logo
Pakistan's Plot To Target Harmandir Sahib Exposed: A Direct Assault On Communal Harmony

Pakistan's Plot To Target Harmandir Sahib Exposed: A Direct Assault On Communal Harmony

News1819-05-2025
Last Updated:
To attempt a missile or drone attack on the Golden Temple in Amritsar is not merely an act of war but an act of blasphemy against the very idea of India
If there ever was a line that should never be crossed, it was this one. And Pakistan, in its habitual ignorance of history and faith, has not just crossed it but bombed it, quite literally.
The Harmandir Sahib, or the Golden Temple, is not only the holiest shrine of Sikhism, it is India's beating heart of spirituality, tolerance, and unity. To attempt a missile or drone attack on it is not merely an act of war, it is an act of blasphemy against the very idea of India.
According to senior military officials, what the Indian Army has uncovered during Operation Sindoor is nothing short of staggering: a deliberate and calculated assault by the Pakistan Army on the Golden Temple in Amritsar.
A place of profound reverence whose foundation stone, ironically, was laid not by a Sikh or a Hindu, but by a Muslim Sufi saint, Hazrat Mian Mir, who was personally invited by Guru Arjan Dev.
That one historic act exemplifies India's timeless spirit of pluralism – the very spirit Pakistan has tried to strike down with its cowardly missiles. This isn't just about faith but strategy – one that feeds on deceit, proxy propaganda, and the manipulation of religious sentiment.
Pakistan's plan is as old as its founding: divide and distract. This time, its weapons weren't just explosives, but lies alleging that India planned strikes on Nankana Sahib and the Golden Temple to inflame Sikh sentiment worldwide and diplomatically isolate itself. It was a dangerous lie – one that not only insulted intelligence, but desecrated memory.
Thanks to India's vigilant armed forces, that plan failed. The Indian Army has confirmed that during Operation Sindoor, a series of drones and long-range missiles – many believed to be aimed at civilian and religious targets including the Golden Temple – were intercepted and destroyed before they could cause damage. The sacred precincts of Harmandir Sahib were saved, not just by technological prowess but by the iron resolve of those who stand guard at India's borders.
Major General Kartik C Seshadri, General Officer Commanding, 15 Infantry Division, was unequivocal: 'The Pakistan Army has no legitimate targets to strike inside India, nor does it have the courage or capability to stand up to the Indian Armed Forces face-to-face. Hence, it resorts to terrorism as a national policy, using drones and long-range missiles launched from its own soil. The Golden Temple, internationally renowned and a place of faith for all, saw a surfeit of drone and missile attacks, which were bravely thwarted by our army air defence gunners."
Let's be blunt: this was not a military campaign. This was a terrorist act by a failing state. Having failed to divide Sikhs through decades of pro-Khalistan propaganda, Pakistan has now turned to brute force.
Their proxies like Gurpatwant Singh Pannun and the banned 'Sikhs for Justice' (SFJ), have long peddled separatist narratives dressed up in religious symbolism. But this time, Islamabad's own fingerprints are visible on the remote controls.
What Pakistan refuses to understand is that Sikhs don't need to prove their loyalty. From Saragarhi to Kargil, they have laid down their lives not for applause, but for a deeper sense of belonging. Their faith in India is not fragile, it is forged in sacrifice.
During Operation Sindoor, it wasn't just the Indian Army or the Air Force that responded, it was a Sikh Air Chief Marshal AP Singh, who led from the front. While Pakistan peddled disinformation, Indian Sikh officers and soldiers defended the nation with quiet strength. Try explaining that to Islamabad's propagandists, who still believe loyalty can be bought with slogans and social media campaigns.
Let us also not forget that the Harmandir Sahib is more than a religious symbol. It is a living embodiment of Sikh values – compassion, equality, and service. Every day, its langar (community kitchen) serves over one lakh meals, feeding anyone who walks in, regardless of caste, creed, or religion. No identity is checked, no label matters. Hunger is the only commonality and service, the only response.
The teachings of Sikhism – as laid out by Guru Nanak Dev and passed through generations – are deeply rooted in the oneness of God and of humanity. 'Ik Onkar' – there is only one Creator – is not just a prayer but a worldview. It is this inclusive vision of faith that Pakistan tried to attack. And it is this vision that has stood resilient.
This latest provocation from Pakistan is not without precedent. In 1971, they shelled gurdwaras in Punjab. In 1965, they falsely claimed Indian shells had struck Kartarpur. Even today, while they restrict Indian Sikh pilgrims at Kartarpur Sahib, they freely allow radical extremists to roam. Their agenda has never been spiritual – only cynical.
But this time, they struck a nerve. Not among Sikhs but among all Indians. Far from sparking communal division, Pakistan's actions have sparked national unity. No matter the religion, every Indian today stands shoulder to shoulder in defence of our sacred spaces, our pluralistic values, and our national sovereignty.
Pakistan's missiles may have missed their physical target, but they exposed its moral bankruptcy. The Golden Temple still stands bathed in golden light, reflected in the calm waters of the Amrit Sarovar. And in that reflection, we see not fear, but unshakable faith.
The Harmandir Sahib is not just a Sikh shrine. It is a monument to India's soul. And that soul, no matter how many drones fly at it, will never surrender.
(Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views)
tags :
Golden Temple religion ‪Sikhism‬
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 19, 2025, 21:58 IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Once Again Claims He Stopped India, Pak War
Trump Once Again Claims He Stopped India, Pak War

