US hostage envoy urges Hamas to ‘take the deal' with Israel
In an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union,' Boehler said that the current deal on the table — where Hamas releases at least 10 remaining hostages in exchange for a path to peace — is the 'best they're going to get.'
'We need to get the other hostages out. And then what we have done is, we have said, 'Hey, there's a firm pathway to negotiate peace.' That's the best they're going to get. And they should take on the offer, take the offer that's there. They haven't in the past,' Boehler said.
'Every single time they don't take it, it goes down and goes down and goes down. So, my recommendation to Hamas would be, take the deal that Israel, that the United States is offering you. Let's get some people home. And let's move to end this conflict,' he continued.
Boehler said he is 'optimistic' about an agreement with Hamas, especially after Israel's military action in Iran, 'there's a new sense of ability to get something done.'
'The Israelis want something done. Now, I will tell you, because I have been with them, Hamas is very hardheaded. They have been offered many things that they should take, and it's time for Hamas to release the hostages,' he said.
'So I'm more optimistic than I was because all of those factors are there. We have got an A-team negotiating it. Now what I really want to see is Hamas take action. And if they don't, I will tell you something, Israel's going to have to take some kinetic action,' he added.
Efforts to reach a 60-day ceasefire have continued in Qatar, but international reports indicate talks have hit a standstill.
Trump has increased pressure on Israel to work towards brokering a ceasefire with Hamas. Boehler, in the interview, described Hamas as 'hardheaded' and said 'Israel at this point is bending over backwards' to strike a deal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Former NYT staffer blasts Gray Lady for ‘twisting' facts about Israeli hostage digging own grave
A former New York Times staffer on Monday slammed the Gray Lady for 'twisting' the facts about how it framed a story about an emaciated Israeli hostage being forced to dig his own grave. The liberal broadsheet — which was forced to amend a front-page article featuring an image of a supposedly starving child in Gaza — published a video on Saturday about Israeli Evyatar David being held by Hamas since Oct. 7, 2023, without using the horrific photo of his skeletal frame. The video ran with the headline, 'Hundreds Protest in Tel Aviv After Hostage Videos Surface From Gaza,' and claimed, 'The circulation of videos created by Hamas showing Israeli hostages living in dire conditions incited families to protest in Tel Aviv on Saturday to demand a cease-fire and the return of their loved ones.' Advertisement 5 Yaakov Ort slammed his former employer, The New York Times on Facebook, calling out the newspaper's slanted coverage. Yaakov Ort/Facebook Yaakov Ort, who spent 35 years at the Times working in its creative services division, ripped his former employer over the false premise that the majority of Israelis were protesting to demand a cease-fire. 'This is an appalling twisting of the facts, and mindful, heartless concealment of the truth: Rather than running a photo of hostage Evyatar David being forced to dig his own grave by Hamas terrorists, and writing about the actual reaction of million of Israelis to seeing it, the foreign desk and photo desk ran a photo of a relative handful of protestors in Tel Aviv,' Ort wrote on his Facebook page. Advertisement Ort, who is now a senior editor at said that he has never publicly chastised his former colleagues but was aghast at the editiorial decision. 'If The Times had a Jerusalem bureau that reported the thoughts, communications and actions of the vast majority of Israelis, they would have told readers that the reaction of millions to this and other photos and videos of the physical and psychological torture of our children is not fear or protest, It is horror, rage and resolve,' he wrote 'The symbolism of the photo is so apt, since digging our own graves is exactly what the current Times news, editorial and op-ed page writers and editors, and those justifiably fearful of the Islamic street in the the West are arguing daily that we should do. Guess what? We won't.' Advertisement 5 Evyatar David was abducted on Oct. 7 at the Nova rave in southern Israel. The Times did not respond to requests for comment. David, 24, was abducted in one of the bloodiest scenes of Oct. 7. at the Nova rave in southern Israel, where more than 350 people were massacred by Hamas terrorists. David's family said in a statement to The Times that he had become a 'living skeleton, buried alive' in Hamas tunnels. Ort's outrage comes after the Times amended a story it had published containing a shocking image of a child purportedly suffering from starvation in Gaza. Advertisement In an editor's note buried in last Tuesday's edition, readers learned Mohammed Zakaria al Mutawaq — the Gazan boy 'diagnosed with severe malnutrition' and pictured in the article — suffers from 'pre-existing health problems.' 5 David has beeb held by Hamas since Oct. 7, 2023. He recently appeared in a harrowing video by Hamas. Al-Qassam Brigade Footage 'We recently ran a story about Gaza's most vulnerable civilians, including Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, who is about 18 months old and suffers from severe malnutrition,' a spokesperson for the outlet said in a statement. 'We have since learned new information, including from the hospital that treated him and his medical records, and have updated our story to add context about his pre-existing health problems,' the rep continued. 'This additional detail gives readers a greater understanding of his situation.' 5 The New York Times has been under fire for its coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. NurPhoto via Getty Images The image of Mohammed — shown with a gaunt face and his spine protruding from his back as his mother held him — went viral, with many using him as the poster child for starvation in the Palestinian enclave amid Israel's war against Hamas. Advertisement Days after The Times published images of Mohammed, pro-Israel group HonestReporting noted on July 27 that the boy's older brother, Joud, is standing in the background, appearing in far better condition. Mohammed's mother told CNN that her son suffers from a 'muscle disorder' for which he receives specialized nutrition and physical therapy.
