Chinaware that props up Pakistan in conflict
It was widely known that China has emerged as the key supplier of weaponry for its iron brother Pakistan over the past decade accounting for over 80% of the country's military imports currently, but the first outing for some of these weapons came this week, in strikes and counter-strikes carried out by India and Pakistan. Pakistan's armed forces used, for the first time, the Chinese-made J-10C fighter jet and PL-15 missile.
Military ties between Beijing and Islamabad have grown since the early 1960s, at a slow pace initially but rapidly in the last decade or so. Defence cooperation is now a key component of the 'China-Pakistan All-Weather Strategic Cooperative Partnership'. 'The two sides underscored that strategic defence and security cooperation between China and Pakistan plays an irreplaceable and critical role in maintaining peace, stability and strategic balance in the region. The two sides expressed satisfaction that the two militaries have long enjoyed a high level of mutual trust, high-level cooperation, and high-level coordination. The two sides agreed to maintain the momentum of high-level military-to-military visits and exchanges, and to continuously elevate cooperation in areas of joint training, exercises and military technology,' a joint statement issued after Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari's visit to China in February said.
It had also emerged from SIPRI's analysis that though several of the deals are labelled 'co-production' or 'joint programme', implying significant Pakistani R&D input, in most cases the R&D was mainly or all Chinese even for specific Pakistani requirements.
'Pakistan is the largest buyer of Chinese arms, including fighter jets, air defence systems, naval vessels, and UAVs,' Yang Zi, associate research fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies told CNBC after Chinese defence stocks surged following reports of Pakistan using Chinese weapons against Indian strikes.
None of this will be news to India's military planners, who are also likely to have assessed the Chinese weapons being used by Pakistan during the just-ended hostilities. For instance, the recovery of a PL-15 missile, in good condition, from a field in Punjab was met with some excitement in Indian military circles (China has been very guarded about the capabilities of this missile).
The Pakistani and Chinese militaries have also been involved in joint air, sea and land exercises. Ties between the two navies are particularly strong, with the Chinese arming the Pakistani navy with warships and submarines. The People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy has delivered all four Type 054A/P frigates to the Pakistan navy. In May 2023, two Type 054A/P frigates built by China for the Pakistan navy were delivered, marking that all four Type 054A/Ps ordered by the Pakistan navy have been commissioned.
'The Type 054A/P is one of the latest multi-role frigates of Chinese origin, equipped with state-of-the-art weapons and sensors that include CM-302 surface-to-surface missiles and LY-80 surface-to-air missiles, as well as an Advanced Anti-Submarine Warfare suite and Combat Management System, enabling ships of this class to operate under multi-threat scenarios,' the Chinese state-run Global Times tabloid reported earlier this year.
In March, the PLA Navy delivered a second new submarine, equipped with state-of-the-art weapons and sensors, to Pakistan. The Hangor-class submarine has, according to Chinese state media, sustained stealth capability, manoeuvrability and endurance. It is also equipped with torpedoes, anti-ship missiles and mine-laying capabilities, along with advanced underwater detection systems. Cooperation between the Chinese and Pakistani navies is a critical component of defence ties between the two. The ongoing programme for eight Type-041 submarines, planned for delivery in 2022-2028, includes four to be produced under licence in Pakistan. This makes it imperative for India to put its own submarine projects on the fast track.
The views expressed are personal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Chinese benchmark ends marginally higher
Asian stocks ended mixed in lackluster trading on Friday despite the leaders of the U.S. and China agreeing to further talks aimed at reaching a deal. U.S. President Donald Trump described a phone call with his Chinese counterpart as "very good" and said it "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries." Traders also reacted to a hawkish ECB rate cut and braced for a soft U.S. employment report later in the day for additional clues on the Fed's rate trajectory. Economists expect U.S. employment to increase by 130,000 jobs in May after an increase of 177,000 jobs in April. The unemployment rate is expected to hold at 4.2 percent. Gold prices inched higher in Asian trade and headed for a weekly gain as the U.S. dollar faced a weekly loss amid signs of economic weakness and stalled trade talks. Oil dipped but headed for its first weekly gain in three as optimism over peak seasonal demand offset lingering concerns about oversupply. China's Shanghai Composite index finished marginally higher at 3,385.36 while Hong Kong's Hang Seng index fell 0.48 percent to 23,792.54 as Trump's phone call left key issues unresolved.
