logo
"Hands Off Iran": Global Protests Erupt Over US Strikes On Iran

"Hands Off Iran": Global Protests Erupt Over US Strikes On Iran

NDTV4 hours ago

People in multiple US cities and across the world have taken to the streets to demonstrate against President Donald Trump's decision to launch strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The actions, which Tehran called an act of war, were seen as a major escalation in the Iran-Israel conflict.
Protests broke out in Germany, Pakistan, Australia, and India, where demonstrators condemned the attack. In the US, several cities saw large-scale anti-war protests on Sunday, with banners reading "Hands off Iran" and "No US-Israel war on Iran."
Footage shared on X showed protesters chanting anti-war slogans and urging the Trump administration to stop backing Israel and withdraw from the escalating conflict.
Outside the White House, demonstrators waved Iranian flags and carried socialist-themed signs. Trump ally Laura Loomer posted a video of the protest, calling participants "anti-Trump, pro-Iran," and claimed the event was organised by groups linked to George Soros and the Muslim Brotherhood.
"Imagine being a 'Trump supporter' and repeating the Left's anti-Trump, pro-Iran talking points. Traitors and idiots," she wrote.
Anti-Trump, pro-Iran protesters are currently outside of the White House chanting 'Hands off Iran' and waving Iranian flags & socialist signs.
The protest was organized by groups associated with George Soros and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Imagine being a 'Trump supporter' and… pic.twitter.com/fLT6Mzc95w
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) June 22, 2025
HAPPENING NOW ????: Anti-war protest outside the White House pic.twitter.com/Fy34IzVxxj
— Ron Smith (@Ronxyz00) June 22, 2025
Large crowds gathered in New York City and Washington, DC, staging anti-war and anti-Trump protests in response to the recent strikes on Iran.
Massive anti-war / Anti-Trump protests breaking out in New York and DC. pic.twitter.com/z2KCMBrSfz
— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) June 22, 2025
Massive anti war protests erupt throughout United States as the American people don't want to fight another war on behalf of Israel, this is New York right now. @POTUS #Israel #Iran pic.twitter.com/q7HbzUA5Ns
— Oppressed (@NaiKaroYar) June 19, 2025
On Sunday, Pakistanis gathered in Karachi to protest against the United States and Israel. Prominent leaders addressed the crowd, declaring that the conflict was no longer just Palestine and Iran versus Israel and the US, but a larger battle between "humanity and oppression."
On Sun, June 22, 2025, Pakistanis of all faiths & walks of life rallied against Israel & US in Karachi. Leaders like Allama Hasan Zafar Naqvi & Allama Shahenshah Naqvi declared this isn't just Palestine-Iran VS Israel-US—it's a battle between humanity & oppression. #IsraeliranWar pic.twitter.com/bheIzAGlj2
— Sajeel Syed (@sajeelshamsi) June 22, 2025
BREAKING:
Thousands pour into the streets of Karachi, Pakistan, in a powerful display of solidarity with the Iranian nation.
This is more than protest — it's an uprising of conscience against imperial aggression. pic.twitter.com/UtLOAUQ6h1
— Sahar Emami (@iamSaharEmami) June 22, 2025
A protest was held in India's Gwalior today condemning the unprovoked US attack on Iran.
Protest in Gwalior today against the unprovoked attack by the US on Iran. @MABABYCPIM addressed the protest, describing this attack by the US as a barbaric and criminal act, done by flouting all international laws.
He described the attitude of the Modi-led Indian govt as… pic.twitter.com/doTSdJBgFI
— CPI (M) (@cpimspeak) June 22, 2025
Hundreds marched in Germany's Berlin, condemning Israeli aggression on Iran and calling for an end to the escalating violence.
Hundreds took to the streets of the German capital, Berlin, in solidarity with Iran, condemning the ongoing Israeli aggression on the country.
Follow Press TV on Telegram: https://t.co/LWoNSpkJSh pic.twitter.com/fsnNeLik6p
— Press TV ???? (@PressTV) June 21, 2025
On Monday, three protests are scheduled in London, UK, against the US and Israeli actions on Iran.
#IranIsraelConflict #Iran #PalestineAction
3 protests are planned for tomorrow, Monday, in London. Parliament Sq at noon. The USA Embassy at 6.30pm and the Israeli Embassy at 6pm pic.twitter.com/y4BKng7oUK
— Rangzen (@revoltinghippie) June 22, 2025
Protesters also gathered in Australia's Melbourne to denounce the recent US attacks on Iran.
Melbourne/Naarm yet again taking to the streets to protest our holocaust-enabling PM @AlboMP, his depraved foreign minister @SenatorWong, and their complicity with Israeli and American atrocity. Free all of us from Zionist warmongers. Free Palestine. pic.twitter.com/bki7RYhll4
— David Milner (@DaveMilbo) June 22, 2025
Iran responded to the US strikes with missile attacks on Israeli cities. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the operation was close to achieving its objectives, while Iran warned of "everlasting consequences."
Global leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, UK's Keir Starmer, and Turkey's President Erdogan have called for an immediate de-escalation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gujarat: Visavadar's political realignment from Congress to AAP
Gujarat: Visavadar's political realignment from Congress to AAP

