New study makes concerning discovery after testing samples from nearly 200 homes: 'It's a global problem'
Many people trust private wells to deliver clean, natural water — but a new study reveals that's not always the case.
What's happening?
A three-year study from Pennsylvania State University found that nearly one in five private wells tested in Pennsylvania contained PFAS — manmade "forever chemicals" linked to serious health problems. According to WESA, the researchers tested 167 private wells across the state and discovered that 18% showed PFAS contamination, with some exceeding federal safety limits.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of long-lasting chemicals often used in products like nonstick cookware, water-resistant clothing, and firefighting foam. They're known to build up in the human body and the environment, and they're now showing up in unexpected places — including people's homes.
"It's a global problem that I think researchers as a whole should come together to figure out how to support communities who may be impacted vastly," said Faith Kibuye, a water resources extension specialist at Penn State, per WESA.
Why is this finding concerning?
Research has linked PFAS exposure to increased risk of cancer, weakened immune systems, hormone disruption, and developmental issues in children. With over 1 million households relying on private wells in Pennsylvania alone — many of which are located in rural or underserved areas — this issue has significant public health implications, WESA reported.
Since state and federal water regulations don't cover private wells, homeowners must handle testing and treatment themselves. That makes PFAS contamination an invisible threat — one that families may not realize they're exposed to until it's too late.
Unfortunately, this isn't an isolated case. One study revealed that nearly half of the U.S. tap water contains PFAS, and experts in the U.K. have called for tighter regulations on the presence of "forever chemicals" in their drinking water. These stories show just how widespread the problem is becoming.
What's being done about PFAS in well water?
The researchers hope their work will help spread awareness and prompt more homeowners to test their water. "It's also a good thing that we're getting a lot of awareness out there about PFAS in general and what people can do," Kibuye said, per WESA.
In Pennsylvania, homeowners can turn to state-certified labs to test their well water for PFAS. If contamination shows up, filtration systems — like activated carbon or reverse osmosis — can help remove the chemicals.
On a larger scale, several states have begun tightening regulations on PFAS use. Last year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized nationwide limits for six types of PFAS in public water systems, and it confirmed this spring it intends to uphold those regulations under the new administration.
Although current regulations exclude private wells, increasing awareness of the issue could help close that gap and give more families peace of mind about the water they rely on every day.
Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home?
Majorly
Sometimes
Not really
I don't know enough about them
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
CDC: Childhood Vaccination Rates Fell Further In 2024-2025 School Year
Childhood vaccination rates dropped even further for the 2024-2025 school year down to the lower 92% range with a record number of exemptions from vaccinations among kindergarteners, according to new data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Meanwhile, this year the U.S. has already experiencing the most measles cases and outbreaks that it's had in years with 1,333 and 29, respectively. Gee, do you think these things are somehow connected in any way? Well, the likely answer rhymes with the word 'mess.' Childhood Vaccination Rates Have Fallen To The 92% Range 'A mess' can describe what used to be a tidy public health situation. The newest CDC data shows that measles, mumps, rubella vaccination coverage among kindergarteners continued a downward trend. Rates have dropped from 95.2% in the 2019-2020 school year down to 92.7% in the 2023-2024 school year and even further to 92.5% this past school year. Coverage numbers for other vaccines have been going the wrong direction as well. Rates for the diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine otherwise known as the DTaP vaccine have fallen from 94.9% in 2019-2020 to 92.3% in 2023-2024 to 92.1% this past school year. Over the same time periods. the percentage of kids who got two doses of the varicella vaccine went from 94.8% to 92.3% to 92.1%. And coverage for the polio vaccine has gone from 95% to 92.7% to 92.5%. All of this has corresponded to a rise in the number of parents seeking exemptions from vaccinations for their children, going from 2.5% in the 2020-2021 schools year to 3.3% in 2023-24 to 3.6% in 2024-25. The U.S. basically had an all-time record number of such exemptions last school year with around 138,000 children getting them for at least one vaccine. And this isn't an issue in just a few states painted a certain political color. The majority of states (36 of them) in the U.S. as well as the District of Columbia had increases in exemptions from the previous. In fact, 17 states saw exemption rates that went above 5%. And which state do you think had the highest rate of exemptions? It rhymes with 'I don't know.' Idaho had the highest rate at a whopping 15.4% 2025 Has Already Had 1,333 Confirmed Measles Cases, 29 Outbreaks Meanwhile, the