![‘I'm Not [an] Expert:' Man Gets in a Honda Civic. Then It Starts Making This Mystery Noise When He Puts It in Reverse](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.motor1.com%2Fimages%2Fmgl%2FzxA306%2Fs1%2Fhonda-civic-on-road-l-man-with-long-hair-shares-what-happened-when-he-shifted-gears-on-his-civic-c-honda-civic-steering-wheel-r.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
‘I'm Not [an] Expert:' Man Gets in a Honda Civic. Then It Starts Making This Mystery Noise When He Puts It in Reverse
In a clip that's been viewed nearly 500,000 times, creator Black Blaze Motors (@black.blaze.motor) reveals why they decided not to buy a Honda Civic that was up for auction.
'I'm no expert in transmissions, but it kind of sounds like a transmission problem,' the creator says after shifting the car in and out of reverse a few times. Each time, the vehicle makes a noise and shudders.
Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily.
back
Sign up
For more information, read our
Privacy Policy
and
Terms of Use
.
Some courageous buyer wasn't scared off, however. Black Blaze Motors noted in the comments that the Civic with more than 200,000 miles sold for $2,200.
A Honda With Problems
A loud clunk when shifting is never a good sign, especially if it comes with a jolt strong enough to shake the car while it's still parked.
According to the comments, one of the most likely explanations for the Honda Civic's issue is worn or broken engine or transmission mounts. These rubber components are responsible for holding the powertrain in place and dampening vibration. When they degrade over time, the torque from shifting into gear can cause the engine to twist or lurch, leading to a noticeable thud or shake.
It's a moderate issue that won't necessarily leave you stranded, but if ignored, could cause damage to other components. Replacing mounts typically costs anywhere from $300 to $700, depending on the vehicle and labor costs.
Another potential issue, especially for rear-wheel-drive vehicles, is excessive drivetrain slack or worn U-joints. When U-joints wear out or become loose, they can create a snapping or clunking noise as torque transfers through the driveline. This problem can compromise driveability or even safety if the driveshaft fails under load. The fix generally runs between $150 and $500.
The problem could also lie within the transmission itself. This is a more serious issue. Harsh engagement when shifting can indicate internal wear, valve body failure, or solenoid issues, which are far more costly to address. Repairs range from $500 to several thousand dollars for a full rebuild or replacement.
There's also the simple possibility of low or dirty transmission fluid.
Trending Now
Honda Says It's Forced to Kill The Civic Type R In Europe
Woman Walks Up to a Brand-New Ford Lariat. Then She Learns it has a New 'Luxury' Feature
Automatic transmissions rely on fluid for both lubrication and hydraulic pressure during shifts. When fluid is old, burnt, or running low, it can result in delayed or harsh gear engagement. Fortunately, this is one of the easier fixes, with a flush and refill typically costing up to several hundred dollars at most.
If your car jolts or makes a loud noise when shifting, don't shrug it off. That initial clunk could be the first sign of a problem that worsens over time. In many cases, a quick inspection can reveal whether you're dealing with something simple, like dirty fluid, or something more serious, such as broken mounts or internal transmission wear.
Should You Buy at a Car Auction?
The clip reinforces that car auctions can offer tempting deals, but they're also not for the faint of heart. Whether you're shopping at a public auction like
Copart
or a dealer-only event like
Manheim
, strategy matters.
The upside? Auctions can offer below-retail pricing, especially for vehicles with cosmetic damage, high mileage, or salvage titles. According to
Black Book
, many dealers source their inventory this way, marking vehicles for resale on traditional lots. That margin can become your savings if you know what you're doing.
But the risks are real. Most vehicles are sold as-is, with no test drive and often no guarantee of mechanical soundness. That clunk in the TikTok video is what you might not notice until you've already placed the winning bid. Even experienced buyers can be caught off guard by undisclosed flood damage, missing airbags, or title issues that don't show up until after the paperwork is signed.
Experts recommend running the vehicle identification number (VIN) through services like AutoCheck or
Carfax
ahead of time and checking whether the auction provides pre-sale inspection reports or arbitration options. Some auctions also let you bring a mechanic or pay for a third-party inspection, but this varies by location.
In short, car auctions can be a treasure hunt or a mechanical minefield. Bring your research, set a firm budget, and always assume you'll need to spend more than just the hammer price to get a vehicle road-ready.
Black Blaze Motors did not respond to an inquiry sent via TikTok comment.
Honda
didn't respond to an email. We will be sure to update this if either replies.
More From Motor1
Man Spots Chihuahua in a Ford With the Engine Off and Windows Rolled Up. What Should He Do?
