
Do You Have An 'Upper Class' Nest Egg? Here's What The Top 20% Have Saved For Retirement — Hint, It's Less Than You'd Think
Maybe you're living the good life now—grocery delivery, takeout on repeat, the kind of spending that doesn't require checking your bank app first. Or maybe you're playing the long game—budgeting, investing, skipping the daily lattes—hoping it all pays off when retirement rolls around.
Either way, the goal's the same: to retire comfortably, maybe even with a taste of the upper class.
But what does that actually take? More specifically, how much does the average upper-class household really have set aside for retirement?
Don't Miss:
Hasbro, MGM, and Skechers trust this AI marketing firm —
'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones.
It's not just about income—though that's part of it. According to Pew Research, an upper-class household of three earns at least $256,920. But income alone won't carry you through retirement. That's where net worth—and retirement savings—take over.
A New York Times analysis shows upper-class families typically have a 3:1 wealth-to-income ratio, meaning that $256,000 income translates to around $770,760 in net worth.
And according to the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances:
The top 10% of U.S. households hold a median net worth of $2.7 million.
The 75th to 89.9th percentile sits closer to $790,000.
So whether you define "upper class" by income or wealth, the bar is high—and rising.
Net worth can include a lot—your house, your brokerage account, maybe even a chunk of that side business your cousin swears is "about to blow up." But when it comes to what's specifically earmarked for retirement, the numbers start to look a little more grounded.
The top 10% have a median retirement savings of $900,000.
The next tier down—the 75th to 89.9th percentile—comes in at just $269,000.
Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —
That's a big drop, and a good reminder: being "upper class" doesn't always mean you're sitting on millions in a retirement account.
Put that next to the median U.S. household, which has about $87,000 saved, and the picture gets clearer. Overall, the average upper-class retirement nest egg likely falls somewhere between $400,000 and $500,000—solid, for sure, but maybe not as sky-high as you'd assumed.
It's not just bigger paychecks—it's different habits. The wealthiest 20% tend to approach retirement planning like a long game, not a last-minute scramble. Here's what they often get right:
They save like it's a billFor them, contributing to retirement isn't optional—it's automatic. Pay comes in, savings go out. No debate.
They invest early—and stay inThey don't try to time the market. They buy, hold, and let compounding do its quiet magic.
They make the tax code work for them Roth IRAs, 401(k) matches, HSAs—they know the tools and use them. Every little tax break adds up.
They get advice instead of winging itThey're not scrolling Reddit for retirement tips. They call someone with a license and a strategy.
They plan for the life they want—not just the bills they'll oweIf you're not where you planned to be, don't panic. These moves can help you build your own retirement cushion:
Start where you are: Even small contributions add up over time.
Max out your employer match: Free money? Always say yes.
Open an IRA: Traditional or Roth, it's another place to grow your savings tax-advantaged.
Boost your savings rate: Every raise is an opportunity.
Use catch-up contributions: If you're 50+, take advantage of higher limits.
The upper class isn't coasting through retirement on vibes—they're bringing real savings to the table. Somewhere between $400,000 and $900,000, to be exact.
If you're living well now, think of retirement like the sequel: it should live up to the original. But it won't happen by accident. It takes planning, habit, and a little bit of discipline—right alongside the Amazon boxes and sushi orders.
Read Next:
Nancy Pelosi Invested $5 Million In An AI Company Last Year —
Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets –
Image: Shutterstock
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Do You Have An 'Upper Class' Nest Egg? Here's What The Top 20% Have Saved For Retirement — Hint, It's Less Than You'd Think originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Reddit (RDDT) Shares Skyrocket, What You Need To Know
Shares of online community and discussion platform Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) jumped 7.2% in the afternoon session after the major indices rebounded, as the Bureau of Labor Statistics report revealed a resilient labor market with non-farm payrolls rising by 139,000 in May 2025, significantly above the consensus forecast of 125,000. Notably, a stable labor market often supports consumer spending, which is a key driver of economic growth, which means the report could help ease some of the recession fears that gripped markets. The data also supports the soft landing narrative, where the Fed can manage inflation toward its 2% target without significant damage to the economy. The shares closed the day at $121.15, up 7.9% from previous close. Is now the time to buy Reddit? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Reddit's shares are extremely volatile and have had 62 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 18 days ago when the stock dropped 5.1% on the news that Wells Fargo downgraded the stock from Buy to Hold, raising concerns as Google prepares to fully integrate generative AI into its platform. The firm noted that recent disruptions in search-driven traffic appear more permanent, as more users turn to AI-powered search. Reddit is down 27.1% since the beginning of the year, and at $121 per share, it is trading 46.3% below its 52-week high of $225.23 from February 2025. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Reddit's shares at the IPO in March 2024 would now be looking at an investment worth $2,399. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Sign in to access your portfolio


USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
BarkBox employee compared Pride to MAGA in leaked memo. The CEO apologized.