Hans India

time25 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Gujarat: Visavadar's political realignment from Congress to AAP

Ahmedabad: Visavadar, a seat long held or closely contested by the Congress, delivered a verdict in the 2025 bypoll by electing Aam Aadmi Party's Gopal Italia, a result which encapsulates the crumbling of old allegiances and the emergence of new political aspirations. With 75,942 votes to his name, Italia defeated BJP's Kirit Patel (58,388 votes) by a decisive margin of 17,554. Congress, which once wielded commanding influence in this agrarian belt of Junagadh district, plummeted to a dismal third with a mere 5,501 votes. It is a reversal of political fortunes few would have predicted a decade ago. Visavadar has historically been a 'Congress country'. From the days of Madhavsinh Solanki's dominance in Gujarat politics to the post-liberalisation electoral churn, Congress maintained a strong presence in Saurashtra through its grassroots workers, its caste alliances, particularly with the Patidar and Koli communities and its image as the party of farmers. In the 2017 and 2022 elections, Visavadar was one of the few seats where Congress remained competitive even as its presence diminished elsewhere in Gujarat. The bypoll was triggered by the defection of AAP MLA Bhupendra Bhayani to the BJP, an act seen by many locals as political betrayal. This left the seat vacant and opened the field for a high-stakes contest. The Congress, weakened by internal strife and a crumbling cadre, fielded a low-key candidate, hoping nostalgia and legacy would carry them through. But the ground had shifted. Instead of flowing back to Congress, the anti-BJP sentiment in the constituency rallied behind Gopal Italia, a leader with credibility, conviction, and connection. Italia's entry into the contest changed the entire dynamic. His political identity, shaped by activism, anti-corruption movements, and his prominent role in the Patidar agitation, gave AAP the kind of leadership Gujarat had been lacking. His appeal extended beyond caste lines, drawing in first-time voters, disenchanted Congress supporters, and farmers fed up with both state and central neglect. For Congress, the defeat is more than electoral; it is existential. The party's vote share in Visavadar has collapsed from nearly 30 per cent in 2022 to under 8 per cent now. This isn't just about one seat. It's about a broader rejection of a party that has failed to offer fresh leadership, build new narratives, or even sustain old ones. The resignation of Gujarat Congress chief Shaktisinh Gohil in the aftermath only highlights the turmoil. AAP, by contrast, ran a meticulously localised campaign. While Delhi's governance model was highlighted, the focus remained on Visavadar's specific issues: dwindling water resources, poor healthcare infrastructure, agricultural distress, and the feeling of political abandonment. Italia's team worked booth-to-booth, speaking in the idiom of the voter, not the Delhi headquarters. The BJP's second-place finish is significant but also telling. Despite their deep pockets and statewide cadre network, they could not capitalise on Congress's collapse. Their bet on Bhayani's defection misfired badly, and the selection of Kirit Patel failed to energise voters. The electorate's message was clear: it will not reward opportunism or take kindly to backroom deals. What Visavadar demonstrates is a changing pulse in Gujarat's rural politics. A constituency once loyal to Congress has not only turned away but has not defaulted to the BJP, a scenario Gujarat has rarely seen in recent years. Instead, it has consciously chosen a third path. For the Aam Aadmi Party, this is more than a symbolic win. It is a confirmation that their brand of issue-driven, personality-backed politics has potential in Gujarat beyond urban fringes. With Gopal Italia now firmly established as the face of this new push, AAP has its first real grassroots icon in the state. It remains to be seen whether they can build on this momentum, but for now, they have what Congress once had in Visavadar, a toehold in the voters' trust. Visavadar's verdict is a turning point. It tells the story of a constituency that once stood with the Congress, turned restless, and now has chosen to invest its faith in a new experiment. Whether that experiment flourishes or flounders will shape not just the future of 'Saurashtra' but potentially of Gujarat's politics itself.

