2025 farm bill: Advocates prioritize anti-hunger policies while Republicans push budget cuts
But GOP members of the House Agriculture Committee are pushing forbudget cuts to the Farm Bill, the legislation that authorizes food stamps and a variety of other nutrition and agriculture programs.
"We know that 15.4% of households in rural areas had experienced food insecurity in 2023," Bhatti told The Daily Yonder in a phone interview. "So that's a significant number."
SNAP is the first line of defense against hunger, according to a report from Jordan Baker, senior communications manager at FRAC.
The last Farm Bill was signed into law by Trump in 2018 during his first term. Since then, the legislation has been in limbo, awaiting updates until September 2025, when Congress is scheduled to vote on new legislation.
Bhatti said nutrition advocates are pushing for three major changes in the 2025 Farm Bill to address food insecurity in rural areas.
SNAP allowances are based on estimations of the cost of groceries for a given year, something the USDA Food and Nutrition Service refers to as the Thrifty Food Plan. According to the November 2024 Thrifty Food Plan, the estimated monthly cost of groceries for a family of four was $983.80 (SNAP allowances can vary by household size, gender, and age).
The Thrifty Food Plan estimates the cost of groceries for an individual or household, then uses that estimation to determine the maximum SNAP allotments a person can receive. Congress updates the Thrifty Food Plan every five years to keep SNAP allotments up to date with market prices.
Bhatti said that protecting funding for the Thrifty Food Plan will be important for fighting food insecurity in rural America.
In 2022, an estimated 2.5 million rural households relied on SNAP to subsidize their grocery bill. That's about 14% of all rural households, slightly higher than the 11% of metropolitan residents who rely on SNAP.
About one million households that rely on SNAP are families with children, a group that makes up about 22% of the rural population.
To add to that, every SNAP dollar spent in a rural community has an outsized effect on economic activity compared to metropolitan counties.
"For every SNAP dollar, there's an economic impact of $1.54 cents," said Bhatti. "But that is even more impactful within rural parts of the country because a lot of our farmland is in rural America. SNAP is an economic investment."
SNAP drives economic activity in rural areas primarily by supporting local grocery stores, providing money that, without SNAP, "is going to really hurt [the store's] bottom line," Bhatti said.
Those SNAP dollars spill over into agriculture and food processing, industries which have a large economic base in rural areas, according to a USDA report.
Many GOP lawmakers want to cut back on its funding. In May of 2024, Republican chair of the House Agriculture Committee Glenn Thompson released his proposed farm bill that would make it harder for the USDA to keep the Thrifty Food Plan up to date with potential increases in the cost of healthy food.
"There's an attempt to cut SNAP benefits over the next 10 years by $30 billion," Bhatti said of Thompson's proposed legislation. "So that would be … an enormous negative impact because a lot of people came out to vote because groceries are unaffordable."
Thompson's proposal is a response to the Biden Administration's updates to the Thrifty Food Plan, which increased SNAP benefits by 30%.
Under current SNAP guidelines, an individual can only receive three months of SNAP benefits every three years without meeting the program's work requirements.
The Food and Nutrition Service, or FNS, the department of the USDA that oversees SNAP, requires able-bodied recipients between 16 and 59 years old to work or participate in a workforce program for at least 80 hours per month to continue receiving benefits after that three month window.
"We want to eliminate the time limits that are disproportionately impacting rural residents and other underserved populations," Bhatti said. "There's just not enough good paying jobs in rural America, so to force them into low paying work really puts them into a cycle of poverty."
Previous Daily Yonder reporting demonstrated that living in a poor job market may be more burdensome for rural residents compared to their urban counterparts. That's because fewer households in rural America have reliable internet access and transportation compared to urban and suburban residents. Rurality can therefore make it harder for people already struggling to meet SNAP's work requirements.
"We also want to repeal the lifetime ban for individuals with felony drug convictions, which affects a lot of families trying to rebuild in rural areas," Bhatti said.
Living in a rural community can exacerbate existing challenges that felons face in finding employment and meeting work requirements. Rural areas also have limited access to reentry programs compared to urban centers, a deficit that can make it harder for formerly incarcerated people to get back on their feet, according to a report from the Rural Justice Collaborative.
The initial push to ban people with felony drug convictions from SNAP was based on an allegation that many SNAP recipients illegally trade their benefits for things like guns and drugs. Data shows that SNAP fraud accounts for less than 2% of total allotments, with most instances involving retailers rather than individuals trading benefits for drugs.
The practice of banning people with felony drug convictions from participating in SNAP began in 1996 when President Bill Clinton signed into law the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, or PRWORA.
About half of rural Americans live in a state that has either a temporary or lifetime ban for individuals with felony drug convictions, according to a Daily Yonder analysis of PRWORA data.
