Tauranga reverses water services decision, partners with Western Bay of Plenty
Drysdale said the information reconfirmed that a multi-council water organisation was the right direction.
'Western Bay are our family, they've cried out for help, and it's our responsibility as the regional leader to step up and look after our little brother.'
The Department of Internal Affairs made it clear that councils needed to consider what was best for their regional partners, as well as themselves, he said.
The multi-council organisation was a 'win for everyone' because 'everyone pays less,' Drysdale said.
Western Bay of Plenty mayor James Denyer asked Tauranga to reconsider its water decision. Photo / John Borren
Western Bay Mayor James Denyer wrote to Tauranga expressing his 'dismay' at the city council's in-house decision.
Tauranga's decision put Western Bay in a 'very challenging situation' where it would be unable to meet the financial sustainability requirements, the August 6 letter said.
Denyer asked Tauranga to reconsider its decision and to work toward a multiple-council water organisation with them.
Thames Coromandel Mayor Len Salt also wrote to Tauranga on August 13, saying its water services plan would be sub-optimal without its regional partners.
At Friday's meeting, councillor Hautapu Baker said this was the biggest decision this council would make.
The respectful thing to do was give equal time and weight to all the possible water scenarios, which the decision to stay in-house allowed for, he said.
The decision to work with other councils was subject to due diligence.
Mayors Mahé Drysdale and James Denyer went rowing on the Wairoa River in April to get people talking about Local Water Done well. Photo / Tauranga City Council
Western Bay of Plenty needed to be satisfied that concerns expressed by its iwi about Treaty of Waitangi settlement considerations would be considered before Tauranga would include Thames Coromandel.
Western Bay of Plenty councillors also met on Friday to decide the way forward.
Initially, the district council was going to request a Crown facilitator to help deliver a viable water services plan, but this was not required after Tauranga's latest decision.
The cost of a Crown facilitator would have been $1600 a day had it been required.
The district council would stick with its original decision to work with Tauranga on water services.
It noted Thames Coromandel District Council's desire to be part of a multi-council-controlled organisation with Tauranga and the Western Bay.
Also, the district council requested the Office of Treaty Settlements work urgently with tangata whenua to resolve treaty settlement issues raised by iwi.
These issues made it difficult for Western Bay to partner with Thames Coromandel for water.
Western Bay of Plenty District councillor Margaret Murray-Benge. Photo / John Borren
Councillor Margaret Murray-Benge asked if there could be an extension to the September 3 deadline so the council could continue to consult with the community.
However, the deadline for an extension request was August 3.
Both Tauranga and Western Bay held public consultation on options for water services in April.
Murray-Benge said the mayors using casting votes to 'make sure' the in-house options were 'never considered' was a 'vote of no confidence in the whole process'.
Mayor James Denyer used his casting vote to opt for a multicouncil water organisation at Western Bay's water meeting earlier this month.
Deputy mayor John Scrimgeour said there were benefits to everyone by working with other councils.
'If we are trying to get the best result for our ratepayers, we need to be talking about how we can involve as many councils as possible.'
Scrimgeour respected the issues raised about working with other councils, but they needed to work together to get the 'best possible outcomes'.
Denyer said Tauranga's decision allowed Western Bay to move forward with confidence.
'Working with Tauranga is the best step forward for both councils,' he said in a statement today.
'We are all working toward the same goal: sustainable water services under the new framework.'
Both Tauranga City and Western Bay will submit a Water Service Delivery Plan by September 3.
The Department of Internal Affairs will assess them and provide a decision by the end of the year.
- LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Tauranga reverses water services decision, partners with Western Bay of Plenty
Tauranga City Council will now partner with its 'little brother', Western Bay of Plenty District Council, and possibly Thames Coromandel District Council, on a water services organisation from July 2027. Drysdale said the information reconfirmed that a multi-council water organisation was the right direction. 'Western Bay are our family, they've cried out for help, and it's our responsibility as the regional leader to step up and look after our little brother.' The Department of Internal Affairs made it clear that councils needed to consider what was best for their regional partners, as well as themselves, he said. The multi-council organisation was a 'win for everyone' because 'everyone pays less,' Drysdale said. Western Bay of Plenty mayor James Denyer asked Tauranga to reconsider its water decision. Photo / John Borren Western Bay Mayor James Denyer wrote to Tauranga expressing his 'dismay' at the city council's in-house decision. Tauranga's decision put Western Bay in a 'very challenging situation' where it would be unable to meet the financial sustainability requirements, the August 6 letter said. Denyer asked Tauranga to reconsider its decision and to work toward a multiple-council water organisation with them. Thames Coromandel Mayor Len Salt also wrote to Tauranga on August 13, saying its water services plan would be sub-optimal without its regional partners. At Friday's meeting, councillor Hautapu Baker said this was the biggest decision this council would make. The respectful thing to do was give equal time and weight to all the possible water scenarios, which the decision to stay in-house allowed for, he said. The decision to work with other councils was subject to due diligence. Mayors Mahé Drysdale and James Denyer went rowing on the Wairoa River in April to get people talking about Local Water Done well. Photo / Tauranga City Council Western Bay of Plenty needed to be satisfied that concerns expressed by its iwi about Treaty of Waitangi settlement considerations would be considered before Tauranga would include Thames Coromandel. Western Bay of Plenty councillors also met on Friday to decide the way forward. Initially, the district council was going to request a Crown facilitator to help deliver a viable water services plan, but this was not required after Tauranga's latest decision. The cost of a Crown facilitator would have been $1600 a day had it been required. The district council would stick with its original decision to work with Tauranga on water services. It noted Thames Coromandel District Council's desire to be part of a multi-council-controlled organisation with Tauranga and the Western Bay. Also, the district council requested the Office of Treaty Settlements work urgently with tangata whenua to resolve treaty settlement issues raised by iwi. These issues made it difficult for Western Bay to partner with Thames Coromandel for water. Western Bay of Plenty District councillor Margaret Murray-Benge. Photo / John Borren Councillor Margaret Murray-Benge asked if there could be an extension to the September 3 deadline so the council could continue to consult with the community. However, the deadline for an extension request was August 3. Both Tauranga and Western Bay held public consultation on options for water services in April. Murray-Benge said the mayors using casting votes to 'make sure' the in-house options were 'never considered' was a 'vote of no confidence in the whole process'. Mayor James Denyer used his casting vote to opt for a multicouncil water organisation at Western Bay's water meeting earlier this month. Deputy mayor John Scrimgeour said there were benefits to everyone by working with other councils. 'If we are trying to get the best result for our ratepayers, we need to be talking about how we can involve as many councils as possible.' Scrimgeour respected the issues raised about working with other councils, but they needed to work together to get the 'best possible outcomes'. Denyer said Tauranga's decision allowed Western Bay to move forward with confidence. 'Working with Tauranga is the best step forward for both councils,' he said in a statement today. 'We are all working toward the same goal: sustainable water services under the new framework.' Both Tauranga City and Western Bay will submit a Water Service Delivery Plan by September 3. The Department of Internal Affairs will assess them and provide a decision by the end of the year. - LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
UN letter: PM firm with ministers on who should be sending responses
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says he has made it "pretty clear" to his ministers how they should handle correspondence with the United Nations, as the coalition's letter-writing saga drags on. Appearing at his post-Cabinet media conference on Monday, Luxon was pressed on RNZ's revelations that Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith had been consulted before David Seymour issued a forthright reply to the UN in July. "I'm not going to get into that," Luxon told RNZ. "We've canvassed that before." Luxon reiterated his "very clear position" that Winston Peters, as foreign minister, was responsible for coordinating all responses to the UN. Asked what it said about his Cabinet that multiple ministers appeared to misunderstand that process, Luxon was blunt. "It's pretty clear to them now," he said. "I've made it pretty clear." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii However, new correspondence - as reported by RNZ on Saturday - show Seymour's staff stated that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade's preferred approach was actually for a joint reply from "relevant ministers" Seymour, Goldsmith and Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The controversy stems from a June letter from UN special rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples Albert K Barume, who flagged concerns that Seymour's Regulatory Standards Bill excluded Māori traditions and failed to uphold Treaty of Waitangi principles. Seymour, writing as regulations minister, fired back a response in early July, describing the critique as "presumptive, condescending and wholly misplaced" and "an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty". That letter was later withdrawn and both Luxon and Peters publicly rebuked Seymour for bypassing proper process. Peters eventually sent a government-wide response in August , striking a softer tone and expressing regret for the "breakdown in protocol". On Saturday, RNZ revealed new documents, obtained under the Official Information Act, which showed Seymour had run his draft past Goldsmith beforehand and been told his colleague was "happy for us to send it". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
