logo
I tried the Watford takeaway with a 0/5 food hygiene rating - how bad could it be?

I tried the Watford takeaway with a 0/5 food hygiene rating - how bad could it be?

Yahoo26-06-2025
Food Darbar in Whippendell Road is officially Watford's "worst" takeaway, possessing the dubious honour of being the town's only eatery with a 0/5 food hygiene rating. The visited this week to give its verdict.
Having visited a few 1/5 rated establishments in my role as the Watford Observer's unofficial "questionable food correspondent", this visit was uncharted territory - the dreaded "nul points" from food hygiene inspectors.
"Major improvement" was deemed to be necessary in the management of food safety, and cleanliness and condition of facilities - although the council recently allowed it to reopen after being satisfied that the risks had been addressed.
So, how bad could it really be?
(Image: Liam Fitzpatrick/Newsquest)
Tucked away in a quiet part of Whippendell Road and nestled between other shops, Food Darbar only initially stands out because of its bright yellow signage.
The Indian and Afghan eatery opened earlier this year, taking over the unit once occupied by BVRGR CO.
(Image: Liam Fitzpatrick/Newsquest) Inside, it is small and a little cramped, although there's nothing that immediately screams "0/5 for cleanliness" - while not spotless, it is hardly the dirtiest place you will ever set eyes on.
Food Darbar's menu appears to have something for everyone, offering dishes including burgers, kebabs and pizza.
I went for a chicken doner kebab on this lunch visit, priced at a reasonable £5.
(Image: Liam Fitzpatrick/Newsquest) The food itself was nothing to write home about - I have had both better and worse - but at time of writing I am yet to drop dead or suffer food poisoning, so will count that as a win!
Joking aside, this was a reasonably priced lunch that did the trick on a busy day.
In the wake of being hit with a 0/5 rating, Food Darbar's management did not respond to multiple requests for comment, although Watford Borough Council has said improvements have been made.
Liam Fitzpatrick (Image: Liam Fitzpatrick/Newsquest)
If you did not know the business had this rating, it would not be immediately obvious upon stepping inside - perhaps testament to the work done since April's inspection.
On the whole, this was a solid, if unspectacular, meal - albeit one eaten with food hygiene fears in mind.
Hopefully a reinspection will see the albatross removed from the neck of this business once and for all.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

August 13 morning weather update
August 13 morning weather update

Washington Post

time36 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

August 13 morning weather update

Cookie Choices for EU, Swiss & UK Residents We and our 919 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting I Accept enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. Selecting Reject All or withdrawing your consent will disable them. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Manage Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy. If you click 'I accept,' in addition to processing data using cookies and similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our surveys and other interactive content for personalized advertising. If you are an EU, Swiss, or UK resident and you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our If you click 'I accept,' in addition to processing data using cookies and similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our surveys and other interactive content for personalized you are an EU, Swiss, or UK resident and you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our Privacy Policy (consistent with law and, if applicable, other choices you have made).

Villagers face 'bureaucracy' in fight against sea
Villagers face 'bureaucracy' in fight against sea

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Villagers face 'bureaucracy' in fight against sea

Residents of a coastal village say they are willing to pay for defences to protect their homes from the sea but are being thwarted by bureaucracy and delay. One home in Thorpeness, Suffolk, was demolished in 2022 after it was left perilously close to the cliff edge, and villagers fear two more could be lost this winter. Maureen Jones, chair of Aldringham-cum-Thorpe Parish Council, said residents were willing to invest money in defending their homes but had been met with challenges. East Suffolk Council told the BBC that getting the necessary permission for such defences took time. Defences, including rocks, gabions and geobags, have been installed to manage the effects of coastal erosion, but last year up to 23ft (7m) of coast was lost to the sea. Some residents want to install more defences "Residents in Thorpeness are prepared to put in money and they have put in for planning but unfortunately at the moment they are coming up against a brick wall because there's about 10 agencies concerned in getting planning through," said Jones. Sophie Marple, who bought her home in Thorpeness about 20 years ago, describes it as her "happy place". In 2010, after the area was hit with a "big surge" and more defences were installed, she decided to invest and rebuild the property. "It gave us a feeling of security. There was a thought if they maintained, we would have a life of at least 25 years," she said. However, over the past winter there have been "constant" northerly winds which have stripped back shingle on the beach and left defences exposed. She said she had received a warning from East Suffolk Council that once the erosion reached a certain point, she would be told to demolish her home. "We are going to fight to do something. One of the things this does do is bring the people together who are most affected," she said. Lucy Ansbro has already spent £450,000 on rock defences to protect her home. She and others have applied for permission to install more, but have been told this would require a full environmental impact assessment, which could take months. The council has launched a survey, asking villagers what they think should be done. It said the latest erosion had outpaced plans to install more rocks and it was doing all it could to support homeowners. Mark Packard, Liberal Democrat cabinet member for planning and coastal management, said: "It does take time and you have to have specialists doing that. "That's going to slow things up tremendously, and then you have to get all these permissions from Natural England, from the Environment Agency, from the Crown Estates - all sorts of people - and they take their time." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. More on this story Push to protect village from erosion threat begins Plans made to defend cliffs with more rocks Erosion fears affecting mental health - residents Coastal dwellers may pay more towards defences Related internet links Aldringham-cum-Thorpe Parish Council East Suffolk Council

