Aussies tipped to spend $80bn to save on power bills
A report released by REA Group with Origin found that half of Australians are looking to make their homes more sustainable, as they see it as a way of saving on their electricity bills.
When homeowners were asked the reasons why they would switch to more energy-efficient appliances, 68 per cent said it was due to cost of living and the price of energy, outweighing the 55 per cent who cited environmental concerns.
But saving money on their power bills will come at a huge cost over the short term, with the average household planning to spend $7,50 on energy-efficient improvements over the next five years, signalling a potential spend of more than $80bn nationwide.
REA Group senior economist Eleanor Creagh said the rising cost of living had placed affordability at the forefront of household concerns, with homeowners and renters seeking solutions to reduce energy bills.
'Making the switch to all-electric appliances in the home could help save costs, reduce energy use and lower carbon emissions,' she said.
'Yet, upfront costs and knowledge gaps are significant barriers preventing many from adopting energy-efficient features.'
Just shy of two in three respondents said property owners should be responsible for improving energy efficiency in established homes, while about half put some of the onus on either the federal or state government.
The findings follow the quarterly consumer price index data released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics that showed quarterly growth in housing was driven by a spike in electricity prices, which were up 16.3 per cent.
The rise was driven by increased electricity prices in Brisbane, where most households have used up the $1000 Queensland state government electricity rebate. resulting in higher out-of-pocket electricity costs.
The report also found that only 34 per cent of respondents had a good understanding of the benefits of 'electrification', a term that those under the age of 35 knew least about.
Origin retail executive general manager Jon Briskin said while saving money was a huge motivator for Australians, many didn't know where to start.
'Small changes to energy habits and upgrading to more efficient appliances within their budget is a good starting point for many households,' he said.
Ms Creagh said Aussies with a greater understanding of energy-efficient appliances were more likely to convert their property to electricity compared with those with no knowledge.
'It's clear that people with a good understanding of energy efficiency are more likely to make upgrades to their home and alter their behaviour to reduce energy use. This indicates that wider education is crucial to improving energy efficiency across Australia,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Australian full-time wages just passed an historic milestone, so why do we all feel broke?
The average Australian full-time worker is now earning more than $2000 a week for the first time in history. New figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) show the average ordinary full-time weekly earnings for adults hit $2011.40 before tax in May. It comes to a 4.5 per cent rise compared to the same time last year. Men working full-time are now earning an average of $2106.40 a week, while women earned $1864.10. 'This is the first time that average weekly ordinary time earnings for full-time adults have been greater than $2000,' ABS head of labour statistics Sean Crick said. 'Annual growth in May 2025 remained high at 4.5 per cent, a rise of $86.60 a week from May 2024. This was just below the annual growth rate of 4.6 per cent in the year to November 2024.' Across the states and territories, the ACT recorded the highest average full-time weekly earnings at $2236, followed by Western Australia at $2154. Tasmania was the lowest at $1793. Industry data showed mining workers were the highest paid, averaging $3174 a week, while employees in accommodation and food services earned the least at $1459. Public sector workers earned more on average ($2167) than those in the private sector ($1966). The ABS also reported the unemployment rate fell to 4.2 per cent in July after a small increase the previous month. Despite the historic wage milestone, many working Australians report feeling poorer than ever, as the rising cost of everyday essentials continues to outpace income growth. A recent Canstar survey found the average weekly grocery bill for a family of four has jumped 11 per cent in the past year, rising from $215 to $240. Weekly pay packets are also being eaten away by housing pressures. Renters are facing historic challenges with availability pushing up prices. Sydney's median weekly rent has hit a whopping $730, while firstâ€'home buyers are finding the market increasingly out of reach. Research shows that to buy a medianâ€'priced house outright without mortgage stress, a household now needs an annual income of about $203,000 across the country, and nearly $300,000 in Sydney. Labor has acknowledged the 30 per cent of Australians with mortgages being kicked by interest rate rises, but renters continue to feel left out of the conversation as their excess cash, normally put away for a