logo
Common appliance raises kids' cancer risk nearly twice as much as adults' — and it's in 2 out of 5 US homes

Common appliance raises kids' cancer risk nearly twice as much as adults' — and it's in 2 out of 5 US homes

Yahoo09-05-2025

Let's clear the air.
Benzene, a harmful chemical found in gasoline, cigarette smoke and paint strippers, is a known carcinogen. Long-term exposure to high levels of benzene has been linked to leukemia and other blood-related cancers.
Now, a new study out of Stanford University reports that benzene-caused cancer risks are significantly higher — especially for children — in homes with medium to high usage of gas stoves and inadequate ventilation.
'Natural gas and propane stoves emit benzene, a known carcinogen through combustion,' the researchers explained in the forthcoming July issue of the Journal of Hazardous Materials.
'To our knowledge, ours is the first study to assess the carcinogenic health risks from benzene formed during gas combustion from stoves, as well as leukemia cases attributable to gas stove use.'
For the study, researchers simulated different cooking scenarios involving varying burner intensities and oven temperatures with minimal or no ventilation.
When there's no ventilation, benzene exposure in kitchens and living rooms is highest in smaller apartments, followed by manufactured homes, attached homes and detached homes, the researchers found.
'Particularly concerning were the elevated risks in bedrooms, where people typically spend the most time,' they wrote.
Their analysis also suggested that children's cancer risk from gas stove exposure is 1.85 times higher than adults.
The researchers noted that children generally breathe faster and take in more air — and therefore more pollutants — relative to their smaller body size.
'Since there is no safe limit for benzene's carcinogenic effects, it is crucial to further evaluate the health risks associated with these effects,' the study read.
Ventilation plays a key role in reducing benzene concentrations — the researchers recommend opening windows and using good-quality outdoor vent hoods. Homeowners could also switch to electric stoves.
'The study underscores the importance of addressing combustion-related indoor air pollutants to protect public health, particularly in households with limited ventilation,' the study authors wrote.
Gas stoves have come under fire in recent years as studies suggested they emit pollutants like nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, benzene and formaldehyde, which can trigger asthma and potentially increase the risk of heart disease and other health problems.
The stoves have fueled heated debate about health and environmental concerns and government overreach with limitations or bans.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order in January that 'safeguards the American people's freedom to choose from a variety of goods and appliances,' including gas stoves.
The order followed a watered-down rule from the Biden administration requiring some gas and electric stoves to be more efficient.
Other restrictions have had more teeth. In 2023, New York became the first state to ban the installation of new gas stoves in most new homes and buildings. It's set to take effect in 2026 for buildings under seven stories and in 2029 for larger structures.
NYC also has a ban on natural gas in new buildings — the ordinance was upheld in federal court in March.
Meanwhile, research on the potential effects of gas stoves continues. About 38% of American households, or roughly 40 million homes, have these appliances.
Stanford scientists say that 6.3 million Americans are exposed to the top 5 % highest benzene-emitting gas stoves.
They measured emissions in 87 homes across 14 counties in Colorado and California for a 2023 study.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Plan to Kill Dozens of NASA Missions Threatens US Space Supremacy
Trump Plan to Kill Dozens of NASA Missions Threatens US Space Supremacy

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Plan to Kill Dozens of NASA Missions Threatens US Space Supremacy

