The full list of Trump's tariffs – from India to Taiwan
The order listed higher import duty rates that would start in seven days for 69 trading partners as the 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT) deadline approached.
Below is a list of the countries and the reciprocal tariffs they face, plus a searchable table:
Afghanistan – 15%
Algeria – 30%
Angola – 15%
Bangladesh – 20%
Bolivia – 15%
Bosnia and Herzegovina – 30%
Botswana – 15%
Brazil – 10%
Brunei – 25%
Cambodia – 19%
Cameroon – 15%
Chad – 15%
Costa Rica – 15%
Côte d`Ivoire – 15%
Democratic Republic of the Congo – 15%
Ecuador – 15%
Equatorial Guinea – 15%
European Union: Goods with Column 1 Duty Rate > 15%* – 0%
European Union: Goods with Column 1 Duty Rate < 15%** – 15%
Falkland Islands – 10%
Fiji – 15%
Ghana – 15%
Guyana – 15%
Iceland – 15%
India – 25%
Indonesia – 19%
Iraq – 35%
Israel – 15%
Japan – 15%
Jordan – 15%
Kazakhstan – 25%
Laos – 40%
Lesotho – 15%
Libya – 30%
Liechtenstein – 15%
Madagascar – 15%
Malawi – 15%
Malaysia – 19%
Mauritius – 15%
Moldova – 25%
Mozambique – 15%
Myanmar (Burma) – 40%
Namibia – 15%
Nauru – 15%
New Zealand – 15%
Nicaragua – 18%
Nigeria – 15%
North Macedonia – 15%
Norway – 15%
Pakistan – 19%
Papua New Guinea – 15%
Philippines – 19%
Serbia – 35%
South Africa – 30%
South Korea – 15%
Sri Lanka – 20%
Switzerland – 39%
Syria – 41%
Taiwan – 20%
Thailand – 19%
Trinidad and Tobago – 15%
Tunisia– 25%
Turkey – 15%
Uganda – 15%
United Kingdom – 10%
Vanuatu – 15%
Venezuela – 15%
Vietnam – 20%
Zambia – 15%
Zimbabwe – 15%
* For purposes of this Executive Order and its Annexes, 'Column 1 Duty Rate' means the ad valorem (or ad valorem equivalent) rate of duty under column 1-General of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
** Minus Column 1 Duty Rate
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
Mexico's headline inflation seen easing in July, core inflation still above target
MEXICO CITY, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Mexico's headline inflation likely slowed in July, although the core index likely remained above the official target, supporting expectations the central bank will slow its pace of interest rate cuts later this week, Reuters poll showed on Monday. The median estimate from 13 analysts forecast headline inflation of 3.53% in the 12 months through July, which if confirmed would be its lowest reading since December 2020. (MXCPIA=ECI), opens new tab For core inflation, considered a better parameter for measuring price trends because it eliminates highly volatile products, estimates indicate that it stood at 4.23%, slightly below June's 4.24% (MXCCPI=ECI), opens new tab but still above the Bank of Mexico's target of 3%, plus or minus a percentage point. The central bank last month lowered its benchmark rate by half a percentage point, although the decision by the five-member board of governors was not unanimous, after Deputy Governor Jonathan Heath voted to leave it unchanged. According to the minutes from July's meeting, all four officials who backed the cut — the fourth consecutive cut of that magnitude — said the board may adopt a more gradual approach in future decisions, as inflation shows signs of slowing and economic activity proceeds at a sluggish pace. Compared to the previous month, consumer prices are forecast to have risen by 0.28% (MXINFL=ECI), opens new tab in July, while for the core index an increase of 0.30% is expected (MXCPIX=ECI), opens new tab, according to the survey. The official data will be released on Thursday, a few hours before the central bank's rate decision. Another Reuters poll published on Friday showed that the market is widely discounting that the bank will announce a decrease of only 25 basis points in the cost of credit. The central bank has cut its benchmark rate by 325 bps since early 2024 as part of a monetary easing cycle that began after the rate reached a record high of 11.25%.