The Latest G7 Was A Disaster, Thanks To Trump
The Latest G7 Was A Disaster, Thanks To Trump

NDTV

time25 minutes ago

  • NDTV

The Latest G7 Was A Disaster, Thanks To Trump

As expected, the G7 summit in Kananaskis in Canada proved somewhat of a disaster for the group. With the deep differences between the US and the other six members from Trump's first term getting accentuated after his re-election, the prognostics for this summit were, in any case, not good. The European leaders were openly against Trump's re-election. This lack of empathy between him and the other six members was bound to affect the solidarity of the G7 at Kananaskis. This solidarity had actually got reinforced on the security front under the Biden administration by the overwhelming hostility of the G7 countries towards Russia over the Ukraine conflict. With Trump disowning Biden's Russia policy, spurning President Volodymyr Zelensky and initiating a dialogue with Russia to end the war and explore the possibility of normalising ties with Moscow, the rift with Europe has become deeper, with the latter remaining bent on supporting Ukraine with arms and funds to counter Russia. The Growing Rift Other than this fundamental security issue in the eyes of Europe, Trump's use of tariffs as a weapon against other members of the G7 totally contrary to World Trade Organization (WTO) provisions, has deeply soured US ties with them. The original objective of the G7 was to promote financial and economic stability at the global level. We now see that the US seeks to disrupt this objective by US-centric policies premised on the belief that the country has been the victim of unfair trade practices and that its economy has been hollowed out because its partners have not shared equally security burdens at the global level. The slogan 'Make America Great Again' is at the cost of US allies, too. The US and the other G7 members are, therefore, not on the same page on strategic political, economic and security issues. The G7's raison d'être is being undermined by the US under Trump. The Tensions With Canada Adding to all this is Trump's contemptuous attitude towards Canada, the host of the G7 meeting. The new Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, has been combative and has sought to hit back at the US on tariffs and other economic measures. This did not necessarily provide a more conducive setting for the G7 summit. However, as host - and in order to save the summit - Carney tried to ingratiate himself to Trump, flattering him by saying publicly that "The G7 is nothing without U.S. leadership, your personal leadership". This, however, did not work. Trump snubbed the G7 by departing early because of some momentous decision he had to make - presumably on Iran- and dispensing with planned bilateral meetings, including with President Zelensky. The meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi also could not take place (The chance to clear the air personally after many loose statements by Trump on his role in bringing about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan and his desire to mediate on Kashmir was missed. India, therefore, decided to make a statement publicly countering Trump's false narratives on his role and firmly reject any mediatory role by him). A Short, Thin Statement Given all these differences, the other six members had come to terms with the fact that it would not be possible to issue a joint communique, and that a Chair's summary would be issued instead. If the expectation was that the Chair's summary would spell out robustly the united position of six members on issues over which the US differed, it has been belied. It was probably thought that it was not advisable to isolate the US in this manner. The Chair's summary is short and terse. It contrasts dramatically with the inordinately lengthy communique; of last year's G7 summit in Italy, which had a total of about 240 paragraphs and sub-paragraphs, with 18 on Ukraine, 10 on Gaza, four each on Iran and Africa, 14 on Sustainable Development Goals, 16 on the Indo-Pacific, nine on China, 26 on energy and climate change, 10 on the global economy and finance, eight on trade, 14 on economic resilience and economic security, and nine on health. The Chair's summary at Kananaskis, in contrast, has only 14 paragraphs. This shows how much the ambit and substance of this G7 summit got reduced due to the Trump factor. The Chair's summary lists issues of concern, such as the need for greater economic and financial stability, technological innovation, an open and predictable trading regime, energy security and the digital transition underpinned by secure and responsible critical mineral supply chains, and more collaboration within and beyond the G7. With China in mind, the G7 leaders have undertaken to safeguard their economies from unfair non-market policies and practices that distort markets and drive overcapacity. This would include de-risking through diversification and reduction of critical dependencies. The new Canada-led G7 initiative - the Critical Minerals Production Alliance - is mentioned. This would aim at working with trusted international partners to guarantee supply for advanced manufacturing and defence. In the single paragraph on Ukraine, the G7 leaders have accommodated Trump by expressing support for his efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in the country. This is a remarkable turnabout because Europe is, in fact, deeply opposed to Trump's peace efforts, which exclude it. Zelensky has been thrown a crumb by recognising that Ukraine is committed to an unconditional ceasefire to which