I'm a spine doctor — beware this surprising cause of back pain, and what you can do to improve it
It's a real pain in the back.
An estimated 80% of Americans will experience back pain at some point in their lives — and for around 16 million of those adults, the issue is chronic and with no easy end in sight.
While incredibly common, back pain is notoriously difficult to treat because 'it may be caused by multiple overlapping factors that cannot always be visualized on a scan,' Dr. Patricia Zheng, a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist, told Medical Xpress.
3 Back pain is difficult to treat because it has so many different causes — and this one is frequently overlooked.
New Africa – stock.adobe.com
Some common causes of back pain include muscle strain, herniated discs, sprains, arthritis, poor posture, obesity, lack of exercise and even stress.
But, according to Zheng, one of the most overlooked causes of chronic back pain isn't physical at all — it's psychological.
'In a 2024 study, we identified smoking, alcohol, obesity, sleep disturbance and depression as risk factors for chronic back pain,' she told the outlet.
'I think some patients are surprised that depression, which may be associated with sleep disturbances, is linked to back pain.'
Depression can often make pain feel more severe, which is why she recommends seeing a therapist or taking antidepressants to patients who consistently feel down.
'Studies show that the neurotransmitters that play a role in depression and anxiety are also involved in the way we process pain, so taking an antidepressant may dampen the nervous system's overreaction to pain,' she said.
3 'I think some patients are surprised that depression, which may be associated with sleep disturbances, is linked to back pain,' Zheng said.
fizkes – stock.adobe.com
A recent study found only one out of every 10 treatments to be effective in relieving lower back pain, so the condition often needs to be tackled in a myriad of ways.
Firstly, Zheng recommends exercising — but not too strenuously, as research has shown that can actually make things worse.
'I can't emphasize enough how important it is to stay active,' she said, adding that she personally rotates between Pilates, aerobics and light weightlifting five days a week.
'But I'm not perfect; when life gets busy, I slack off.'
When you're in the office, she suggests maintaining good posture and getting up from your desk once every hour to move around 'because prolonged sitting puts pressure on the spinal disks.'
As for those trendy standing desks? Some studies show they can help relieve back pain, but there's more science behind simply going for a walk.
In fact, a recent Norwegian study showed that walking 100 minutes per day was associated with a 23% lower risk of chronic lower back pain.
3 Dr. Patricia Zheng is a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist.
UCSF
If your back pain is due to an injury, Zheng emphasizes the importance of easing back into activity.
'The problem is, if you don't move, you get deconditioned,' she told the outlet.
'That can make you more susceptible to future injuries.'
In some extreme cases, minimally invasive surgeries or steroid injections might be recommended.
Meanwhile, some people have successfully relieved back pain by following an anti-inflammatory diet, which means eliminating things like sugar, red meat and alcohol.
Although Zheng herself is no stranger to temptation.
'I try to eat a balanced diet, but for me personally, I love sweets,' she said.
