logo
DA withdraws from National Dialogue, will vote against budgets of ‘corruption accused' ANC ministers

DA withdraws from National Dialogue, will vote against budgets of ‘corruption accused' ANC ministers

Daily Maverick28-06-2025
The DA will oppose the budget votes of 'corruption accused ANC ministers' – including Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane and Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane.
The DA is not leaving the Government of National Unity (GNU), but it will not participate in the looming National Dialogue, following the axing of its Deputy Minister of Trade and Industry Andrew Whitfield.
'Frankly, the President cannot even dialogue meaningfully with his own coalition partners, so there is little point in pretending there is any substance to an ANC-run National Dialogue,' DA leader John Steenhuisen said at a press conference in Cape Town on Saturday, 28 June.
'Effective immediately, the DA will therefore have no further part in this process.
'We will also actively mobilise against it to stop this obscene waste of R740-million – starting with a call on civil society to join us in demanding that the National Dialogue not proceed until President [Cyril] Ramaphosa fires ANC corruption accused and other delinquents from the executive,' Steenhuisen continued.
Earlier this month, Ramaphosa announced the appointment of 31 prominent South Africans to lead the National Dialogue expected to take place on 15 August this year.
The initiative – meant to tackle a wide range of South Africa's pressing issues including unemployment, poor governance and gender-based violence – was met with immediate opposition owing largely to its R740-million price tag.
Steenhuisen announced the decision of the DA's Federal Executive (FedEx) after Ramaphosa removed Whitfield from his position on Wednesday, 25 June, providing no reason for his dismissal. Whitfield's removal, it later emerged, was apparently due to an 'unauthorised' trip he took to the US for the DA in February this year.
On Thursday, Steenhuisen gave the president an ' ultimatum ' to clean house of the ANC ministers and deputy ministers implicated in corruption within 48 hours or face 'grave consequences'.
He accused Ramaphosa of a 'flagrant double standard' and had specifically called on him to remove Human Settlements Minister Thembi Simelane, Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane and Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation David Mahlobo from his Executive.
The political developments surrounding South Africa's fragile coalition government, caused Ramaphosa to cancel his trip to Seville, Spain, on 30 June, to attend a conference on financing for development. He instead delegated International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola to attend.
'President Ramaphosa has delegated Minister Lamola as the Head of Delegation for the Summit following recent political developments that require close monitoring and management in the country,' his office said in a statement on Saturday.
According to a Sunday Times report earlier on Saturday, the DA was said to be considering leaving the GNU.
In response to questions from reporters on why the party has decided to remain in the coalition government, Steenhuisen said the DA did not believe that it was 'in the interest of South Africa for the current GNU to collapse'.
He said that if the GNU were to break, it would cause 'significant economic damage' to the country. Steenhuisen said the country 'benefits' from having the DA in the GNU.
'A more impactful way would not have been to leave the Government of National Unity, because that would've opened South Africa up to the coalition of chaos and destruction, and would have led very clearly to more disastrous consequences for South Africa,' he said.
Steenhuisen threw the ball back into Ramaphosa's court, saying it was up to the ANC whether they wanted to kick the DA out of the national coalition.
'The ball is in the President's court and the ANC's court – if they want to take a strong stance against us and want to stop us [from] standing against corruption, well, they must fire us from the Government of National Unity,' he said.
DA to vote against budget votes
In addition to mobilising against the National Dialogue, Steenhuisen said the DA would also be voting against the individual budget votes for Simelane and Nkabane's departments. '
A second, critically important step that the DA is taking, is to vote against upcoming departmental budget votes for the departments headed by Simelane, Nkabane, and other corruption accused ANC ministers.
'We will keep voting against those departmental votes until those ministers are removed.
'In this way, the DA will strike the appropriate balance by allowing the broader GNU budget process to proceed to ensure the stability of the country, while forcing the ANC to act against specific ministers.
'If the ANC wants our support for those departmental budgets, they must replace the incumbent ministers with alternatives that meet the very standard the President has set for himself through Whitfield's axing,' said Steenhuisen.
He said that the ministers in those portfolios would need to source other ways of getting their budgets passed in Parliament.
'We won't be voting against the globular budget and, I think, that is a result of the fact that we want to ensure that delivery proceeds for the people of South Africa. But those individual budget votes where ministers are severely compromised and sitting at the top of those departments, will obviously have to find other ways to get those budgets passed,' he said.
Steenhuisen added that the party's Federal Executive had also considered tabling a motion of no confidence in Ramaphosa. However, he said the DA understood the concerns of many South Africans if Ramaphosa were removed as President.
'While the FedEx decided not to table a Motion of No Confidence at this stage, it is clear that the DA is in the process of losing confidence in his ability to act as a leader not of the ANC, but of the GNU of which we are the second-largest component,' said Steenhuisen.
'If the ANC fails to course-correct, the FedEx will seriously consider exercising our constitutional prerogative by tabling a motion of no confidence.' He mentioned, on several occasions, that the GNU Statement of Intent had been undermined by Ramaphosa and the ANC.
'I think the intent of the Statement of Intent is correct, but it would be great if that was being honored. It is being repeatedly violated. It says a lot about where we're at that a year later, we still have a conflict resolution mechanism; that the Clearing House in the GNU has no terms of reference,' he said.
Steenhuisen said that Ramaphosa had not afforded him the opportunity to inform Whitfield himself about what was expected to happen before he received a letter from Ramaphosa alerting him of his removal.
'That is not respectful and that is not right,' he said, suggesting that certain clauses relating to consultation and consensus in the Statement of Intent were violated. 'The Statement of Intent needs to be respected in both letter and spirit,' he said.
A replacement for Whitfield
Steenhuisen did not provide any names for Whitfield's replacement, saying that the decision was with the party's FedEx. 'We will be submitting a replacement name, and that will obviously be a matter for our Federal Executive to take through the process.
It is a DA position, and once again, the fact that we got six ministers and six deputy ministers, is also another example of how we put South Africa first. We, proportionately, are entitled to a lot more than that, and yet it is another matter we had to swallow at that particular time to make sure we got a GNU that worked,' he said. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Call for people-driven National Dialogue
Call for people-driven National Dialogue