U.S. continues to go back in time when it comes to the measles. Measles outbreaks were very common before the arrival of the measles vaccine in the 1960s. Then over time as vaccination coverage increased, the threat of measles decreased. Once measles vaccination rates stayed above the herd immunity threshold of 95% for years, measles became rarer and rarer. That was because with such a large percentage of the population vaccinated, the measles virus had trouble finding unprotected humans to infect and treat like a cheap motel to reproduce and spread further. Eventually, the measles virus was effectively gone baby gone from the U.S., which declared measles eliminated in 2000. How quickly people forget, though. Since 2000, persistent misinformation and disinformation about the measles vaccine have helped erode MMR vaccination rates. Over the past decade, I've been writing more and more about measles cases and outbreaks, like this one, in the U.S. mainly because more and more measles cases and outbreaks have been occurring. I've written about I wrote in Forbes in 2019 about how anti-vaxxers made that year's World Health Organization's list of top ten global health threats All of this brings us to this year, which has been a great year if you are the measles virus. Not so great for many humans. As of July 29, there's already been a total of 1,333 confirmed measles cases across 40 jurisdictions, according to CDC data. Try to find the states that are not among the following that have had reported measles cases: Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York City, New York State, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wyoming. Oh, and measles is really contagious. Like really, really contagious. Among unvaccinated people, one case can easily lead to 12 to 18 more cases. About 87% of all reported measles cases this year have been part of outbreaks. This year has also already had 29 reported outbreaks, up from 16 in all of 2024. Lack Of More Urgent Action Dropping vaccination rates and rising measles cases and outbreaks should be more than a canary in a coal mine for the U.S. It should be a freaking elephant. We've essentially allowed a problem that was taken care of to return and potentially make America measle-ly again. Not only that. With other vaccination rates declining as well, we could see resurgences of other infectious disease as well, including polio. Things could be reversed if prompt actions are taken to get vaccination rates back up again before the different nasty microbes can spread too far in the U.S. population. But there doesn't seem to be an organized effort at the federal level to address these worsening problems. In fact, there are disturbing trends in the opposite direction such as the layoffs of personnel who were dedicated to help control infectious diseases, claims being made about vaccines that are unsupported by scientific evidence and cuts in funding for scientific research and public health efforts. The CDC website still has language about vaccination being simply a personal choice. But that simply is not the case. Since the percentage of people vaccinated affects the spread of viruses and other microbes, each person's decision to get vaccinated affects everyone else's risk of getting the disease. Therefore, having people around you not vaccinated against say the measles raises your risk of your risk of getting the measles, even if you yourself are already vaccinated against the measles. In other words, childhood vaccinations are not simply child's play.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Watching My Parents Die Convinced Me To Plan A Completely Different Path — And My Idea Came From A Movie
'I saw Dad's junk today. Good times!' 'You just made me spit out my coffee,' my sister texted back with a laughing-crying emoji. The mental image of Lisa doing a spit take at work was a small consolation for seeing my dad in this diminished state. No longer able to navigate a trip to the bathroom on his own, he'd ended up on the tile floor at 3 a.m. with his pajama pants bunched around his knees. He was too weak to get himself back to bed. Dad had entered hospice a few weeks before this episode because he was dying from a rare bone marrow cancer. He had only six weeks to live, and I'd flown across the country to be his in-home hospice caregiver. Lisa eventually joined me in Dad's house as co-caregiver. She saw his junk, too. Along with confirming that I would have made a lousy nurse, the experience raised a nagging question that would haunt me in the following years: With no kids of my own, who will take care of me when my time comes? When I first arrived in Michigan to help my dad, I didn't believe he would die in a little over a month. The man seemed fine, puttering around the house on his own and laughing with family during visits. There really wasn't much for me to do, other than to make sure he took his meds each morning and cook something for dinner before 'Jeopardy!' came on. But just as hospice predicted, Dad declined a little each week. He became fatigued and unsteady on his feet, requiring a walker and eating less and less of the food I prepared. His pain increased to the point where morphine was no longer up to the task, and the hospice nurse — who came to Dad's house just once a week for a quick check-in — asked me if I thought it was time for a fentanyl patch. 'I'm a magazine editor,' I thought. 