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
France and Saudis vow to keep up momentum for 'two-state solution' to Israel-Palestinian conflict
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — After decades of inaction and frozen negotiations, the issue of an independent Palestinian state living in peace with Israel returned to the spotlight at a high-level U.N. conference — and France and Saudi Arabia, which spearheaded the effort, are determined to keep up the momentum. But hurdles for a two-state solution that would see Israel living side-by-side with an independent Palestine are very high. War in Gaza — a crucial part of a hoped-for Palestinian state — drags on with escalating violence in the West Bank, the other main component. And Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing government vehemently oppose an independent Palestinian state, which the Israeli leader says would be a reward for terrorism after Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attacks against his country. Nonetheless, after eight decades of conflict between Israel and Palestinians, pressure is growing for a two-state solution, as last week's high-level U.N. conference co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia demonstrated — even if it was boycotted by Israel and its close ally, the United States. The conference illustrated that many believe a political solution is possible The French U.N. ambassador, Jerome Bonnafont, conceded in an Associated Press interview that without a Gaza ceasefire and massive humanitarian aid for over 2 million Palestinians sliding toward famine, 'it will be extremely difficult to move forward to define a new way of administering Gaza as part of Palestine' – and he said these are priority issues. But the conference demonstrated that a majority of the U.N.'s 193 member nations are 'convinced that there is a possibility of a political solution,' he said, and that is 'what its follow-up will continue to promote.' About 160 of the U.N.'s 193 member nations participated, 125 spoke in support of a two-state solution (forcing the meeting into an unexpected third day), and between 40 and 50 were represented by a government minister. An independent state of Palestine is recognized by over 145 countries, and the meeting sparked new pledges of recognition by three of the seven members of the powerful Group of Seven — France, United Kingdom and Canada — as well as Malta. A statement by seven others, including Australia, New Zealand, Finland and Portugal, expressed 'positive consideration' of following suit. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farham are determined not to let the spotlight fade. They are planning 'an event' during the annual gathering of world leaders at the General Assembly, which starts Sept. 23, when the new pledges are expected to be officially announced. The conference was notable for being co-chaired by an Arab and Western nation, and for setting up eight working groups with diverse chairs to make proposals on key issues for a two state solution — security for Israel and an independent Palestine, political reforms, legal problems, humanitarian assistance, economic development and Gaza reconstruction, to name some. The result was a seven-page 'New York Declaration.' The French and Saudi foreign ministers sent the declaration, with a lengthy annex of recommendations from the working groups, to all 193 U.N. members and asked them to endorse it by early September, before the world leaders' gathering. The declaration, which also was endorsed by the European Union and Arab League, urges Israel to commit to a Palestinian state, and urges further recognitions as 'an essential and indispensable component of the achievement of the two-state solution.' The declaration contains some stronger language For the first time, the Arab League's 22 member nations condemned 'the attacks committed by Hamas against civilians' in southern Israel on Oct. 7, and agree that 'Hamas must end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority.' It sets out a plan to then move to an independent, demilitarized Palestine, including deployment of a U.N. Security Council-mandated 'temporary international stabilization mission' supported by the Palestinian Authority. It would protect civilians, help build support for a Palestinian state and its security forces, and provide 'security guarantees for Palestine and Israel.' Richard Gowan, the International Crisis Group's U.N. director, gave French President Emmanuel Macron credit 'for raising the level of ambition for the conference,' and helping make it 'more symbolically significant than many diplomats expected.' The meeting gave weighty states including France, Britain and Canada the opportunity 'to signal their discontent with Israeli policy,' he said, and it gave Palestinians seeking a peaceful road to statehood 'some political ammunition.' Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, who hosted a Hamas delegation in Istanbul last week to discuss Gaza's humanitarian crisis and stalled ceasefire talks, noted growing global support for the Palestinians and a Palestinian state — and Israel's increasing isolation. Bonnafont, the French ambassador, had messages for Israel's opponents and Israelis seeking more territory. 'We say to those who are hostile to Israel, the way to peace is certainly not to deny the right of existence to Israel. This is the way to perpetual war,' Bonnafont said. 'And the real way to defend the Palestinians is to give them a state, and the only way to give them a state is a two-state solution — and we have demonstrated concretely that this solution exists and is feasible.'