(Bloomberg) -- NASA's car-sized Perseverance rover has been roaming the surface of Mars for four years, drilling into the alien soil to collect dirt it places in tubes and leaves on the ground. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? Engineers designed Perseverance to be the first step in the agency's exploration of the Red Planet. In the future, more robotic spacecraft would arrive to sweep up the capsules and rocket them back to Earth, where scientists could look for signs that Mars once was, or is, a world with life. The wait for answers may be about to get longer. President Donald Trump's proposed 2026 budget for the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration would cancel the planned follow-on mission, potentially abandoning the tubes for decades to Martian dust storms. The White House is calling for a roughly 50% cut to NASA's science spending to $3.9 billion, part of an overall pullback that would deliver the lowest funding level in the agency's history and kill more more than 40 NASA science missions and projects, according to detailed plans released last month. The Trump administration has also left the agency without a permanent leader and without a vision for how America's civilian space policy is going to work with US allies and compete with China and other rivals. The cuts would follow a shift in how the American public thinks about space. NASA has long enjoyed a unique place in US culture, with its exploits celebrated by movies, theme parks and merchandise — but companies like Elon Musk's SpaceX have begun to capture more attention. For decades, NASA's scientific undertakings have provided critical groundwork for researchers seeking to understand the structure of the universe, study how planets form and hunt for evidence that life might exist beyond Earth. Pictures from NASA craft like the Hubble Space Telescope and the recently launched James Webb Space Telescope have inspired and delighted millions. Now, the agency's position at the vanguard of discovery is facing foreclosure. Among the other programs set to lose funding are a craft already on its way to rendezvous with an asteroid that's expected to pass close to Earth in 2029, and multiple efforts to map and explore the acidic clouds of Venus. Researchers worry that abandoning missions would mean investments made by earlier generations might be lost or forgotten. 'Once you launch and you're operating, then all those costs are behind you, and it's relatively inexpensive to just keep the missions going,' said Amanda Hendrix, the chief executive officer of the Planetary Science Institute, a nonprofit research organization. 'So I'm very concerned about these operating missions that are still producing excellent and really important science data.' The Trump administration's narrower vision for NASA comes as it is seeking to reduce waste and jobs in the US government. Critics have faulted NASA over sluggish management of key programs, spiraling costs and delays. Still, the administration is eager to pour more money into putting people in space. It wants to use $7 billion of the $18.8 billion it would allocate to NASA overall to ramp up efforts to return people to the moon, and invest $1 billion more in sending people to Mars. 'This is a NASA that would be primarily human spaceflight focused,' Casey Dreier, chief of space policy for The Planetary Society, a nonprofit that advocates for space science and exploration, said of the proposed changes. 'This is a NASA that would say, 'The universe is primarily the moon and Mars,' and basically step away from everything else.' There are signs that the administration's proposed cutbacks won't satisfy lawmakers who view space as vital to US interests. Senator Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican who leads a committee that oversees NASA, has proposed legislation that would would provide nearly $10 billion to the agency. 'American dominance in space is a national security imperative,' Cruz said in a statement to Bloomberg. 'The Commerce Committee's bill carefully invests in beating China to the Moon and Mars — while respecting every taxpayer dollar. It's rocket fuel for the commercial space companies and NASA that are working to keep America ahead of China in the Space Race.' As Trump's spending proposal moves through Congress, NASA has been left without a strong leader who can press its case after the president withdrew his nomination of billionaire commercial astronaut Jared Isaacman to run the agency. In a recent interview on the All-In Podcast, Isaacman appeared to suggest Trump pulled his nomination because of his close ties to Musk, who had a public falling out with the president. Trump threatened to cancel SpaceX's government contracts amid the row, but has since backed down. 