Campaign to protect green space loved by residents continues
Campaign to protect green space loved by residents continues

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Campaign to protect green space loved by residents continues

The campaign to save a green space from development continues, with residents illustrating its importance within the community with posters. Harwood residents are desperately trying to stop the land from being lost and be replaced by a new housing estate. The a two-year saga between developer Oak Tree Ltd and Harwood residents has now gone to the planning inspectorate for a final decision. The plans were first submitted in 2022 – originally an application for two dozen houses – but was amended to 20 just off Longsight Lane. Campaigners for Longsight Park. (Image: Leah Collins) They were rejected by the planning committee on November 18 last year – but the developer filed an appeal on May 16 – almost exactly six months after the decision. Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) The Friends of Longsight Park have since campaigned against the appeal and to keep the site and to also keep a public right of way, intact. READ MORE: Bolton Council rejects planning application for houses in Harwood Locals dismayed at appeal over rejected Longsight Lane plan Dozens gather in protest against plans to develop in Harwood Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) READ MORE: Longsight Park, Harwood is a hidden gem for all to enjoy Speaking to The Bolton News, Belinda Williams, who runs one of the sub-groups in the campaign said: 'We have painted placards and posters with love and care to show the planning inspectorate just how much Harwood is loved and cherished. 'The residents are all keen on saving this green space because its so special. It's a green corridor that cuts through the Millennium Wood and when it's gone it's gone. "There are approximately 320 species across the two fields. "Some of the friends who've painted signs include Mandy, Lisa, Jackie, Maria, Julie and myself. A road is planned to intersect this area. (Image: Leah Collins) 'The planned development will also feature a road that goes through the Old Ned's Lane, which is a public right of way. Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) "The proposed sites are along a green corridor, its vital that this stays intact as to ruin this would disrupt the wildlife here. 'The spaces will also affect tree roots, there are trees in the ancient hedge row that have long roots spread out and will go under the development. 'One in four British mammals are at risk of extinction, but here we have rabbit, fox, roe deer and wood mice frequently crossing and living on the site. Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) 'How will they survive?' Ward councillor Les Webb said: 'Having supported residents through this arduous journey so far, where this potential development is solely about profit for the developers and not providing sufficient affordable houses. "This application was correctly refused by the elected councillors at the planning meeting and these level of complaints are only manifesting due to greed of the developers. The development is proposed for this site. (Image: Leah Collins) 'I sincerely hope the Planning Inspectorate will protect the Green Spaces , Wildlife corridors as well as ancient trees and hedge rows and this debacle to bed once and for all. 'Also let it be a lesson to other developers who see Harwood as a quick buck our residents will fight for our Green Belt and remind BMBC of the Brown Belt first policy as well as the directives of Places for Everyone. 'Our villages infrastructures can not support further expansion, school places are at capacity, doctors surgery's without appointments and a grid locked road system relying on data from 2007 - 2009 since any data was collected, Harwood is full!' Speaking at the planning meeting where the plan was rejected, Cllr John Walsh said: "This development is cause for serious concern specifically because of its proximity to a site of biological interest and the significant negative impact on this will not be lost. It is for that reason I'm refusing the application."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store