Advocates for Black maternal health press NC General Assembly to approve ‘MOMnibus' legislation
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's latest maternal mortality report found that in 2023, Black women nationally were more than three times more likely than white women to die during or after childbirth. (FatCamera/Getty Images)
On the week that North Carolina senators were busy rolling out a $32.6B spending plan, it was difficult to gain attention for legislation that some consider a longshot this session. But Senator Natalie Murdock (D-Chatham, Durham) refused to allow budget week to shift her focus from what she sees as the critical need to pass a bill crafted to improve Black maternal health outcomes.
The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. And Black women in the U.S. are three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related health problems than white women.
Murdock has repeated those sobering facts for more than three years now, as she tries to get the Republican-controlled Senate to advance the MOMnibus 3.0 Act.
Gabriel Scott, an MPA with the North Carolina Coalition of the National Council of Negro Women, joined Murdock last week in advocating for Senate Bill 571/House Bill 725.
Scott said when she went into labor at 25 weeks, doctors were dismissive.
'I needed pain medication, I needed help, I needed something. They did not listen.'
After she delivered her twins, complications with the placenta and an excessive loss of blood, left her husband terrified she might need a blood transfusion.
'They finally had an anesthesiologist come to give me medication. My husband said, can you at least tell me what the medication is? And the anesthesiologist laughed and said, 'Oh, this is typically medicine we give to war vets who have had limbs blown off,'' Scott recounted. 'They took it as a joke. The doctor continued to shove his arm in me.'
Hours later in recovery, a white female doctor came to her room acknowledging the difficulty of the delivery.
'And she said, there are things that we know we do well at the hospital and then there are things that we know we don't do well, and one of those things is our treatment of African-American women and childbirth.'
The same doctor suggested both she and her husband might seek mental health help.
Scott gives thanks to God that her twin girls are healthy. But she's been dealing with pelvic pain for over four years and the trauma of doctors who didn't listen to her.
Dr. Charity Watkins, an assistant professor of social work at North Carolina Central University and a maternal health researcher at Duke University, shared her own terrifying story of pregnancy-related heart failure.
'I always feel it is important for me to introduce myself using my professional roles. Maybe my doctoral degree will save me from the daily mistreatment I experienced because of my dark complexion. Maybe leaning into the perceived prestige of being a professor will protect me from poor perceptions and negative stereotypes associated with being a Black woman,' Watkins told a room of reporters on Wednesday.
After her pregnancy, Watkins presented with classic heart failure symptoms, a family history of heart disease, and a recent cesarean delivery followed by hemorrhaging.
She was told by a doctor that maybe it was the flu.
'What could have led to me receiving quality health care without having to prove I'm worthy of being treated as a human being?'
Watkins believes the MOMnibus 3.0 Act would have changed her birth story, with doctors who would not have dismissed her as being over-dramatic or 'just another Black woman exaggerating her pain levels.'
The legislation would direct the NC Department of Health and Human Services to establish and operate a maternal mortality prevention grant initiative that would establish or expand programs for the prevention of maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity among Black women.
'It's time for us to provide Black mothers with more confidence in their care before, during, and after childbirth,' said Watkins.
The legislation would also require NCDHHS, in collaboration with community-based organizations led by Black women and a historically Black college and universities (HBCUs) that primarily serves minority populations to create evidence-based implicit bias training program for health care professionals.
Patients receiving care at a perinatal care facility would also receive a list of their rights including being informed of continuing health care requirements following discharge.
The bill would also earmark $3 million for each year of the 2025-27 biennium for the UNC Board of Governors for recruiting, training, and retaining a diverse workforce of lactation consultants in North Carolina.
Reps. Zack Hawkins (D-Durham) and Julie von Haefen (D-Wake) are advocating for HB 725, the companion bill in the state House.
Hawkins said his two sisters and his wife had their own stories in which doctors were not 'listening appropriately' to their pain, and the fact that they knew their own bodies.
Von Haefen said while it may not seem like her place to speak on Black health, she also knew she could not turn away.
'This should not be something that's put solely on Black women. White women need to be allies in this fight, because we are all mothers.'