'Stopping Jared from becoming confirmed is only going to hurt NASA's ability to push back on budget cuts,' Jim Muncy, a space consultant and lobbyist with PoliSpace, said before Isaacman's nomination was pulled. Spaceflight Shift For decades, NASA handled every step of launching rockets, probes and people into space, from developing, building and launching vehicles, to running missions. Only the government had the resources and the capacity to shoulder the risks without returning a profit. That all changed in recent years with the emergence of a vibrant US space industry dominated by wealthy entrepreneurs with a passion for spaceflight and the financial wherewithal to withstand repeated failure. Over time, NASA has ceded more design, development and production work to those companies. SpaceX is carrying cargo and astronauts to the International Space Station, and sending probes into deep space from a rented launchpad at NASA's Kennedy Space Center. After helping to spur the development of SpaceX hardware, NASA is now one of the company's biggest customers. 'This has kind of been the tension with the rise of commercial space,' said Mike French, a consultant for the Space Policy Group. 'NASA has gone from 'We're operating these things; we're building these things' to 'We've gotten really good at buying these things.'' During Trump's presidency, NASA's transformation into an incubator for private industry is likely to gain speed. Throughout its budget proposal, the White House calls for mimicking past programs that have leaned more on outsourcing to the private sector. 'With a leaner budget across all of government, we are all taking a closer look at how we work, where we invest, and how we adjust our methods to accomplish our mission,' NASA's acting administrator, Janet Petro, wrote in a message accompanying the plan. 'At NASA, that means placing a renewed emphasis on human spaceflight, increasing investments in a sustainable plan to return to the Moon for long-term human exploration and accelerating efforts to send American astronauts to Mars.' NASA declined to comment beyond Petro's statement. NASA contracts remain one of the most significant and steady sources of funding for the space industry, which has allowed the agency to set the direction for many businesses. But that balance of power is shifting, and cuts to NASA's funding could cause its leadership to fade. 'NASA would, in a sense, define access and define the culture of spaceflight and define the ambitions of spaceflight,' Dreier said. 'Now, they have competitors for that, and frankly, some of their competitors are laying out more ambitious programs.' Challenging Missions While NASA has evolved into a technical adviser and financial backer for space companies, pure science has remained part of its mission. NASA's transition to more commercial partnerships was started, in part, to free up money to spend on exotic, challenging missions with no obvious near-term commercial rewards. Pulling back is likely to have consequences. Trump's broader push to curtail funding for science — the administration has choked off money for medical, climate and other research — risks eroding an important source of American soft power. After the end of the Cold War-era space race, NASA became a vessel for international cooperation, proving countries with lofty goals can work together. Many of the NASA missions Trump has proposed canceling or pulling away from entailed collaboration with European allies. The prospect of reduced funding is also causing worry about agency talent. Already, NASA is competing with the private space industry for engineers. Shutting down missions could push agency scientists to seek other opportunities. 'Folks are very worried about what they're going to do now with their lives, and where they're going to go,' said Hendrix, the Planetary Science Institute's CEO. The long-term outlook for NASA is difficult to discern. In the coming years, it is expected to continue its Artemis moon program, and start a new program for human exploration of Mars, with commercial companies at the forefront. But the scientific ambitions that long helped define NASA appear likely to become more limited. 'If we elect to say we no longer want to understand our origins, or we no longer want to challenge ourselves to see if there's life out in the cosmos, that is the equivalent of turning our heads down and burying ourselves in our cell phones when we're standing at the edge of the Grand Canyon,' said The Planetary Society's Dreier. 'We miss something more profound and big and deep that we otherwise have no access to in our modern society.' New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Goodbye, dad bod: Weight loss medications are changing fathers' physiques — and their relationships with their kids.
Goodbye, dad bod: Weight loss medications are changing fathers' physiques — and their relationships with their kids.