NDTV

time19 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Trump Once Again Claims He Stopped India, Pak War

Washington: US President Donald Trump on Monday once again repeated his claim that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan. Talking to the press in the Oval Office while meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Trump claimed to have ended six wars, including the war between India and Pakistan. While answering a question, Trump said he thought that the Russia-Ukraine war would be the "easiest one" to end, but it is not. Trump said that "it is the tough one", and we have been talking about it for a long time, like "we were talking about others …India-Pakistan." Trump also indirectly mentioned India and Pakistan on his Truth Social post earlier in the day. "I've settled 6 Wars in 6 months, one of them a possible Nuclear disaster," Trump posted. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over 40 times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in Parliament that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. On the day of his summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday, Trump repeated multiple times within hours his claim that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan, as well as spoke about Delhi's purchases of Russian oil.

A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship
A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship

Economic Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

A chill is setting in that will take a long time to recover in the India-US relationship

Synopsis The India-US relationship has deteriorated, with disproportionate responses from the White House despite India's efforts to address trade concerns. Political imperatives in the US, rather than trade merits, seem to be driving the decisions, leading to a chill in relations and a hardening public mood in India. Over the past few weeks, as the India-US relationship has near-imploded, several opinions and assessments have emerged. Most analysts have been measured and thoughtful, and attempted to discern the long view. Others have been astonishingly uninformed, ranging from amateurs talking through their hats to (former) professionals opining through their golf caps. ADVERTISEMENT To be sure, any consequential policy episode must see a reckoning and self-appraisal within the government. This is to be expected in an accountable democracy. The external affairs ministry, commerce ministry and even the PMO would naturally undertake such an exercise. Were there diplomatic missteps? Could the trade negotiations have gone differently? Were gaps in Operation Sindoor's strategic comms deterministic? These are all good questions. Since there is always room for improvement, they must be asked and deliberated upon. However, this should not deflect from a fundamental and pivotal point: nothing India did, no act of commission or omission, merited the sort of response that has come from the White House and Trump regime. It's egregiously disproportionate. Inevitably, this warrants the conclusion that the issue is not about some minor sticking point that can be resolved with a 'high-level phone call' here, or more 'trade concessions' there. Advice that India should rethink its position on GM food, or making investment announcements even without resources to back them, is not particularly sensible those who should know better have advocated reckless and adventurist approaches that no Indian minister, civil servant or public official - past, present and future - can carry out. The legitimate restraints of the Indian system will always - and correctly - prevent also needs to be said India's diplomats recognised the importance of the trade and tariffs issue very early, and worked to a win-win plan. On their part, trade negotiators from the commerce ministry - again, often criticised - came up with the most ambitious market-access package in India's history. They were given the political space for it by the PM, and they delivered. ADVERTISEMENT Whatever else it is, the White House's rejection/non- acceptance of the trade offer - which would give the US an unprecedented market and strategic advantage in India - is not on merits. Even USTR insiders have that appreciation. So, what is driving the Trump regime's decision flow? How goalposts have shifted repeatedly in recent weeks would suggest that trade imperatives have long given way to political imperatives, perhaps even strategic and domestic calculations in the US president's inner council. If that is, indeed, the case, the basket of bilateral challenges could both deepen and expand in the near term. ADVERTISEMENT Either way, the relationship will take a long time to recover