Labour grandee Alan Milburn urged to step aside from advising private equity sharks who swooped on NHS dentists as millions struggle for appointments
The former health secretary, a key aide to Wes Streeting, is acting for the profit hungry capitalists at a time when patients are forced to pay huge costs to fix their teeth and many find it difficult or impossible to find an NHS dentist.
Mr Milburn, 67, was appointed non-executive director to the board of the Department for Health and Social Care in November.
But while lending a hand to the current health secretary, Mr Milburn has also been a long-standing adviser to Bridgepoint Capital which swooped to buy MyDentist in an £800m deal last month.
The firm, previously owned by Palamon Capital, is the UK's biggest private dental chain with a 5pc market share, and the largest private company providing NHS work.
The DHSC is currently working on a root and branch reform of crisis-hit NHS dentistry, which has a chronic shortage of practitioners, sending adult usage to a record low.
Only 40 pc of adults have seen an NHS dentist in two years, according to most recent figures.
Last night, Milburn, health secretary from 1999 to 2003 at the height of Tony Blair's premiership, faced concern from campaigners who believe the two roles for UK-listed investment company Bridgepoint and DHSC were incompatible and urged to 'step aside from one role or the other'.
It comes as an investigation by the Mail on Sunday yesterday revealed the extent to which private equity sharks are tightening their grip on Britain's dental sector – with 12pc of clinics now owned by big chains.
As availability of health service dentistry dries up, more and more patients are forced to go private, where fees for simple procedures can be up to 3.5 times that of the NHS.
Dennis Reed, of pensioners' campaign group Silver Voices, called Mr Milburn's dual roles 'a shocking overlap of responsibility.
He said: 'I wouldn't hold out too much hope that Alan Milburn is going to be rooting for NHS dentistry. He should step aside from one role or the other.'
'I think the public are sick and tired of these sorts of conflicts of interest between politicians' public roles and their private interests.'
Stuart Andrew MP, Shadow Health and Social Care Secretary, said: 'It's hard to see how this doesn't amount to a clear conflict of interest. Alan Milburn is advising Labour on NHS policy while being paid by the private equity firm that just bought Britain's largest provider of NHS dentistry.
'Patients need confidence that NHS decisions are being made in the public interest, but this appears to be just more cronyism, sleaze and scandal at the heart of the Labour government.'
Bridgepoint have not revealed how much they pay Mr Milburn but his role with the company caused controversy at the time of his appointment by DHSC because the private equity firm previously ran Care UK, a large chain of over 160 nursing homes.
He receives £15,000 per annum for the directorship at DHSC and works two to three days a month.
Mr Milburn has reportedly been advising Mr Streeting since Labour was in opposition.
Mr Milburn is paid for his private consultancy work via AM Strategy Limited, a company listing the politician, his partner and two sons as the only directors.
The family withdrew dividends of more than £8m from the firm between 2016 and 2023, according to accounts filed with Companies House.
As well as working for Bridgepoint, the former Darlington MP has been a longstanding advisor to PwC's health practice, confectionary giant Mars and US-based healthcare firm Centene Corporation.
While an MP, he received £25,000 a year to sit on the board of Lloyds Pharmacy and was paid £20,000 a year as an advisor to soft drinks firm PepsiCo.
At Milburn's detached four-bedroom home in Northumberland, his partner Ruth Briel declined to comment. Closing the door, she said: 'It's got absolutely nothing to do with me.'
Bridgepoint said Milburn 'advises on leadership and development topics' but is 'not involved in deals'.
The Department of Health and Social Care said: 'Mr Milburn has declared his interests in any discussions or activity that relate to products or services that are or may be provided by companies owned by Bridgepoint Capital Ltd, making the nature of any potential conflict transparent'.