Russia must agree, adding that the G7 Leaders are resolute in exploring all options to maximise pressure on Russia, including financial sanctions. Nothing On Middle East, Divisions Over China The para on the Middle East is devoid of any real substance, with the G7 leaders reiterating the importance of unhindered humanitarian aid to Gaza, the release of all hostages, an immediate and permanent ceasefire, and the need for a negotiated political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that achieves lasting peace (no mention of a two-state solution). The leaders exchanged views on "the active conflict between Israel and Iran", affirming Israel's right to defend itself, and were clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. The G7 released a statement on recent developments between Israel and Iran, which essentially reiterates these bare points. On China, Trump and the six others are not entirely on the same page, but some concerns are shared. The G7 leaders, while stressing the importance of constructive and stable relations with China, have called on it to refrain from market distortions and harmful overcapacity. They discussed their ongoing serious concerns about China's destabilising activities in the East and South China Seas and the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. The leaders acknowledged the links between crisis theatres in Ukraine, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific. What these links are is not clear. The Irony With 'Foreign Interference' According to the Chair's summary, the G7 leaders condemned foreign interference, underlining the unacceptable threat of transnational repression to rights and freedoms, national security and state sovereignty. The irony is that foreign interference and threats to national security and state sovereignty primarily emanate from the G7 countries themselves, as we experience in India ourselves. With Trump having walked out of the Paris Climate Change agreement, it is not surprising that the only indirect reference to climate change is the discussion by the G7 on the impact of increasingly extreme weather events around the world. On the G7 meeting with invited leaders, including India, the focus was on ways to collaborate on energy security, just energy transitions as well as sustainable and innovative solutions to boost energy access and affordability, mitigating the impact on climate and the environment, technology and innovation, diversifying and strengthening critical mineral supply chains, building infrastructure, and mobilising investment. The G7 leaders have agreed to collaborate with partners on concrete outcomes, to which end they agreed to six joint statements, including securing high-standard critical mineral supply chains, driving secure, responsible and trustworthy AI adoption, boosting cooperation on quantum technology, etc. India is already engaged in discussions in all these areas with most of the G7 members. PM Modi's Interventions: Energy And Terrorism At the summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made two interventions. He spoke of India's energy security plans and ambitions, noting that at present, renewable energy accounts for about 50% of our total installed capacity. He also mentioned India's launch of global initiatives such as the International Solar Alliance, Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure, Mission LiFE, Global Biofuels Alliance, One Sun One World One Grid. India, he said, considered it its responsibility to bring the priorities and concerns of the Global South to the world stage. Not surprisingly, the Prime Minister drew the attention of G7 leaders to the grave issue of terrorism bluntly and forcefully. He recalled the Pahalgam attack and spoke of India's neighbourhood becoming a breeding ground of terrorism. He reminded the leaders that there must be no place for double standards when it came to terrorism, and that any country that supported terrorism must be held accountable. He regretted that the reality was quite the opposite. He challenged the G7 leaders when he said: "On the one hand, we are quick to impose various sanctions based on our own preferences and interests. On the other hand, nations that openly support terrorism continue to be rewarded. I have some serious questions for those present in this room". In his second intervention, Prime Minister Modi spoke about technology, AI, and energy. For AI's energy needs, India, he said, was focusing on solar energy and small modular reactors. He pointed out that AI models developed and tested against the benchmark of India's diversity will hold immense relevance and utility for the entire world. The G7 summit provided him with an opportunity to meet the Canadian Prime Minister bilaterally and discuss the state of India-Canada relations and the way ahead. The two leaders agreed to take calibrated and constructive steps to restore stability in the relationship, beginning with the early return of High Commissioners to each other's capitals, restarting senior ministerial as well as working-level engagements across various domains, and exploring opportunities for future collaboration in various areas. The importance of restarting the stalled negotiations on the Early Progress Trade Agreement (EPTA) was flagged. Although the G7 summit was a bit of a damp squib because of internal cracks within the group between the US and others, the invitation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, despite serious bilateral differences with Canada, was a continued recognition of India's mounting global geopolitical and economic importance.

