Elon Musk's influence? South Africa's digital policy amendment sparks debate
Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi faces backlash after a proposal to amend the digital communication policy for foreign communication companies to bypass the BEE requirement.
Image: X
Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi has been accused of siding with wealthy United States-based businessman Elon Musk by proposing an amendment that would weaken a black empowerment policy in the digital communication sector.
The accusation followed Malatsi's communique on Friday proposing an amendment to the government policy that required multinational companies to sell 30% or more of their stake to previously disadvantaged black people in South Africa.
Malatsi, who gazetted his proposal on May 23, wants the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), which regulates the electronic communication space, to go easy on the multinational companies by implementing 'certain amendments to regulations promulgated by it to meet the imperatives of other national laws'.
'The focus of this policy direction is on lowering regulatory hurdles to investment in reliable broadband and ensuring access to the internet.
'This is in line with the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Codes of Good Practice, which recognise that the global nature of multinational corporations' operations may constrain their ability to comply with equity ownership requirements,' read his proposal.
Interested people have been given 30 days from the date of the publication of the proposal to provide written comments for or against it.
Malatsi was yet to respond to questions sent to his spokesperson, Kwena Moloto, seeking a response on the allegations that this was done to appease Musk.
The proposal came to light two days after President Cyril Ramaphosa met with US President Donald Trump at the White House on Wednesday.
During a media briefing with international media before the two leaders held a private engagement, South African multibillionaire businessman Johann Rupert not only begged Trump to assist South Africa with technology to fight crime, but also proposed that Starlink, which is owned by Musk, come to South Africa.
In the communique, Malatsi, who represents the DA in the ANC-led Cabinet, said the amendment of Section 9(2)(b) of the Electronic Communications Act, 2005, was necessary because multinational corporations were not keen on complying with equity ownership requirements.
'Consequently, there is a need to harmonise the requirements and provisions of the Act with other legislation that applies to the recognition of ownership of members of the ICT Sector, including the Amended Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) ICT Sector Code.'
It was reported that the government had previously rejected Musk's attempt to launch Starlink's branch in South Africa after he had refused to sell 30% or more of his shares to previously disadvantaged black people.
It was also reported that Musk accused the government of refusing his move because he was not black.
The proposal said multinational operators in the ICT industry have for a long time sought clarity on the equity equivalent investment programmes.
'This will provide the certainty necessary to attract increased investment in ICT and accelerate universal internet access,' it read.
It said the World Bank research showed that, on average, every 10% increase in broadband penetration results in 1.21% GDP growth in middle-income countries such as South Africa.
'Broadband access makes it easier for people to start businesses, grow businesses, seek employment, work remotely, and market goods and services.
'Giving millions of South Africans access to broadband would, therefore, constitute one of the biggest empowerment programmes the South African government has ever undertaken,' read the document.
The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) was directed to urgently consider aligning the regulations 'in respect of the Limitations of Control and Equity Ownership by Historically Disadvantaged Groups (HDG) and the Application of the ICT Sector Code, with the Amended Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) ICT Sector Code.'
EFF accused Malatsi of proposing to bring Starlink into the country through the backdoor.
'This policy direction is unconstitutional and driven by external pressure, particularly from Elon Musk, a close ally of Donald Trump.
'This policy is tailor-made to allow Starlink access to operate in South Africa without meeting the mandatory 30% local ownership requirement as per the Electronic Communications Act.
'Musk has arrogantly refused to comply with our sovereign laws, and the ANC-led government has chosen to kneel,' read the EFF statement.
Political analyst Thabani Khumalo said Malatsi's proposal could be good for accelerating the expansion of the country's communication network, and bad for interfering with the country's transformation policies.
'Remember, the country has been criticised over the years by investors for its policy uncertainty.
'So, if you bend a particular policy to please a particular company, then you are seen to be practising a policy uncertainty,' said Khumalo.
He said those who perceive that this decision was taken to impress Musk would be justified.
'If it is done within that context, nobody can trust this government to implement its policies consistently.
'This should be managed in a way that would give clarity to all sectors involved,' said Khumalo.
Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) national spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, described the proposal as a dangerous precedent for future state capture by foreign corporations, saying this was done to help 'foreign tech oligarchs - chief among them, Elon Musk's Starlink' to bypass transformative procurement frameworks and 'fast-track backdoor deals with foreign'.
'This is not just about Starlink, but it opens the door to a deregulated, surveillance-prone digital future controlled by foreign actors,' he said.
However, University of KwaZulu-Natal political analyst Zakhele Ndlovu said, fearing that foreign-sourced technology might make it easy for foreign governments to spy on South Africa, was not an issue.
'Because America is already spying on us anyway, so I don't think that we should be too worried about that.
'It looks like Rupert has a lot of influence,' said Ndlovu.
The DA was fully behind the proposal, which it said had nothing to do with Starlink and Rupert recommending Starlink at the White House, but ICASA has been working on it for months.