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Don't trust the ‘influencers' — Trump's base isn't breaking over Israel
When President Donald Trump was weighing a potential attack on Iran's nuclear facilities a few months ago, influencers and commentators in a certain corner of the right went into an uproar. The base will not stand for it! they shouted, calling the very idea a betrayal — and the liberal media accepted their framing. 'MAGA is split over Iran,' the headlines screamed. They were soon proved wrong. Republican voters overwhelmingly supported ridding the planet of the threat of a nuclear Iran, to the tune of 80%. Advertisement The same thing played out over the administration's awkward handling of the Jeffery Epstein files. This time he's really done it! brayed the influencers — Trump's supporters would not tolerate burying the Epstein list, they declared. 'The Epstein case is tearing MAGA apart,' the media parroted. Once again, the commentariat was wrong; polling showed how little GOP voters cared about the topic, and how little they blamed Trump for his aides' stumbles. The lesson should be clear: Doubt the president's understanding of his base at your peril. Advertisement Yet today these same characters, following the social-media engagement algorithms, declare that Israel's war with Hamas is losing the right. Attention-seeking lawmakers are claiming a 'genocide' in Gaza, as influencers predict an imminent GOP rupture. And again, it's just not true. Advertisement For starters, polling still shows vast support for Israel among Republicans —including for the current war against Hamas. Last week 71% of Republican voters told Gallup that despite all the headlines claiming famine in Gaza, they are on Israel's side in this war — compared to just 25% of independents and a shocking 8% of Democrats. Meanwhile, 81% of Republicans approve of Trump's handling of the situation, including his clear and proud Israel backing. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Advertisement True, younger Republicans express less support for Israel — their approval of the Jewish state is at 50%, polls show. But the reason for that isn't anti-Israel sentiment. It's populism. Young Republicans, like young Americans across the board, have less appetite for war — especially when they are being asked to fund it. A survey of attendees at the recent Turning Point USA Student Action Summit, which gathered over 5,000 young conservatives, found that 73% called themselves pro-Israel — even as the event's prominent speakers were expounding on Epstein's alleged ties to Mossad. The vast majority of the young activists in attendance agreed that Israel has a right to defend itself. But they also said they were sick of being asked to pay for wars they don't see as benefiting them — unlike the strike on Iran, which 86% supported. A few days ago Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk convened a focus group on Israel with conservative Gen Z students. Advertisement 'What's the first word that comes to mind when you hear 'Israel'?' Kirk asked them. Some responded with terms including 'Judaism,' 'conflict' and 'sacred' — but by far, the word that came up most often was 'aid.' 'Our house is burning down and so is our neighbor's, and we're trying to put their fire out before we put ours out,' one student explained. Israel absolutely has a right to exist and a right to defend itself, these young Americans said, but we have a right to want our taxpayer dollars spent at home. Advertisement It's the exact same logic heard from many MAGA partisans when they explain their fatigue with paying for the war in Ukraine, or for USAID grants: They can't afford to buy a home, yet their tax dollars are going elsewhere. Meanwhile, when pro-Israel partisans paint these young Trump supporters as antisemitic for opposing aid to Israel, they feel alienated, complaining that a woke speech code has infected the discourse. 'It's very similar to our support for Ukraine,' one of the students explained to Kirk. Advertisement 'We're sending a lot of money over there, not really getting in my opinion a huge return on investment . . . When people talk about their distrust or dis-support for Israel, that's the first thing that usually comes up, is all the money that we're sending them.' 'I think we have a lot bigger issues at home,' another said. 'I think we should be spending most of our tax dollars on securing our border, keeping our home people safe . . . we have a much bigger problem on the home front, rather than sending money to foreign countries.' Crucially, they don't see this stance as being anti-Israel — but as being pro-American. 'I think it's critical that we remain friends with them, they remain our ally,' another focus group participant succinctly put it. 'I just don't think we should be subsidizing them as much as we are.' Advertisement So ignore the newly anti-Israel right-wing podcasting class. Gen Z Republicans aren't turning on Israel. They're just insisting that their own right to the American Dream must come first — as they should. Batya Ungar-Sargon is the author of 'Second Class: How the Elites Betrayed America's Working Men and Women.'