In North Carolina Black women are 1.8 times more likely to die from childbirth, two-thirds of these deaths are preventable, according to Murdock.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Philadelphia paper warns Fetterman to take Senate job seriously – ‘or step away'
The Philadelphia Inquirer's editorial board has issued a sharp rebuke of Pennsylvania senator John Fetterman in a new opinion piece, urging him to take his job 'seriously' and writing that 'it's time for Fetterman to serve Pennsylvanians, or step away.' In a strongly worded piece published on Sunday, the editorial board of the Philadelphia Inquirer, which endorsed Fetterman during his 2022 Senate campaign, said the first-term Democrat 'has missed more votes than nearly every other senator in the past two years' and 'regularly skips committee hearings, cancels meetings, avoids the daily caucus lunches with colleagues, and rarely goes on the Senate floor'. The editorial board also wrote that six former Fetterman staffers told an Inquirer reporter that Fetterman was frequently absent or spent hours alone in his office, avoiding colleagues and meetings. 'Being an elected official comes with public scrutiny,' the board wrote. 'If Fetterman can't handle the attention or perform his job, then in the best interest of the country and the nearly 13 million residents of Pennsylvania he represents, he should step aside.' Related: Republican senator criticized for mock apology after saying 'we all are going to die' 'Being an elected representative is a privilege, not an entitlement,' it added. 'Being a US senator is a serious job that requires full-time engagement.' Fetterman responded to the piece and allegations on Monday during a Fox News debate with Republican senator David McCormick. 'For me, it's very clear, it's just part of like this weird – this weird smear,' Fetterman said. 'The more kinds of, left kind of media continues to have these kinds of an attack, and it's just part of a smear and that's just not … it's just not accurate.' He continued: 'I've always been there, and for me, if I miss some of those votes, I've made 90% of them, and we all know those votes that I've missed were on Monday. Those are travel days and I have three young kids and … those are throwaway procedural votes that … they were never determined if they were important. That's a choice that I made.' Fetterman also reportedly claimed senators Bernie Sanders and Patty Murray had missed more votes than he has. 'Why aren't the left media yelling and demanding them and claiming they're not doing their job?' Fetterman said. In response, a spokesperson for Murray told Politico that most of her missed votes occurred during a vote-a-rama when her husband was hospitalized. A spokesperson for Sanders did not immediately respond to request for comment from Politico, but the outlet pointed out that according to data from a government transparency site, Sanders has missed 836 of 6,226 rollcall votes since 1991, or about 13.4%. Murray has missed 290 of 11,106 rollcall votes since 1993, or roughly 2.6%. By comparison, Politico reported that Fetterman has missed 174 of 961 rollcall votes, approximately 18.1%, in his first term, according to The editorial on Sunday comes as last month, New York magazine published an article on Fetterman which quoted several former and current Fetterman staffers who expressed concerns about the Senator's mental and physical health, and his behavior. In response, Fetterman dismissed the piece, calling it 'a one-source story, with a couple anonymous sources' and labeling it a 'hit piece from a very left publication'.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers reject proposals that would roll back new paid family and medical leave program
Jun. 2—AUGUSTA — Lawmakers on Monday rejected proposals that would roll back protections in Maine's new paid family and medical leave program, including bills that would repeal the program, make it voluntary and that would exclude certain workers from coverage. The House of Representatives voted 75-65 to reject a bill repealing the program and 74-65 to reject a bill that would make it voluntary for employers and employees to participate. The Senate voted 20-14 against a bill to exempt agricultural employers and employees from the program. The bills face further votes in both chambers, but the action Monday indicates the program approved in 2023 likely won't be significantly changed by lawmakers despite Republican-led efforts to either repeal the program entirely or change aspects of it. Democrats in the House defended the fledgling program Monday, saying that while the state has only just begun collecting the new payroll tax to fund the program and benefits won't be available until next year, it promises to improve the lives of families. "It's a popular program, even before it was in law or before it pays out a single benefit," said Rep. Amy Roeder, D-Bangor. Roeder said there has been speculation that the costs of the program will "spiral out of control," but said experiences in other states have shown otherwise. "Paid family programs across the country have remained stable over time, with most states avoiding major rate increases and no premium over 1.2%," Roeder said. As of August 2024, Maine and 12 other states had adopted mandatory paid family and medical leave programs, while eight states have voluntary paid leave options that employers can purchase through private insurers, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The Maine program is funded with a 1% payroll tax split evenly between employers and employees. When benefits become available on May 1, 2026, the program will pay up to 90% of regular wages for up to 12 weeks for workers who are ill or need to take care of newborns or other family members, among other reasons. Employers with fewer than 15 workers are exempt from paying into the program, but workers at small businesses still pay a 0.5% payroll tax and will be eligible for benefits. Republicans in the House pushed for repeal of the program, saying