logo
Intel's CEO Draws Support for Revival From SoftBank, Trump

Intel's CEO Draws Support for Revival From SoftBank, Trump

Mint20 hours ago
Less than two weeks after President Donald Trump called for the ouster of Intel Corp.'s Lip-Bu Tan, the company's chief executive officer has a shot at securing billions of dollars in fresh capital that could help him turn around the troubled US chipmaker.
The Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in Intel, possibly by converting grants made to the company under the US Chips and Science Act into equity, according to people familiar with the matter. That could allow Intel to tap about $10 billion in capital as Tan works out a strategy for revival.
In another surprise, SoftBank Group Corp. agreed to take a $2 billion stake in Intel, as the Japanese company seeks a broader role in the artificial intelligence boom. Founder Masayoshi Son already owns a majority stake in chipmaker Arm Holdings Plc and has laid plans to compete with Nvidia Corp. in AI chips. Intel's chipmaking skills could help SoftBank manufacture chips to run — and possibly train — AI models like ChatGPT.
Intel shares rose about 7% in pre-market trading on Tuesday. SoftBank's own stock price fell 4% in Tokyo.
Earlier this month, Tan's hold on his CEO role looked precarious after Trump called on him to resign over alleged conflicts of interest. Yet the executive quickly visited Trump at the White House to clear the air, with the president then praising the Intel CEO for his career success and 'amazing story.'
That set the stage for the government's possible investment, which would make the US the chipmaker's largest shareholder. The federal government is considering an investment that, under one scenario, would involve converting some or all of the $10.9 billion in grants the company had won under the Chips Act, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the information is confidential. The company can also draw on up to $11 billion in loans under the 2022 law.
The grant money, which was originally designed to be disbursed over time as Intel meets project milestones, is roughly enough to pay for the targeted holding. At Intel's current market value, a 10% stake in the chipmaker would be worth around $10.5 billion. The exact size of the stake, as well as whether the White House chooses to move ahead with the plan, is still in flux, the people said.
White House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions, saying only that no deal is official until it's announced by the administration. The Commerce Department, which oversees the Chips Act, also declined to comment. Intel didn't respond to a request for comment.
SoftBank's investment is another unconventional bet on Tan's ability to revive Intel's fortunes. The Japanese company announced its plan to buy new shares at $23 a share, a small discount to Intel's last close. Son has ambitions to design an energy-efficient AI chip through what he calls the 'Izanagi' project to compete with Nvidia's products, though that has yet to translate into a marketable product.
Son held talks with Intel's chief executive about buying the company's contract chipmaking business before agreeing to make the $2 billion investment, the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the talks. The investment doesn't preclude a bigger deal for that part of Intel's business, the newspaper said.
A big question is whether a government holding and SoftBank's vote of confidence would help reinvigorate Intel's business. The tech pioneer has fallen behind Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. in contract chipmaking and Nvidia Corp. in chip design, missing out on a boom in spending on artificial intelligence.
Last week, Intel's stock had its biggest one-week rally since February, after the initial news of the government's possible investment.
Tan, who served on SoftBank's board for two years, is seeking a turnaround. But his efforts have largely been focused on cutting costs and eliminating jobs. Intel will add large-scale manufacturing capacity only once customers are committed to using its more advanced production techniques, Tan said last month, sparking concern among investors that the company may be bowing out of the race for semiconductor leadership.
The Trump administration is particularly focused on shoring up Intel's sprawling project in Ohio, the home state of Vice President JD Vance. Intel has repeatedly delayed the anticipated opening of that site, which the company originally envisioned as the world's biggest semiconductor facility.
Beyond Intel, the White House official also floated the possibility that the administration could convert other Chips Act awards into equity stakes. It's not clear whether that idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with any companies that could be affected.
The Chips Act set aside $39 billion in manufacturing grants — plus loans and tax credits — to revitalize the American semiconductor industry after decades of production shifting to Asia. Using Chips Act money for an Intel stake would mean the chipmaker isn't necessarily getting a bigger government infusion than expected — possibly just one that's on a faster timeline. As is the case for all Chips Act winners, Intel's award was designed as a reimbursement, with the grant money split into tranches tied to specific project benchmarks.
Intel had received $2.2 billion of its award as of January. It's unclear whether that amount would be included in the possible equity stake, whether the company has received additional disbursements of its award since Trump took office, and on what schedule Intel would receive money under a possible equity stake.
While TSMC and South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. are expanding their US operations with Chips Act support, having an American company like Intel building cutting-edge chips on domestic soil has been a priority for both the Trump and Biden administrations.
Biden officials, for example, tried to get companies like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. to consider using Intel as a manufacturing partner, and also explored long-shot ideas like a tie-up between Intel and GlobalFoundries Inc.
Earlier this year, Trump's team held early-stage conversations with TSMC about potentially operating Intel's factories — an arrangement from which TSMC has backed away. Trump officials have also internally floated the prospect of seeking an Intel investment from the United Arab Emirates. It's unclear whether either of those approaches has progressed much past a thought exercise.
Washington has become more aggressive in strategic sectors. The Trump administration's secured an agreement to receive a 15% cut of AI chip sales to China and took a so-called golden share in United States Steel Corp. as part of a deal to clear its sale to a Japanese rival. That's while the Defense Department announced a plan that would make it the largest shareholder in US rare-earth producer MP Materials Corp.
The US government and the Japanese tech conglomerate both see the potential for a turnaround at Intel, although each likely values different parts of the business. For the Trump administration, a recovery of the chipmaker's manufacturing prowess would help win jobs and voters. For SoftBank, Intel's chip design operations beckon with the promise of high margins.
With assistance from Brody Ford, Ville Heiskanen, Ryan Gould, Josh Wingrove, Min Jeong Lee and Edwin Chan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Know How To Kill Russians': Ukraine Envoy Pokes Moscow, Demands NATO Membership With Chilling Boast
‘Know How To Kill Russians': Ukraine Envoy Pokes Moscow, Demands NATO Membership With Chilling Boast