'I'm not going to pass on the dessert!'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Underestimated Cost of Healthcare in Retirement - Your Money Briefing
As retirees get older, they could face additional costs including medication and doctors visits that could add tens of thousands of dollars to out-of-pocket expenses . Host Oyin Adedoyin talks with WSJ contributor Gail Marks Jarvis about how to prepare for unanticipated healthcare expenses in retirement. Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Oyin Adedoyin: Here's Your Money Briefing for Monday, June 16th. I'm Oyin Adedoyin for the Wall Street Journal. Saving for retirement is hard enough; where you choose to live once you retire can add tens of thousands of dollars in healthcare costs, and then you have to factor in the costs of doctor's visits and certain medications. Gail Marks Jarvis: There have been some estimates that have said that the average couple, instead of thinking they're going to spend $330,000, that maybe they'll have to spend over $600,000. That takes into account more of these unusual expenses that people may have to pay. Oyin Adedoyin: We'll talk with Wall Street Journal contributor Gail Marks Jarvis about where these sneaky medical costs come from and how to prepare for them. That's after the break. Americans tend to enter retirement in relatively good health, but as they age, their health may start to deteriorate, which could lead to recurring expenses that can squeeze even the most affluent retirees. Wall Street Journal contributor Gail Marks Jarvis joins me to talk about it. So Gail, planning for retirement is kind of like trying to see into the future in some ways. We're estimating how much money we're going to need to live comfortably in our 60s and 70s. Your reporting has shown that medical costs can be a blind spot in that crystal ball. Why is that? Gail Marks Jarvis: Well, in part it's because it's hard to know just what's going to happen to you medically. So a lot of people are going to go through retirement and spend about what Fidelity estimates, which is, during all of retirement, about $330,000 for a couple and about $165,000 for an individual. But you don't know if you are that average. What happens if you get sick and need drugs that are not covered by your drug plan, or what happens if you think you're really healthy when you're young and you move out to some isolated area and you get sick? So your expenses could be huge. Oyin Adedoyin: Those are some pretty interesting numbers. Let's say that I'm a retiree with a pretty healthy nest egg saved up like that. Guidance from Fidelity says that retirees should have 10 times their salary by the time they're 67. How much of this is estimated to be eaten up by those medical costs that you mentioned? Gail Marks Jarvis: If you have saved that 10 times amount and you average, you're probably going to be okay in terms of your medical costs. But if you start doing unusual things like going to a mountaintop to live in retirement where there's no doctors around or no good hospitals, that's going to change considerably. There have been some estimates that have said that the average couple, instead of thinking they're going to spend $330,000, that maybe they'll have to spend over $600,000. That takes into account more of these unusual expenses that people may have to pay. Oyin Adedoyin: One of the things that you explain in your story as one of those unanticipated costs is Part D Medicare. Can you talk a little bit about how that works and how that can add to those costs when you're retired? Gail Marks Jarvis: Just a few years ago, they added a new part of Medicare, and it's called Part D. and that's what's supposed to cover your drugs. You pay a premium every month, just like you pay a premium every month for Medicare. Medicare only pays about 80% of your medical costs, so the supplement pays the extra 20%, and the drug insurance pays some of your drug costs. But the key about Medicare Part D, the drug insurance, is that you are only covered by what your policy says they cover. What people don't realize is that their drug coverage is based on something called the formulary list that every drug plan has, and every drug plan is different. If you bought a drug plan and I bought a drug plan, each one would have a different formulary. So maybe a cancer drug would be covered in yours but not mine. So what do you do about that? If you're stuck with a drug that costs $9,000 and your plan doesn't cover it, for that year, you're going to have to pay the $9,000. But at the end of the year, you have the right to shop for a new drug plan. And what you can do then is pick a new drug plan that does have that expensive drug on the formulary list. And so instead of having to pay $9,000 again the next year, you pay only $2,000. Oyin Adedoyin: Wow. Those costs are really adding up. Gail, what are some possible solutions and ways that people can either prevent the situation or navigate it? Gail Marks Jarvis: Before they ever retire, while they're still on regular insurance, go to that community that they think they're going to live in, find a doctor, and get accepted by that doctor as a patient. They still could get turned down later when they go on Medicare, but doctors tend to continue to take patients that they have had even when they go on Medicare. A second step is just to realize that, for example, Florida is a place people go to cut their taxes, but they may have extra expenses, like they may pay more for medical care. So all of these things are things to think about in advance of retiring. Oyin Adedoyin: Speaking of in advance, Gail, I'm 25. This is all blowing my mind right now. I have a 401k through my job, and that's it. What can I do now to ensure that I don't end up in that predicament where I'm underestimating future medical costs by the time I'm retired? Gail Marks Jarvis: Well, it sounds like you're aware of the rule of thumb that when you go to retire, you want at least 10 times what you were making. But the other thing is, every year you should try to maximize what you're putting in your 401k, and you should make sure that you're at least getting the employer match. I have been shocked at the number of young people who say, "Oh, I have student loans. I'm busy. I can't figure out the 401k." And they skip it even though their employer would give them free money. Some of that free money, if you start in your 20s, that's liable to be like $250,000 of free money by the time you go to retire. So you don't want to ever give up that free money. Oyin Adedoyin: That's WSJ contributor Gail Marks Jarvis, and that's it for Your Money Briefing. This episode was produced by Ariana Aspuru with supervising producer Melony Roy. I'm Oyin Adedoyin for the Wall Street Journal. Thanks for listening.