'How the hell should I know?' One day, while I was pushing Dad around the living room in his wheelchair, he murmured, almost under his breath, 'I want to die.' I wanted that for him, too. Six years after my 74-year-old dad succumbed to his illness, I discovered that my mom had vascular dementia, and that she was already years into the disease. The realization blindsided me during an otherwise normal phone chat. Related: Related: Out of the blue, Mom said she wanted to tell me a secret: Someone named Lisa had been calling her, and she had no idea who this person was. Mom had been playing along during their conversations because she didn't want to offend the nice woman on the phone. With a shaky voice I explained that Lisa was her firstborn daughter. Mom sounded surprised, exclaiming, 'Really!' as if I'd told her that the neighborhood squirrels had just flown a nut-shaped rocket to the moon. With me in California, Lisa in Michigan and Mom living alone in South Carolina — she never remarried after divorcing my dad decades earlier — the situation required a whole other level of caregiving. The excruciating, long-distance kind. Two years of hell followed Mom's late diagnosis. Managing her care became a second job, made even more difficult by the fact that she had no financial resources and I had to raid my retirement savings to help pay for it. As Mom's dementia escalated, she sometimes called me several times a day in agitation and confusion, telling me about a mysterious and frightening man who'd somehow gotten into her apartment and was moving things around. Sometimes, she said, he left items there that were not hers. 'The man,' as she called him, did not exist; like many people with dementia, my mom suffered from hallucinations and delusions. We kept Mom in her apartment as long as possible, as she would have wanted, but in-home caregivers proved scarce and unreliable in her small town. She eventually got to the point of needing 24-hour care, costing almost $600 a day, and the agency we hired 50 miles away had only one person available in Mom's area. One weekend, when her regular caregiver couldn't come, a neighbor called to tell me that the agency had left Mom to fend for herself for the past two days, and that paramedics were on the scene. Lisa and I started making plans to get her out of there the next day. Mom was far better off in assisted living, though she wasn't always happy about her new accommodations. A fiercely private person all her life, she didn't understand why staff members kept coming into her room uninvited, pushing aside the assorted items she'd used to barricade the door and insisting she go down to the dining room for meals. I wouldn't have wanted to come out of my room, either; the facility was dated and depressing — but it was the best that Lisa and I could manage. At 78 years old, Mom was younger than most of the other residents there and among only a few who could walk around the place unassisted. Until she started falling. Related: In the span of a couple of months, she broke both hips and fractured her shoulder, confining her to a wheelchair. Immobility and subpar care led to a gruesome pressure wound on her foot that her depleted, 65-pound body could never heal. What kind of society insists on keeping a person alive in that condition? In her predementia days, my mom — always quick with a joke or a biting comment — would have said, 'Just get a gun and shoot me.' When Mom died last year, the day before Mother's Day, I cried with both sorrow at her unfair, horrible ending and with relief that it was finally over. Yet, the nagging question remained about my own uncertain future. Caring for my parents, I'd become increasingly obsessed with the idea that I was doomed to spend my final years in a dreary care facility surrounded by strangers, just waiting for the end to come. While I realize that having kids does not guarantee that they will someday take care of you, I also know that there is a zero percent chance that your nonexistent offspring will do it. This thought filled me with a crushing sense of fear and foreboding about getting older. That is, until I resolved to plan my own death. The idea surfaced gradually from some hidden cranny of my subconscious, reminding me of my favorite movie since high school: 'Harold and Maude.' In this 1971 dark comedy starring the great Ruth Gordon, a morbid young man falls in love with a free-spirited septuagenarian. In the film's climax, Maude carries out a long-held plan to end her life on her 80th birthday, on her own unconventional terms. Why shouldn't I be like Maude? At first, I thought my death would have to be a DIY affair. I knew that if I wasn't going to die from an incurable illness within six months, or if I had dementia, that would disqualify me from the 'medical aid in dying' options offered by a growing number of states. Though well intentioned, these programs are so mired in bureaucracy and restrictions that even patients who qualify often die while waiting for approvals. Advocacy groups like Death With Dignity are working to streamline and expand end-of-life options across the country, but the wheels turn slowly. And if you have dementia, like my mom, or just feel like you've had a good run after 90 years on the planet? No soup for you! Determining how to bring about a dignified, pain-free ending without medical help was a daunting prospect, so I began workshopping the idea — only half-joking — with friends. Would my college pal, an anesthesiologist, be willing to risk prison time to help me out? What kind of bribe money would I need to convince a veterinarian to do the deed? Then, in the months after my mom's death, an acquaintance recommended Amy Bloom's 'In Love: A Memoir of Love and Loss,' a