Analysis finds devolved tax powers could add £4 billion for local services
The County Councils Network, which commissioned the report, stressed the proposals do not advocate tax rises and acknowledged that a process of redistributing tax revenue would need to be established to address regional variations in the amounts generated.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner recently said she wanted 'more push' towards fiscal devolution as part of the Government's pledge to transfer central decision making to local areas.
The English Devolution White Paper published last year states that mayors could submit proposals for new powers, such as fiscal devolution, which the government is obliged to consider.
The guidance recently published alongside the the Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill earlier this month stipulates that new strategic authorities can pilot devolved powers to make it 'easier to deepen devolution over time'.
The 20 CCN councils, including top tier shire authorities and unitaries, serve about 45% of the population and contributed almost £390 billion in national tax receipts in 2022/23, the report said.
This level of county revenues amounted to 44% of the revenue total for England of £891.3 billion, rising to 57% if London's contribution is not taken into account.
This includes contributions of 62% in income tax and and 55% in VAT.
The analysis found that expenditure in county areas totalled £273 billion, amounting to a net benefit to the exchequer of £113.6 billion a year.
The report said allowing authorities to retain 'better than expected' income tax growth could raise £3.8 billion in county areas annually and would 'dramatically incentivise' local job creation.
Retaining half of stamp duty on new homes could provide about £237 million and encourage councils to deliver more housing, the analysis showed, while a tourist tax set at £2 a night could generate about £209 million in extra annual revenue.
If county and unitary councils were granted 10% of funds from the apprenticeship levy generated locally, councils could direct an estimated £120 million a year to skills and growth.
The report concluded that these measures combined could raise about £4.4 billion in county areas, which equates to 10% of an average budget for these authorities, while nationally the figures are about £8.9 billion a year.
Richard Roberts, CCN's economic growth spokesman, said the research 'warrants serious consideration from government and from existing mayors'.
He added: 'There has never been a better time to consider empowering local areas with fiscal devolution and let's be clear: this is not about new taxes for local residents and businesses. It's about using existing taxes more effectively, allowing local areas who understand what's needed to drive growth to invest to that end.
'More pressingly, there is the shared local and central government need to increase growth, create jobs and build homes alongside the urgency to invest in local economic growth services and infrastructure.
'The potential revenue generated from the fiscal devolution options modelled in this report would be a game-changer for local areas, allowing them to invest in growth and incentivise areas to maintain productivity gains.
'Whilst there will still be a need for central government to a play a redistributive role to ensure equity across regions, we have long argued counties are the backbone of the economy.
'Now is the time for Government be bold and ambitious and think about unleashing the potential of counties.'
London Councils, which represents the 32 boroughs in the capital, said authorities' current reliance on council tax and government grants perpetuates unsustainable financial stress.
Claire Holland, chairwoman of London Councils, said: 'Devolving more fiscal powers to a local level is crucial for fixing this broken system and ending the crisis in council finances.
'With more autonomy and flexibility – such as powers to introduce an overnight accommodation levy – we would be in a much stronger position to respond to our communities' needs and encourage economic growth.
'London is the powerhouse of the UK economy, but still faces immense challenges around productivity, unemployment, and poverty, as well as an enormous £500 million funding gap in boroughs' budgets.