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Trump's degraded data is worse than book-cooking
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump's stance on Covid-19 turned out to be a prelude for his second term. The U.S. president, who in 2020 argued that 'If we stopped testing right now, we'd have very few cases' of the coronavirus, is applying this logic to environmental, health, and - with the firing of the top Labor Department statistician — economic data. With presumably committed professional staff still in place and alternative data sources available, the main risk of isn't fake, rosy data — it's that firms, investors and policymakers will see pillars of the market crumble. The Bureau of Labor Statistics each month estimates jobs created in the prior period and updates its two previous estimates. Glum numbers on Friday prompted Trump to shoot the messenger. Following a report that 73,000 jobs were added in July, combined with a reduction of 258,000 for May and June's numbers, the president fired BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. His argument that the employment survey is biased, and that revisions were tilted in favor of former President Joe Biden, does not survive under scrutiny. The agency revised, opens new tab down job growth by 818,000 during 2024's presidential election—hardly positive news for an incumbent administration. While this revision was large, volatility is unsurprising amid a trade war and immigration restrictionism. This president is already dismantling other research bodies, whether at the Environmental Protection Agency, or the carbon-tracking Mauna Loa observatory, or advisory boards at the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control. Companies and whole sectors, like insurance and pharmaceuticals, rely on government data for myriad uses: carbon markets, flood insurance calculations, automaker emissions compliance, solar energy output projections, disaster planning and resilience, creditworthiness for infrastructure projects, and more. There is no explicit promise to outright cook the books. Nonetheless, any threat to the integrity of this data degrades a vast infrastructure supporting modern markets, built up over more than a century. A ham-fisted push to skew the numbers would probably be self-destructive, drawing skepticism from outside professionals. Signals like resignations of remaining career staff will be clear. And, simply put, people know whether they have a job or not. Studies from countries that have manipulated official data, like Argentina, opens new tab, show that consumers don't trust fake figures, creating black markets to exploit any spread between fantasy and reality. Even without active sabotage, outdated practices may have slid in this direction by accident: officials warned, opens new tab that the BLS needs a refresh, including by jettisoning ever-less-reliable phone surveys and favoring real-time digital sources like job postings or credit card data. Those worries now get an extra political dimension, no matter what happens. Follow Gabriel Rubin on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
American Bar Association considers ending diversity requirements for board seats
Aug 4 (Reuters) - The American Bar Association is proposing to end its practice of reserving five seats on its governing board for women, racial minorities and other underrepresented groups, as the organization's diversity policies have come under scrutiny in President Donald Trump's second term. The revision, part of a slate of proposed changes, opens new tab that would reduce the size of the ABA's Board of Governors and its House of Delegates, would instead set aside three board seats for lawyers committed to 'advancing the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion,' regardless of the candidates' demographic backgrounds. The existing rules require the designated members to be "racially or ethnically diverse, a woman, or self-identify either as LGBTQ+ or as having a disability." The board, which oversees management of the ABA, would go from the current 43 members to 32 under the proposal. The House of Delegates will consider the changes when it meets on August 11 and 12. The ABA committee that developed the reforms said they are needed amid declining membership and would help the organization become more nimble and efficient. Paid and free ABA membership fell to 227,000 in 2024 from nearly 400,000 in 2015 — a decline of about 43% that an ABA spokesperson said is partly attributable to the elimination of some free and low-cost membership categories. A report from the ABA committee did not specifically reference political influence, but the organization has faced mounting pressure from the Trump administration over its diversity and inclusion efforts. An ABA spokesperson declined to comment on what prompted the revision to its diversity requirements, saying it has yet to pass. Trump in April threatened to revoke the ABA's status as the federal government's designated accreditor of law schools due to its requirement that law schools demonstrate their commitment to diversity in recruitment, admissions and programming, which he said is illegal. That rule has since been put on hold through August 31, 2026. A coalition of conservative legal groups in February asked the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to investigate several of the ABA's diversity hiring programs, claiming they discriminate by giving priority to minority applicants and other underrepresented groups. Under the Board of Governors proposal, candidates for the three diversity seats could be evaluated based on their 'involvement in groups or initiatives, lived experience, professional work, or obstacles overcome and resilience developed.' Read more: Trump executive order says ABA's role as law school accreditor may be revoked ABA keeps law school diversity rule on hold into 2026 amid Trump crackdown