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Three-year legal practice rule for judicial services could deter the brightest minds
Written by Shailesh Kumar and Raju Kumar There is no doubt that judges ought to be trained in legal procedures, judgment-writing, evaluating evidence and assessing societal situations. This is particularly so in subordinate courts that are the final arbiters in a majority of cases, and which deal with factual questions, raw emotions, and engage mostly members of marginalised communities. The right question, therefore, is not whether aspiring judicial magistrates in India should have such training, but rather whether such knowledge and experience can only come from three years of practice as an advocate. Let's begin by acknowledging two public secrets of the Indian legal profession. First, a law graduate can obtain a certificate of practice without entering a courtroom. Second, it is still, primarily — and regrettably so — an institution run by caste-, class-, and gender-based networks, and not by merit per se. The 14th Law Commission Report (1958) said that subordinate judicial officers would benefit from three to five years' practice at the Bar, but made an exception for the proposed All India Judicial Services (AIJS) for the higher judiciary, where fresh law graduates could be recruited directly by subjecting them to post-selection training. In the All India Judges' Association I case (1992), the Supreme Court directed the central government to set up the AIJS and allowed fresh law graduates to apply for it with post-selection training. And in the All India Judges' Association II case (1993), the Court emphasised that three years of practice as a lawyer was essential for the subordinate judiciary. Soon after, the Justice Shetty Commission (1999) found that the rule had not drawn the 'best candidates': The most successful ones were nearing 30, while top law graduates chose corporate roles or academia instead. Acting on these findings, the Supreme Court in All India Judges' Association III (2002) struck down the rule to make subordinate judicial careers accessible to fresh law graduates. We must mention here that the first five National Law Universities (NLUs) had already been established, with several batches of NLSIU having graduated by then. After more than two decades, the matter resurfaced on May 20, when the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Gavai, reinstated the three-year legal practice requirement — this time citing High Courts' opinions and without the support of any empirical evidence. The assertion that appointing law graduates without Bar experience has failed in the past is largely anecdotal. The Court mainly relies on the opinion of the High Courts, but there are no research findings to back this broad generalisation. Without empirical evidence, such sweeping policy decisions may do more harm than good. Back in 1999, the Shetty Commission had advised against this very requirement. Its reasoning was straightforward: The new five-year integrated BA LLB (Hons) programme already includes practical training components, such as internships, moot courts, and simulations. So, the Supreme Court should have enquired about the demography and institutional background of graduates who entered the subordinate judiciary since 2002, and whether these were the 'best talent' sought, by outlining certain criteria, to assess if the Shetty Commission's objective remained unfulfilled. Reinstituting the three-year Bar requirement not only disregards that recommendation but also ignores how legal education has evolved to bridge the very gaps this rule claims to address. Many top-performing students from NLUs regularly secure roles at leading law firms or express strong interest in public service. Yet they are now told to wait for three years, regardless of their readiness or aptitude. This delay wastes potential and may discourage some of the best minds from pursuing judicial careers altogether. What about the financial reality? A (discretionary) monthly stipend of Rs 2,000 to Rs 20,000 — where a senior advocate might earn Rs 20 lakh for a single hearing in a higher court — is a severe pay gap and is barely enough to get by, especially in tier-1 and tier-2 cities. For many students — particularly those from SC/ST/OBC communities, economically weaker sections, rural areas, women, or those with caregiving responsibilities — this rule effectively shuts the door on a judicial career before it can begin. After five to six years of education, it unintentionally pushes them into other fields where they can earn a living straight after graduation. The rule favours those who can afford to wait — in other words, the elite class. India already faces a chronic shortage of judges, especially at the district level. By restricting who can apply, this rule reduces the eligible talent pool even further. Fewer recruits mean higher caseloads for sitting judges, longer delays for litigants, and declining public trust in the system's ability to deliver timely justice. Under this new rule, aspiring judges must wait three years, possibly