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Goodbye, dad bod: Weight loss medications are changing fathers' physiques — and their relationships with their kids.

Neal Bland has done Ironman competitions and marathons. He's given countless personal training sessions over the course of his life and has always prided himself on staying in shape, especially given that obesity runs in his family. But by age 52, time and genetics had begun to catch up with Bland (who asked that we not use his real last name for privacy reasons). His blood pressure and blood sugar were climbing, his body mass index was hovering in the low 30s, and his joints were aching. Then, during a photo shoot with his wife last year, the photographer told Bland he 'looked good for a dad bod.' Bland knew the photographer had 'meant it as a compliment,' he tells Yahoo Life, 'but it really stuck.' He was still maintaining a rigorous diet and exercise regimen at the time, but it wasn't working for him. So, in March of 2024, he started on the GLP-1 medication tirzepatide. He's lost 45 pounds in a phase of his life he's dubbed his 'dad bod reboot.' Let's be clear: There's nothing wrong with a dad bod. In fact, the expectation for men to have chiseled abs — at any point, but especially in middle and older age — can be harmful. But for the 38% of American dads who are obese, their bodies may be putting them at risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease and other potentially life-threatening medical conditions. Some of these fathers have started taking GLP-1 weight loss medications, a decision that can bring about not just changes to their 'bods' and health indicators, but also to their lives as parents. We spoke to some of them about what it's like to be a dad, minus their former bods. Thirty-seven-year-old father of two Noah Wiggins is taking his nursing board exams and looking forward to beginning his new career in health care. 'But I looked in the mirror and thought, I can't expect patients to be healthy and maintain a healthy weight if I can't,' he tells Yahoo Life. Plus, Wiggins loves coaching his children's sports teams, but he found himself getting winded and sore when he tried to demonstrate athletic skills for the kids. While he could shed pounds for a time with the help of various diets, he couldn't maintain a healthy weight long-term. So Wiggins talked to his own health care provider, who agreed that GLP-1 medication could be a good option for him. He started taking Zepbound in January 2024. The medication, along with the support of his two children, has helped him lose more than 80 pounds since then. 'As I started to lose weight and get more active, they started making comments and encouraging me to make healthy food choices … without judgment,' says Wiggins. His daughter, who is about to turn 16, has been especially vocal, keeping Wiggins accountable when he picks up an unhealthy snack or tries to flake on going to the gym. 'I've had to fight the urge to say, 'I'm the parent, I'll go when I want to,'' says Wiggins. But ultimately, he's grateful for the tough-loving support from his kids. 'I think it's been a growing moment for them and for me,' he says. Wiggins's children have also noticed that he has more energy and can just be more fully present for them. Despite his progress, Wiggins still struggles with his body image. Like others that Wiggins has spoken to within the GLP-1 community, he half-expected that once the scale reached a certain number, he would feel satisfied with his body and appearance. 'But I don't know anyone who actually hits that number and feels like that,' he says. 'I look in the mirror and am happy with how I look and especially how I feel, but body dysmorphia is a real thing, and a lot of times you don't know you have it until you've lost weight.' At his lowest weight, Wiggins was tempted to lose another 20 pounds to make his reflection match the idealized version of himself in his mind, but he knew that would have put him below a healthy weight. That's when Wiggins realized that it wasn't about losing more weight. He needed to make a conscious effort to improve his mental health and confidence to help him feel content in his own skin. It's an important lesson that he wants his children to learn: how to 'be comfortable in your body, but balance that with good health,' Wiggins says. He's pushed himself to talk more openly with his kids about his own journey toward striking that balance. 'The best thing to do was just have more conversations with them about all of that, and they'll actually take the lead on those conversations once you start them.' Twenty years ago, when Ryan Rasmussen and his wife, AnnaLyn, were young newlyweds, they wanted desperately to start a family. After three years of trying, AnnaLyn got pregnant with quadruplets. But tragedy struck: None of the four babies survived more than about an hour after birth. The Rasmussens managed to pick up the pieces of their shattered hearts and eventually went on to have four children, born individually. But even as someone moves on, grief can linger in the body, wreaking havoc. For Rasmussen, the loss of his newborns quietly ate at him and, in turn, Rasmussen now recognizes he ate to cope with his grief. He reached nearly 300 pounds, he told Yahoo Life for our series On My Weigh. For those intervening 20 years, Rasmussen tried the Atkins diet and various other low-carb eating plans. He'd lose a little weight, then gain back as much or more. In the meantime, his family stayed active and went on ski trips. 