New mortgage rates fall for the third month in a row
Overall new mortgage rates fell to 3.72pc in April, down from 3.77pc in March, Central Bank of Ireland statistics show. Mortgage rates are now at their lowest level in just over two years.
The Eurozone average rate increased marginally to 3.34pc. However, rates varied hugely across the currency bloc. They are as low as 1.69pc in Malta to as high as 4.40pc in Latvia.
Ireland had the fifth highest rates in the Eurozone. This is a vast improvement on a few years ago when mortgage rates in this country were among the highest in the area. Also falling, but at a faster rate, are the interest rates banks are paying savers.
The Central Bank of Ireland figures show that the average interest rate on household deposits with a fixed maturity fell from 2.26pc to 1.95pc. This reflects the fact that the European Central Bank cut rates for the eighth time last week putting pressure on savings and deposit rates.
One more rate cut is expected by the money markets, possibly in September.
Daragh Cassidy, head of communications at mortgage broker Bonkers.ie, said the gap between Irish mortgage rates and European ones was narrowing fast.
'Although we now have the fourth highest rates in the Eurozone, the 0.38 percentage point gap between the average Eurozone rate and the average Irish rate is actually the smallest it's been in 10 months.'
He said the ECB cut rates again this month, and is likely to cut rates once more before the end of the year. This should lead to mortgage rates in Ireland continuing to creep a bit lower over the coming months.
The lowest rate in the market is currently just under 3pc, which is with Avant Money's new tracker-like variable product which tracks the Euribor, Mr Cassidy said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Learn more
AIB and PTSB both offer fixed rates as low as 3pc, but homeowners much have a Building Energy Rating of B3 or better.
Mr Cassidy said: 'We could see a fixed rate slightly under 3pc on offer by the end of the year for mortgage customers with big deposits. However, the sub-2pc rates we saw as recently as 2022 don't look like returning any time soon.'
He said this is particularly relevant for some of those coming off fixed rates in the next year or so.
Despite the overall decline in rates, some may still be facing higher repayments than those they have been used to when they come to re-fix, he added.
And asked if it has plans to pass on the latest ECB rate cut to its customers, Pepper Advantage said it expects to pass this on. 'Pepper Advantage recently cut rates in April and anticipates further reductions for customers in the near future. Pepper Advantage continues to monitor ECB interest rate changes with a view to passing them on to customers.'
People whose mortgages are serviced by the likes of Pepper Advantage on behalf of vulture funds are known as 'mortgage prisoners'. This is because they are only offered very high variable rates and are unable to fix.
They are unable to move their mortgage to another lender as many of them are either in arrears or fell behind on their payments in the past.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
US taxi app Lyft completes acquisition of Freenow for around €175m
US RIDE-HAILING GIANT Lyft has completed its acquisition of taxi app Freenow. In April, Lyft announced it had entered a definitive agreement, for around €175 million , to acquire Freenow from its current owners, German carmakers BMW and Mercedes-Benz. In a statement yesterday, Lyft announced that the acquisition has been completed. Lyft is a North American ride hailing app, that offers rideshare, bikes and scooters – it's second only to Uber in the US market for allowing users book trips with its drivers. Lyft had 23.7 million active riders in 2024. Advertisement In a statement, Lyft said the move will see the two companies 'join forces to seize the incredible opportunity of doubling Lyft's current addressable market to more than 300 billion personal vehicle trips per year'. Lyft CEO David Risher said the move will 'bring out the best of each company to the other' while Freenow CEO Thomas Zimmerman said that for European users of the app, the service will be 'amplified'. 'With Lyft's platform and resources behind us, we can innovate faster and serve drivers, passengers, and city partners even better,' Zimmerman added. For users of the Freenow app, they will be prompted to download Lyft whenever they use Freenow in the US and Canada. Lyft also said that in the coming months, European users will 'experience more consistent pricing and faster matchings'. Meanwhile, Freenow drivers are told to expect more rides as Lyft users will be prompted to download Freenow whenever they are in Europe. Lyft also noted that around 50% of taxi bookings in Europe take place offline and that it is 'committed to strengthen Freenow's leadership in the taxi industry, backed by decades of trusted partnerships with regulators, cities, unions, and fleet operators'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
The 42
4 hours ago
- The 42
Thurles racecourse announces closure with immediate effect
THURLES RACECOURSE HAS closed with immediate effect and fixtures which had been scheduled for later in the year will not go ahead. The first ever recorded race-meeting at Thurles took place in 1732 and it has been in the hands of the Molony family since the early 1900s. Riona Molony announced the closure in a statement this morning. She thanked the 'extended racecourse family', such as staff, sponsors, the racing community, local businesses, and racegoers for their support. 'It has been an honour and a privilege for our family to have run Thurles Racecourse, and I am officially announcing our retirement today,' said Riona Molony. She said she is 'very proud of the immense contribution our family has made to racing' and remarked that 'horse-racing is part of the fabric of our family'. Advertisement 'My family and I look forward to going racing with you again, as spectators,' she added. The parade ring at Thurles Racecourse Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Her late husband Pierce Molony, who died in 2015, took over the running of the Co Tipperary racecourse from his father Dr Paddy Molony in 1974. 'Since my beloved husband Pierce passed away, with the help of our four daughters Patricia, Helen, Ann Marie and Kate and our wonderful staff, we've managed to keep the show on the road and I know he would be very proud of us for that,' said Riona. She added: 'The girls all have their own families, careers and lives to live. 'Ever increasing industry demands and the cost of doing business has also been a major factor.' Thurles Racecourse is fully licenced to race until 31 December and has 11 prominent fixtures scheduled for the 2025/26 racing calendar. However, these meetings will not go ahead. Riona added: 'We're going to enjoy this time together and relax now the decision is made and the news is out before we consider our options.' 'Surprise to everyone in the industry' The CEO of Horse Racing Ireland, Suzanne Eade, described Thurles Racecourse as a 'cornerstone of the National Hunt programme in Ireland during the winter months'. She said today's announcement 'was a surprise to everyone in the industry'. However, she added that the announcement must have been a 'hugely difficult one' and that she 'respects their decision to take a step back from running racing at Thurles'. Eade remarked that Pierce Molony 'contributed significantly to the Irish racing industry for many years and the Molony family, led by Riona, certainly stepped up following his untimely passing' The Horse Racing Ireland CEO added that she will be seeking a meeting with the Molony family in the near future to discuss their position.
Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war
In the hours following the announcement that the US and EU had struck a deal last weekend on tariffs, European reaction was mixed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the deal, which imposes 15% tariffs on most items going both ways, "creates certainty in uncertain times" and "delivers stability and predictability, for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic" as she tried to sell the deal to the 27 EU member states. But if Ms von der Leyen expected a lap of honour to ease her troubled start to her second term, one was not coming. "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission," French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X of what he called the "von der Leyen-Trump deal". German Chancellor Friedrich Merz himself initially appeared satisfied, saying that the agreement "succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard". But by Monday, amid cross-party criticism, Mr Merz said the deal would "substantially damage" his nation's finances, but acknowledged that the negotiating team "couldn't expect to achieve any more" as Mr Trump's willingness to enter into a 30% trade war was apparent. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an ally of Mr Trump, said the US president "ate von der Leyen for breakfast" while Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he would support it "without any enthusiasm". Across the bloc, there has been criticism of Europe's perceived capitulation, with many echoing Mr Bayrou's sentiments that it poses fundamental questions about the cohesiveness of the project. German Green MP Sandra Detzer told her parliament that the EU "has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade, instead of long-term stability". Ms Detzer's alarm is representative of a particular sharp end of the deal. According to one think tank, the deal will cost the German economy around €6.5bn in terms of its GDP in the first year, while experts have slashed the country's growth forecasts in recent months. Fabio de Masi, a German MEP, told EuroNews this week that not only was the deal bad, it was "a betrayal" for which Ms von der Leyen should resign. The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals entering the US, and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth €643bn over three years. But as the tariffs were set to kick in on Friday, the two sides had not agreed on all of the details, which Ms von der Leyen's commission has stressed will be a "set of principles" and not a trade deal. On Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that "from there will flow the additional negotiated exemptions that we're looking to bake into our agreement with the US". Drinks tariffs What shape those carveouts take is still to be decided, with a 15% tariff applying until they are. That is of particular concern to the drinks industry across the continent. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. The US tariff on European spirits is currently 10%. Brussels is keen to reduce that to zero or, for wine at least, to the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates that are set on a fixed cost per litre basis, rather than in percentage terms. Until recently, spirits had benefited from zero tariffs between the US and EU following an agreement in 1997 that also included other countries such as Canada and Japan. That lasted until 2018, when the EU response to US steel and aluminium tariffs included increased duties on US bourbon and other spirits. These were suspended in 2021. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. File photo US most-favoured-nation rates for wine are 19.8c per litre for sparkling and 6.3c per litre for most other wine, which equates to very low rates in most cases. But as Mr Trump signed an executive order overnight into Friday, there was no movement on the exemption and the drinks industry will, for now at least, pay the 15% rate. With EU officials privately briefing Reuters that negotiations could run into late autumn, that will mean financial pain for those businesses in the short-term, at least. Speaking to journalists at a press conference on Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said: 'The commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs, including for traditional EU products such as wine and spirits. 'It is not our expectation that wine and spirits would be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the US tomorrow, and therefore that sector, as with all other economic sectors, will be captured by the 15% ceiling.' Motor tariffs In Germany, a number of car manufacturers revised down profit guidance on the back of the tariffs, which will face a 15% tariff as well, but for BMW, the impact of the agreement was "exaggerated". 'I think this tariff discussion is way exaggerated and also its effects on the industry,' chief executive Oliver Zipse told the Financial Times. 'What's more important is the question, are the products attractive?' Carveouts At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, enterprise minister Peter Burke updated ministers on the detail of the weekend's agreement, telling journalists that there will be exemptions to the tariff regime, with aviation one for which Ireland had successfully argued alongside others. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carveouts. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agri-foods and potentially spirits.' Ireland, like many other countries, is banking on the carveouts agreed protecting key sectors like agri-foods and that the rate for pharmaceuticals would not exceed 15%. Like many countries across Europe, ministers here are privately saying that the deal is far from ideal, but also query what else is to be done. By Friday, they could point to Mr Trump's executive order, which imposed tariffs on many countries with whom he had not negotiated. But there is also acceptance that the tariff regime brings with it a new reality, one with which the EU needs to grapple. If countries are arguing for exceptions, how does the European negotiating team balance those interests? And what will the reaction be when the final deal is reached?