'ICASA is an independent entity of the government. As the DA, we have full faith that the amendments are in line with market research. It took ICASA months of work to produce this document.
'Linking the proposed policy direction to Starlink speaks to a narrow view on the independence of ICASA,' said DA's spokesperson on communication, Sholofelo Motshidi-Bodlani.
In rejecting the proposal, the ANC Youth League said: 'This proposal represents a clear step backwards in our nation's ongoing struggle to dismantle apartheid-era economic structures.
'The very purpose of B-BBEE is to ensure that the historically excluded black majority are not relegated to being ordinary consumers of foreign technology, but are instead positioned as key producers, owners, and innovators in the economy.'
[email protected]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Elon Musk blasts Donald Trump's mega-bill as 'disgusting abomination'
Tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump erupted as the world's richest man derided the president's key piece of economic legislation in a startling rupture just days after exiting a controversial job in the White House. Musk was lauded by the Republican leader as he left his advisory role atop Trump's 'Department of Government Efficiency' last week, despite criticism over his failure to deliver on promises of radical spending cuts. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X as he followed its progress from the sidelines, in by far his most caustic remarks on Trump's agenda. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' It was not Musk's first comments on Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' which is set to add $3 trillion to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programmes. But Musk's previous criticism was more restrained, with the Tesla and SpaceX magnate offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts. On Tuesday he said the bill – being considered by Congress – would burden 'citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' His post laid bare an increasingly tense relationship between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Trump's 2024 election campaign. Musk has become disillusioned, US media reported, as his goals for White House action that would benefit him personally have gone unrealised. The bill he was criticising cuts the electric vehicle tax credit – bad news for Tesla – while Axios reported that Musk was rebuffed in his efforts to extend his role beyond the statutory 130-day limit. He also failed to have his Starlink satellite system used for air traffic control, according to Axios, and was angered by Trump withdrawing the nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to be NASA chief. The normally pugilistic Trump has pulled his punches, aware of his biggest backer's enormous influence over young, tech-savvy and historically apathetic voters – a key Trump constituency in 2024. 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet. The spat came with House Republicans set to pass legislation sent from the White House to enshrine into law $9.4 billion of DOGE's cuts, mostly money destined for public broadcasting and foreign aid. House Speaker Mike Johnson called Musk's comments 'disappointing,' adding that he had walked the entrepreneur through the bill on Monday, and that he 'seemed to understand.' As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's 'incredible service.' Trump even insisted that Musk was 'really not leaving' after a turbulent four months in which the South Africa-born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. DOGE led an ideologically driven rampage through the federal government, with its young 'tech bros' slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But its achievements fell far short of Musk's original boast that he could save $2 trillion – more than the government's entire discretionary spending budget for 2024. The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers less than a tenth of that total – just $180 billion – and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. Senate Democrats released a report on Tuesday itemising 130 examples of 'unethical or potentially corrupt' administration actions they say have helped Musk dodge regulation and add $100 billion to his wealth. The report came as senators began what is expected to be a fraught month of negotiations on Trump's mammoth policy package, expected to add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over a decade. Trump said on Monday it was 'the single biggest Spending Cut in History,' although he added: 'The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Jacinta Zinhle MaNgobese Zuma's campaign against illegal immigration gains support
March and March campaign supporters Scelo Mlaba, Gcina Dube, Mxolisi Nxumalo and Msizi Ngidi after their picket outside the Pietermaritzburg Magitrate's Court on Thursday. Image: Bongani Hans FORMER radio personality Jacinta Zinhle MaNgobese Zuma's newly established March and March Until We Win campaign against illegal immigrants is gaining traction around the country while being allegedly shunned by the government. On social media, ordinary South Africans have expressed their support for MaNgobese Zuma's campaign. However, she expressed concern about the government departments' lack of support. MaNgobese Zuma, who also enjoys support from ActionSA, said the national police and KwaZulu-Natal Premier Thami Ntuli, were the only ones not hostile and who were willing to hear her concerns. 'Otherwise, all the other departments are very, very hostile when we try to work with them. 'We write letters without getting responses, we try to facilitate engagements, we don't get feedback from them, and we tried reaching out to the president,' she said. She spoke to this reporter telephonically on Thursday after a group of her supporters picketed outside the Pietermaritzburg Magistrate Court where a suspect, who was believed to be from Malawi, had appeared for allegedly raping a 10-year-old girl from Copesville. Although she welcomed Ntuli's campaign against illegal immigrants, she stated that this was not sufficient. 'My point is that you cannot do something once off and keep quiet for three months because the situation is dire and requires serious intervention,' she said. She wanted President Cyril Ramaphosa to declare a state of emergency against illegal foreigners and deploy the army to assist the police in flushing them out of the country. 