"There's a bipartisan agreement to get rid of [the ban], which is really great," said Bhatti.
This story was produced by The Daily Yonder and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
14 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Mark Cuban says companies should be taxed more for buying back their own shares
In an X post on Tuesday, the billionaire investor said raising the federal tax on the practice would push companies to reinvest in their businesses and hit wealthy shareholders — including himself — the hardest. The "Shark Tank" star called it "a way to charge the biggest public companies more" while shifting incentives toward long-term growth. Stock buybacks, also called share repurchases, happen when a company buys back its stock from investors, often reducing the number of shares in circulation. This can boost earnings per share and, in turn, the stock price, benefiting remaining shareholders. Critics say the practice can prioritize short-term gains over long-term investment. American companies bought back $166 billion in shares in July — the highest July total on record — bringing the year-to-date tally to $926 billion, surpassing the previous year-to-date record set in 2022 by $108 billion, per data from stock market research firm Birinyi Associates. The US has had a 1% tax on stock repurchases on publicly traded corporations since the Inflation Reduction Act, which took effect on January 1, 2023. Cuban said that a higher tax could encourage firms to use the cash to expand or pay dividends to shareholders, which he said would be tax-free for many Americans. "Married households making under 94k pay no taxes on it," Cuban wrote. "If I own it. I pay full taxes." In a follow-up X post, Cuban suggested exempting companies from the higher tax if they distributed repurchased shares to all employees, from interns to the CEO, based on each worker's share of total annual cash earnings. He said this would be a "baby step" toward reducing income inequality and boosting workers' net worth. A market correction could encourage more buybacks Citi predicted in a March note that there would be $1 trillion in buybacks for the year, up 11% from about $900 billion in 2024. The bank said market declines could spur more repurchases, as companies seize the chance to buy their shares at discounted levels. Citi said large firms like Apple, Alphabet, Nvidia, Wells Fargo, and Visa repurchased roughly $190 billion in stock last year alone. Citi's forecast came before a series of market warnings from Wall Street strategists. Analysts at BTIG, Evercore ISI, Stifel, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo have all flagged the potential for a correction in the S&P 500 in the coming months. They cited stretched valuations, seasonal weakness in August and September, and uncertainty over tariffs' economic impact.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The EPA wants to roll back climate regulations. Here's how Hoosiers can have a say
Hoosiers have limited time to voice their opinions as the U.S. EPA prepares to roll back rules meant to curb the effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The announcement in Indianapolis last month to rescind a major climate rule was one of the Trump administration's many pushes to deregulate major greenhouse gas polluters — in this case, the transportation industry. And with a rich history of auto manufacturing, Indiana stands to benefit, according to a statement made by U.S. Rep. Jim Baird during the announcement. Meanwhile, Americans will become more vulnerable, said Shannon Anderson, the director of advocacy at Earth Charter Indiana. While greenhouse gas emissions are not directly toxic to human health, they are the driver behind human-caused climate change, which is exacerbating the frequency and intensity of natural disasters across the globe. 'People sometimes feel like climate change is a problem that's coming later, but we're starting to experience it now,' Anderson said. She pointed to extreme heat events and increased flooding across the continent. Sam Carpenter, the executive director of the Hoosier Environmental Council, warned denial of climate science is bad for individual Hoosiers, communities, and the economy. The EPA has regulated greenhouse gases for over 15 years, but now the agency wants to quash a 2009 ruling that anchors its ability to fight climate change. The agency will no longer regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants or oil and gas operations. And all greenhouse gas standards for new motor vehicles and motor vehicle engines will be repealed, according to the EPA. Before the ruling is finalized, the public has until Sept. 15, 2025, to submit comments on the proposal. Indiana's role in greenhouse gas emissions Indiana's greenhouse gas emissions — which come from compounds like carbon and methane — are hefty compared to similar states. Indiana releases the most energy-related greenhouse gases per capita in the Midwest and eighth in the nation, according to the HEC. About 21 percent of Indiana's total emissions come from the state's transportation sector. But as a desire to mitigate climate change impacted consumer choice and federal policy, like the Inflation Reduction Act, Indiana became a leader in electric vehicle manufacturing. Related industries now employ over 240,000 Hoosiers. The repeal of greenhouse gas emission standards could reduce the incentives helping Indiana pursue electric vehicles and battery manufacturing. 'We were starting to get a foothold in the U.S. under the Inflation Reduction Act, and Indiana has benefited mightily from those investments,' said Carpenter of HEC, nodding to the state's push toward clean energy. 'That's all being kind of pushed away through the current stance of denial on climate change. And so, it really has impacts on our health, on our communities, and in our economy.' How to get a word in Despite the agency's new stance on regulating greenhouse gases, 74 percent of Americans think that carbon dioxide should be regulated as a pollutant, according to the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Anderson thinks the EPA will soon have to face the masses during the required public comment period, where the agency must consider input before the ruling is finalized. 