Time of India

time4 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Know How To Kill Russians': Ukraine Envoy Pokes Moscow, Demands NATO Membership With Chilling Boast

'India's Strikes, Not Trump': Tharoor Backs India's Stance On Ceasefire With Pakistan At the launch of the book 'Whither India-Pakistan Relations Today? Can They Ever Be Good Neighbours?', Congress MP Shashi Tharoor praised Operation Sindoor, calling it a decisive response to cross-border terror. He said India's strikes—"not Mr. Trump"—prompted Pakistan to request a ceasefire in May. Tharoor revealed he had written an op-ed days after the Pahalgam attack suggesting such action, and expressed surprise that the government followed the same course. He said India's interception of missiles aimed at Delhi on May 10 showed strength. With Balakot and now Sindoor, Tharoor said India has shown it won't tolerate terror on its soil. 6.7K views | 5 hours ago

You can now carry rifles, shotguns in Washington DC without facing charges: New policy after Trump takeover
You can now carry rifles, shotguns in Washington DC without facing charges: New policy after Trump takeover

First Post

time4 minutes ago

  • First Post

You can now carry rifles, shotguns in Washington DC without facing charges: New policy after Trump takeover

Federal prosecutors in Washington, D.C., will no longer seek felony charges for carrying rifles or shotguns. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro cites Supreme Court rulings and constitutional rights in line with Trump's law enforcement push. Federal prosecutors in Washington, D.C. have been directed not to pursue felony charges against people caught carrying rifles or shotguns in the city, a dramatic departure from long-standing practice. The instruction, confirmed by US Attorney Jeanine Pirro in an email obtained by The Washington Post, follows guidance from the Justice Department and its solicitor general. Until now, D.C.'s law barring residents from carrying long guns with only limited exceptions had been used in several notable prosecutions, including the 2016 'Pizzagate' incident, when an armed man stormed a local restaurant and a 2019 case involving a shotgun attack in Northeast Washington. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The policy shift coincides with President Donald Trump's aggressive expansion of federal law enforcement in the capital, a campaign touted as a crackdown on illegal firearms. White House officials have pointed to the seizure of 68 weapons since the start of the initiative. Yet the new stance raises questions about how many of those cases will result in charges. Pirro, who took over as the city's chief federal prosecutor earlier this month and is a close Trump ally, stressed that her office will continue to prosecute violent crimes and weapons trafficking cases involving rifles or shotguns. Handgun cases, which make up the majority of gun-related prosecutions in D.C., are also unaffected. In a statement, Pirro was quoted by the Washington Post as saying that the District's ban on carrying rifles and shotguns conflicts with Supreme Court rulings that have expanded gun rights, notably District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022). Both decisions held that restrictions not grounded in US historical tradition cannot stand. 'President Trump and I remain fully committed to prosecuting gun crime,' Pirro said. 'But we will do so in ways consistent with the Constitution and the laws of the land.'