'The police cannot do this by themselves, as they are already overwhelmed. 'Our courts and the national defence force need to play their parts,' she said. She called on the South African citizens to assist by stopping to rent out spaces in their homes to the illegal immigrants to open spaza shops. MaNgobese Zuma described the issue of illegal immigrants as the country's crisis that has depleted already scarce resources earmarked for the local citizens. She said there was no way that the government could misinterpret the March and March campaign as xenophobic because it was supported by legal foreigners who understood the situation. She said the crisis was clear because people were losing their jobs as companies were opting to employ illegal foreigners. 'We state all those things in our communication with the departments, and if they keep ignoring us, things are going to get worse. 'Look at the health department, people complain about overcrowded clinics and hospitals, leading to the lack of access to healthcare, and that leads to more tension on the ground. 'We recently saw a report from ActionSA stating that 70% of the files at the Department of Health in Johannesburg belonged to foreigners, and that speaks to the situation that is not healthy,' she said. Responding to ActionSA MP Dr Kgosietsile Letlape's parliamentary questions last year, Public Service and Administration Minister Inkosi Mzamo Buthelezi said out of 12 million employees of government departments nationally and various provinces, more than 6,000 were foreign nationals. MaNgobese Zuma said she started the March and March campaign on March 24 this year after realising the future of young South Africans was bleak. 'I was inspired by looking at the future of this country and seeing the pain from thinking of my poor children of South Africa, where they can no longer be able to go outside and play because there is kidnapping, human trafficking, and drugs. 'The youth of South Africa don't have jobs,' said MaNgobese Zuma. She alleged that illegal immigrants were contributing to the high crime rate. 'They are armed to the teeth with all kinds of ammunition and guns, and there is even a spaza shop mafia run by Pakistanis and Somalians, and when South Africans try to open a shop, it becomes a crisis. 'How is that even possible that a country cannot allow its citizens to open spaza shops?' she said. According to the Home Affairs website, the department deported close to 47,000 illegal immigrants in the 2024/2025 financial year alone. In a statement issued on April 2, Home Affairs Minister Dr Leon Schreiber described the country's deportation rate, which he linked to improved working relationships between his department, the Border Management Authority and police, as having improved than the previous years. 'The fact that Home Affairs now performs more than double the number of deportations conducted in a country like France, which has the highest rate of deportations in the European Union, sends a clear message to offenders that the days of impunity are over. This improved performance, coupled with our digital transformation reforms that will automate entry and exit to prevent people from entering the country illegally through our ports of entry, is contributing to enhanced national security and trade facilitation,' said Schreiber. [email protected]

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
SA Rugby in the pound seats as international rivals struggle to make ends meet
Saru CEO Rian Oberholzer was happy to report a R100m profit for the union this week. Photo: Supplied Image: Supplied South African rugby is set to buck the global trend and report a profit of more than R100 million for 2025, clearing 2024's losses and ensuring the 15 member unions receive their full funding, while support for the Springboks and all national teams continues unchecked. This good news emerged from the annual meeting of the South African Rugby Union (SARU) in Cape Town on Thursday. Last year, South African rugby recorded a loss of R93 million due to its investment in northern hemisphere rugby competitions, but SA Rugby has already wiped out that deficit with a strong start to 2025. This is in contrast to many rival countries, who are under severe financial pressure. Other international federations have lost as much as R913 million, with five other Tier One nations reporting losses of between R588 million and R181 million. The next 'best' performance after South Africa's was a loss of R126 million, members at the meeting were told. SA Rugby's continued investment into membership of northern hemisphere competitions led to a group loss in 2024, but the organisation had already wiped out that deficit with a strong start to 2025 - more here: 👍 — Springboks (@Springboks) June 5, 2025 Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Rian Oberholzer, CEO of SA Rugby, said that participation in the United Rugby Championship (URC) and European Professional Club Rugby (EPCR) came at a net cost of R124 million in 2024. 'We have been investing in the long-term future of South African rugby to become full members of the URC for the best part of eight years,' said Oberholzer. 'It has come at a significant cost to the sport, but there is no doubt that it has been the right thing to do. 'Once we fulfil certain membership obligations this year, we will begin to reap the on- and off-field rewards of such investment. 'If we had not undertaken this journey, we would have been reduced to playing only domestic competitions, which would have had catastrophic high-performance as well as financial ramifications for rugby in South Africa. 'It has been a tough financial road, but we have annually outperformed our global peers since the pandemic, while taking on the unusual cost of our investment into the URC and EPCR. 'Reporting a loss can never be desirable, but the irony is that we are more than satisfied with our position,' said Oberholzer. 'We had budgeted for a loss in 2024 in the expectation that the members would approve the private equity transaction that they had sought, releasing funds to cover the deficit. 'When that did not happen, we continued with our planned commercial reset and other revenue generation plans, which have borne fruit. We are in the very rare position among our international peers of continuing to be debt-free and confident of posting a surplus in 2025.'