Buzz Feed
8 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
How Much Salt Is Too Much Salt When It Comes To Your Health?
Low-sodium soy sauce, soup and snacks dominate supermarket shelves, so it seems pretty obvious that a lot of Americans are aware that they need to lower their sodium intake. But to what extent is it really a problem? Most people have no idea how much salt they're eating every day, or how much is recommended (particularly for those with certain health conditions). And did you know that some people are actually encouraged to eat more salt? We spoke with doctors to answer all of our saltiest questions. First of all, we do need to eat a certain amount of sodium. According to Dr. Columbus Batiste, the regional chief of cardiology with Kaiser Permanente in Southern California, 'We need the right amount of salt to provide our bodies with important electrolytes that can regulate things like muscle contractions, fluid balance and nerve transmission.' Dr. Rohan Khera, an assistant professor of cardiovascular medicine at the Yale School of Medicine, told HuffPost that salt is 'needed for every single body cell, especially the more active heart and muscle tissues.' Moreover, salt plays a role in 'sweating, normal cell function, metabolism, maintenance of body fluids, and keeping muscles and nerves working properly,' said Dr. John Higgins, a cardiologist with UTHealth Houston. Healthy adults only need 500 milligrams of salt per day (about a quarter-teaspoon of salt) to maintain healthy body function, according to cardiologist Dr. Nieca Goldberg, the medical director of Atria New York and a clinical associate professor of medicine at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Limiting salt intake to such a paltry amount isn't realistic for many people, and that's OK for most healthy adults, as long as they don't overdo it. The American Heart Association recommends that healthy adults consume no more than 2,300 milligrams of salt per day and ideally no more than 1,500 milligrams, or about three-quarters of a teaspoon of salt per day. However, most Americans eat far more than the recommended amount of salt, according to Goldberg. 'The average American eats about 3,500 milligrams of sodium a day,' she said. 'Seventy percent of that salt that consumed is from processed foods.' Although the recommended maximum of salt may seem low for such an important nutrient, there is a good reason for these guidelines. Khera explained that 'our body is built to preserve sodium, so we only have to supplement a little in our diet to ensure we are in good balance' — and too much salt is risky for some people. What are the risks of eating too much salt? Too much salt can be dangerous. This is true whether you add salt to your food or purchase processed foods made with salt. According to Higgins, 'A high-salt diet can contribute to high blood pressure, stroke, heart disease, osteoporosis, stomach cancer, kidney disease, renal stones and obesity.' Since too much salt can increase blood pressure, this has the ability to cause a heart attack or stroke, he added. Other risks of high salt intake include blood vessel damage and negative impacts on hormonal and inflammatory pathways, immune response, the gut microbiome and body fat metabolism, Batiste said. He added that the effects of consuming too much salt can lead to premature death. Are we all at equal risk? Not everyone needs to worry. Too much salt 'may not be bad for everyone. It depends on the person's health status,' Goldberg explained. 'If you are healthy and have low blood pressure, salt may not be harmful,' she said. If you aren't sure whether you need to watch your salt intake, Goldberg recommended discussing your diet with your doctor. High amounts of salt are dangerous for many people, however. For those with high blood pressure 'in the pre-hypertensive range or higher,' or with 'heart failure or kidney disease,' Goldberg cautioned that 'high salt intake may worsen your condition.' Higgins said that patients with moderate to severe heart failure should limit their salt intake to under 2,000 milligrams, or about one teaspoon, a day. Those who have had a heart attack or stroke should consume under 1,000 milligrams, or about a half-teaspoon, per day. Here are the best ways to lower salt intake. Higgins recommended switching out table salt for an alternative like Morton Salt Substitute, which does not contain any sodium. Goldberg also recommended looking for lower-salt versions of foods that you already eat and becoming skilled at reading labels. For those with high blood pressure, Higgins recommended eating fruits and