Ayatollah Khamenei Asks Putin To Do More For Iran After US Air Strikes
Ayatollah Khamenei Asks Putin To Do More For Iran After US Air Strikes

NDTV

time25 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Ayatollah Khamenei Asks Putin To Do More For Iran After US Air Strikes

Iran's Supreme Leader sent his foreign minister to Moscow on Monday to ask President Vladimir Putin for more help from Russia after the biggest US military action against the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution over the weekend. US President Donald Trump and Israel have publicly speculated about killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and about regime change, a step Russia fears could sink the Middle East into the abyss. While Putin has condemned the Israeli strikes, he is yet to comment on the US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, though he last week called for calm and offered Moscow's services as a mediator over the nuclear programme. A senior source told Reuters that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi was due to deliver a letter from Khamenei to Putin, seeking the latter's support. Iran has not been impressed with Russia's support so far, Iranian sources told Reuters, and the country wants Putin to do more to back it against Israel and the United States. The sources did not elaborate on what assistance Tehran wanted. The Kremlin said that Putin would receive Araqchi but did not say what would be discussed. Araqchi was quoted by the state TASS news agency as saying that Iran and Russia were coordinating their positions on the current escalation in the Middle East. Putin has repeatedly offered to mediate between the United States and Iran, and said that he had conveyed Moscow's ideas on resolving the conflict to them while ensuring Iran's continued access to civil nuclear energy. The Kremlin chief last week refused to discuss the possibility that Israel and the United States would kill Khamenei. Putin said that Israel had given Moscow assurances that Russian specialists helping to build two more reactors at the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran would not be hurt in air strikes. Russia, a longstanding ally of Tehran, plays a role in Iran's nuclear negotiations with the West as a veto-wielding U.N. Security Council member and a signatory to an earlier nuclear deal Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. But Putin, whose army is fighting a major war of attrition in Ukraine for the fourth year, has so far shown little appetite in public for diving into a confrontation with the United States over Iran just as Trump seeks to repair ties with Moscow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store