Oil prices rise on US demand strength, though sanctions uncertainty remains
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Oil prices rose on Thursday, pausing a five-day losing streak, on signs of steady demand in the U.S., the world's biggest oil user, though the prospect of U.S.-Russian talks on the Ukraine war eased concerns of supply disruptions from further sanctions. Brent crude futures rose 20 cents, or 0.3%, to $67.09 a barrel by 0039 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $64.57 a barrel, up 22 cents, or 0.3%.Both benchmarks slid about 1% to their lowest in eight weeks on Wednesday after U.S. President Donald Trump's remarks about progress in talks with Moscow.Trump could meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week, a White House official said on Wednesday, though the U.S. continued preparations to impose secondary sanctions, including potentially on China, to pressure Moscow to end the war in Ukraine.Russia is the world's second-biggest producer of crude after the U.S.Still, oil markets were supported from a bigger-than-expected draw in U.S. crude inventories last week.The Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday that U.S. crude oil stockpiles fell by 3 million barrels to 423.7 million barrels in the week ended August 1, exceeding analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 591,000-barrel draw.[EIA/S]Inventories fell as U.S. crude exports climbed and refinery runs climbed, with utilization on the Gulf Coast, the country's biggest refining region, and the West Coast climbing to their highest since 2023.But the unsettled nature of the talks and the overall supply and demand situation with major producers increasing their output has made investors cautious, said Hiroyuki Kikukawa, chief strategist of Nissan Securities Investment, a unit of Nissan Securities."Uncertainty over the outcome of the US-Russia summit, possible additional tariffs on India and China - key buyers of Russian crude - and the broader impact of U.S. tariffs on the global economy are prompting investors to stay on the sidelines," said Kikukawa."With planned OPEC+'s output increases weighing on prices, WTI will likely remain in the $60-$70 range for the rest of the month," he said, referring to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies including Russia.Adding to the pressure on Russian oil buyers, Trump on Wednesday imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing their continued imports of Russian oil. The new import tax will go into effect 21 days after August 7.Trump also said he could announce further tariffs on China similar to the 25% duties announced earlier on India over its purchases of Russian oil.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
India RETALIATES Against U.S. Tariff Bullying, Junks Multi-BILLION DOLLAR BOEING Deal? Report
Will US Tariff And Russian Oil Trigger Major Inflation Surge In India? RBI Governor Explains Impact The Reserve Bank of India has raised red flags on the brewing global trade storm, triggered by the United States' recent tariff hikes. In his latest monetary policy address, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra warned that escalating trade tensions, especially involving the US, could derail India's growth path. With the repo rate held at 5.5%, the focus shifted sharply to the external threats facing India's economy. As tariffs rise, export prospects dim, and volatility in global financial markets intensifies, India stands at a critical juncture. Will America's aggressive trade stance trigger a ripple effect across Indian industries, jobs, and inflation? Is this the beginning of a new trade cold war? Watch as we decode the RBI's warning, the potential fallout for Indian exporters, and what lies ahead in this high-stakes global face-off.#rbi #monetarypolicy #sanjaymalhotra #indianeconomy #reporate #inflation #globaltrade #ustariffs #tradetensions #economicoutlook #rbigovernor #policyupdate #geopoliticalrisk #financialmarkets #stickyinflation #breakingnews #trending #trendingnow #toi #bharat #toibharat #indianews 20.7K views | 23 hours ago
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is cautious ‘Elephant-Dragon' tango making a comeback as Donald Trump tightens trade screws against India?
India and China are showing signs of re-engagement. High-level visits and dialogues are being planned. Russia-India-China trilateral dialogue may revive. Despite this, trade tensions persist. The US has increased tariffs on Indian exports. This comes amid pressure on India's ties with Russia. It is unclear if India's strategic position is shifting. All these factors add complexity to the situation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Signs of cautious re-engagement emerge NSA visit, ministerial engagements underline dialogue effort Defence minister holds firm at SCO meeting Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Direct flights still remain on hold China joins BRICS in terrorism condemnation Trade friction continues beneath surface diplomacy Apple's India expansion hit by Chinese engineer recall US pressure grows amid tariff escalation Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Strategic recalibration or temporary adjustment? Just as the US announced new tariffs, raising it to 50 % on Indian exports, a cautious thaw appears to be taking shape in India-China relations . Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China for the first time in seven years. National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, External Affiar Minister S Jaishankar and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh 's recent visits to China signal a tentative improvement in bilateral ties, which have remained tense since the 2020 Galwan clashes, even as friction continues on trade, technology, and security activity between India and China has picked up pace in recent weeks. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to visit China for the first time in seven years. Efforts are also underway to revive the Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral dialogue, reflecting an attempt to engage on regional and global month, as per an ET report, India signaled willingness to consider reviving the long-inactive Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral dialogue, following renewed interest from Moscow. Russia's foreign minister Sergey Lavrov had urged the resumption of the RIC format. Speaking at a conference, Lavrov said, "I would like to confirm our genuine interest in the earliest resumption of the work within the format of the troika -- Russia, India, China which was established many years ago on the initiative of Yevgeny Primakov."National Security Advisor Ajit Doval's recent visit to China focused on strategic and border security matters. His trip follows earlier visits by India's foreign and defence ministers, suggesting a coordinated effort to keep diplomatic channels open even as border tensions remain June, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh participated in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Defence Ministers' meeting in Qingdao, China. He refused to back a joint statement that, according to Indian officials, would have weakened India's position on the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people. As a result, the SCO did not issue a joint statement due to disagreements over and China are also in talks to resume direct passenger flights, which were suspended in 2020 due to the pandemic and border tensions. However, officials have not provided any timeline for the BRICS summit in Brazil, all member nations, including China, signed a joint statement condemning terrorism — marking a rare instance of alignment on India's security concerns. The statement specifically condemned the Pahalgam attack , where India had earlier faced pushback in other forums. India blamed Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack, in which 26 tourists were killed by ongoing diplomatic contacts, trade tensions persist. China recently delayed the shipment of a German-made tunnel boring machine intended for India's Ahmedabad-Mumbai bullet train this year, China temporarily halted rare earth exports to India, affecting the electric vehicle manufacturing sector. Some Indian producers warned of possible disruptions in India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) has also alleged that China is restricting the export of capital equipment vital for electronics manufacturing in India, potentially undercutting India's efforts to become an electronics production July, about 300 Chinese engineers working at Foxconn's Indian plants were reportedly ordered to return to China. The move was widely seen as an attempt to delay Apple's supply chain shift to India and slow the production ramp-up of latest US tariff hike on Indian exports comes amid growing friction over India's energy ties with Russia. The White House has defended the 50% tariff as part of its broader strategic response to countries continuing trade with Moscow.A bill pending in the US Senate proposes a 500% tariff on imports from countries that do not align with US policy on Russia, which could further strain India's export-driven sectors. China faces similar scrutiny from backchannel diplomacy, multilateral cooperation, and possible high-level visits point to cautious re-engagement with China, it remains unclear whether India's broader strategic posture is shifting. The Galwan incident, trade disputes, and regional security concerns continue to shape the same time, the rising economic pressure from the US adds a new layer of complexity. Whether this pushes India to hedge more visibly between Washington and Beijing remains an open question, shaped by both external pressures and domestic strategic priorities.
Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Strategic autonomy in the face of pressure
Donald Trump's re-election in 2024 was seen by some as a potential stabilising force in a world embroiled in multiple crises. On the campaign trail, Trump boldly claimed he could resolve the Russia–Ukraine conflict within 24 hours. However, those promises have not materialised. Instead, his second term has been marked by erratic decision-making that is straining US ties with key allies and partners, including India. U.S. President Donald Trump (REUTERS) Frustrated by his failure to bring Russia to the negotiating table, Trump appears to be redirecting pressure toward India. His administration has criticised New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil and military equipment, threatening tariffs as high as 50% and other punitive trade measures. These actions seem less about trade policy and more about using India as a lever to influence Moscow, an approach which can be viewed as a deflection from Trump's own inability to shift Putin's position. This criticism, however, reflects a stark double standard. While Washington rebukes India for its economic ties with Russia, both the US and EU continue to import critical goods from Moscow. The EU remains dependent on Russian energy, fertilisers, metals, chemicals, and machinery. The US imports uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear sector, palladium for electric vehicles, and significant volumes of Russian fertilizers and chemicals. These facts expose the selective nature of the Trump administration's pressure tactics. Trump's rhetoric accusing India of 'obnoxious' trade barriers and imposing high tariffs is part of his broader transactional foreign policy. He often uses economic tools like tariffs and sanctions to extract concessions, even from strategic partners like India. In this context, Trump's threats appear to be negotiating ploys aimed at isolating Russia by coercing India into alignment with western positions. India, however, has maintained a resilient and independent stance. Rooted in its historical commitment to strategic autonomy and non-alignment, India has prioritised its national interest over external pressure. The ministry of external affairs has reiterated that India's relationship with Russia 'stands on its own merit' and should not be evaluated through the lens of third countries. New Delhi has consistently defended its Russian oil imports as legitimate and necessary, given its 85–90% reliance on foreign crude and the economic benefits of discounted Russian oil. India further argues that its purchases have contributed to global price stability, preventing oil prices from soaring above $137 per barrel benefiting both emerging and developed economies, including the US. India's abstentions from United Nations resolutions on the Russia–Ukraine conflict reflect a pragmatic approach grounded in its long-standing, time-tested partnership with Moscow. For New Delhi, its ties with Russia and the US are not mutually exclusive. India seeks to maintain balanced relations with both, safeguarding its economic and security interests through a nuanced and independent foreign policy. While the India–Russia oil trade is expected to continue in the near-term, the two countries must work toward diversifying their trade relationship, which currently leans heavily on energy. Broader cooperation in sectors such as technology, defence manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, and critical minerals will be essential for sustaining their strategic ties in a changing geopolitical environment. India is likely to adopt a wait-and-watch approach to Trump's threats, treating them as part of a larger negotiation dynamic. Whether the proposed 25–50% tariffs materialise or not, India will factor them into its broader strategy, possibly using the Russia card as leverage in future trade discussions with the US. It is neither accurate nor constructive to view India–Russia relations through the prism of US anxieties. Framing Russia as a point of friction in US–India ties is misguided and overlooks India's consistent pursuit of independent diplomacy. The tensions reflect a deeper American expectation that India should align more closely with the West in its confrontation with Russia. Such expectations fail to appreciate the complexity of India's foreign policy calculus. China, the largest buyer of Russian crude oil and widely regarded as Washington's primary strategic adversary, has faced fewer punitive measures. In contrast, New Delhi, one of the US's most important partners in the Indo-Pacific has been singled out for criticism and targeted with tariff threats. Given Trump's unpredictability and penchant for dramatic turnarounds, it is also plausible that he might recalibrate his position. His past record suggests a tendency to pivot if offered a diplomatic win or a chance to boost his global image perhaps even with an eye on accolades like the Nobel Peace Prize. Until then, India will continue to chart its own path, guided by national interest and strategic balance. This article is authored by Pravesh Kumar Gupta, associate fellow (Eurasia), Vivekananda International Foundation, New Delhi.
