Kizik brings legal dispute with Skechers to Europe
In the complaint, issued by Fast IP, LLC – the intellectual property (IP) holding company of HFL – and seen by WWD, a disputed amount of one million euros was cited. The number serves as a preliminary estimate used to get the lawsuit filed, the media outlet noted.
HFL has named the German, Swiss, Belgian, Italian and French arms of Skechers operations in the suit, which bears resemblance to the complaint already underway in the US. As such, HFL is once again targeting Skechers' Hands Free Slip-Ins line, the products of which it claims infringe on a number of its utility and design patents
Akin to its US filing, HFL has called for Skechers to be banned from selling its hands-free shoes in 18 European countries, and is seeking to recall products placed on the market since July 9. HFL is also requesting provisional damages amounting to 200,000 euros, as well as other monetary damages.
HFL had initially launched its legal quarrel with Skechers in July. According to its filing with a court in Texas, the company believes Skechers had 'knowingly and willfully' infringed on its patents that protect 'ornamental innovations'. Gareth Hosford, HFL's CEO, said the company was 'forced to defend' its hands-free technology 'against a company that chose to imitate rather than innovate'.
Skechers later publicly responded to the lawsuit, calling HFL's claims 'baseless' and stating that it intended to 'aggressively challenge both the validity of the patents and the infringement claims'. In its statement, the footwear giant said it had 'obtained more than 140 utility and design patents worldwide, including in the US'. It also expressed suspicion at the timing of the lawsuit, which came shortly after the announcement that the brand was to be taken over by 3G Capital in a 9.42 billion dollar merger.
In regards to this latest complaint, a Skechers spokesperson told WWD that the company had 'no further comment'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MAGGIE PAGANO: We are all paying the price for Labour
Eating cake rather than bread is not an option. Blame my Viking-cum-Italian genes. But there are two household staples that we are never without: tealights and olive oil. My addiction is such that I'm eagle-eyed about hunting down the best prices. But here's the rub. It doesn't seem to matter whether you are shopping for candles at Homebase or B&M, or Waitrose or Tesco for liquid gold – prices are soaring again having fallen back after inflation peaked nearly three years ago. As any regular shopper will tell you, so are the prices of most foods and household products. June's annual food inflation rate was up at 4.5 per cent, the third month in a row that prices rose, and the highest since the beginning of last year. Inflation figures for July out next Wednesday are expected to show further jumps. So it's hardly surprising that 85 per cent of adults surveyed by the Office for National Statistics say that the cost-of-living crisis is the most important issue facing the UK today – ahead even of the NHS. About six in ten adults also report that costs have risen in the last month – that's more people citing price rises than in July last year when Labour took office. This time around, rising prices can't be blamed on either the after-effects of the pandemic, which crippled supply chains around the world, or indeed Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which saw the price of wheat and sunflower oils, as well as energy, rocket into the stratosphere. Today's price rises, however, are mainly home-grown, the direct result of Labour's tax hikes. Prices have further to climb because of the Budget tax rises, as even the Bank of England has admitted. The British Retail Consortium (BRC) has also warned that the full impact of the last Budget has yet to fully filter through to prices. Labour's policies will add £7billion to retailer costs this year, ranging from higher employment costs to the new packaging tax. The BRC also says that if this autumn's Budget attacks retailers again, with its planned higher business rates threshold on 4,000 larger stores, then it will be poorer families which will be hit hardest. At the same time, the UK's farming industry is being whacked on all fronts, threatening the country's food security. The latest smack in the face is Labour's decision not to give any financial aid to the bioethanol industry after President Donald Trump's tariff hike. Smaller farm owners are being devastated by the new inheritance tax rules and are shutting down. Dairy farmers are closing because of higher costs and worker shortages, opening the door to more imports and less competition. Even the price of bread is now in question. The planned merger between ABF's Kingsmill and Hovis is going to be an interesting test for Labour to chew on. Both Kingsmill and Hovis lose money. Together they would lead the market in sliced bread, putting them ahead of sector leader Warburtons. What's Labour to do? On the one hand the Government will want to show its support for business, giving a nod to the Competition and Markets Authority to pass the takeover. But that means big job losses and a potential monopoly position for its breads, the price of which they may be mindful of has so often led historically to riots. Telling people to eat cake is not an option.