vegetables high in potassium, which can lower blood pressure naturally. These include potatoes, tomatoes, spinach, raisins, lima beans, lentils, bananas, oranges, watermelon and cantaloupe. Some people may actually need to eat more salt. MirageC / Getty Images Although most people consume too much salt, some conditions require more salt. However, before increasing your salt intake, Khera emphasized that 'these are specialized conditions that require specific expertise,' and that no one should increase their salt intake before having 'explicit discussions with their doctor.' The following conditions may require adding salt to one's diet: Orthostatic hypotension. Khera explained that if people have low blood pressure when standing up, or orthostatic hypotension, they may need more salt. When a patient is diagnosed with this condition — one variation of which is postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome — doctors 'sometimes recommend salt to retain more fluid in the body and have fewer dizzy or loss-of-consciousness spells,' Khera said. High-performance athletes. Khera explained that high-performance athletes may lose a lot of salt via sweat, especially if they are training or competing in hot climates. However, he noted that 'this is rarely needed,' and that when it is, 'modest increases are sufficient.' Cystic fibrosis. Individuals with cystic fibrosis lose salt through their sweat more than those without the condition, Khera said. That means they 'often require an increase in intake in salt,' although the amount of additional salt each person needs varies and is determined by their doctor. Addison's disease. According to Batiste, 'People with Addison's disease, a condition affecting the adrenal glands, may experience low levels of sodium.' Health care providers may recommend increased salt intake to maintain electrolyte balance. Electrolyte abnormalities. Some electrolyte abnormalities, such as low blood sodium or hyponatremia, are treated with increased sodium intake. However, these conditions are sometimes treated with reduced fluid intake.
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
RFK's anti-vax agenda endangers the entire Trump reform drive
Word of warning to Health Secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr.: Restoring Americans' trust in the feds' public-health decisions means hiring truly fair-minded, science-driven folks — not anti-vax crackpots. RFK Jr. last week canned all 17 members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), saying: 'A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science.' Most of them got appointed just last year to terms that would last through 2028, so Kennedy would've had to fire at least some to have much impact on the panel — and President Joe Biden set clear precedent for axing supposedly bi- and non-partisan advisory-board members. Advertisement Yes, ACIP members are supposed to be unbiased experts, but vaccine recommendations nonetheless plainly did get politicized in the Biden years (along with a lot of other public-health 'science,' such as guidelines for reopening schools). Not only did CDC and FDA officials cover up negative side-effects of COVID vaccines, they prompted top career officials to resign over the psuedo-scientific 'findings' that everyone should get vaxxed and re-vaxxed. Happily, several of the eight new ACIP members RFK announced later in the week look to be solid scientists, such as biostatistician Martin Kulldorff, a co-author of the anti-lockdown Great Barrington Declaration, and pediatrician Cody Meissner, who's served on the panel before. Advertisement But at least one pick raises serious alarm bells: Vicky Pebsworth served on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center, an anti-vax outfit that fearmongers about 'vaccine injuries and deaths.' Plus: In announcing the firings, Kennedy announced the federal health department will now prioritize 'public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda.' Huh? It should be pro-vaccine, albeit in a 'trust but verify' mode, because the jabs overall are objectively a life-saving public good. Just ask the victims of the current measles breakout, which anti-vax propaganda has made worse. Advertisement Naming Pebsworth to ACIP is a clear sign RFK still has at least one foot in the anti-vax conspiracy-theory camp; if he keeps it up (he's got 11 more slots to fill on the panel), he'll prove that all who opposed his confirmation were right. The White House needs to keep Kennedy on a short leash, lest he alienate rational Republicans and give Democrats ammunition for undermining the entire Trump agenda.