5 days ago
- 1News
Kaipara council's $52,000 Māori report slammed as 'anti-Māori'
Kaipara District Council has spent an unplanned $52,000 producing a document which attempts to spell out what legal obligations the local authority has to Māori. Mayor Craig Jepson claimed the document would serve as a guide for staff, councillors and the public, clarifying obligations and potentially saving the council money in the future. But one councillor has described the paper as "actively anti-Māori" while another deemed it "bull****". The unbudgeted 127-page document was produced by Wellington law firm Franks Ogilvie and formally adopted in late July by a narrow 5:4 vote. Legal advice around local government law change that the firm gave to Hobson's Pledge, a group known for lobbying against co-governance, is included. Kaipara District Council chief executive Jason Marris commissioned the report following direction from the council's remuneration and development committee, which oversees his performance and is chaired by Mayor Jepson. ADVERTISEMENT Marris said he had not received committee direction on how the document should be used with staff but would now consider its implications. Cr Eryn Wilson-Collins asked whether staff would be required to follow the Māori interaction ceilings outlined in the document, rather than anything more than that. "There are many questions around its purpose and where it will go from here," she said. She added that while there was currently no formal direction, she feared the document would serve as the ceiling for council dealings with Māori. The document was developed as a single point of reference, summarising and explaining council obligations — or lack thereof — to Māori under various laws and frameworks. These include the Treaty of Waitangi, principles of the Treaty, the Local Government Act 2022, Resource Management Act 1991, Māori Language Act 2016, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Mayor Jepson said the document could serve councils around the country. ADVERTISEMENT "There had not been a single source of information around this previously," Jepson said. "It provides an opportunity for other councils around New Zealand to follow." Kaipara District Council at its 2022 swearing in ceremony in Dargaville. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) The Jepson-chaired remuneration and development committee's members — Deputy Mayor Jonathan Larsen and councillors Mike Howard, Gordon Lambeth and Rachael Williams — voted to adopt the document. Cr Mike Howard said the document was worthwhile because it addressed actual legal obligations rather than misinterpretations. However, Cr Wilson-Collins described it as "embarrassing" and said she looked forward to a new council after the upcoming elections. She said community feedback showed concern about ratepayer money being spent on a document that was divisive and politically charged. ADVERTISEMENT "There are a lot of questions that the community have raised with me around the framing of the document," she said. Wilson-Collins said the document falsely claimed councils were not part of the Crown and therefore had no real Treaty of Waitangi duties, only those narrowly imposed by statute. "This is false and misleading," she said. "While councils are not the Crown in the constitutional sense, courts and the Waitangi Tribunal have repeatedly said Crown obligations can extend to councils where powers or functions are delegated." Te Moananui o Kaipara Māori ward councillor Pera Paniora said the report was "bull****" and an echo chamber of the political positions of some councillors. She said committee members Jepson, Larsen, Howard, Lambeth and Williams, who had worked on its genesis, should have paid for it themselves. Several councillors opposing the adoption attempted to pause the meeting vote to allow time for an information briefing, in line with normal council process. ADVERTISEMENT Cr Mark Vincent questioned the motives of those pushing for adoption at the meeting without that step. "We need to give it proper consideration," Cr Vincent said. Deputy Mayor Larsen said a briefing could happen, after the document had been adopted. Cr Eryn Wilson-Collins. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) Cr Wilson-Collins said the document undermined the Treaty of Waitangi as a constitutional document, treating it more like a political courtesy. She said the document denied councils had Treaty obligations, claimed Māori had no right to consultation or outcomes, and framed participation as a burden. "This is disrespectful to local mana whenua," she said. ADVERTISEMENT "It said mana whenua mandates had no statutory basis." Cr Wilson-Collins said this was a complete dismissal of local hapū and iwi rights, with existing obligations spun as optional. She said the document repeatedly reinforced the idea that council's obligation was to general community democracy, as if that were incompatible with upholding Māori rights. It referred to the Waitangi Tribunal as non-binding and nearly irrelevant to council operations. Cr Wilson-Collins said the report was politically biased and echoed rhetoric from NZ First, ACT, and anti-co-governance narratives. "I'm ashamed and embarrassed that would be the case," she said. The council's law firm Simpson Grierson peer-reviewed the document. ADVERTISEMENT LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