'Fiscal devolution could help us tackle these issues and maximise London's contribution to the country's future prosperity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
27 minutes ago
- Metro
What changes in ISAs could mean for you and where you should invest
As the British economy struggles with minimal growth and stubborn inflation, Rachel Reeves wants Brits to change the way they save money. The Chancellor thinks too many people are content storing their savings away in a low-interest account when they could invest them, giving UK businesses a boost and likely bagging them a better return. Reports earlier in the year suggested Reeves was planning to slash the annual limit for tax-free savings accounts from £20,000 to just £4,000. This would encourage people – especially young people – to shift their money from a cash ISA to a stocks and shares ISA. Or so the logic would go. But that idea was met with a lot of backlash from consumer groups, who argued it would hit risk-averse older people and others who just want their savings to be savings without worrying about building them up. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Yesterday, Reeves gave a speech at Mansion House in the City of London where she outlined her plans to get the British economy on a better track. In it, she did not announce any plans to change the cash ISA limits, to the relief of campaigners like Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis who called it a 'good move'. Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at saving app Moneybox, said cash ISAs 'are not, and never have been, a blocker to investing', describing them instead as 'a gateway'. He added: 'We fully support the Government's ambition to foster a stronger investment culture in the UK and while our research shows that there is an appetite to invest amongst most savers, people are held back by fear of financial loss, a lack of confidence and limited knowledge.' However, the Chancellor did say she would 'continue to consider further changes to ISAs' – without any hints about what those changes might be. When you go to a bank, you tend to get two main options for where to put your money – a current account and an individual savings account (ISA). Current accounts tend to be very low-interest, as they're typically used to store money you need for day-to-day budgeting and spending. Savings accounts are used to build a nest-egg which might come in useful for the future. They usually have a higher interest rate than a current account. There are several different types of ISA, including cash ISAs – which offer tax-free interest, with varying levels of access – and stocks and shares ISAs – which involve investment in a range of assets. More Trending The reason ISAs can offer higher rates of interest is because the bank is technically borrowing your money to use as reserves for loans like mortgages for other people, and paying you interest. Among the places offering the best easy-access cash ISA rates at the moment are Trading 212, which has a 4.98% rate for 12 months. Leeds Building Society is also offering a 4.1% rate for a cash ISA account that allows withdrawals. Stocks and shares ISAs managed by either real experts or automated services are also by platforms including Wealthify, Moneyfarm and Nutmeg. All cost some money to access. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Secret £850m scheme bringing Afghans on '33,000-long kill list' to UK revealed MORE: Middle class parties hit by lumpy skin disease MORE: What changes to mortgages for first-time buyers means for you
Leader Live
27 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Swinney accuses Reeves of ‘channelling Thatcher' with financial reforms
John Swinney hit out in the wake of Ms Reeves's Mansion House speech which contained a package of reforms aimed at attracting more investment to the UK. Ahead of Tuesday evening's keynote address, there had been speculation among observers that the Labour Chancellor would 'channel Margaret Thatcher' with a new era of deregulation. Ms Reeves said she would be 'rolling back regulation that has gone too far' with plans to cut red tape in the City and reform banking rules, including the ring-fencing the financial sector, the Chancellor insisted the changes are needed for the UK to stay competitive in a more uncertain global economy. She said she had 'placed financial services at the heart of the Government's growth mission, recognising that Britain cannot succeed and meet its growth ambitions without a financial services sector that is fighting fit and thriving'. However Mr Swinney said: 'The very idea that a Labour Chancellor thinks that channelling Margaret Thatcher is what our economy needs is extraordinary. 'It is the very last thing we need as we try to recover from Tory austerity.' He added that people 'right across Scotland' had 'suffered terribly' during Conservative Mrs Thatcher's time as prime minister from 1979 to 1990, and that 'communities were decimated and countless livelihoods were thrown on the scrapheap'. Going on to claim the country is 'still dealing' with the impact of Thatcherism, Mr Swinney said: 'The UK economy does not work for Scotland. 'Rather than come up with serious solutions to fix it, Labour are doubling down on the same agenda that has failed before. 'We do not need an effort to replicate Thatcher's agenda – we need bold action and investment to tackle the effects of Thatcher that are still with us. 'Labour could relax their fiscal rules or make the choice to ask higher earners to pay a little more to unlock investment, just as we have done in Scotland.' But the First Minister said the UK Government 'clearly lack the political courage' to do this. He added: 'Scotland was promised change by Labour – instead we have been given the same tired economic policies, and efforts to balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable. 'We have learned that you cannot trust a word Labour say before an election – and that if Scotland is to create an economy that works for everyone, the only way we can do so is as an independent country.'
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
These picturesque UK cities want to charge you to visit
Bath and Cambridge are urging the government to allow them to introduce visitor levies, commonly known as tourist taxes. The cities have written to Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, highlighting the increasing pressure tourism places on local infrastructure and services. They propose a modest visitor levy, similar to those in Wales and Scotland, to support sustainable tourism and benefit both residents and visitors. Leaders of both councils emphasise the need for tools to manage tourism effectively and address its negative impacts on local communities. This initiative follows a growing trend among English destinations, including Brent and Oxford, seeking powers to implement similar visitor charges.