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Call for people-driven National Dialogue

Former leaders and foundations must step back, say experts, urging citizens to take control of South Africa's National Dialogue. The National Dialogue is in the wrong hands and should not be led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, former president Thabo Mbeki or the legacy foundations, according to two experts. Rather, they should all back off because it's time for ordinary citizens to take control and be heard. It was time for the VIPs to take a back seat and let the people speak. Time for VIPs to take a back seat in National Dialogue Prof Lesiba Teffo and Dr Levy Ndou say the current stayaway by seven legacy foundations and leading political parties will open space for civil society and grassroots people to take over the process. They said the state should just provide resources, such as logistics and funding, and take a back seat to let people talk among themselves about the kind of South Africa they want. Teffo said the country is facing so many crises because leaders across the board have failed the country. ALSO READ: National Dialogue: Ramaphosa urges citizens to embrace differing views There is poverty, landlessness, immigration chaos, crime, unemployment and no economic growth. The policies they jointly approved in the pre-1994 talks are directly responsible for the current state of the country, he said. Teffo said the current immigration and land crises were due to the failure to address the issues at the multiparty constitutional talks at the Convention for a Democratic South Africa. Leaders came with no solution for SA's problems 'We are in this because of these leaders, some of them were presidents, but they came with no solution for the country's problems. 'Now they want to sit at the front table and tell us that they have a solution,' Teffo said. Politicians must open up the space for ordinary people and civil society to lead the process. ALSO READ: 'No different to an EFF rally or Joy of Jazz' – iPhupho L'ka Biko leader after National Dialogue performance According to Teffo, the National Dialogue should be facilitated by external individuals with no vested interest in the issue. Also, there were many local experts who could play a role and do a better job, so the process is not mired in the political battles of the elite, as it was turning out to be at the moment. The Thabo Mbeki, FW de Klerk, Desmond and Leah Tutu, Steve Biko, Albert Luthuli, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo foundations have pulled out of the dialogue, citing rushed processes and exclusion of citizens. Foundations and parties pulled out Parties within the government of national unity have also boycotted the dialogue, leaving Ramaphosa to handle the issue with his backers and a few civil society organisations. It is not clear where the Nelson Mandela and the Ahmed Kathrada Foundations stand on the issue. Neither have publicly stated whether they will participate or not in the dialogue, despite fellow struggle stalwarts' foundations staying clear of the process. ALSO READ: National Dialogue has big gaps in it Ndou said the National Dialogue is supposed to be people-driven, not top town. 'The people who have pulled out are the people who have had an opportunity to lead and we have heard them. But now it is time to hear ordinary citizens. 'It could be a blessing in disguise. Maybe the voice that is unknown could have been suppressed,' Ndou said. Dialogue should be people-driven 'I don't think that we need to be led by people that we know or for the National Dialogue to be blessed by people that are known.' Ndou said that as it was the first such forum that involved ordinary people, it could not be expected to be the best executed. 'Therefore, we should take advantage of the fact that the government has given it the go-ahead and assisted in providing logistics, but their role is just to listen and not to lead,' Ndou said. NOW READ: Pull the plug and start dialogue over

Malusi Gigaba finds little love in the wake of his criticism of the ANC
Malusi Gigaba finds little love in the wake of his criticism of the ANC

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Malusi Gigaba finds little love in the wake of his criticism of the ANC