'We know there are so many Americans who stand with us on this issue, and it won't even take all of them to speak out on this, but as many as possible that are willing to just take a minute to write a public comment, to send a message to their legislators, that can be tremendously powerful,' Anderson said. The EPA is "going to have to acknowledge that they are flying in the face of overwhelming public consensus.' The public can submit written comments to the EPA through an online portal, email or by mail. Earth Charter Indiana also created a toolkit to help Hoosiers find out how to comment and contact their elected officials. Comments are due Sept. 15, 2025. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Sophie Hartley is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach her at or on X at @sophienhartley. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: The EPA is rescinding climate regulations. Here's what that means for you Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to Maximize Your Retirement Portfolio with These Top-Ranked Dividend Stocks
Here's a revealing data point: older Americans are scared more of outliving wealth than of death itself. And older Americans have legitimate reasons for this worry, even if they have dutifully saved for their golden years. That\s because the traditional ways people manage retirement may no longer provide enough income to meet expenses- and with people generally living longer, the principal retirement savings is exhausted far too early in the retirement period. Your parents' retirement investing plan won't cut it today. For many years, bonds or other fixed-income assets could produce the yield needed to provide solid income for retirement needs. However, these yields have dwindled over time: 10-year Treasury bond rates in the late 1990s were around 6.50%, but today, that rate is a thing of the past, with a slim likelihood of rates making a comeback in the foreseeable future. The impact of this rate decline is sizable: over 20 years, the difference in yield for a $1 million investment in 10-year Treasuries is more than $1 million. In addition to the considerable drop in bond yields, today's retirees are nervous about their future Social Security benefits. Because of certain demographic factors, it's been estimated that the funds that pay the Social Security benefits will run out of money in 2035. So what's a retiree to do? You could cut your expenses to the bone, and take the risk that your Social Security checks don't shrink. Or you could find an alternative investment that provides a steady, higher-rate income stream to replace dwindling bond yields. Invest in Dividend Stocks We feel that these dividend-paying equities-as long as they are from high-quality, low-risk issuers-can give retirement investors a smart option to replace low-yielding Treasury bonds (or other bonds). Look for stocks that have paid steady, increasing dividends for years (or decades), and have not cut their dividends even during recessions. Going beyond those familiar names, you can find excellent dividend-paying stocks by following a few guidelines. Look for companies that pay a dividend yield of around 3%, with positive annual dividend growth. The growth rate is key to help combat the effects of inflation. Here are three dividend-paying stocks retirees should consider for their nest egg portfolio. ACNB (ACNB) is currently shelling out a dividend of $0.34 per share, with a dividend yield of 3.15%. This compares to the Banks - Southwest industry's yield of 0.87% and the S&P 500's yield of 1.51%. The company's annualized dividend growth in the past year was 6.25%. Check ACNB dividend history here>>> Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is paying out a dividend of $0.23 per share at the moment, with a dividend yield of 3.85% compared to the Banks - Midwest industry's yield of 2.72% and the S&P 500's yield. The annualized dividend growth of the company was 4.55% over the past year. Check Associated Banc-Corp dividend history here>>> Currently paying a dividend of $0.22 per share, Coterra Energy (CTRA) has a dividend yield of 3.67%. This is compared to the Oil and Gas - Exploration and Production - United States industry's yield of 0% and the S&P 500's current yield. Annualized dividend growth for the company in the past year was 4.76%. Check Coterra Energy dividend history here>>> But aren't stocks generally more risky than bonds? Yes, that's true. As a broad category, bonds carry less risk than stocks. However, the stocks we are talking about-dividend-paying stocks from high-quality companies-can generate income over time and also mitigate the overall volatility of your portfolio compared to the stock market as a whole. Combating the impact of inflation is one advantage of owning these dividend-paying stocks. Here's why: many of these stable, high-quality companies increase their dividends over time, which translates to rising dividend income that offsets the effects of inflation. Thinking about dividend-focused mutual funds or ETFs? Watch out for fees. If you're interested in investing in dividends, but are thinking about mutual funds or ETFs rather than stocks, beware of fees. Mutual funds and specialized ETFs may carry high fees, which could lower the overall gains you earn from dividends, undercutting your dividend income strategy. Be sure to look for funds with low fees if you decide on this approach. Bottom Line Pursuing a dividend investing strategy can help protect your retirement portfolio. Whether you choose to invest in stocks or through low-fee mutual funds or ETFs, this approach can potentially help you achieve a more secure and enjoyable retirement. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report ACNB Corporation (ACNB) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