home deposit, gets set aside to fund their landlord's mortgage via a rent rise. A further study by the Australia Institute found that 72 per cent of respondents felt their wages had grown slower than the prices they're paying, while 53 per cent said their financial situation had worsened over the past two years. In fact, nearly half of all Australian workers believe their salaries are not keeping pace with living costs. According to the Employee Sentiment Index, 45 per cent of employees report growing financial strain, and many are just managing to get by. It's all a bit wonky in 2025 By and large, Australia's baby boomer generation, and even some of the next, was able to build a family on a single wage. They were also able to capitalise on dirt-cheap real estate, use it to leverage more purchases, and then profit from historically unprecedented price rises. That idea is a fever dream for young Aussies today, unless they've somehow landed themselves a quarter-million-per-year job or fallen into a trust fund or inheritance. Associate Professor at the University of Sydney Gareth Bryant, explains that the housing 'phenomenon' in the early 2000s saw a rapid increase in the home-price-to-income ratio that has never been rectified. He says that the high interest rates of the late 80s and 90s meant home ownership was hard, but it was mostly an 'income issue', meaning you could eventually work your way up to a position to afford high rates. But now, with the average dwelling costing seven to 10 times the average Aussie wage, it's become more than just an income issue. 'The problem now is you still need high income but a reasonable amount of wealth to have the deposit,' Prof. Bryant told 'It used to be much more possible for those with good jobs to save for a deposit. 'For a lot of people in decent jobs, it's really difficult to save, unless you've got some kind of additional assistance.' He says the rise in housing has naturally forced millions to enter the housing market later in life, or not at all. 'There's a delay. People are buying and forming families later, there are many who will be lifelong renters, or 'generation rent'.' In 1980, Australian households typically spent about 60 per cent of their disposable income on essential living expenses, including housing, food, transport, and utilities. This left a modest buffer for savings or discretionary spending. Almost one in two households were single-income, with one partner typically staying at home. By 2025, despite higher average incomes, the proportion of income required for living costs has increased significantly. Rising housing costs, particularly in major cities, have forced many households to allocate a larger share of their income to essentials. Today, around 73 per cent of families with children under 15 have both parents employed. We have also seen the great devaluing of tertiary education. In 1980, approximately 5 per cent of Australians aged 15-74 held a bachelor's degree or higher. By 2024, this figure had risen to a whopping 33 per cent. In the 80s, you could build a family on one income, even if you were among the outstanding majority (95 per cent) of those without university qualifications. Today, the story is the opposite, with several couples claiming their monthly expenses are too high to consider children, despite both working in fields requiring tertiary educations. But yes, wages are 'higher than ever'.
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Boycott': Aussies fume over Netflix's latest price hikes
Aussie Netflix users have been quick to call out the streaming giant following its sixth price increase since entering the Australian market in 2015. On Wednesday, the platform announced all subscription tiers would be impacted as early as September this year. Understandably, it's not been met with open arms by users already impacted by the cost-of-living pinch. Taking to social media, users even threatened to 'cancel' their subscriptions as they vented their frustrations. 'Greedy company. Raising prices multiple times per year will only push more ships into the sea,' one person said. 'Boycott Netflix. Raising prices again...,' another added. Aussies react to Netflix price rises. Credit: Supplied In response to the promotion of the Netflix original film My Oxford Year, other Netflix subscribers argued the quality of content available for streaming didn't warrant the uptick in price. 'Worst content on your platform in history losing so many shows and you think you need a price increase 😂,' one user said. 'Another price increase? Cancel time,' another chimed in. Subscribers on Netflix's two standard plans will be forced to part with an extra $2 every month, with the 'standard with ads' option shifting from $7.99 to $9.99, and the ad-free Standard plan now set at $20.99 monthly. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have become regular features on Netflix. Credit: Netflix / Netflix Premium subscribers are looking at the steepest leap, with a $3 rise, taking the plan from $25.99 to $28.99. According to tech site Tom's Guide, Netflix's initial prices for Australian users were $8.99 monthly for a basic ad-free plan and $14.99 for premium access, making today's Premium option nearly double the cost. Netflix said the higher prices would allow them 'to bring you even more exciting, new entertainment', promising 'fresh, can't-miss shows and movies every week'. Netflix (inclusive of price updates) $9.99/month - inclusive of ads $20.99/month - Standard ad-free $28.99/month - Premium ad-free Amazon Prime $9.99/month — inclusive of ads $12.98/month — ad-free Stan $12/month — Basic ad-free $17/month — Standard ad-free $22/month — Premium ad-free Apple TV+ $12.99/month — ad-free Disney+ $15.99/month — Standard inclusive of ads $20.99/month — Premium ad-free Binge $10/month — Basic inclusive of ads $19/month — Standard ad-free $22/month — Premium ad-free Paramount+ $6.99/month — Basic inclusive of ads $10.99/month — Standard ad-free $13.99/month — Premium ad-free Australian streaming platform prices compared. Credit: Supplied
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
Secret Deloitte review into automated JobSeeker system warns of 'instability,' 'unintended impacts'
A $439,000 report kept under wraps by the government has issued urgent warnings over the system responsible for managing vulnerable Australians on JobSeeker, with fears the program punishes those struggling and is prone to error. The damning report comes after the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) and Services Australia were found to have illegally cancelled the JobSeeker payments of 964 recipients between April 2022 and July 2024. A review completed by Deloitte, which was received by DEWR on June 18 and remained unpublished until inquiries from NewsWire on Thursday, said repeated modifications and updates of the system had created at 'excessively convoluted' code base which 'lacks architectural integrity' had become 'difficult to manage. Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson said he feared it would have likely resulted in 'profound if not catastrophic' effects on Australians struggling financially. The mistaken terminations, which have been likened to robodebt 2.0, occurred after the controversial automated Targeted Compliance Framework (TCF) responsible for ensuring JobSeeker recipients met their mutual obligations repeatedly malfunctioned. A lack of a 'comprehensive design register' also meant any changes require 'extensive manual intervention across multiple databases and workflows,' resulting in a high 'likelihood of system instability and unintended impacts on participant case outcomes'. Additionally the Statement of Assurance said the TCF has 'not evolved or matured' since it was introduced under the Coalition government in 2018, and 'lacks the risk-based proportionality and participant centred design' found in similar programs used by the ATO, Australian Border Force and the NDIS. In another scathing finding, Deloitte, who were paid $439,142 to undertake the review, said other large government IT systems which weren't used by vulnerable Australians placed 'greater emphasis on human case management to respond to complex participant needs'. Criticisms were also made of the TCF's technical makeup. The report said the volatility of the program had been 'exacerbated by the widespread use of unconventional technical practices', like hard-coded fixes. However, the two out of three of the glitches which resulted in the nearly 1000 JobSeeker payment terminations were 'embedded during the original 2018 system'. Despite amendments passed in 2022, which called for greater discretion to be used before the cancelling of payments, Deloitte said there was 'no evidence' that the 'capacity for discretionary decision-making functionality was embedded in the system' ever. The review called on DEWR to limit or suspend further modifications to the system to 'constrain the risk of further disruptions,' and limit the introduction of new defects. If necessary, changes to comply with legislative updates should be 'thoroughly assessed by policy, legal and technical authorities to ensure legislative and policy compliance and anticipated outcomes are maintained'. DEWR must also urgently strengthen its current internal review processes to ensure negative case determinations are 'supported by appropriate evidence' and lawful under current legislation. Welfare advocates, like the Anti-Poverty Centre, the Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS), and Economic Justice Australia have repeatedly criticised the use of the TCF, calling for the punitive measure to be removed. Mr Anderson, the Commonwealth Ombudsman also singled out DEWR secretary Natalie James had been so slow to act, taking 10 months April 2022 to September 2023 to pause the automated cancellations after it was raised by external legal advisers. As of March 21 this year, reductions and cancellations in income support payments have been paused pending ongoing legal and IT reviews, however suspensions have remained. The department has also yet to implement the Digital Protections Framework, despite legislative requirements passed in 2022, with Mr Anderson writing: 'We do not consider a delay of over three years, coupled with an indefinite commitment to future action, is reasonable'. Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth and the DEWR were contacted for comment.