U.S. government eyes stakes in chipmakers; OpenAI to touch highest valuation for a private firm; Google settles YouTube children's lawsuit
U.S. government eyes stakes in chipmakers; OpenAI to touch highest valuation for a private firm; Google settles YouTube children's lawsuit

The Hindu

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. government eyes stakes in chipmakers; OpenAI to touch highest valuation for a private firm; Google settles YouTube children's lawsuit

U.S. government eyes stakes in chipmakers U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the U.S. government is looking at picking up more equity stakes in computer chipmakers that are a part of the CHIPS Act. The U.S. federal government is already in talks to receive a 10% equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants. Lutnick said the they're exploring companies like Micron, TSMC and Samsung. Intel and Micron are the biggest recipients of grants from the CHIPS Act. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has confirmed the decision calling it a 'creative idea that has never been done before.' The U.S. government will not be directing Intel how to run their operations. Similar actions where the U.S. has taken a stake in a company to offer cash have happened before during time periods of economic uncertainty. Earlier this year, Trump approved Nippon Steel's purchase of U.S. Steel after being promised a 'golden share' that would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying investments, transferring production or jobs outside the U.S. or shutting down plants without Trump's permission. The $52.7 CHIPS Act provides funding for research and grants for building chip plants in the U.S. Last year, the U.S. Commerce Department gave out subsidies of $4.75 billion to Samsung, $6.2 billion to Micron and $6.6 billion to TSMC. OpenAI to touch highest valuation for a private firm OpenAI is in discussions to sell $6 billion in shares pushing the AI firm's valuation to $500 billion, the highest valuation for a privately held firm. This would edge it past Elon Musk's SpaceX and TikTok parent ByteDance. Currently, SpaceX is the most valued private company globally at $350 billion. Investors who will be a part of the secondary share sale includes SoftBank, Dragoneer Investment Group and Thrive Capital. All of them had already invested in OpenAI earlier. A few weeks ago, OpenAI had raised $8.3 billion at a valuation of $300 billion. The deal was a part of OpenAI's broad strategy to secure $40 billion this year in funding. A Wired report said that there two deals in play. The SoftBank investment in OpenAI which is expected to be closed by the end of the year will value OpenAI at $300 billion. The share sale will move OpenAI 's valuation to $500 billion. Cheaper shares have already been bought while the pricier shares are still on sale. Google settles YouTube children's lawsuit Google will settle a lawsuit filed that alleged YouTube collected personal information of minors without parental consent by paying $30 million. A preliminary settlement of the class action was filed on Monday and is pending approval. Google has denied the allegations. Back in 2019, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission had made similar claims and YouTube had paid $170 in fines and made some changes to their practices. Parents and guardians of 34 children accused Google of violating dozens of state laws by allowing content providers to bait children with cartoons and nursey rhymes to help collect sensitive information post the 2019 case. The content providers listed were Hasbro, Mattel, Cartoon Network and DreamWorks Animation but Google said there was insufficient proof that they were collecting data. The class action covered children under 13 years of age and were watching YouTube between July 2013 and April 2020 and had between 35 million to 45 million members as plaintiffs. If 1% to 2% submitted claims in the case, which is the usual rate for similar cases, plaintiffs could receive between $30 to $60 each.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store