A source added Mr Milburn 'recuses himself from any discussions or activity in the department directly related to these companies', adding that he 'had no involvement in Bridgepoint's acquisition of this business and has recused himself from all discussions in the (DHSC) relating to dentistry'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
28 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
BP fuels FTSE 100 but soft US data tempers gains
The London-based brewer and distiller, which owns brands ranging from Guinness stout to Johnnie Walker whisky, on Tuesday reported a decline of more than a third in its bottom line in the financial year that ended in June, as a slight decline in net sales was compounded by impairment and restructuring costs, unfavourable currency movements, and narrowed operating margins.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Yorkshire Water boss paid 'extra' £1.3 million from firm's offshore parent company despite 'dire' environmental record and hikes to bills
A water company boss was handed more than £1.3 million in 'extra' pay from an offshore firm, despite its abysmal record on pollution and increasing household bills. Chief executive Nicola Shaw pocketed two payments of £660,000 in the last two years from Yorkshire Water's parent company Kelda Holdings, in addition to her salary with the beleaguered utilities firm. Yorkshire Water was allowed to raise average annual household bills by 41 per cent last year, and this summer introduced a hosepipe ban for its 5.5 million customers. It was ordered to pay £40 million in the spring to address its 'serious failures' over wastewater and sewage, and was also separately fined nearly £1 million last month for polluting a watercourse with chlorine, causing the death of hundreds of fish. Yorkshire Water is one of the six water companies currently banned from paying bonuses under Government action designed to prevent bosses who 'oversee poor environmental and customer outcomes' from receiving extra money. But figures showed Ms Shaw received just over £1.3 million between 2023 and 2025 from Kelda, in addition to her Yorkshire Water salary of around £689,000 per year - remuneration which was reduced by about one-third after she decided to forgo her bonus before the Government performance-related pay ban came in. The Kelda money is 'a fixed fee for investor-related work' performed by Ms Shaw for the parent company 'and complies fully with expectations and reporting requirements', Yorkshire Water said. Including the offshore company payments, she has been awarded more than £3 million in total pay over three years since she joined the firm in 2022, according to analysis first reported by the Guardian. Ofwat, the water regulator, is now investigating. Ms Shaw's earnings have infuriated environmental campaign groups. Amy Fairman, head of campaigns for River Action, said: 'Yorkshire Water has just been fined over £900,000 for polluting a watercourse with millions of litres of chlorinated water, killing hundreds of fish, yet its CEO is quietly handed an extra £1.3 million through an offshore firm. 'This is business as usual in a system that rewards environmental destruction and shields those responsible. 'Until executives are held criminally accountable, not just cushioned by shareholders, nothing will change. 'And unless we see a complete overhaul of the water industry, one that finally ends the failed privatisation experiment, this scandalous cycle will continue.' The Ilkley Clean River Group has now written to Kelda chairman Vanda Murray, asking her to justify Ms Shaw's pay given Yorkshire Water's dismal record under her watch. The campaigners wrote: 'To the customer, the additional payments to Ms Shaw look like a way of "working around" the fact that bonuses were causing public outrage and subsequently banned by government. 'There is in effect no change to eye-watering salaries at the top of Yorkshire Water.' A Yorkshire Water spokesman said Ms Shaw's work for Kelda Group included 'investor engagement, financial oversight, and management of the Kelda Group, which is recognised by a fee of £660,000 paid by shareholders'. He added: 'This is a conscious governance decision: we do not believe that work done on investor-related activities should be paid for by Yorkshire Water customers' bills. 'This fee, which has remained unchanged year on year, reflects the critical importance of the work during this period that was led by Nicola in securing long-term investment for Yorkshire Water. 'We remain focused on our long-term commitment to delivering better outcomes for customers, communities, and the environment across the region.' It was reported tonight that Ofwat's chief executive David Black is due to resign, ahead of the watchdog's planned abolition by ministers.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Are online travel agents cleaning up their acts?
On Thursday I will fly on British Airways from London to Denver. The return trip cost £621. But I could have bought the same flights for around £30 cheaper going through an online travel agent (OTA). Odd though it may seem, the practice of selling some seats at deep discounts through a middleman has some merit from the airlines' point of view. The roots of the practice lie in the bad old days of heavily regulated fares. On many routes airlines could not be seen to sell tickets cheaper than the official fares. So they sold through companies called 'consolidators' who punted out cheap seats though retail agencies known as 'bucket shops'. Often the ticket would show an official fare that bore no relation to the amount paid – eg £1,200 for a trip that actually cost £500. That maintained the fiction that every airline was adhering to super-high fares. Thankfully, these days – in most circumstances – airlines can charge what they like. Yet they still often pay a modest commission to online agents who undercut them. Airlines use intermediaries to provide additional sales power. They want to be relevant in the intensely fare-sensitive part of the market, such as people who search on Skyscanner and other price-comparison sites. Take my flight from London to Denver this week. BA knows that there are plenty of us who will book direct, in order to minimise problems when things go wrong – and, in the case of buying on the benefit of a cooling-off spell of 24 hours in which to cancel for a full refund. To meet this demand, the airline can apply a modest premium. But for those who are simply interested in the lowest fare, BA seats are likely to be available more cheaply through an OTA. My rule is only to use an online travel agent if the saving is 10 per cent or more. In this case, it was under five per cent. Not enough to persuade me to agree to the online agent's terms and conditions. The OTA reserves the right to apply credit card surcharges, and has a 'confirmed quotation' stage – after which point, fares could be increased, with little choice but to pay the extra. What if the airline cancels the flight? The online agent doesn't even mention the word 'refund', even though this is the traveller's legal right in the event of a cancellation. As we discovered during the Covid pandemic, many OTAs took a cut of the airline's refund (and some just hung on to the customer's cash, blaming the carrier). In the EU, though, the rules are being redrawn in the traveller's favour. This week, the European Commission said that it had agreement from two giants, Expedia and that money will be handed back in full within two weeks of the cancellation. Similar undertakings have been made by other big OTAs, including Etraveli. You may not know this Swedish firm, but its brands include GoToGate and MyTrip. I used the latter to buy a ticket for a JetStar flight from Singapore to Melbourne earlier this year – which was cancelled at the gate. The cash took 17 days to come back. In contrast, still holds some of my money for a booking that fell victim to Covid five years ago. I shall revisit that transaction and see if the new agreement works to my advantage. It may be that UK travellers get a windfall from the EU's work – despite our bold decision to reap the many benefits of Brexit that we are now enjoying.