BarkBox employee compared Pride to MAGA in leaked memo. The CEO apologized. "I do not agree with the content of the message," BarkBox founder and CEO Matt Meeker said. "It wasn't good, it doesn't reflect our values and I'm deeply sorry that it happened." Show Caption Hide Caption Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue celebrating Pride Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue organizing and celebrating Pride, although some corporate support dwindles. Less than a week into Pride Month, BarkBox is receiving backlash for a leaked memo that compares an LGBTQ+ themed pet collection to the Make America Great Again movement. Now the monthly dog subscription service's CEO is looking to make amends. The memo, shared to Reddit this week, informed a group of employees that the monthly dog subscription service would cease advertisements for its Pride collection, which includes several Pride and rainbow accessories. The memo was shared by one employee to a small group of others, BarkBox confirmed to USA TODAY. "While celebrating Pride is something we may value, we need to acknowledge that the current climate makes this promotion feel more like a political statement than a universally joyful moment for all dog people," the memo shared on Reddit reads. "If we wouldn't feel comfortable running a promotion centered around another politically charged symbol (like a MAGA-themed product), it's worth asking whether this is the right moment to run this particular campaign." BarkBox CEO: 'It wasn't good' In a social media statement shared on June 4, BarkBox founder and CEO Matt Meeker apologized for the leaked memo. "I do not agree with the content of the message," Meeker wrote. "It wasn't good, it doesn't reflect our values and I'm deeply sorry that it happened." As of June 6, BarkBox's Pride collection was promoted on the BarkBox website. Since the leaked memo, Meeker shared that 100% of the proceeds from the collection will be donated to the LGBTQ resource, Kaleidoscope Youth Center in Columbus, Ohio. DEI: What fueled the Target DEI boycott? The answer may surprise you Pride Month: What are the safest places for gay and trans people? See where your state ranks What else did the BarkBox memo say? "After some thoughtful discussion today with leadership, we've made the decision to pause all paid ads and lifecycle marketing pushes for the Pride kit effective immediately," the memo shared on Reddit begins. "This isn't about backing away from support − it's about tone and ensuring our marketing remains inclusive and welcoming to everyone in our community. Right now, pushing this promo risks unintentionally sending the message that 'we're not for you' to a large portion of our audience," the memo concludes. BarkBox did not confirm when the memo was sent, or by who. What is BarkBox's Pride collection? BarkBox's Pride collection features more than 25 LGBTQ+ themed toys, including a rainbow tug toy, "slay the drag queen" plush and "gaylien," an alien plushy with a T-shirt that reads, "Take me to your leather," a reference to the queer leather community. These items an be added to any BarkBox for an upcharge. A typical BarkBox, which is $24 a month, includes two toys and two treats each month. More Pride Month: Trump's actions on LGBTQ+ issues in Pride Month criticized as 'bullying' by advocates Memo leak follows other national brands moving away from DEI The memo follows a string of companies who have eradicated or pulled back on DEI − diversity, equity and inclusion − programs, including Target, Walmart, Amazon and McDonald's. The DEI rollbacks began after President Donald Trump took office. As soon as he could, the president issued executive orders to dismantle DEI by putting pressure on federal contractors to end "illegal DEI discrimination" and direct federal agencies to draw up lists of companies that should be investigated for their DEI policies. And while Trump has been successful in part during his first 100 days in office, there are still countless major companies publicly backing DEI, including Costco, American Express, Apple and Levi's. Contributing: Jessica Gunn, USA TODAY Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
X Reforms API Pricing as It Seeks More Revenue Options
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. Given the rising value of data sources, this could be a smart move from X. Or a disastrous one, depending on the specifics of its implementation. According to reports, X has started informing its top-tier Enterprise API subscribers that it will soon shift away from an access pricing model, to a revenue share one instead, which will see X take a percentage of any money made by projects that utilize its data. As reported by Mashable: 'X recently began sending out emails to paid subscribers of its Enterprise API plans, which start at $42,000 per month, informing them of the upcoming change. The new API pricing scheme is scheduled to go into effect on July 1. X has not yet shared final details about the change, such as exactly what percentage the revenue share model will be, with its customers.' So instead of these users paying $42k per month for access to all of X's posts (Enterprise API has no post access limits), X will presumably determine a percentage share of what X contributes to any relative business offerings or systems, which will see X glean direct revenue from expanded use of its content. Which could be more profitable for X, particularly in cases like LLM development, and AI projects that are accessing X posts to feed their tools. In order to create an effective AI system, you need data input, and a lot of it, so you can ensure that your system is able to understand how people talk and pose different queries, while also providing relevant, timely answers. The value of X in this regard is that it's the home of real-time discussion, so X data can provide relevant, time-sensitive responses, in an always-on feed. X data is also valuable for market research, and tracking stock market movements. When news breaks on X, that often, eventually, leads to market shifts, and staying on top of this can give analysts an advantage in respective trading. How X might value such contribution is another question, as it could be difficult to suggest that X-sourced knowledge led to a relative increase in revenue intake. But the change here seems more pointed towards AI projects, and ensuring that X keeps getting paid for the use of its data, if such initiatives do choose to use X posts as their input. And really, there's not a heap of better options on this front. Meta's data is locked down, and hidden behind various privacy settings, LinkedIn data is also restricted, while TikTok and Pinterest are more visually focused, making them less valuable in this respect (both of their API tools are also aligned with usage insights, not content). Reddit is probably the best comparison, and Reddit has also reformed its API pricing to ensure that it's maximizing benefit from expanded AI developer interest. So X may be one of the best sources for conversational, topical data to inform AI models. Though, strangely, at the same time, X has also updated its Developer Agreement documentation to seemingly stop external projects from using its data to train AI models either way. As reported by TechCrunch: 'In an update on Wednesday, the company added a line under 'Reverse Engineering and other Restrictions,' a subsection of restrictions on use: 'You shall not and you shall not attempt to (or allow others to) […] use the X API or X Content to fine-tune or train a foundation or frontier model,' it reads.' So it wouldn't benefit from AI projects using its API anyway? I don't know, the revenue share model seems geared towards exactly this type of project, but X is also looking to stop people from doing just that. Which means it's seeking to take revenue from other uses, like the stock analytics use case. Which, again, will be much harder to put a value on, in terms of data use. Yeah, it's slightly confusing, and I would ask X's comms department to clarify, if it had one. But essentially, X is looking for alternative ways to make more money from its data, which, depending on its demanded percentage intake, could see some Enterprise API users cut off their X data feed. Recommended Reading xAI Acquires X in a Deal That Secures the App's Immediate Future