'Annalyn is a marathon runner, and she's kept [the kids] in shape, but I think they've probably worried about me,' says Rasmussen. He tried to join their athletic activities, but skiing and hiking were hard on his overburdened joints. Two of his sisters, who also struggled with their weight, found success with GLP-1 medications. Impressed with their progress, Rasmussen tried the new class of weight loss drugs too. Within a year, he dropped 80 pounds. 'Being there for my family was the goal,' he says. Not only can Rasmussen now join the family ski trips, but hiking and spending time outdoors are day-to-day ways he bonds with his kids. His weight loss 'has definitely allowed us as a family to do more healthy activities,' Rasmussen says. Plus, his good habits have rubbed off on his children. Desserts, once a staple, are reserved for special occasions, and the household's midnight snacking has all but disappeared. Rasmussen's new body has also allowed him to get back in touch with his fashion sense. 'I like to look good and dress well, but when you're big, [that's] difficult,' he says. Now that he's lost weight, 'being able to dress with purpose in the morning has probably been one of the best things for me and my mental health,' says Rasmussen. And he's not the only one who's noticed his new look. One of his daughter's friends used the viral 'hear me out' cake trend on TikTok as an excuse to show some appreciation for Rasmussen. 'She said, 'hear me out, but Charlie's dad is attractive,'' Rasmussen explains. 'But [Charlie] was a good sport, she laughed about it.' Bland's now adult children grew up knowing him as the ultra-fit dad, who was always on the go for his job as a pharmaceutical researcher, or hitting the gym to train for his next big event. But he was always fighting against his genetics. 'I come from a long line of fluffy people,' Bland says. He spent his own childhood watching his mother constantly watch her weight. Despite avoiding smoking and drinking and maintaining a reasonably healthy diet, she eventually had to have both of her knees and one hip replaced and also suffered a stroke, 'all of which can be attributed to [extra] weight on your frame,' says Bland. Recognizing his family's propensity to obesity was part of what drove Bland to be so disciplined. 'But my genetics eventually outran my lifestyle,' he says. Even with the same routines in place, Bland gained weight in his early 50s, saw his A1C and blood pressure rise, and had inflammation in his hips and knees. And Bland admits that vanity was also a factor. The shirtless man in his vacation photos no longer looked like the version of himself he expected to see. 'I gained about 35 pounds in 10 years; it was the classic 'man-o-pause,'' he says. Though he didn't meet the clinical qualifications for brand-name GLP-1 medications, Bland tried compounded tirzepatide, suspecting that it would not only help him keep weight off but also reduce the inflammation in his joints. Once he started the medication, 'it was literally like somebody flipped a switch,' says Bland. The food noise (constant, intrusive thoughts about food) disappeared. He no longer ate just because he was bored. The joint pain was barely noticeable, and his workout recovery time improved. He also started to look more like himself in gym selfies. Bland didn't initially tell his children that he was taking GLP-1 medications. But one of his adult sons noticed that Bland was looking pretty shredded in some of his photos; in fact, he was a bit concerned. He told his father, 'You've lost so much weight and went from really fluffy to really not. Are you sure you're not ... taking PEDs,' meaning performance-enhancing drugs, recalls Bland. Though Bland, now 53, has been taking testosterone replacement therapy for years, that and the GLP-1 have allowed him to return to the weight and energy levels of his younger years. And he's now switched to a very low maintenance dose of tirzepatide to make sure he doesn't lose too much weight. 'It's been a little bit of a return to what they were used to when they were kids,' he says of his new — or, maybe more accurately, restored — bod. 'And I feel like I'm back to the person that my wife married,' Bland adds.

Divorcing SpaceX Just Isn't Possible Right Now
Divorcing SpaceX Just Isn't Possible Right Now

Bloomberg

time38 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Divorcing SpaceX Just Isn't Possible Right Now

The public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, the world's richest person, was unsettling given the power these two men wield and how their verbal tussle quickly escalated to issues that directly affect national security. Trump floated the cancellation of all NASA and Department of Defense contracts with SpaceX, the space-launch and satellite-internet company Musk founded in 2002. Musk countered that he would withdraw the services of the Dragon space capsule, which is the only option now, except for resorting to the Russians, for ferrying astronauts to the International Space Station.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store