Woman Starts Her GMC Denali SUV. Then It Sputters Out
'Do People Not Read the Owner's Manual Anymore?': Woman Buys New Honda. Then She Tries Filling It Up With Gas
Toyota Math: 9 Million EVs Are Just as Polluting as 27 Million Hybrids
Share this Story
X
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
24 minutes ago
- CNET
Tesla to Pay $243M After Jury Finds It Partly Liable for Fatal Autopilot Crash
Table of Contents Tesla to Pay $243M After Jury Finds It Partly Liable for Fatal Autopilot Crash A federal jury in Florida has found Tesla to be partly liable for a fatal car crash that occurred in 2019 involving its self-driving feature Autopilot. Elon Musk's electric vehicle company must now pay $243 million in damages as a result of the judgment, multiple reports Friday said. Prosecutors filed charges back in 2022 alleging that the driver didn't brake in time when approaching a T-intersection while driving his Tesla Model S with Autopilot active, and as a result killed two passengers in the car he collided with. A Tesla spokesperson told TechCrunch Friday that the verdict is "wrong" and will "set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology." Tesla plans to appeal, according to the statement. Tesla didn't immediately respond to CNET's request for comment. In California, Tesla is currently in the courts for another case involving Autopilot, where the state DMV is suing for allegations of false advertising and misleading customers. The California DMV alleges that Tesla is misrepresenting the capabilities of its advanced driver assistance systems by naming them "Full Self-Driving" and "Autopilot," and is seeking a 30-day suspension of Tesla's license to sell vehicles in the state.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla (TSLA) a ‘Buy' as Pullback Triggers Favorable Risk-Reward: TD Cowen Analyst
Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is one of the best AI stocks to buy, according to billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller. On July 24, TD Cowen analyst Itay Michaeli reiterated a 'Buy' rating on the stock and a $374 price target. david-von-diemar-ZBWn5DvO0hg-unsplash The bullish stance comes as the analyst reiterates that the recent dip pullback has tilted the stock's risk/reward favorably amid emerging new catalysts. The electric vehicle giant has already announced it has started building its more affordable model, with volume production planned for the second half of the year. The company plans to ramp up production of the affordable model, having suffered a major blow with the signing into law of the One Big Beautiful bill Act. With the new bill, there will no longer be a $7,500 tax credit that was the catalyst behind Tesla ramping up sales of its high-end models. To mitigate the expiration of the tax credits, Tesla has also confirmed plans to ramp up production of its purpose-built robotaxi, starting in 2026. Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) designs, manufactures, sells, and leases electric vehicles, as well as energy generation and storage systems. It also leverages artificial intelligence technology to train cars to drive themselves and create useful humanoid robots. While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and 11 Best 52-Week High Stocks to Buy Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


TechCrunch
an hour ago
- TechCrunch
Tesla partly liable in Florida Autopilot trial, jury awards $200M in damages
A jury in federal court in Miami has found Tesla partly to blame for a fatal 2019 crash that involved the use of the company's Autopilot driver assistance system. The jury assessed punitive damages only against Tesla, CNBC reported. The punitive fines coupled with a compensatory damages puts the total payments to around $242.5 million. Neither the driver of the car nor the Autopilot system braked in time to avoid going through an intersection, where the car struck an SUV and killed a pedestrian. The jury assigned the driver two-thirds of the blame, and attributed one-third to Tesla. (The driver was sued separately.) The verdict comes at the end of a three-week trial over the crash, which killed 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and severely injured her boyfriend Dillon Angulo. The verdict is one of the first major legal decisions about driver assistance technology that has gone against Tesla. The company has previously settled lawsuits involving similar claims about Autopilot. Brett Schreiber, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement to TechCrunch that Tesla designed Autopilot 'only for controlled access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans.' 'Tesla's lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology, putting everyday Americans like Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo in harm's way,' said Schreiber. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives.' Tesla, in a statement provided to TechCrunch, said it plans to appeal the verdict 'given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.' 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' the company wrote. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash. This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility.' Tesla and Musk spent years making claims about Autopilot's capabilities that have led to overconfidence in the driver assistance system, a reality that government officials — and Musk himself — have spoken about for years. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) came to this determination in 2020 after investigating a 2018 crash where the driver died after hitting a concrete barrier. That driver, Walter Huang, was playing a mobile game while using Autopilot. The NTSB made a number of recommendations following that investigation, which Tesla largely ignored, the safety board later claimed. On a 2018 conference call, Musk said 'complacency' with driver assistance systems like Autopilot is a problem. 'They just get too used to it. That tends to be more of an issue. It's not a lack of understanding of what Autopilot can do. It's [drivers] thinking they know more about Autopilot than they do,' Musk said at the time. The trial took place at a time when Tesla is currently in the middle of rolling out the first versions of its long-promised Robotaxi network, starting in Austin, Texas. Those vehicles are using an enhanced version of Tesla's more capable driver assistance system, which it calls Full Self-Driving. Update: This story has been updated to include the amount of compensatory damages in the total.