ITV News
10 hours ago
- ITV News
Uncertainty over future of Teesside bioethanol plant but company remains 'positive'
A bioethanol plant on Teesside is having urgent discussions with the Government following an announcement that grant funding will not be provided to support the sector. Ensus, based at Wilton site near Redcar is one of the two largest bioethanol producers in the UK - the other being Vivergo Fuels, in Hull. The firms have been in consultation with the Government following a trade deal made with the US allowing American ethanol to be imported tariff free. While Vivergo, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), has now said its facing closure within weeks, Ensus says the future is more "positive" because of the carbon dioxide it makes as a bi-product of bioethanol. The Department for Business and Trade said it had to make the "difficult decision" not to offer support, citing that it would not be "value for the taxpayer", but added that proposals are being worked on to support CO2 supply. Mon 16 June: Chemicals firm on Teesside warns UK-US trade deal could shut them down in a matter of weeks Ensus, which is owned by German company Sudzucker and CropEnergies, is the country's only large scale producer of the gas, providing 30-60% of the CO2 needed in the UK. Grant Pearson, Chairman of Ensus UK, said: "I met with Sarah Jones, the Minister for Business, today to receive the Government's response to our request for financial support and the policy changes required to ensure that the Ensus facilities can continue to operate. "The Minister confirmed that they value both our contribution to the UK economy, the jobs we provide and support in the North East of England and in particular our production of biogenic CO2 which is a product of critical national importance. "They are therefore looking at options to secure an ongoing supply of CO2 from the Ensus facility. "This is positive news, however it is likely to take time to agree upon and finalise and therefore urgent discussions will be taking place to provide a level of assurance to the Sudzucker and CropEnergies Boards that there is a very high level of confidence that an acceptable long term arrangement can be reached." Ensus employs 100 people, and impacts around 3,000 in its supply chain. Until May, all ethanol imported into the UK from the US was subject to a 19% tariff. After the deal was made the eradicate the import fee, Ensus told ITV Tyne Tees that it could not compete in the market without Government support. Vivergo, which employs more than 160 people, said it was now beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant – a process which could see production stop before 13 September. A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade said: 'This Government will always take decisions in the national interest. That's why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace.'We have worked closely with the companies since June to understand the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade, and have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces.'We recognise this is a difficult time for the workers and their families and we will work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support them through this process. We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO2 supply in the long-term in consultation with the sector.'
The National
11 hours ago
- The National
Scottish farm fumes as council gives milk contract to German dairy giant
Mossgiel Organic Dairy teamed up with the local authority back in 2021 to provide every school in the area with its organic milk. The farm in Mauchline, where Robert Burns once ploughed the fields and wrote many of his famous verses, aims to provide sustainable, organic milk while challenging the dominance of the bigger dairy companies and their negative impact on the industry. READ MORE: Scottish 85-year-old pens scathing letter to Keir Starmer over immigration rules The farm has won multiple awards and is known for providing a high quality product whilst also being environmentally friendly. For example, it was the first dairy farm in the UK to ditch single-use plastics But, The National can now confirm that the council has decided to award the contract to Müller – a German multinational firm which is considered the largest dairy brand in the UK. Mossgiel took to social media to hit out at the move. In a statement, they claimed: 'On paper, the council saves £6500 a year. In reality, here's the rest of the bill: "Recycling costs: Single-use milk packaging could add £2000–£5000 a year to waste bills, even if they pour from bigger supermarket jugs instead of little cartons. "Jobs lost: Two full-time equivalent local roles gone; £50–55k removed from Ayrshire's economy, plus around £5k less in National Insurance contributions for public services. "Local milk value: £61,000 less per year for our farm and the co-op of organic family farms we work with." They then added: 'Best case? They save a couple of grand up front, but lose around £111,000 from the East Ayrshire economy. Worst case? No saving at all plus the loss of jobs, farm income and the circular economy on top. 'Either way, that's over £100,000 stripped out of our community every year, diesel fumes back in playgrounds, and a prayer that milk cartons actually make it into recycling instead of landfill. Oh, and profits? Straight to a German-owned company. We respect the council's decision but we don't agree with it.' In a statement to The National, East Ayrshire Council confirmed that Mossgiel Milk's bid to keep the contract was unsuccessful and that Müller will replace them. 'The Council remains committed to providing healthy nutritious school meals, and has for the past 20 years, issued fresh and organic food contracts. The contracts are designed to provide a range of produce that meets higher welfare, and health and nutritional value. The successful tenderers have committed to maintain these standards,' the council said. 'The council also has strong links through the Ayrshire Economic Forum that engages with the wider local market to promote opportunity; and there is also direct support from the council's business support team and the Supplier Development Programme, which delivers grant support and expertise to businesses exploring public sector procurement opportunities.'