juggling low-paying work or uncertain prospects in the meantime. The alternative should be to invest in what happens after selection, or during the course degree itself. Legal education should incorporate daily courtroom exposure in the final year — similar to the clinical internships followed in medical colleges — as an integral part of the curriculum. In the past, there was a two-part training structure: One part involved real-world learning under experienced judges, while the other focused on classroom-based judicial instruction. This method was not perfect, but it worked — and with some updates, it could serve the purpose well again. Rather than holding people back, the system should focus on preparing them thoroughly once they are in. Let us not assume that the 'best' law students come only from (expensive) NLUs; perhaps the most trained ones do, because of the structural benefits NLU students have in India's several-tier legal education system. Moreover, the learning process for a judge should not end once they take an oath. Like other professionals, judges need to stay updated. One way to do this is by requiring newly appointed judges to undergo structured training — perhaps approximately 200 hours — within their first year and a half on the bench. The goal is to make continuing education a normal part of the job, not a one-time event. The Supreme Court must also examine the quality of training the High Courts provide for probationary magistrates. Research findings from one of the authors, albeit in a specific context, suggest that judicial training has mostly been poor, and there has been resistance — particularly from district judges — to undergo training. This is a serious policy issue with severe implications for the future. Considering that the problems outlined exist, is this the right medicine? The Supreme Court ought to have relied on solid evidence rather than opinions, even if they came from the High Courts. Shailesh Kumar is a Lecturer in Law at Royal Holloway, University of London and a Commonwealth Scholar. Raju Kumar is a legal consultant at Prohibition & Excise Department, Govt of Bihar, and a graduate from Chanakya National Law University, Patna
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mini launches Countryman E JCW Pack at ₹62 lakh
Mini India has launched the Countryman E John Cooper Works (JCW) Pack, a limited-edition electric vehicle priced at ₹62 lakh (ex-showroom). Only 20 units of the model will be available in India, and bookings are exclusively open on the Mini online shop. Deliveries are set to commence from June 10, 2025. This marks the Indian debut of the electric Mini Countryman in its JCW avatar, combining a fully electric powertrain with design elements inspired by Mini's motorsport heritage. The Countryman E JCW Pack is available as a Completely Built-Up (CBU) unit and is based on the third-generation Countryman architecture. Performance and range The Countryman E JCW Pack features a 66.45 kWh lithium-ion battery that delivers a maximum output of 150 kW (204 hp) and 250 Nm torque. The vehicle accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 8.6 seconds and offers a claimed range of up to 462 km (WLTP). It supports fast charging through a 130 kW DC charger (10–80% in 29 minutes) and 11 kW AC charger (full charge in 6 hours and 45 minutes). Design and features The model is available in two exterior shades — Legend Grey and Midnight Black — and features Jet Black roof and mirror caps. It rides on 19-inch JCW Runway Spoke Black alloy wheels and includes JCW-specific design enhancements on the grille, bumpers, side skirts, rear spoiler, and door entry sills. Inside, the car is equipped with JCW Sports Seats finished in Vescin/Cord combination upholstery, a JCW steering wheel with paddle shifters, and an OLED circular 240 mm infotainment touchscreen powered by Mini Operating System 9. The system supports voice control via the 'Hey MINI' command and includes features such as navigation, digital key, head-up display, and a Harman Kardon surround sound system. Safety and assistance For safety, the Countryman E JCW Pack includes features such as adaptive cruise control, Parking Assistant Plus with a 360-degree camera, Comfort Access (proximity-based keyless entry), and several driver assistance systems. Standard safety equipment includes multiple airbags, Dynamic Stability Control, ABS, Cornering Brake Control, and Tyre Pressure Monitoring System. Ownership, warranty, and financing The model is covered by a two-year unlimited kilometre warranty, with an 8-year/160,000 km warranty on the high-voltage battery. Service Inclusive plans start from 4 years/200,000 km and are extendable up to 10 years. Warranty extensions are also available for up to 10 years. Mini Smart Finance, offered by BMW India Financial Services, provides options such as low monthly instalments, assured buyback, and upgrade flexibility. This launch further strengthens Mini's electric portfolio in India, positioning the brand to cater to a growing segment of premium electric vehicle buyers seeking performance, technology, and exclusivity.
