be getting a chance to read it. That's why every week our Features and Perspectives editor Rob Williams brings you Unmissable, highlighting the best of what we do - bringing it to you directly from us. Make sure you don't miss out, and see what else we have to offer, by clicking here and signing up for MEN Daily News. And be sure to join our politics writer Jo Timan every Sunday for his essential commentary on what matters most to you in Greater Manchester each week in our newsletter Due North. You can also sign up for that here. You can also get all your favourite content from the Manchester Evening News on WhatsApp. Click here to see everything we offer, including everything from breaking news to Coronation Street. If you prefer reading our stories on your phone, consider downloading the Manchester Evening News app here, and our news desk will make sure every time an essential story breaks, you'll be the first to hear about it. And finally, if there is a story you think our journalists should be looking into, we want to hear from you. Email us on newsdesk@ or give us a ring on 0161 211 2920. .
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
S&P 500 Gains and Losses Today: Lululemon Stock Falls as Forecasts Reflect Consumer Caution
The S&P 500 added 1% on Friday, June 6, as a strong jobs report pointed to resilience in the labor market despite tariff-related concerns. After retreating from record highs over the past few sessions, shares of data analytics firm Palantir bounced back, boosted by a signal of robust AI demand. Shares of Lululemon plummeted after the apparel maker cut its outlook for the current quarter and the full year, citing soft consumer U.S. equities indexes pushed higher to close out the trading week. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the U.S. economy added 139,000 jobs in May, topping economists' forecasts and helping alleviate concerns about a tariff-driven slowdown in the labor market. The S&P 500 gained 1% on Friday, closing above the 6,000-point level for the first time since February. The Dow was up 1.1%, while the Nasdaq jumped 1.2%. Shares of big data analytics software provider Palantir Technologies (PLTR) popped 6.5% higher, securing the top daily performance in the S&P 500. Positivity around its expanding government business helped lift Palantir to an all-time high on Tuesday, but before Friday's gains, the stock had been pulling back for a couple of sessions. Palantir and other artificial intelligence companies benefited from upbeat sentiment after earnings results from chipmaker Broadcom (AVGO) revealed strong AI demand. Moderna (MRNA) shares wrapped up a volatile week of trading with a gain of 5.1% on Friday. The biotech company announced at the end of last week that it had received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the use of its new COVID-19 vaccine by older and higher-risk patients. On Tuesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Moderna had agreed to a placebo-controlled trial of the vaccine. United Airlines (UAL) announced a partnership with Spotify Technology (SPOT) that will allow airborne passengers to access playlists, audiobooks, and video podcasts from the streaming service on their seatback screens. United shares increased 4.8% on Friday, while rival carrier Delta Air Lines (DAL) shares were up 4.3%. Tesla (TSLA) shares advanced 3.7% on Friday as the feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump showed signs of de-escalation heading into the weekend. The spat between the two contributed to a major drop in the electric vehicle (EV) maker's stock in the prior session. Several analysts reaffirmed their bullishness on Tesla despite the high-profile conflict, but they noted that the tensions with Trump could complicate the regulatory path for the firm's self-driving technology or risk alienating people with certain political perspectives. Lululemon Athletica (LULU) issued lower-than-expected sales and profit guidance for the current quarter and trimmed its full-year profit forecast. The maker of yoga attire and other athletic apparel noted that U.S. consumers are taking a cautious approach to spending and discussed plans to increase prices on some products as it aims to mitigate tariff impacts. Lululemon shares plunged 19.8% on Friday, dropping the most of any constituent in the S&P 500. JPMorgan and UBS analysts cut their price targets on Lululemon stock following the underwhelming outlook. Broadcom posted fiscal second-quarter sales and adjusted profit results that were roughly in line with consensus forecasts. A major year-over-year uptick in artificial intelligence semiconductor revenue helped the chipmaker achieve record quarterly revenue of $15 billion. However, Broadcom shares slipped 5% on Friday, receding from a string of record highs notched before the earnings release. Mosaic (MOS), a provider of fertilizers and other agricultural products, reduced its 2025 phosphate production guidance, citing operational issues at its U.S. facilities. Shares of Mosaic were down 4.4%. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data