heartbreaking book that chronicles the author's journey to Zurich to witness the assisted death of her husband, who'd been diagnosed with early Alzheimer's. Related: I was astonished to learn that, in Switzerland, assisted death has been legal for over 80 years. It's lawful as long as the person is of sound mind and is able to self-administer the life-ending pharmaceutical cocktail. Dignitas, a nonprofit that Bloom writes about in her memoir, requires that the individual have an illness that will eventually lead to death — including dementia — or be living with an unbearable disability. Another organization, Exit International, also lays out options for older adults and couples who want to go together. Exit's founder, Philip Nitschke, even invented a futuristic, 3D-printable pod designed to deliver a euphoric, painless death without the need for assistance. The third-generation prototype is still in the testing phase, but in the meantime, Nitschke's nonprofit offers an array of 'final exit' resources, including guides to life-ending drugs and assisted death programs in Switzerland. Though some may find it macabre, learning about organizations like Dignitas and Exit International has brought me an incredible sense of peace and comfort in knowing that I have options. Instead of feeling overwhelmed with constant dread of getting older, I can focus on living. Still, I can't help thinking about what will happen if I can't make it to Zurich when I feel like it's time to sign off. Wouldn't it be wonderful for Swiss-style options to be available here in the United States, and affordable to all? Then, those who decide to opt out could do so on their home turf surrounded by loved ones, without adding physical or financial burdens to the process. I realize that not everyone would welcome this. However, I believe that, like abortion, end-of-life decisions are a personal choice that should be made by the individual. If you don't believe in it, don't do it. And if the Swiss can avoid the so-called slippery slope for 80-plus years through tight regulation and documentation, the U.S. can figure it out, too. My husband of 22 years, my beloved companion on life's journey, says he isn't quite ready to sign up for the BOGO assisted-death special — a final date night, if you will — but a lot can happen in the next couple of decades. We could both expire well before the need for such a plan arises, or I could simply change my mind. It's enough for me to know that I need not be forced to keep living beyond my self-determined expiration date — even if I have to travel all the way to Switzerland to pull the plug. I can do it Maude's way. Tina Caputo is a multimedia journalist and writer based in California. Her work has appeared in McSweeney's, The Belladonna Comedy, and too many wine and lifestyle publications to mention. This article originally appeared on HuffPost in August 2024. Also in Goodful: Also in Goodful: Also in Goodful: Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Astronauts splash down in Pacific after completing ISS mission that relieved stranded crew members
Four crew members who flew to the International Space Station (ISS) earlier this year to relieve two astronauts who were left stranded by a beleaguered space capsule returned to Earth on Saturday. NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, along with Japan's Takuya Onishi and Russia's Kirill Peskov, splashed down in the Pacific off the coast of Southern California on Saturday morning at 11:33 a.m. ET in a SpaceX capsule. It was the first Pacific splashdown for NASA in 50 years, and the third for SpaceX with people on board. NASA astronauts last splashed down in the Pacific in 1975, during the Apollo-Soyuz mission, the first crewed international space mission that involved Americans and Soviets. The crew launched in March, replacing Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, who were left stuck at the space station for nine months on what was meant to be a week-long mission after the Boeing Starliner they arrived in suffered thruster problems and helium leaks. NASA concluded returning them to Earth in the capsule was too risky, so the Starliner flew back crewless, and Wilmore and Williams came home in a SpaceX capsule in March after their replacements arrived. Wilmore announced his retirement after 25 years with NASA this week. "We want this mission, our mission, to be a reminder of what people can do when we work together, when we explore together," McClain said before leaving the space station on Friday, mentioning "some tumultuous times on Earth." She said she was looking forward to "doing nothing for a couple of days" once back home, and her crewmates were excited about hot showers and burgers. Earlier this year, SpaceX decided to switch their splashdowns from Florida to California to reduce the risk of debris falling on populated areas. After exiting the spacecraft, the crew received medical checks before being flown via helicopter to meet up with a NASA aircraft bound for Houston. "Overall, the mission went great, glad to have the crew back," Steve Stich, manager of NASA's Commercial Crew Program, said in a press conference after splashdown. "SpaceX did a great job of recovering the crew again on the West Coast." Dina Contella, deputy manager for NASA's International Space Station program, added that she was "pretty happy to see the Crew 10 team back on Earth. They looked great, and they are doing great." She noted the crew had orbited the Earth 2,368 times and traveled more than 63 million miles during their 146 days at the space station.