File picture: Themba Hadebe/Associated Press. Former Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba has set tongues wagging online Image: File picture: Themba Hadebe/Associated Press. Former finance minister and ANC NEC member receives backlash from his party after he publicly criticised the organisation for including DA in the Government of National Unity (GNU) @ZizinjaAbelungu Malusi Gigaba spoke about a number of issues that are affecting the ANC! Opulence within the party, embedded corruption as well as the wholesale of buying votes in the ANC Conference in Nasrec 2017. Cyril Ramaphosa being in the centre of buying that Conference. The ANC has issued a Letter of disapproval of these rhetoric and has labelled it as a 'flagrant violation of ANC communication protocols'. @AfricaisBlack The ANC has responded with 'serious concern and disapproval' to recent public statements by Malusi Gigaba and Senzo Mchunu. The party says their comments, which criticised the ANC's direction and its role in the Government of National Unity, violate internal discipline. The ANC statement warns that no one will be exempt from action for undermining unity. @XFactor079 Dr Malusi Gigaba is speaking the truth about ANC buying votes That's why some people in the ANC are rattled by his comments. @Judaeda3 Malusi Gigaba explaining how the ANC has been playing with people's emotions but has never delivered anything so far. @Mbalulafikile The ANC has noted with serious concern and disapproval the recent conduct and public statements made by Cde Malusi Gigaba and Cde Ssenzo Mchunu. @Ke_Moeletsi ANC is dead, nothing said by Gigaba and Mchunu is unknown. We will bring ANC to its knees, the arrogance will come to an end. You have been talking 'renewal since 2018, you gotten worse ever since, ANC ibolile and it must rejected by the masses. @Goolammv During the very dark days of state capture and corruption, Malusi Gigaba was one of the biggest enablers for the Gupta family from a Nadia to loot. He is corrupt, corrupt, corrupt. The Zondo commission report which is gathering dust, was damning against him. When he wanted to delete actual evidence from his ex wife Norma's phone, he got the Hawks to come from Mpumalanga to Pretoria to arrest her. Take all her devices and wipe out actual evidence. @Rasor896 Malusi Gigaba is the only sober person in the ANC. It a pity that he will be receiving his latter after this interview. In ANC they don't want someone who speaks the truth. He confirmed that ANC has a culture to steal votes. @Yanga_Co Mbalula is using the ANC to fight his battles, he is eliminating Gigaba because of potential ANC presidency candidate. @Markosonke1 ANC is not ready for self reflection people are busy in their little corners little groupings campaigning for 2026; 2029 – Malusi Gigaba. @Cinstitution_94 Malusi Gigaba showed a total disdain of Cyril Ramaphosa. He is launching his political campaign at the expense of the ANC & its current leaders. Senzo Mchunu must be thrown out for the nonsense he caused at SAPS. @KhanyaMsika So Mbalula is angry at Gigaba for saying we shouldn't have been in bed with the DA? A party that cant be criticised by its members is undemocratic. DAILY NEWS

Marikana resembles ANC's shameful legacy
Marikana resembles ANC's shameful legacy

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Marikana resembles ANC's shameful legacy

The National Prosecuting Authority is set to reinstate charges against the police officers who were acquitted for the Marikana Massacre. Image: Leon Sadiki / Independent Newspapers Archives SATURDAY marked the 13th anniversary of the Marikana massacre, a commemoration that carries no significance for the ANC and its current President Cyril Ramaphosa. It's no wonder that South Africans no longer trust the party with the responsibility of leading this country. It cannot own up to the tragedy that befell the miners at the time they were demanding fair pay and improved working conditions, issues upon which the ANC's foundation was built. This year's commemoration came a day after Ramaphosa addressed the opening of the so-called National Dialogue in Pretoria on Friday. Among the important questions he said need to be answered is why were the majority of the black population still trapped in abject poverty. One assumes the president knows the answer to this question, but was just playing to the gallery. Perhaps the families of the slain Marikana miners would have all the answers to that question. Only if he had visited them and apologised for the massacre, as any caring government should have long done. They would have told him that their fathers, brothers, sons and husbands embarked on strike precisely because of the poverty they were subjected to despite the long hours underground. They would have also informed him that their children were robbed of their breadwinners by the very state that was supposed to protect them. They would have painted a picture of struggles they are confronted with to make ends meet in an economy that is characterised by the alarming cost of living. But these are the answers that Ramaphosa and his current ANC are not prepared for. They are the enablers of these struggles, directly or indirectly. That is why the Marikana massacre has become a taboo topic in the former liberation movement. Ramaphosa confirmed what many have long believed; that the ANC he leads is so detached from the realities confronting poor South Africans. If it was not, it would not waste millions from the public purse debating issues that all of us are aware of. Instead, that money could have been spent towards the education of the children of the miners the government killed in Marikana.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store