it's been difficult for businesses to implement and a burden for taxpayers, particularly those who pay into the program but may never use it. "Maine citizens currently shoulder one of the highest tax burdens in the nation," said Rep. Joshua Morris, R-Turner, the sponsor of LD 406, which would repeal laws related to the paid family and medical leave program. "As of Jan. 1, with the implementation of this new payroll tax, that burden has only gotten higher." LD 406 was rejected 75-65 along party lines in an initial House vote Monday and now heads to the Senate. Other changes to the program were also rejected in initial votes Monday. LD 1333, sponsored by Rep. Jennifer Poirier, R-Skowhegan, would require employees to be employed with their employer for 120 days before they're eligible for leave and would prohibit employees from taking paid leave unless they have simultaneously taken any available unpaid leave, among other changes. Poirier said the bill would add fairness and sustainability to the program. "This bill will help ensure there are proper guardrails on the program," she said. The bill was defeated 75-63 and heads to the Senate. In a House debate, Roeder addressed the requirement for an employee to be with their employer for 120 days, saying that an employee's payment into the program should follow them from job to job. "If I worked at a company for 20 years and I quit and go to another company, I should be able to use the paid leave I earned over that 20 years," she said. The House on Monday also rejected a bipartisan proposal, LD 1712, from Rep. Tiffany Roberts, D-South Berwick, for changes to the program. In the Senate, lawmakers rejected bills Monday that would exempt agricultural employees and employers from the program and that would allow for reimbursements of payroll taxes collected from businesses who offer equivalent or superior private plans. Both bills were rejected 20-14. The Senate also approved LD 894, a Department of Labor bill providing clarifying and technical changes to the current law. Both chambers gave initial approval Monday to LD 1221, which directs the department to study ways to protect the program's funds from being expended for any purposes other than paid family and medical leave benefits. Copy the Story Link


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Republican Senator Says 'Best Health Care Is a Job' in Response to Cuts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. During a debate over President Donald Trump's sweeping legislative package, known as the "Big Beautiful Bill," Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that "the best health care is a job," according to news outlet The South Dakota senator added during Monday's discussion with other Republican lawmakers that this was because jobs can provide helpful benefits that give employees access to health care. Newsweek contacted Thune's press office outside of regular working hours via email for comment. Why It Matters The ongoing budget and tax debate has profound implications for American families and individuals dependent on Medicaid and other social support programs. The Republican-backed proposal aims to curb government spending with reforms that could reduce eligibility for programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), stirring fears among advocates that millions could lose essential benefits. Estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office suggested up to 10 million Americans risk losing Medicaid coverage if proposed work requirements pass. Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the Capitol in Washington D.C. on Monday, June 2, 2025. Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the Capitol in Washington D.C. on Monday, June 2, 2025. J. Scott Applewhite/AP What To Know Thune's comments came during a conversation about the proposed changes to Medicaid. Part of the budget bill includes adapting eligibility for the program, meaning that enrollees would have to work for 80 hours a month as a minimum, unless medically exempt, in order to receive the benefit. Thune reportedly said: "You know a lot of times health care comes with a job and so creating those better paying jobs that come with benefits is ultimately the goal here." His remarks reflect a broader Republican strategy to tie access to health care directly to employment benefits. Proposed stricter work requirements for benefit recipients have provoked vocal protests during recent Republican town halls, including an incident involving Iowa Senator Joni Ernst. When confronted by constituents who warned of tragic outcomes from the policy, Ernst replied, "Well, we are all going to die," a comment that generated criticism for its perceived insensitivity. House Democrats have unanimously opposed the legislation, calling it an attempt to "rip health care and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off, and the well-connected." Thune also said extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts remained a priority in ongoing negotiations in the Senate, and that he hoped to "make some of these tax provisions permanent." He warned that without immediate action, "the average family that makes $80,000 dollars a year is going to see a $1,700 tax increase if Congress doesn't act." He also noted that the child tax credit would revert from $2,000 to $1,000 with a halved standard deduction, and that there would be a $2.6-trillion tax increase next year for American families. What People Are Saying John Thune, Senate Majority Leader, said, according to the news outlet "I talked about growing the economy. There are certain policies that generate growth in the economy. And that ultimately is what you want. A rising tide lifts all the boats." What Happens Next The Senate will continue deliberations on the "Big Beautiful Bill," with possible amendments, before an expected vote ahead of the July 4 deadline. The future of tax extensions and Medicaid work requirements will be determined by negotiations between Republican leaders, moderates, and Democrats.