to the levels of political trust it has been used to over the past 20 years. A chill is setting in. The public mood is hardening, and the pressure on the Narendra Modi government - including on its ability to offer further trade concessions - is there for all to reckoning in New Delhi is that India is facing the most structured and coercive assault on its strategic autonomy - industrial and policy - in a long time. Inevitably, this perception will shape reactions. Consequences will not be limited to just the immediate future. ADVERTISEMENT No doubt there will be an economic cost. 50% tariffs are not going to be easy to manage, particularly for industries significantly dependent on US exports. Yet, this will also make other sectors wary of the geopolitical risks of excessive market exposure to the US. Rather than spur further engagement - as the trajectory of India-US relations has done in recent decades - it will induce caution and a desire to hedge and diversify. India's economic approaches towards China and Russia will become a self-fulfilling prophecy for Washington's tariff a slightly longer, but still not-too-distant, timeframe, India could conclude a trade deal with the EU. Once the EU recovers from its current 'He loves us, he loves us not' trans-Atlantic minuet, and assesses its position in the ballroom, it will note the opportunity of the moment. Next, India needs to find a non-China, non-RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) pathway to an economic and supply chains partnership with the Indo-Pacific. ADVERTISEMENT CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) lends itself as an idea. Admittedly, CPTPP standards are very stringent. Could there be a trade-off between political comfort - the absence of arm-twisting and/or supply chains surrender - and calibrating just how much an external trade agreement could be used to drive internal reform and regulatory change? The process will not be easy, or without pain. Even so, if it is achieved, it could give India a longer-term hedge and option vis-a-vis the US. The lessons of the Summer of 2025 will alter the baseline for a reset, whenever that happens. This is not a stare-down India wanted - or, more accurately, wants. But whatever happens, India cannot allow itself to be outstared. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2024 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online. NEXT STORY

High court seeks govt plan and timeline for kabrastan
High court seeks govt plan and timeline for kabrastan

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

High court seeks govt plan and timeline for kabrastan

Panaji: The Bombay high court has asked govt for steps it will take, along with timelines, for the setting up of burial grounds for the Muslim community. The high court is hearing a public petition concerning the lack of burial grounds for Muslims. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now When the court was told that land was also acquired for the Christian community and people of no faith, advocate general Devidas Pangam told the high court that out of the 30,000 sqm of land acquired for a common burial ground at Sonsoddo, 95 per cent is inaccessible because of the steep gradient of the land. He further said govt was able to dedicate only 2,500 sqm for the setting up of burial grounds for the Muslim community. The Margao Municipal Council (MMC) in June unanimously agreed to sign a deed of exchange for land with the Raia comunidade, which is required for an access road to the proposed kabrastan site at Sonsoddo. A survey report revealed encroachments on the access road to the site. The previously acquired 30,000 sqm land from the comunidade for the burial ground in the survey findings highlighted complications with the access route. The high court has repeatedly expressed disappointment over the lack of progress. Despite issuing directives in Oct 2022 for expeditious development of the kabrastan within six months, construction work has yet to start. Community members have also expressed dissatisfaction with the House committee on kabrastan, crematoriums, and cemeteries, which was constituted last year. The committee, comprising representatives from various political parties, was tasked with establishing and regulating common burial grounds across Goa's panchayats and municipal areas. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Last year, the high court issued a notice to the Chaplain of St Joaquim Chapel at Bornda after officials were reportedly denied access to the kabrastan site through the chapel's cemetery gates. The project has faced several hurdles, including local opposition and terrain constraints.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store