logo
ENع
‘S**t People': Vance Condemns Pro-Ukraine Protestors Who Followed Him

‘S**t People': Vance Condemns Pro-Ukraine Protestors Who Followed Him

Yahoo09-03-2025

Vice President J.D. Vance took to X on Saturday to condemn protestors who he claims followed him and his 3-year-old daughter around shouting, causing his daughter to become increasingly anxious and scared.
He said that he decided to speak with the protestors 'in the hopes that I could trade a few minutes of conversation for them leaving my toddler alone,' something nearly all of them agreed to.
Though Vance described the dialogue as a mostly respectful conversation, he then went on to call the protestors 's--t people,' writing, 'If you're chasing a 3-year-old as part of a political protest, you're a s--t person.'
Cincinnati's WCPO 9 News obtained footage of the interaction, which did indeed appear to be a largely respectful conversation in which Vance, amongst other things, conceded that Russia 'certainly did invade Ukraine in 2022.' President Donald Trump has previously accused Ukraine of starting the war with Russia and has publicly praised 'genius' Vladimir Putin for his 'very savvy' attack on Ukraine. Vance, meanwhile, said in 2022 that he does not care what happens to Ukraine 'one way or the other.'
When protestors accused the Trump administration of selling the Ukrainians out, Vance rebutted, 'With respect, ma'am, I disagree. I think that what we're doing is we're actually forcing a diplomatic settlement.'
The interaction came after dozens of protestors rallied in Cincinnati's Walnut Hills neighborhood, where Vance lives, to protest the ongoing invasion of Ukraine. They were also present on Friday evening and reportedly plan to return on Sunday afternoon.
One protestor, a Ukrainian woman who has lived in Cincinnati for 25 years, told WCPO, 'My whole family still lives in Ukraine. I'm embarrassed as an American Ukrainian to see what's happening in America and how we're abandoning our allies.'
This isn't the first time protestors have disrupted Vance's downtime, and it undoubtedly won't be the last. Last weekend, Vance was ambushed by pro-Ukraine protestors during a planned ski vacation at Vermont's Sugarbush Resort. Protestors were particularly incensed as the demonstration came soon after the disastrous meeting at the White House between Vance, Trump, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
One Sugarbush employee even mounted her own protest, using the day's snow report to rebuke the Trump administration's 'direct attack' on national park employees and negligence regarding climate change. Lucy Welch encouraged anyone frustrated by the situation to 'direct your anger to the source': the administration that is 'threatening our democracy, our livelihoods, our land.'
The New York Times reported earlier this week that while the post was taken down later that day, Welch was not fired. A spokesperson for Sugarbush told the Times, 'We respect the voice and opinion of all our employees but determined that the snow report was not the appropriate medium to share.'

Hashtags

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store